Abstract
Hippocamposeptal (HS) neurons send GABAergic projections from the hippocampus to the medial septum/diagonal band of Broca (MS/DBB) as part of a reciprocal loop that is critical for memory. HS neurons are proposed to be particularly sensitive to the deleterious effects of pathological exposure to amyloid-β (Aβ), as would occur during Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, it is not known how HS GABA release in the MS/DBB is altered during the progression of AD. To target HS neurons in a mouse model of AD, we crossed SST-Cre mice to 5XFAD mice and performed stereotaxic injections of Cre-dependent AAV containing mCherry/channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) into the hippocampus of offspring at 4, 6, 9, and 12 months. We used optogenetics to selectively stimulate HS terminals while performing whole-cell patch-clamp recordings from MS/DBB neurons in slices. There was a transient reduction in HS-inhibitory postsynaptic current (IPSC) amplitude in female 5XFAD mice at 6 months, but no difference in males at any age, and no difference in paired-pulse ratio in either sex at any age. When bath applying the GABABR agonist, baclofen, we found a larger decrease in HS-IPSC amplitude in 5XFAD females at 9 months and 5XFAD males at 12 months. In 12-month-old 5XFAD females, response to baclofen was significantly reduced. These data suggest that there is a transient increase in responsiveness to GABABR activation in 5XFAD mice that occurs earlier in females than in males. These sex-specific changes to HS function are likely to impact the relay of information between the hippocampus and MS/DBB.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Hippocamposeptal (HS) neurons are GABAergic neurons in the hippocampus that send projections to the medial septum/diagonal band of Broca (MS/DBB) (Alonso and Kohler 1982; Toth et al. 1993; Jinno and Kosaka 2002). HS neurons have extensive connections in both the hippocampus and MS/DBB (Toth et al. 1993; Blasco-Ibanez and Freund 1995; Gulyas et al. 2003; Takacs et al. 2008; Mattis et al. 2014; Yuan et al. 2017), making them uniquely positioned to modulate and synchronize activity between these two regions (Dragoi et al. 1999; Manseau et al. 2008; Quilichini et al. 2012; Kang et al. 2017). The MS/DBB and hippocampus, and connections between these regions, have been shown to play vital roles in regulating learning and memory (Mizumori et al. 1990; Burgess et al. 2002; Bannerman et al. 2004; Khakpai et al. 2013; Ballinger et al. 2016; Haam and Yakel 2017). Thus, it is likely that alterations to HS signaling may be associated with cognitive decline in diseases that affect memory, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD). A loss of cholinergic signaling within the reciprocal septohippocampal pathway has long been associated with deficits in hippocampal-mediated memory formation and has been linked to AD (Davies and Maloney 1976; Perry et al. 1977; Bartus et al. 1982; Ballinger et al. 2016; Haam and Yakel 2017). However, less is known about how the function of HS neurons is affected during the pathogenesis of AD, leaving an incomplete picture of how septo-hippocampo-septal circuit activity is altered by AD.
Previous studies suggest that exposure to high levels of amyloid-β (Aβ) can lead to a loss of HS neurons (Villette et al. 2012; Kim et al. 2019). In the 5XFAD mouse model of AD, which displays rapid Aβ pathology (Oakley et al. 2006), there is a significant reduction in the density of HS fibers targeting MS neurons (Kim et al. 2019). HS neurons are also damaged if Aβ is directly infused into the hippocampus, and this has been linked to memory impairment along with a decrease in the firing rate of parvalbumin-expressing GABAergic neurons in the MS/DBB (Villette et al. 2010, 2012). While these studies point to a loss of HS neurons caused by Aβ, it is not known how this translates into changes in HS GABA release in response to pathological Aβ exposure. Understanding how HS GABA release in the MS/DBB is affected by Aβ will provide necessary information for understanding how activity within the larger septo-hippocampo-septal loop is altered in AD.
In addition to affecting baseline levels of HS GABA release, it is also possible that AD disrupts the modulation of HS GABA release by altering local circuitry and presynaptic receptors found on HS terminals. One receptor that has been shown to have a critical role for regulating HS GABA release in the MS/DBB is the GABABR. Activation of GABABRs can directly and dramatically reduce HS GABA release (Damborsky and Yakel 2021). This regulation can further mediate the effects of other neuromodulatory signaling pathways that alter local inhibitory activity in the MS/DBB. Specifically, any activity that increases GABAergic signaling in the MS/DBB might activate GABABRs on HS terminals, thereby decreasing HS GABA release. This effect has been seen with cholinergic signaling, which increases spontaneous GABA release in the MS/DBB (Damborsky et al. 2017) and indirectly decreases HS GABA release through a GABABR-dependent mechanism (Damborsky and Yakel 2021). There is still much to be learned about how GABABRs are affected in AD. In the hippocampus, early human studies indicated a decrease in GABABR binding in multiple subregions (Chu et al. 1987). However, subsequent studies indicate that GABABR1 expression may be increased in moderate AD and then decreased in severe AD (Iwakiri et al. 2005). It is not yet known how GABABR modulation of HS GABA release is affected in AD, but any changes are likely to have far-reaching impacts on HS signaling.
