Effect of transplant status in CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has shown promise for relapsed/refractory malignancies. Many patients have undergone prior hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), yet effects of transplant status on CAR T-cell therapy efficacy and safety have not been reported. The purpose of the study is to systematically evaluate the likelihood of achieving optimum response, severe cytokine release syndrome (sCRS), and neurotoxicity in the context of CAR T-cell therapy for HSCT-naïve patients versus those with prior HSCT. Trials were identified in ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library, and PubMed, and through reference pearl growing. Included studies used CD19-directed CAR T-cells for relapsed/refractory B-lineage Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and B cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, enrolled both HSCT-naïve and prior-HSCT patients, and denoted transplant status with outcomes. Six studies were included for optimum response, five for sCRS incidence, and four for neurotoxicity incidence. The pooled odds ratio for optimum response was 1.57 favoring HSCT-naïve patients (95% CI 0.54–4.61), whereas the pooled odds ratios for sCRS and neurotoxicity were 1.41 (95% CI 0.51–3.94) and 1.37 (95% CI 0.28–6.77), respectively, toward HSCT-naïve patients. Odds ratios were non-statistically significant. Overall risk of bias was moderate. While pooled estimates showed an advantage among HSCT-naïve patients for achieving optimum response and increased likelihood for sCRS and neurotoxicity, findings were not statistically significant. Any differences in efficacy and safety of CAR T-cell therapy cannot be verifiably attributed to transplant status, and additional controlled trials with increased sample sizes are needed to determine whether suggestive patterns favoring HSCT-naïve patients are validated.
KeywordsCAR T-cell therapy Hematopoietic stem cell transplant MRD-negative complete remission Cytokine release syndrome Neurotoxicity
The authors would like to thank Dr. Roger Strair, MD, PhD and Dr. Pranela Rameshwar, PhD, for contributing insightful comments and suggestions during the preparation of this manuscript.
This review was completed without any funding from public, commercial, or not-for-profit sources.
- 6.National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN guidelines)—acute lymphoblastic leukemia. 2014. Version 1. http://williams.medicine.wisc.edu/all.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2017.
- 7.Hallek M, Cheson BD, Catovsky D, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a report from the international workshop on chronic lymphocytic leukemia updating the national cancer institute-working group 1996 guidelines. Blood. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-06-093906.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 8.National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN guidelines)—non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. 2014. Version 4.2014. https://www.nccn.org/about/nhl.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2017.
- 15.U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Systematic review data repository. https://srdr.ahrq.gov/. Accessed 11 Aug 2018.
- 17.Hu Y, Wu Z, Luo Y, et al. Potent anti-leukemia activities of chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells against CD19 in Chinese patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphocytic leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1799.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 19.Lee DW, Kochenderfer JN, Stetler-Stevenson M, et al. T cells expressing CD19 chimeric antigen receptors for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children and young adults: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Lancet. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61403-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 20.OpenMeta[Analyst]. http://www.cebm.brown.edu/openmeta/. Accessed 11 Aug 2018.
- 21.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE). 2010. https://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/CTCAE_4.03_2010-06-14_QuickReference_8.5x11.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2017.