Skip to main content
Log in

Radiation sensitization with sodium nitrite in patients with brain metastases: a pilot randomized controlled trial

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Systemic administration of nitrite anion seems to be a practical way to produce local burst of nitric oxide, a hypoxic cell radiosensitizer in solid tumors. This randomized controlled pilot study assessed radiologic objective response rate (ORR) in patients suffered from brain metastases treated by whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) concurrent with intravenous infusion of sodium nitrite versus WBRT alone. Twenty patients were randomized into the following groups: Ten patients treated by WBRT (30 Gy in ten fractions over 2 weeks) concomitant with 2-hour intravenous infusion of sodium nitrite (267 µg/kg/h) before each fraction of radiation (WBRT + SN arm) and ten patients received the same schedule of WBRT, alone (control arm). ORR was measured according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST version 1.1). There were four radiologic objective responses in WBRT + SN arm compared with three in the control group without significant statistical difference (P = 1.00). In contrast, age ≤ 65years (P = 0.05) and presence of extra-cranial metastases (P = 0.01) were predictor factors of ORR. In conclusion, intravenous infusion of sodium nitrite with this dose and schedule to patients with brain metastases concurrent with radiotherapy did not show any major benefit in terms of radiologic response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hall EJ. Radiobiology for the radiologist. 7th ed. Hagerstown: LWW; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jordan BF, Sonveaux P, Feron O, Gregoire V, Beghein N, Dessy C, et al. Nitric oxide as a radiosensitizer: evidence for an intrinsic role in addition to its effect on oxygen delivery and consumption. Int J Cancer. 2004;109(5):768–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Oronsky BT, Knox SJ, Scicinski JJ. Is nitric oxide (NO) the last word in radiosensitization? a review. Transl Oncol. 2012;5(2):66–71.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Folkes LK, O’Neill P. DNA damage induced by nitric oxide during ionizing radiation is enhanced at replication. Nitric Oxide. 2013;34:47–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Frerart F, Sonveaux P, Rath G, Smoos A, Meqor A, Charlier N, et al. The acidic tumor microenvironment promotes the reconversion of nitrite into nitric oxide: towards a new and safe radiosensitizing strategy. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(9):2768–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sonveaux P, Jordan BF, Gallez B, Feron O. Nitric oxide delivery to cancer: why and how? Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(8):1352–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pluta RM, Oldfield EH, Bakhtian KD, Fathi AR, Smith RK, Devroom HL, et al. Safety and feasibility of long-term intravenous sodium nitrite infusion in healthy volunteers. PLoS One. 2011;6(1):e14504.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Glantz MJ, Cole BF, Forsyth PA, Recht LD, Wen PY, Chamberlain MC, et al. Practice parameter: anticonvulsant prophylaxis in patients with newly diagnosed brain tumors. Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2000;54(10):1886–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ryken TC, McDermott M, Robinson PD, Ammirati M, Andrews DW, Asher AL, et al. The role of steroids in the management of brain metastases: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Neurooncol. 2010;96(1):103–14.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ree AH, Hollywood D. Design and conduct of early-phase radiotherapy trials with targeted therapeutics: lessons from the PRAVO experience. Radiother Oncol. 2013;108(1):3–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mitchell JB, Wink DA, DeGraff W, Gamson J, Keefer LK, Krishna MC. Hypoxic mammalian cell radiosensitization by nitric oxide. Cancer Res. 1993;53(24):5845–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. De Ridder M, Verellen D, Verovski V, Storme G. Hypoxic tumor cell radiosensitization through nitric oxide. Nitric Oxide. 2008;19(2):164–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Viani GA, Manta GB, Fonseca EC, De Fendi LI, Afonso SL, Stefano EJ. Whole brain radiotherapy with radiosensitizer for brain metastases. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2009;28:1.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gamboa-Vignolle C, Ferrari-Carballo T, Arrieta O, Mohar A. Whole-brain irradiation with concomitant daily fixed-dose temozolomide for brain metastases treatment: a randomised phase II trial. Radiother Oncol. 2012;102(2):187–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by Cancer, Petroleum and Environmental Pollutants Research Center (Grant No. CRC-9207).

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical approval

The Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences ethics and scientific committees approved the study protocol according to the Helsinki declaration (ajums.REC.1392.170).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Bagheri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hosseini, S.M., Arvandi, S., Razmjoo, S. et al. Radiation sensitization with sodium nitrite in patients with brain metastases: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Med Oncol 32, 46 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-015-0493-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-015-0493-2

Keywords

Navigation