Skip to main content
Log in

Gene expression classifier for the diagnosis of indeterminate thyroid nodules: a meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prior studies demonstrate that a novel genomic test, the gene expression classifier (GEC), could identify a benign gene expression signature in those nodules with indeterminate cytology with a negative predictive value of greater than 95 %. Examine the performance of the AFIRMA gene expression classifier in predicting benign and malignant nodules in patients with cytologically indeterminate nodules. MEDLINE and EMBASE search for studies meeting eligibility criteria between January 1, 2005, and August 30, 2015. A total of 58 studies identified. After excluding duplicates, case reports, reviews, commentary, insufficient data, a total of seven studies selected for analysis. We combined individual patient data from seven studies that examined the GEC test for indeterminate thyroid nodules. The reference standard for determination of benign or malignant nodules was the histopathology of the thyroidectomy specimen. A QUADAS-2 report for all studies included in the final analysis was tabulated for risk of bias and applicability. The pooled sensitivity of the GEC was 95.7 % (95 % CI 92.2–97.9, I 2 value 45.4 %, p = 0.09), and the pooled specificity was 30.5 % (95 % CI 26.0–35.3, I 2 value 92.1 %, p < 0.01). Overall, the diagnostic odds ratio was 7.9 (95 % CI 4.1–15.1). Patients with benign GEC were not followed long enough to ascertain the actual false-negative rates of the index test. Our meta-analysis revealed a high pooled sensitivity and a low specificity for the AFIRMA-GEC test for indeterminate thyroid nodules. This makes it an excellent tool to rule out malignancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jarzab B, Wiench M, Fujarewicz K, Simek K, Jarzab M, Oczko-Wojciechowska M, et al. Gene expression profile of papillary thyroid cancer: sources of variability and diagnostic implications. Cancer Res. 2005;65(4):1587–97. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-3078.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernet V, Hupart KH, Parangi S, Woeber KA. AACE/ACE disease state commentary: molecular diagnostic testing of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytopathology. Endocr Pract. 2014;20(4):360–3. doi:10.4158/ep14066.ps.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hirsch D, Robenshtok E, Bachar G, Braslavsky D, Benbassat C. The implementation of the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology improves malignancy detection despite lower rate of thyroidectomy in indeterminate nodules. World J Surg. 2015;. doi:10.1007/s00268-015-3032-6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(8):529–36. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 1997;315(7109):629–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. George BJ, Aban IB. An application of meta-analysis based on DerSimonian and Laird method. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015;. doi:10.1007/s12350-015-0249-6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fleiss JL, Gross AJ. Meta-analysis in epidemiology, with special reference to studies of the association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer: a critique. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(2):127–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ades AE, Lu G, Higgins JP. The interpretation of random-effects meta-analysis in decision models. Med Decis Mak. 2005;25(6):646–54. doi:10.1177/0272989x05282643.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Welton NJ, White IR, Lu G, Higgins JP, Hilden J, Ades AE. Correction: interpretation of random effects meta-analysis in decision models. Med Decis Mak. 2007;27(2):212–4. doi:10.1177/0272989x07300428.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Deeks JJ. Systematic reviews in health care: systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 2001;323(7305):157–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–58. doi:10.1002/sim.1186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moses LE, Shapiro D, Littenberg B. Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations. Stat Med. 1993;12(14):1293–316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chu H, Cole SR. Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(12):1331–2. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.011 (author reply 2–3).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AW, Scholten RJ, Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(10):982–90. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.02.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Alexander EK, Kennedy GC, Baloch ZW, Cibas ES, Chudova D, Diggans J, et al. Preoperative diagnosis of benign thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(8):705–15. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1203208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Alexander EK, Schorr M, Klopper J, Kim C, Sipos J, Nabhan F, et al. Multicenter clinical experience with the Afirma gene expression classifier. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(1):119–25. doi:10.1210/jc.2013-2482.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Aragon Han P, Olson MT, Fazeli R, Prescott JD, Pai SI, Schneider EB, et al. The impact of molecular testing on the surgical management of patients with thyroid nodules. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(6):1862–9. doi:10.1245/s10434-014-3508-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Harrell RM, Bimston DN. Surgical utility of Afirma: effects of high cancer prevalence and oncocytic cell types in patients with indeterminate thyroid cytology. Endocr Pract. 2014;20(4):364–9. doi:10.4158/ep13330.or.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lastra RR, Pramick MR, Crammer CJ, LiVolsi VA, Baloch ZW. Implications of a suspicious afirma test result in thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology: an institutional experience. Cancer Cytopathol. 2014;122(10):737–44. doi:10.1002/cncy.21455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Marti JL, Avadhani V, Donatelli LA, Niyogi S, Wang B, Wong RJ, et al. Wide inter-institutional variation in performance of a molecular classifier for indeterminate thyroid nodules. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;. doi:10.1245/s10434-015-4486-3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McIver B, Castro MR, Morris JC, Bernet V, Smallridge R, Henry M, et al. An independent study of a gene expression classifier (Afirma) in the evaluation of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(11):4069–77. doi:10.1210/jc.2013-3584.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bhatia P, Deniwar A, Friedlander P, Aslam R, Kandil E. Diagnostic potential of ancillary molecular testing in differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Anticancer Res. 2015;35(3):1237–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nayar R, Ivanovic M. The indeterminate thyroid fine-needle aspiration: experience from an academic center using terminology similar to that proposed in the 2007 National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration State of the Science Conference. Cancer. 2009;117(3):195–202. doi:10.1002/cncy.20029.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Choi WJ, Baek JH. Role of core needle biopsy for patients with indeterminate, fine-needle aspiration cytology. Endocrine. 2014;45(1):1–2. doi:10.1007/s12020-013-0071-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Macias CA, Arumugam D, Arlow RL, Eng OS, Lu SE, Javidian P, et al. A risk model to determine surgical treatment in patients with thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(5):1527–32. doi:10.1245/s10434-014-4190-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Weber F, Shen L, Aldred MA, Morrison CD, Frilling A, Saji M, et al. Genetic classification of benign and malignant thyroid follicular neoplasia based on a three-gene combination. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(5):2512–21. doi:10.1210/jc.2004-2028.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kamaya A, Lewis GH, Liu Y, Akatsu H, Kong C, Desser TS. Atypia of undetermined significance and follicular lesions of undetermined significance: sonographic assessment for prediction of the final diagnosis. J Ultrasound Med. 2015;34(5):767–74. doi:10.7863/ultra.34.5.767.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Garino F, Deandrea M, Motta M, Mormile A, Ragazzoni F, Palestini N, et al. Diagnostic performance of elastography in cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules. Endocrine. 2015;49(1):175–83. doi:10.1007/s12020-014-0438-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Trimboli P, Treglia G, Sadeghi R, Romanelli F, Giovanella L. Reliability of real-time elastography to diagnose thyroid nodules previously read at FNAC as indeterminate: a meta-analysis. Endocrine. 2014;. doi:10.1007/s12020-014-0510-9.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ohori NP, Nikiforova MN, Schoedel KE, LeBeau SO, Hodak SP, Seethala RR, et al. Contribution of molecular testing to thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology of “follicular lesion of undetermined significance/atypia of undetermined significance”. Cancer Cytopathol. 2010;118(1):17–23. doi:10.1002/cncy.20063.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nikiforov YE, Ohori NP, Hodak SP, Carty SE, LeBeau SO, Ferris RL, et al. Impact of mutational testing on the diagnosis and management of patients with cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules: a prospective analysis of 1056 FNA samples. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(11):3390–7. doi:10.1210/jc.2011-1469.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Howlader NA, Krapcho M, Garshell J, Miller D, Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Mariotto A, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA. SEER cancer statistics factsheets: thyroid cancer. National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/thyro.html. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2012, National Cancer Institute Bethesda, MD. 2012.