Here, we examine how HS GABA release is altered in 5XFAD male and female mice and determine if GABABR modulation of HS GABA release is affected. We determine that the magnitude and regulation of HS GABA release in the MS/DBB are altered in 5XFAD mice in a sex-specific manner. These findings provide insight into the dysfunction of signaling in the septo-hippocampo-septal circuit in AD and underline the importance of considering sex as an important variable in AD studies.
Material and Methods
Animals
Female homozygous SST-IRES-Cre (SST-Cre) mice (Taniguchi et al. 2011) (STOCK Sst < tm2.1(cre)Zjh > /J; RRID:IMSR_JAX:013044) were crossed to male hemizygous 5XFAD mice (Oakley et al. 2006) (6SJL-Tg(APPSwFlLon,PSEN1*M146L*L286V)6799Vas/Mmjax; RRID:MMRRC_034840-JAX). Offspring were all heterozygous for SST-Cre and either WT or hemizygous for 5XFAD mutations. Mice that were WT for the 5XFAD mutations were used as littermate controls. Mice were maintained on a 12-h light/dark cycle under constant temperature control with ad libitum access to food and water. All procedures were approved and performed in compliance with the NIEHS/NIH Humane Care and Use of Animals in Research protocols.
Stereotaxic Injections
Stereotaxic injections were performed 2–3 weeks prior to the mice turning 4, 6, 9, or 12 months of age as previously described (Damborsky and Yakel 2021). Briefly, mice were injected with pAAV-EF1a-double floxed-hChR2(H134R)-mCherry-WPRE-HGHpA (Addgene plasmid #20297 from Karl Deisseroth), which was packaged with AAV stereotype 5 by the Viral Vector Core facility at the NIEHS. Mice were anesthetized and placed in a stereotaxic apparatus (Stoelting/Neurostar). Of virus, 0.5 µl (4 × 1012–1.5 × 1013 GC/ml) was infused bilaterally into the hippocampi at each of four different hippocampal coordinates (relative to Bregma): ± 1.6 ML, − 2 AP, 1.2, and 1.8 DV. Virus infusion rate was 0.1 μl/min. Previous data has shown that injection into these coordinates in SST-Cre mice results in robust expression in the hippocampus and fiber expression in the MS/DBB (Damborsky and Yakel 2021). Following surgery, mice were allowed to recover on a heating pad until ambulatory and monitored for signs of distress.
Electrophysiology
Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were performed as previously described (Damborsky and Yakel 2021). Briefly, mice were decapitated under deep anesthesia, the brain was removed, and 300-μm slices were taken through the MS/DBB while in ice-cold cutting solution containing (in mM) 230 sucrose, 3 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 28 NaHCO3, 5 glucose, 0.5 CaCl2, 7 MgCl2, 1 ascorbate, and 3 sodium pyruvate. In order to confirm proper targeting of virus to the hippocampus, hippocampal slices (300 µM) were taken from each mouse and examined for fluorescence using the same Axio Examiner A.1 (ZEISS) microscope used for electrophysiological recordings. The mCherry signal was activated by delivering 570-nm LED light generated using a CoolLED system delivered through the microscope objective and imaged using Andor iQ software (Oxford Instruments). Whole-cell recordings were performed with the slices in an artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) solution containing (in mM) 126 NaCl, 3.5 KCl, 1.2 NaH2PO4, 25 NaHCO3, 11 glucose, 2 CaCl2, and 1.3 MgCl2 that was continuously oxygenated with 95%O2/5%CO2. Patch pipettes were pulled to a resistance of 3–7 MΩ using P-97 horizontal puller (Sutter Instrument Co.) and were filled with an internal pipette solution that contained (in mM) 130 K+-gluconate, 10 KCl, 10 HEPES, 1 EGTA, 2 MgCl2, 3 MgATP, and 0.3 NaGTP with pH 7.2–7.3 and osmolarity 280–290 mOsm. Cells were held at − 80 mV, and were only used for analysis if access resistance was below 40 MΩ and varied by less than 20% throughout the experiment. Inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) were isolated by bath application of 10 μM DNQX and 40 μM AP5 to block AMPA and NMDA receptors, respectively. Activation of ChR2 was achieved using an Andor Mosaic 3 illumination system (Oxford Instruments), with 460-nm blue LED light generated using a CoolLED system delivered through the microscope objective. Light pulses (5 ms) were given at the lowest possible intensity of 1% maximum power, which corresponded to approximately 0.2 mW as measured by a PM100D power meter (Thorlabs). Andor iQ software was used to control the delivery