Rechallenge treatment with a platinum-based regimen in patients with sensitive relapsed small-cell lung cancer
- 119 Downloads
Among patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), those who relapse > 90 days after first-line chemotherapy are classified sensitive relapse. Rechallenge with a first-line platinum-based regimen has been used in sensitive relapsed SCLC patients, but its importance is not known. We evaluated the outcome of rechallenge with platinum-based chemotherapy for sensitive relapse patients. We reviewed consecutive patients with sensitive relapsed SCLC who received second-line chemotherapy between January 1999 and December 2016. We evaluated the treatment outcomes of platinum-based rechallenge and non-rechallenge regimens for second-line chemotherapy in sensitive relapse patients. Of 245 patients, 81 sensitive relapse patients received second-line chemotherapy. Sixty-seven patients (82.7%) were treated with rechallenging platinum-based regimens (“rechallenge group”) and 14 patients (17.3%) were treated with other regimens (“non-rechallenge group”) as second-line chemotherapy. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.1 months in the rechallenge group and 3.5 months in the non-rechallenge group, and median survival time was 10.8 and 8.2 months, respectively. There were no significant differences in PFS or overall survival (OS) between the two groups. Sub-analyses of patients who received chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment showed that the rechallenge group had longer PFS than that of the non-rechallenge group (median 5.4 vs. 3.6 months, p = 0.0038), and the rechallenge group had a tendency to have longer OS than non-rechallenge group. These data suggest that rechallenge treatment with a platinum-based regimen could be second-line chemotherapy in patients with sensitive relapsed SCLC, especially those treated with chemotherapy alone as first-line therapy.
KeywordsSmall-cell lung cancer Sensitive relapse Rechallenge chemotherapy Second-line chemotherapy
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Institutional review board (IRB) approval from the ethical committee of the Kurume University Hospital was obtained for this study (Ref 14038). As this study was retrospective, informed consent was waived by the IRB.
- 5.Ardizzoni A, Hansen H, Dombernowsky P, et al. Topotecan, a new active drug in the second-line treatment of small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study in patients with refractory and sensitive disease. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Early Clinical Studies Group and New Drug Development Office, and the Lung Cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:2090–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.O’Brien ME, Ciuleanu TE, Tsekov H, et al. Phase III trial comparing supportive care alone with supportive care with oral topotecan in patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(5441–7):1.Google Scholar
- 21.Goto K, Ohe Y, Shibata T, et al. Combined chemotherapy with cisplatin, etoposide, and irinotecan versus topotecan alone as second-line treatment for patients with sensitive relapsed small-cell lung cancer (JCOG0605): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:1147–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar