Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Classical CMF regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer may be more effective compared with anthracycline or taxane-based regimens

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patients suffering from triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) have poor prognosis mainly because no standard treatment is currently available. Our objectives were to explore the prognostic factors for first relapse of patients with TNBC. A cohort of 687 patients with TNBC, diagnosed and treated between January 1995 and December 2008 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, were retrospectively analyzed. Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to explore factors that predict relapse development. Survival rate was computed using the Kaplan–Meier product limit method. The median age of the 687 patients was 46 (range 16–76 years), and 64.8% of the patients were pre-menopausal. The median follow-up time was 56 months (range 14–156 months), in which 194 patients had recurrence, and 115 died. The median recurrence-free time was 25 months (range 4–143 months), with 118 (60.8%) of the cases first relapsing at a single site. The three- and five-year disease-free survival rates were 79.7 and 72.6%, respectively. Primary tumor size at diagnosis, lymph node status, and type of regimen used in the (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy were considered independent predictors of first relapse. CMF-containing adjuvant chemotherapy significantly decreased recurrence compared with the anthracycline- or taxane-based regimens (RR = 0.66, 95%; CI 0.45–0.96; P = 0.030). The median time from first relapse to death was 26 months (range 2–121 months). The two- and five-year survival rates were 60.6 and 36.6%, respectively. Liver metastasis at first recurrence and progression-free survival over 12 months after first-line therapy were two important factors that affected survival rate after recurrence. The median relapse time of TNBC was about 2 years after diagnosis. CMF regimens for TNBC patients may be more effective than anthracycline- or taxane-based regimens. Liver metastasis at first recurrence signifies unfavorable prognosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Perou CM, Sørlie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Rees CA, Pollack JR, Ross DT, Johnsen H, Akslen LA, Fluge O, Pergamenschikov A, Williams C, Zhu SX, Lønning PE, Børresen-Dale AL, Brown PO, Botstein D. Molecular portraits of human breast tumors. Nature. 2000;406:747–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sørlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, Aas T, Geisler S, Johnsen H, Hastie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Thorsen T, Quist H, Matese JC, Brown PO, Botstein D, Eystein Lønning P, Børresen-Dale AL. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:10869–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sotiriou C, Neo SY, McShane LM, Korn EL, Long PM, Jazaeri A, Martiat P, Fox SB, Harris AL, Liu ET. Breast cancer classification and prognosis based on gene expression profiles from a population-based study. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:10393–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brenton JD, Carey LA, Ahmed AA, Caldas C. Molecular classification and molecular forecasting of breast cancer: ready for clinical application? J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:7350–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rakha EA, Tan DS, Foulkes WD, Ellis IO, Tutt A, Nielsen TO, Reis-Filho JS. Are triple-negative tumors and basal-like breast cancer synonymous? Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9:404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nielsen TO, Hsu FD, Jensen K, Cheang M, Karaca G, Hu Z, Hernandez-Boussard T, Livasy C, Cowan D, Dressler L, Akslen LA, Ragaz J, Gown AM, Gilks CB, van de Rijn M, Perou CM. Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:5367–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, Hanna WM, Kahn HK, Sawka CA, Lickley LA, Rawlinson E, Sun P, Narod SA. Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:4429–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carey LA, Dees EC, Sawyer L, Gatti L, Moore DT, Collichio F, Ollila DW, Sartor CI, Graham ML, Perou CM. The triple negative paradox: Primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:2329–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tischkowitz M, Brunet JS, Bégin LR, Huntsman DG, Cheang MC, Akslen LA, Nielsen TO, Foulkes WD. Use of immunohistochemical markers can refine prognosis in triple negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2007;7:1347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bauer KR, Brown M, Cress RD, Parise CA, Caggiano V. Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from the California cancer Registry. Cancer. 2007;109:1721–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hines SL, Vallow LA, Tan WW, McNeil RB, Perez EA, Jain A. Clinical outcomes after a diagnosis of brain metastases in patients with estrogen- and/or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive versus triple-negative breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:1561–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin NU, Claus E, Sohl J, Razzak AR, Arnaout A, Winer EP. Sites of distant recurrence and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: high incidence of central nervous system metastases. Cancer. 