of light. The paired-pulse stimulation protocol was repeated three to four times with 20-s intervals between runs, and the average of these traces was used for data analysis. HS-IPSC amplitude was measured as the difference in the current of the first peak relative to baseline. Paired-pulse ratios were not calculated if the amplitude of either IPSC was 0. The recording chamber was continuously perfused with oxygenated ACSF at a rate of approximately 2 ml/min, and drugs were allowed to be washed on for at least 3 min to ensure complete exchange of bath fluid and slice penetration. Recordings were digitized using an Axon Digidata 1550 digitizer (Molecular Devices) and collected using pClamp 10 software (Molecular Devices) with a Multiclamp 700B amplifier (Molecular Devices). Data were filtered at 2 kHz and sampled at 10 kHz. AP5, DNQX, and Baclofen were acquired from Tocris Bioscience.
Statistical Analyses
Electrophysiology data was analyzed using pClamp 10 software. SigmaPlot 14 (Systat Software, Inc.) was used for statistical analysis, and GraphPad Prism 10 was used for graphical illustrations. Within-group analysis was used to compare responses from the same cell prior to and following baclofen exposure. Data were tested for normality using as Shapiro–Wilk test and then analyzed using a paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test, as appropriate. Between-group analysis to compare responses across ages and genotypes was performed using a two-way ANOVA. Planned Bonferroni multiple comparisons were performed based on a priori hypotheses to compare differences between genotypes at each age and between ages within each genotype. Significance was defined as a p value of < 0.05. The number of cells recorded is reported as n values. At least six mice were used in each group. Data are presented ± S.E.M.
Results
In order to assess how HS GABA release in the MS/DBB may be affected by AD-like pathology, we sought to selectively stimulate and record HS synaptic transmission in the 5XFAD mouse model of AD (Oakley et al. 2006). To do this, we stereotaxically injected AAV5-EF1a-double floxed-hChR2(H134R)-mCherry-WPRE-HGHpA bilaterally into the hippocampi of SST-Cre::5XFAD mice. This resulted in selective expression of ChR2 and mCherry in SST + neurons in the hippocampus and HS fiber expression in the MS/DBB as previously described for SST-Cre mice (Damborsky and Yakel 2021) (Fig. 1A). To compare changes in HS-IPSC in 5XFAD and WT mice, mice that were heterozygous for SST-Cre and hemizygous for 5XFAD mutations (5XFAD) were compared to littermates that were heterozygous for SST-Cre and negative for 5XFAD mutations (WT). Mice were injected 2–3 weeks prior to whole-cell recordings, which occurred at 4, 6, 9, and 12 months of age. During whole-cell recordings from MS/DBB neurons made in the presence of DNQX and AP5, a brief (5 ms) blue light (460 nm) pulse resulted in an HS-mediated IPSC (HS-IPSC) (Fig. 1B), confirming the presence of ChR2 in GABAergic HS fibers synapsing onto MS/DBB neurons.
Two different measurements were used to assess how HS GABA release is affected by aging in WT and 5XFAD mice. During whole-cell recordings, two pulses of light were given, resulting in two HS-IPSCs. We first measured the amplitude of the first IPSC to compare the magnitude of HS GABA release. Secondly, we also compared the ratio of the amplitude of the second IPSC to the ratio of the first IPSC, known as the paired-pulse ratio (PPR), to assess presynaptic release probability. When we compared the amplitude of male WT and 5XFAD mice across ages, we found no significant difference (Fig. 1C). Conversely, in females, there was an overall genotype effect, with 5XFAD having significantly smaller HS-IPSC amplitude than WT (p = 0.049; Fig. 1C). Bonferroni comparisons indicated that this effect was largest at 6 months of age, when 5XFAD mice had significantly smaller HS-IPSC amplitudes than WT mice (p = 0.031). For PPR analysis, we used three different inter-stimulus intervals (ISI), defined as the time between the start of the first 5-ms pulse to the time of the start of the second 5-ms pulse: 50 ms, 100 ms, and 200 ms (Fig. 2A). There was no significant difference at an any age in either males or females between 5XFAD and WT mice at any of the three ISIs (Fig. 2B and C), indicating that presynaptic release probability of HS neurons is unchanged in 5XFAD mice compared to WT littermates.
We previously found that HS GABA release is decreased by presynaptic GABABR activation (Damborsky and Yakel 2021). In order to determine if this regulation of HS GABA release is altered in 5XFAD mice, a low dose (200 nM) of the GABABR agonist baclofen was bath applied to slices during recordings. In comparison to high concentrations of baclofen (20 μM), which completely block HS GABA release, this low concentration of baclofen has been shown to reduce, but not block, HS-IPSC amplitude and increase HS-IPSC PPR (Damborsky and Yakel 2021). We therefore compared HS-IPSC amplitude and PPR at the 100-ms ISI prior to and following baclofen wash-on (Figs. 3A and 4A). In male WT mice, baclofen significantly reduced HS-IPSC amplitude at 4 (p = 0.004), 6 (p = 0.0003), 9 (p = 0.001), and 12 (p = 0.006) months (Fig. 3B). Baclofen also increased PPR in male WT mice at 4 (p = 0.005), 6 (p = 0.025), 9 (p = 0.001), and 12 (p = 0.029) months (Fig. 3D). In male 5XFAD mice, baclofen significantly reduced HS-IPSC amplitude at 4 (p = 0.001), 6 (p = 0.001), 9 (p = 0.002), and 12 (p = 0.004) months (Fig. 3C). It also increased PPR in male 5XFAD mice at 4 (p = 0.015), 6 (p = 0.002), 9 (p = 0.02), and 12 (p = 0.021) months (Fig. 3E). In female WT mice, baclofen significantly reduced HS-IPSC amplitude at 4 (p = 0.004), 6 (p = 0.005), 9 (p = 0.0008), and 12 (p = 0.004) months (Fig. 4B). It also increased PPR in female WT mice at 4 (p = 0.046), 6 (p = 0.014), 9 (p = 0.04), and 12 (p = 0.01) months (Fig. 4D). In female 5XFAD mice, baclofen decreased HS-IPSC amplitude at 4 (p = 0.003), 6 (p = 0.003), 9 (p = 0.004), and 12 (p = 0.026) months (Fig. 4C). It also increased PPR in female 5XFAD mice at 4 (p = 0.038), 6 (p = 0.032), and 9 (p = 0.01) months. There was no significant effect of baclofen on PPR in 12-month-old female 5XFAD mice (p = 0.13) (Fig. 4E).
To compare the magnitude of the effect of baclofen in WT and 5XFAD mice across ages, we compared the percent decrease in amplitude and the percent increase in PPR across all groups. In males, 12-month-old 5XFAD mice had a significantly greater decrease in amplitude compared to 12-month WT mice following baclofen exposure (p = 0.039; Fig. 5A). There were no significant differences in the percent increase in PPR. In females, 9-month-old 5XFAD mice had a significantly greater decrease in amplitude compared to both 9-month WT mice (p = 0.042) and 12-month 5XFAD mice (p = 0.031; Fig. 5B). There were no significant differences in the increase in PPR. Thus, in female 5XFAD mice, there was a transient increase in response to GABABR activation at 9 months, whereas in males, this increase in response is not seen until 12 months.
Discussion
Understanding how activity within the septo-hippocampo-septal loop is altered in AD is vital for connecting dysfunction within this circuit to cognitive impairment and determining potential targets for therapeutic interventions to alleviate these symptoms. Despite their critical location within this loop, there is still little known about how HS GABA release is altered in AD. Here, we provide data to show that in female 5XFAD mice, there is a transient decrease in HS GABAergic transmission in the MS/DBB at 6 months of age, with no differences in males through 12 months of age. We also report sex-specific alterations in the regulation of HS GABA release by GABABRs, with females showing an increase in response to baclofen at 9 months and males not until 12 months. This effect in females was also transient in nature, as by 12 months, the response to baclofen was significantly reduced. These sex-specific, age-specific effects point to an HS system that is relatively functionally resilient in 5XFAD mice. Once functional changes begin to occur, they arise to a greater degree and at an accelerated timeline in female 5XFAD mice compared to their male counterparts. These findings highlight the fluidity of circuitry changes that might occur within the HS system during the progression of AD and highlight the importance of examining different timepoints in both males and females throughout aging to gain a better understanding of these changes.
5XFAD mice display rapid amyloid pathology, with memory impairments in various tasks reported as early as 4–6 months of age (Oakley et al. 2006; Kimura and Ohno 2009; Ohno 2009; Girard et al. 2014; Li et al. 2021). In the MS, intracellular Aβ accumulation can be seen at 2 months, and extracellular plaques are present by 6–7 months (Daini et al. 2021). In the hippocampus, neurons that express SST, including HS neurons, have been shown to be particularly vulnerable to the deleterious effects of Aβ (Ramos et al. 2006; Perez-Cruz et al. 2011; Villette et al. 2012; Jang et al. 2023). A decrease of HS connectivity from the dentate gyrus and subiculum to the MS has been observed as early as 4.5 months in 5XFAD mice, while a decrease of connectivity from CA1 and CA3 to MS was additionally observed at 14 months (Kim et al. 2019). Interestingly, here, we show that, in males, there is no difference in HS-IPSC amplitude through 12 months of age. In females, there was an overall effect of genotype on HS-IPSC amplitude. However, additional analysis revealed that the only age that was independently significantly different was 6 months. Additionally, there was no difference in HS-IPSC amplitude between 6 and 12 months of age. This indicates that while there was an initial decrease in HS GABA release in 5XFAD females, GABA release does not continue to deteriorate as AD-like pathology worsens. Additionally, our data show that there is no difference in PPR in 5XFAD mice, indicating that presynaptic release probability remains unchanged. These results suggest a remarkable stability of functional HS input in the MS/DBB even while Aβ levels, neuronal loss, and cognitive impairments mount.
The seemingly incongruous findings between structural studies and the functional data reported here could point to active compensatory mechanisms within the HS pathway to alleviate the effects of a loss of neuron number. Such functional compensation has previously been reported for GABAergic signaling in the hippocampus. In the GABAergic septohippocampal pathway, circuit remodeling counteracts the effects of GABAergic hyperactivity in the DG of 3xTg-AD mice (Wander et al. 2023). There is also a transient increase in GAD65 and GAT3 protein expression in the hippocampus of APP/PS1 mice at 6 months (Salazar et al. 2021), which could increase GABA synthesis and transport, potentially leading to an increase in GABA release. Outside of the GABAergic system, compensatory changes in postsynaptic receptor density have been reported in response to AD-like pathology. In the cholinergic system, an upregulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor signaling has been observed in the prefrontal cortex of two AD mouse models (Power et al. 2023). Similarly, in the glutamatergic system, a loss of excitatory synapse coincides with an increase in AMPA receptors in the CA1 hippocampus of 5XFAD mice (Neuman et al. 2015). At GABAergic synapses, fast inhibitory postsynaptic currents are mediated by GABAARs. While there is still debate about how the expression of these receptors changes in AD, the majority of studies point to either a decrease or no change in functional receptor expression along with changes in subunit composition in the hippocampus and cortex (Limon et al. 2012; Govindpani et al. 2017; Kwakowsky et al. 2018; Carello-Collar et al. 2023). However, less is known about how GABAARs are affected in the MS/DBB, and it is possible that upregulation of GABAAR signaling precedes a loss of receptors. The functional resilience of HS neurons reported here suggests that information flow from the hippocampus to MS/DBB persists at relatively consistent rates even while neuronal loss and dysfunction are occurring in both regions. This could have a profound effect on regulating and synchronizing activity between these two regions (Dragoi et al. 1999; Manseau et al. 2008; Quilichini et al. 2012; Kang et al. 2017). Understanding why HS projections remain functionally resilient even while neurons in the hippocampus and MS/DBB are lost will be key to understanding how AD pathology impacts communication between these two regions.
Dysregulation of the GABAergic system and perturbations to the balance of excitation and inhibition within the brain are likely to be contributing factors to cognitive decline in AD. (Nava-Mesa et al. 2014; Jimenez-Balado and Eich 2021). As regulators of presynaptic GABA release, GABABRs are linchpins of GABAergic signaling, and dysfunction of these receptors would have far-reaching effects on inhibitory circuits in the brain. However, there is still much uncertainty about how GABABR function is altered in AD. In a recent study using APP/PS1 mice, GABABR subunit protein expression and mRNA transcript levels were found to be decreased in the hippocampus as early as 6 months (Salazar et al. 2021). Conversely, another study found no change in GABAB1 protein expression in the hippocampus through 12 months in APP/PS1 mice but did note a reduction in surface levels of GABABRs (Martin-Belmonte et al. 2020). Incubation of hippocampal slices with Aβ25-35 did not affect mRNA levels of GABAB1 or GABAB2 receptor subunits, but did reduce expression of the subunits of the G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K+ (GIRK) channel that is activated by GABABRs (Mayordomo-Cava et al. 2015). Pre- and postsynaptic GIRK1 and 2 subunit density in the CA1 hippocampus is also decreased in APP/PS1 mice at 12 months (Martin-Belmonte et al. 2022), potentially leading to dysfunction of signaling through GABABRs. Early human studies have also found reduced numbers of GABABRs in the hippocampus of individuals with AD (Chu et al. 1987). Interestingly, while these animal and human studies mostly point to a decrease in GABABR expression or signaling in the hippocampus as a result of Aβ exposure, our data show that there is a transient increase in the effects of baclofen, indicating an amplification of signaling through GABABRs. Subsequently, in 12-month-old females, there is a significant decrease in baclofen-induced reductions in HS-IPSC amplitude. This is also the only group that shows no change in PPR induced by baclofen, signifying a loss of presynaptic GABABR signaling. These results are more in line with human data that has shown that there is a transient increase in the expression of GABAB1 subunits in the hippocampus in moderate AD, followed by a decrease in expression in severe AD (Iwakiri et al. 2005). Additionally, in rats, it has been shown that intrahippocampal injection of a GABABR antagonist can protect against the memory impairments caused by acute Aβ toxicity (Almasi et al. 2018), suggesting that hyperactivity of the GABABR may contribute to the cognitive deficits induced by Aβ. Together, these studies suggest that the function of GABABRs might be differentially altered depending on the degree of progression of AD-like pathology. This study contributes to accumulating evidence suggesting that signaling through GABABRs might initially increase in AD and then decrease as the disease progresses. Understanding the exact timing and mechanisms of this duality will be critical for understanding if there is a potential for therapeutic benefit via modulation of GABABRs.
One of the most striking findings of this study is the divergence of effects on HS projections in females versus males. In addition to the female-specific reduction in HS amplitude in 5XFAD mice, we also saw a sex dependence of the timing of increase in the response to baclofen. In females, the increase is seen at 9 months, whereas in males, the increase is not seen until 12 months. Twelve-month-old 5XFAD females are also the only group that did not have a significant increase in PPR in response to baclofen, suggesting a loss of presynaptic GABABR-mediated signaling. These sex-specific effects could be due to the sex dependence of the pathology of AD. Nearly two-thirds of individuals with AD are women (Alzheimer’s A, 2019). While there may be confounding factors that contribute to this difference, such as the extended lifespan of females, there is also evidence that women with AD may experience more severe cognitive impairment than their male counterparts (Laws et al. 2018). There have also been sex differences observed in 5XFAD mice, with females exhibiting characteristics indicative of a more severe phenotype, including more severe molecular pathology, increased anxiety, increased expression of inflammatory markers, more pronounced changes in gene expression, and stress-induced increases in Aβ (Devi et al. 2010; Bundy et al. 2019; Oblak et al. 2021; Sil et al. 2022). Adding to these studies, our results suggest that females have substantial functional changes in HS release not seen in males and an accelerated timeline of dysfunction in GABABR signaling within the HS pathway, further suggesting a more severe AD phenotype.
In conclusion, we show that HS synaptic transmission is transiently reduced in female 5XFAD mice at 6 months and remains unchanged in 5XFAD males through 12 months. There is also a transient increase in response to GABABR activation in 5XFAD females at 9 months and a loss of presynaptic regulation by GABABRs at 12 months. In 5XFAD males, an increase in GABABR signaling was observed at 12 months. Many of the differences in HS GABA release and regulation do not occur until the later stages of AD-like pathology, and are transient in nature, pointing to potential compensatory mechanisms. These alterations are also sex-specific, with females having larger differences and an accelerated timeline of dysfunction compared to males. These data add a critical component of understanding to the question of how activity within the septo-hippocampo-septal loop is affected in AD.
Data Availability
Data will be made available upon request.