  33. Trimboli P, Bongiovanni M, Rossi F, Guidobaldi L, Crescenzi A, Ceriani L, et al. Differentiated thyroid cancer patients with a previous indeterminate (Thy 3) cytology have a better prognosis than those with suspicious or malignant FNAC reports. Endocrine. 2015;49(1):191–5. doi:10.1007/s12020-014-0453-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Li H, Robinson KA, Anton B, Saldanha IJ, Ladenson PW. Cost-effectiveness of a novel molecular test for cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(11):E1719–26. doi:10.1210/jc.2011-0459.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Brauner E, Holmes BJ, Krane J, Nishino M, Zurakowski D, Hennessey JV, et al. Performance of the afirma gene expression classifier in Hurthle cell thyroid nodules differs from other indeterminate thyroid nodules. Thyroid. 2015;. doi:10.1089/thy.2015.0049.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Labourier E, Shifrin A, Busseniers AE, Lupo MA, Manganelli ML, Andruss B, et al. Molecular testing for miRNA, mRNA and DNA on fine needle aspiration improves the preoperative diagnosis of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;. doi:10.1210/jc.2015-1158.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Larry Dial MD, Chairman of Department on Internal Medicine, Marshall University, for his help in giving us resources to complete this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prasanna Santhanam.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 12 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 12 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santhanam, P., Khthir, R., Gress, T. et al. Gene expression classifier for the diagnosis of indeterminate thyroid nodules: a meta-analysis. Med Oncol 33, 14 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-015-0727-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-015-0727-3

Keywords

Navigation