2008;113:2638–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nam BH, Kim SY, Han HS, Kwon Y, Lee KS, Kim TH, Ro J. Breast cancer subtypes and survival in patients with brain metastases. Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10:R20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schneider BP, Winer EP, Foulkes WD, Garber J, Perou CM, Richardson A, Sledge GW, Carey LA. Triple negative breast cancer: risk factors to potential targets. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:8010–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cleator S, Heller W, Coombes RC. Triple-negative breast cancer: therapeutic options. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:235–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rakha EA, Putti TC, Abd El-Rehim DM, Paish C, Green AR, Powe DG, Lee AH, Robertson JF, Ellis IO. Morphological and immunophenotypic analysis of breast carcinomas with basal and myoepithelial differentiation. J Pathol. 2006;208:495–506.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, Dressler LG, Cowan D, Conway K, Karaca G, Troester MA, Tse CK, Edmiston S, Deming SL, Geradts J, Cheang MC, Nielsen TO, Moorman PG, Earp HS, Millikan RC. Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. JAMA. 2006;295:2492–502.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaplan HG, Malmgren JA, Atwood M. T1N0 triple negative breast cancer: risk of recurrence and adjuvant chemotherapy. Breast J. 2009;15:454–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Haffty BG, Yang Q, Reiss M, Kearney T, Higgins SA, Weidhaas J, Harris L, Hait W, Toppmeyer D. Locoregional relapse and distant metastasis in conservatively managed triple negative early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:5652–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Liedtke C, Mazouni C, Hess KR, André F, Tordai A, Mejia JA, Symmans WF, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Hennessy B, Green M, Cristofanilli M, Hortobagyi GN, Pusztai L. Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1275–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Smid M, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Sieuwerts AM, Yu J, Klijn JG, Foekens JA, Martens JW. Subtypes of breast cancer show preferential site of relapse. Cancer Res. 2008;68:3108–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Colleoni M, Cole BF, Viale G, Regan MM, Price KN, Maiorano E, Mastropasqua MG, Crivellari D, Gelber RD, Goldhirsch A, Coates AS, Gusterson BA. Classical Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil Chemotherapy Is More Effective in Triple-Negative, Node-Negative Breast Cancer: Results From Two Randomized Trials of Adjuvant Chemoendocrine Therapy for Node-Negative. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2966–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rouzier R, Perou CM, Symmans WF, Ibrahim N, Cristofanilli M, Anderson K, Hess KR, Stec J, Ayers M, Wagner P, Morandi P, Fan C, Rabiul I, Ross JS, Hortobagyi GN, Pusztai L. Breast cancer molecular subtypes respond differently to preoperative chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:5678–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang S, Yang H, Tong F, Zhang J, Yang D, Liu H, Cao Y, Liu P, Zhou P, Cheng L, Liu M, Guo J. Response to neoadjuvant therapy and disease free survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2009;36:255–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gennari A, Sormani MP, Pronzato P, Puntoni M, Colozza M, Pfeffer U, Bruzzi P. HER2 Status and Efficacy of Adjuvant Anthracyclines in Early Breast Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials. J Natl Cancer Ins. 2008;100:14–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tan DS, Marchió C, Jones RL, Savage K, Smith IE, Dowsett M, Reis-Filho JS. Triple negative breast cancer: molecular profiling and prognostic impact in adjuvant anthracycline-treated patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;111:27–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tan AR, Swain SM. Therapeutic strategies for triple negative breast cancer. Cancer J. 2008;14:343–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tassone P, Tagliaferri P, Perricelli A, Blotta S, Quaresima B, Martelli ML, Goel A, Barbieri V, Costanzo F, Boland CR, Venuta S. BRCA1 expression modulates chemosensitivity of BRCA1-defective HCC1937 human breast cancer cells. Br J Cancer. 2003;88:1285–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhongyu Yuan.

Additional information

Z. Yuan and X. Wang were contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, S., Shi, Y., Yuan, Z. et al. Classical CMF regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer may be more effective compared with anthracycline or taxane-based regimens. Med Oncol 29, 547–553 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-011-9964-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-011-9964-2

Keywords

Navigation