References
Almasi A, Zarei M, Raoufi S, Sarihi A, Salehi I, Komaki A, Hashemi-Firouzi N, Shahidi S (2018) Influence of hippocampal GABA(B) receptor inhibition on memory in rats with acute beta-amyloid toxicity. Metab Brain Dis 33:1859–1867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11011-018-0292-5
Alonso A, Kohler C (1982) Evidence for separate projections of hippocampal pyramidal and non-pyramidal neurons to different parts of the septum in the rat brain. Neurosci Lett 31:209–214
Alzheimer’s A (2019) 2019 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s Dement 15:321–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2019.01.010
Ballinger EC, Ananth M, Talmage DA, Role LW (2016) Basal forebrain cholinergic circuits and signaling in cognition and cognitive decline. Neuron 91:1199–1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.09.006
Bannerman DM, Rawlins JN, McHugh SB, Deacon RM, Yee BK, Bast T, Zhang WN, Pothuizen HH, Feldon J (2004) Regional dissociations within the hippocampus–memory and anxiety. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 28:273–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.004
Bartus RT, Dean RL, Beer B, Lippa AS (1982) The cholinergic hypothesis of geriatric memory dysfunction. Science 217:408–417. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7046051
Blasco-Ibanez JM, Freund TF (1995) Synaptic input of horizontal interneurons in stratum oriens of the hippocampal CA1 subfield: structural basis of feed-back activation. Eur J Neurosci 7:2170–2180
Bundy JL, Vied C, Badger C, Nowakowski RS (2019) Sex-biased hippocampal pathology in the 5XFAD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease: a multi-omic analysis. J Comp Neurol 527:462–475. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.24551
Burgess N, Maguire EA, O’Keefe J (2002) The human hippocampus and spatial and episodic memory. Neuron 35:625–641
Carello-Collar G, Bellaver B, Ferreira PCL, Ferrari-Souza JP, Ramos VG, Therriault J, Tissot C, De Bastiani MA, Soares C, Pascoal TA, Rosa-Neto P, Souza DO, Zimmer ER (2023) The GABAergic system in Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-023-02140-w.10.1038/s41380-023-02140-w
Chu DC, Penney JB Jr, Young AB (1987) Quantitative autoradiography of hippocampal GABAB and GABAA receptor changes in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Lett 82:246–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3940(87)90264-3
Daini E, Secco V, Liao W, Zoli M, Vilella A (2021) A regional and cellular analysis of the early intracellular and extracellular accumulation of Abeta in the brain of 5XFAD mice. Neurosci Lett 754:135869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2021.135869
Damborsky JC, Yakel JL (2021) Regulation of hippocamposeptal input within the medial septum/diagonal band of Broca. Neuropharmacology 191:108589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2021.108589
Damborsky JC, Smith KG, Jensen P, Yakel JL (2017) Local cholinergic-GABAergic circuitry within the basal forebrain is modulated by galanin. Brain Struct Funct 222:1385–1400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-016-1283-0
Davies P, Maloney AJ (1976) Selective loss of central cholinergic neurons in Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 2:1403
Devi L, Alldred MJ, Ginsberg SD, Ohno M (2010) Sex- and brain region-specific acceleration of beta-amyloidogenesis following behavioral stress in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Brain 3:34. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-6606-3-34
Dragoi G, Carpi D, Recce M, Csicsvari J, Buzsaki G (1999) Interactions between hippocampus and medial septum during sharp waves and theta oscillation in the behaving rat. J Neurosci: Off J Soc Neurosci 19:6191–6199
Girard SD, Jacquet M, Baranger K, Migliorati M, Escoffier G, Bernard A, Khrestchatisky M, Feron F, Rivera S, Roman FS, Marchetti E (2014) Onset of hippocampus-dependent memory impairments in 5XFAD transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Hippocampus 24:762–772. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22267
Govindpani K, Calvo-Flores Guzmán B, Vinnakota C, Waldvogel HJ, Faull RL, Kwakowsky A (2017) Towards a better understanding of GABAergic remodeling in Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Mol Sci 18:1813
Gulyas AI, Hajos N, Katona I, Freund TF (2003) Interneurons are the local targets of hippocampal inhibitory cells which project to the medial septum. Eur J Neurosci 17:1861–1872
Haam J, Yakel JL (2017) Cholinergic modulation of the hippocampal region and memory function. J Neurochem 142(Suppl 2):111–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.14052
Iwakiri M, Mizukami K, Ikonomovic MD, Ishikawa M, Hidaka S, Abrahamson EE, DeKosky ST, Asada T (2005) Changes in hippocampal GABABR1 subunit expression in Alzheimer’s patients: association with Braak staging. Acta Neuropathol 109:467–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-005-0985-9
