Yttrium-90 radioembolization treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-centre prognostic factors analysis
- 193 Downloads
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of Y90 radioembolization (Y90-RE) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) analysing our results and correlating them with independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and for complications. Forty-three patients with advanced inoperable HCC including those with multiple bilobar lesions or portal vein thrombosis (PVT) treated with Y90-RE were reviewed. Treatment efficacy and safety were evaluated. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate analyses were performed for identifying potential prognostic factors. Radiologic response was evaluated with the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (mRECIST) criteria. Clinical toxicities were prospectively recorded. Median overall progression-free survival and OS were 27.7 and 16.8 months, respectively. Longer median OS was revealed in those without PVT (p = 0.0241) and those whose pre-treatment haemoglobin values was higher (p = 0.0471). According with mRECIST criteria, we observed a disease control rate of 69.2 and 61.9% at 3- and 6-month follow-up, respectively. Complications developed in 28 patients (65.1%), among which grade 2–3 events were reported in 17 patients. We noted that activity administered dose presented a correlation with intra-procedural toxicity (p = 0.039259) while common hepatic artery use as release site was associated with a most frequent presentation of remote adverse events. Y90-RE is an alternative treatment with a promising outcome for poor-risk advanced inoperable HCC. PVT and pre-treatment haemoglobin values can be predictors of efficacy. Activity administered dose and arterial release site can be predictors of safety.
KeywordsRadioembolization Yttrium-90 Hepatocellular carcinoma Liver cancer Interventional radiology
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 6.Duran R, Chapiro J, Schernthaner RE, Geschwind JF. Systematic review of catheter-based intra-arterial therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma: state of the art and future directions. Br J Radiol. 1052;2015(88):20140564.Google Scholar
- 16.Kluetz PG, Chingos DT, Basch EM, Mitchell SA. Patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials: measuring symptomatic adverse events with the National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:67–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 38.Demetri GD, Kris M, Wade J, Degos L, Cella D. Quality-of-life benefit in chemotherapy patients treated with epoetin alfa is independent of disease response or tumor type: results from a prospective community oncology study. Procrit Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(10):3412–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 49.Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(3):205–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 64.Lim L, Gibbs P, Yip D, et al. A prospective evaluation of treatment with Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIR-spheres) in patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer previously treated with 5-FU based chemotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2005;5:132.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar