Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal timing of hormonal therapy for prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study was undertaken to examine biochemical progression in patients who received salvage hormonal therapy (HT) for biochemical disease recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP), and to determine the optimal timing for the administration of HT. The study population consisted of 156 patients who underwent RP and received salvage HT for BCR. The starting point of this study was the timing of RP, and the endpoint was biochemical prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression (castration-resistance) after HT. The mean follow-up period after surgery was 8.1 years. First, we excluded 18 patients with persistent PSA (0.2 ng/mL) after RP from an analysis below because their prognoses were significantly poorer compared with 138 patients whose PSA nadirs had reached <0.2 ng/mL. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that Gleason score ≥8 (p = 0.010, hazard ratio (HR) 3.02), and PSA doubling time (PSA-DT) <6 months (p = 0.001, HR 7.39) was independently associated with subsequent biochemical progression after HT. Using these two variables (Gleason score and PSA-DT), we could stratify patients into three risk groups for BCR after salvage HT. Regarding the optimal timing for HT administration for these high-risk patients with both risk factors (relative risk = 22.3), the PSA cutpoint of 1.0 ng/mL at the initiation of HT showed a significant difference in progression-free survival rates (p = 0.023). The findings indicated that for high-risk patients, salvage HT for BCR after PSA nadir (<0.2 ng/mL) should be started before the PSA level exceeds 1.0 ng/mL; otherwise, there is a significant risk of subsequent biochemical progression after HT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Han M, Partin AW, Pound CR, Epstein JI, Walsh PC. Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience. Urol Clin N Am. 2001;28:555–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pound CR, Partin AW, Eisenberger MA, Chan DW, Pearson JD, Walsh PC. Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 1999;281:1591–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Moul JW. Prostate specific antigen only progression of prostate cancer. J Urol. 2000;163:1632–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bott SR. Management of recurrent disease after radical prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2004;7:211–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. The Medical Research Council Prostate Cancer Working Party Investigators Group. Immediate versus deferred treatment for advanced prostatic cancer: initial results of the Medical Research Council Trial. Br J Urol. 1997;79:235–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Makarov DV, Humphreys EB, Mangold LA, Carducci MA, Partin AW, Eisenberger MA, et al. The natural history of men treated with deferred androgen deprivation therapy in whom metastatic prostate cancer developed following radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2008;179:156–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zincke H, Lau W, Bergstralh E, Blute ML. Role of early adjuvant hormonal therapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2001;166:2208–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Messing EM, Manola J, Yao J, Kiernan M, Crawford D, Wilding G, et al. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study EST 3886. Immediate versus deferred androgen deprivation treatment in patients with node-positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:472–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith MR, Kabbinavar F, Saad F, Hussain A, Gittelman MC, Bilhartz DL, et al. Natural history of rising serum prostate-specific antigen in men with castrate nonmetastatic prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2918–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kamidono S, Ohshima S, Hirao Y, Suzuki K, Arai Y, Fujimoto H, et al. Working group for creation of clinical practice guidelines for prostate cancer, the Japanese urological association: evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for prostate cancer (summary—JUA edition). Int J Urol. 2008;15:1–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Scher HI, Halabi S, Tannock I, Morris M, Sternberg CN, Carducci MA, et al. Prostate cancer clinical trials working group. Design and end points of clinical trials for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone: recommendations of the prostate cancer clinical trials working group. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1148–59.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maffezzini M, Bossi A, Collette L. Implications of prostate-specific antigen doubling time as indicator of failure after surgery or radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2007;51:605–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mazumdar M, Glassman JR. Categorizing a prognostic variable: review of methods, code for easy implementation and applications to decision-making about cancer treatments. Stat Med. 2000;19:113–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wong YN, Freedland S, Egleston B, Hudes G, Schwartz JS, Armstrong K. Role of androgen deprivation therapy for node-positive prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:100–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Spiess PE, Lee AK, Busby JE, Jordan JJ, Hernandez M, Burt K, et al. Surgically managed lymph node-positive prostate cancer: does delaying hormonal therapy worsen the outcome? BJU Int. 2007;99:321–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Moul JW, Wu H, Sun L, McLeod DG, Amling C, Donahue T, et al. Early versus delayed hormonal therapy for prostate specific antigen only recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2004;171:1141–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ide H, Nakashima J, Kono H, Kikuchi E, Nagata H, Miyajima A, et al. Prognostic stratification in patients who received hormonal therapy for prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010;40:177–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Siddiqui SA, Boorjian SA, Inman B, Bagniewski S, Bergstralh EJ, Blute ML. Timing of androgen deprivation therapy and its impact on survival after radical prostatectomy: a matched cohort study. J Urol. 2008;179:1830–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zietman AL, Dallow KC, McManus PA, Heney NM, Shipley WU. Time to second prostate-specific antigen failure is a surrogate endpoint for prostate cancer death in a prospective trial of therapy for localized disease. Urology. 1996;47:236–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

There are no funding sources. There are no financial disclosures from any authors.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryuichi Mizuno.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matsumoto, K., Mizuno, R., Tanaka, N. et al. Optimal timing of hormonal therapy for prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Med Oncol 31, 45 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-014-0045-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-014-0045-1

Keywords

Navigation