Abstract
This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of irinotecan in combination with carboplatin in previously untreated, extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC). Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed ED-SCLC received irinotecan (60 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15) plus carboplatin (AUC 5 on day 1) every 4 weeks. Treatment was repeated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or up to 6 cycles. Forty-four patients were enrolled. In an intent-to-treat analysis, the overall response rate (RR) was 75% (8 complete responses and 25 partial responses). The median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.6 and 8.7 months, respectively. The principle toxicities were neutropenia and diarrhea. Grade 3–4 neutropenia occurred in 30% of the patients and 7% of patients presented with febrile neutropenia. Grade 3–4 diarrhea occurred in 21% of the patients. A subgroup consisting of patients ≥65 years of age had outcomes similar to the younger group <65 years of age. The objective RR was 72% in the patients <65 years of age and 77% in the patients ≥65 years of age (P = .738). The median PFS and OS (<65 years vs. ≥65 years) were 5.3 vs. 5.6 months (P = .835) and 9.0 vs. 8.7 months (P = .648), respectively. The combination of irinotecan and carboplatin is active and tolerable in patients with ED-SCLC. This regimen could be considered as a treatment option for patients of advanced age.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Govindan R, et al. Changing epidemiology of small-cell lung cancer in the United States over the last 30 years: analysis of the surveillance, epidemiologic, and end results database. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4539–44.
Murray N, Turrisi AT 3rd. A review of first-line treatment for small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2006;1:270–8.
Rowland KM Jr, et al. Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of cisplatin and etoposide plus megestrol acetate/placebo in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group study. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:135–41.
Roth BJ, et al. Randomized study of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine versus etoposide and cisplatin versus alternation of these two regimens in extensive small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial of the Southeastern Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:282–91.
Ihde DC, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of high-dose and standard-dose etoposide and cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:2022–34.
Rothenberg ML. CPT-11: an original spectrum of clinical activity. Semin Oncol. 1996;23:21–6.
Masuda N, et al. CPT-11: a new derivative of camptothecin for the treatment of refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:1225–9.
Kudoh S, et al. Phase II study of irinotecan combined with cisplatin in patients with previously untreated small-cell lung cancer. West Japan Lung Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:1068–74.
Noda K, et al. Irinotecan plus cisplatin compared with etoposide plus cisplatin for extensive small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:85–91.
Bishop JF, et al. Carboplatin (CBDCA, JM-8) and VP-16–213 in previously untreated patients with small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1987;5:1574–8.
Skarlos DV, et al. Randomized comparison of etoposide-cisplatin vs. etoposide-carboplatin and irradiation in small-cell lung cancer. A Hellenic Co-operative Oncology Group study. Ann Oncol. 1994;5:601–7.
Calvert AH, et al. Carboplatin dosage: prospective evaluation of a simple formula based on renal function. J Clin Oncol. 1989;7:1748–56.
Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976;16:31–41.
Therasse P, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–16.
Simon R. Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10:1–10.
Green RA, Humphrey E, Close H, Patno ME. Alkylating agents in bronchogenic carcinoma. Am J Med. 1969;46:516–25.
Johnson BE, Janne PA. Basic treatment considerations using chemotherapy for patients with small cell lung cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2004;18:309–22.
Simon M, Argiris A, Murren JR. Progress in the therapy of small cell lung cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2004;49:119–33.
Mascaux C, et al. A systematic review of the role of etoposide and cisplatin in the chemotherapy of small cell lung cancer with methodology assessment and meta-analysis. Lung Cancer. 2000;30:23–36.
Fukuoka M, et al. Randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine versus cisplatin and etoposide versus alternation of these regimens in small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1991;83:855–61.
Schmittel A, Keilholz U. Should irinotecan or etoposide be used in combination with carboplatin for small cell lung cancer? Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2009;6:134–5.
Hanna N, et al. Randomized phase III trial comparing irinotecan/cisplatin with etoposide/cisplatin in patients with previously untreated extensive-stage disease small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2038–43.
Lara PN Jr, et al. Phase III trial of irinotecan/cisplatin compared with etoposide/cisplatin in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: clinical and pharmacogenomic results from SWOG S0124. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2530–5.
Miyamoto H, et al. A phase III comparison of etoposide/cisplatin with or without added ifosfamide in small-cell lung cancer. Oncology. 1992;49:431–5.
Niell HB, et al. Randomized phase III intergroup trial of etoposide and cisplatin with or without paclitaxel and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9732. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:3752–9.
Dimitroulis J, et al. Comparison of cisplatin-paclitaxel combination versus cisplatin-etoposide in patients with small-cell lung cancer: a Phase III study. Oncol Rep. 2008;20:879–84.
Eckardt JR, et al. Open-label, multicenter, randomized, phase III study comparing oral topotecan/cisplatin versus etoposide/cisplatin as treatment for chemotherapy-naive patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2044–51.
Okamoto H, Nagatomo A, Kunitoh H, Kunikane H, Watanabe K. A phase I clinical and pharmacologic study of a carboplatin and irinotecan regimen combined with recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in the treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Cancer. 1998;82:2166–72.
DeVore RF, et al. Phase II study of irinotecan plus cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2710–20.
Kinoshita A, et al. Phase II study of irinotecan combined with carboplatin in previously untreated small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006;94:1267–71.
Sohn JH, et al. A phase II trial of fractionated irinotecan plus carboplatin for previously untreated extensive-disease small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2006;54:365–70.
Balducci L, Corcoran MB. Antineoplastic chemotherapy of the older cancer patient. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2000;14:193–212. x–xi.
Langer CJ, et al. Cisplatin-based therapy for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: implications of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 5592, a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:173–81.
Li J, Chen P, Dai CH, Li XQ, Bao QL. Outcome and treatment in elderly patients with small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2009;9:172–82.
Okamoto H, et al. A combination chemotherapy of carboplatin and irinotecan with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support in elderly patients with small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2006;53:197–203.
Chen G, et al. Phase II trial of irinotecan and carboplatin for extensive or relapsed small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1401–4.
Schmittel A, et al. A randomized phase II trial of irinotecan plus carboplatin versus etoposide plus carboplatin treatment in patients with extended disease small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2006;17:663–7.
Hermes A, et al. Irinotecan plus carboplatin versus oral etoposide plus carboplatin in extensive small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:4261–7.
Schmittel A, et al. Irinotecan plus carboplatin versus etoposide plus carboplatin in extensive disease small cell lung cancer: Results of the German randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:abstr 8029.
Spigel DR, et al. Irinotecan, carboplatin, and imatinib in untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a phase II trial of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2:854–61.
Spigel DR, et al. Phase II trial of irinotecan, carboplatin, and bevacizumab in the treatment of patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2009;4:1555–60.
Rothenberg ML, Meropol NJ, Poplin EA, Van Cutsem E, Wadler S. Mortality associated with irinotecan plus bolus fluorouracil/leucovorin: summary findings of an independent panel. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:3801–7.
Shah MA, Ilson D, Kelsen DP. Thromboembolic events in gastric cancer: high incidence in patients receiving irinotecan- and bevacizumab-based therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2574–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, Y.S., Park, S.H., Kyung, S.Y. et al. Irinotecan plus carboplatin in patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer. Med Oncol 28, 342–350 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-010-9453-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-010-9453-z