Jang J, Yeo S, Baek S, Jung HJ, Lee MS, Choi SH, Choe Y (2023) Abnormal accumulation of extracellular vesicles in hippocampal dystrophic axons and regulation by the primary cilia in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol Commun 11:142. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-023-01637-3
Jimenez-Balado J, Eich TS (2021) GABAergic dysfunction, neural network hyperactivity and memory impairments in human aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Semin Cell Dev Biol 116:146–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2021.01.005
Jinno S, Kosaka T (2002) Immunocytochemical characterization of hippocamposeptal projecting GABAergic nonprincipal neurons in the mouse brain: a retrograde labeling study. Brain Res 945:219–231
Kang D, Ding M, Topchiy I, Kocsis B (2017) Reciprocal interactions between medial septum and hippocampus in theta generation: Granger causality decomposition of mixed spike-field recordings. Front Neuroanat 11:120. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2017.00120
Khakpai F, Nasehi M, Haeri-Rohani A, Eidi A, Zarrindast MR (2013) Septo-hippocampo-septal loop and memory formation. Basic Clin Neurosci 4:5–23
Kim S, Nam Y, Jeong YO, Park HH, Lee SK, Shin SJ, Jung H, Kim BH, Hong SB, Park YH, Kim J, Yu J, Yoo DH, Park SH, Jeon SG, Moon M (2019) Topographical visualization of the reciprocal projection between the medial septum and the hippocampus in the 5XFAD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Mol Sci 20(16):3992. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20163992
Kimura R, Ohno M (2009) Impairments in remote memory stabilization precede hippocampal synaptic and cognitive failures in 5XFAD Alzheimer mouse model. Neurobiol Dis 33:229–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2008.10.006
Kwakowsky A, Calvo-Flores Guzmán B, Pandya M, Turner C, Waldvogel HJ, Faull RL (2018) GABA(A) receptor subunit expression changes in the human Alzheimer’s disease hippocampus, subiculum, entorhinal cortex and superior temporal gyrus. J Neurochem 145:374–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.14325
Laws KR, Irvine K, Gale TM (2018) Sex differences in Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Opin Psychiatry 31:133–139. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000401
Li Y, Zhu K, Li N, Wang X, Xiao X, Li L, Li L, He Y, Zhang J, Wo J, Cui Y, Huang H, Zhang J, Wang W, Wang X, Zheng Y (2021) Reversible GABAergic dysfunction involved in hippocampal hyperactivity predicts early-stage Alzheimer disease in a mouse model. Alzheimers Res Ther 13:114. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-021-00859-8
Limon A, Reyes-Ruiz JM, Miledi R (2012) Loss of functional GABA(A) receptors in the Alzheimer diseased brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:10071–10076. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1204606109
Manseau F, Goutagny R, Danik M, Williams S (2008) The hippocamposeptal pathway generates rhythmic firing of GABAergic neurons in the medial septum and diagonal bands: an investigation using a complete septohippocampal preparation in vitro. J Neurosci: Off J Soc Neurosci 28:4096–4107. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0247-08.2008
Martin-Belmonte A, Aguado C, Alfaro-Ruiz R, Moreno-Martinez AE, de la Ossa L, Martinez-Hernandez J, Buisson A, Fruh S, Bettler B, Shigemoto R, Fukazawa Y, Lujan R (2020) Reduction in the neuronal surface of post and presynaptic GABA(B) receptors in the hippocampus in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Pathol 30:554–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/bpa.12802
Martin-Belmonte A, Aguado C, Alfaro-Ruiz R, Moreno-Martinez AE, de la Ossa L, Aso E, Gomez-Acero L, Shigemoto R, Fukazawa Y, Ciruela F, Lujan R (2022) Nanoscale alterations in GABA(B) receptors and GIRK channel organization on the hippocampus of APP/PS1 mice. Alzheimers Res Ther 14:136. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-022-01078-5
Mattis J, Brill J, Evans S, Lerner TN, Davidson TJ, Hyun M, Ramakrishnan C, Deisseroth K, Huguenard JR (2014) Frequency-dependent, cell type-divergent signaling in the hippocamposeptal projection. J Neurosci: Off J Soc Neurosci 34:11769–11780. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5188-13.2014
Mayordomo-Cava J, Yajeya J, Navarro-Lopez JD, Jimenez-Diaz L (2015) Amyloid-beta(25–35) modulates the expression of GirK and KCNQ channel genes in the hippocampus. PLoS One 10:e0134385. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134385
Mizumori SJ, Perez GM, Alvarado MC, Barnes CA, McNaughton BL (1990) Reversible inactivation of the medial septum differentially affects two forms of learning in rats. Brain Res 528:12–20
Nava-Mesa MO, Jimenez-Diaz L, Yajeya J, Navarro-Lopez JD (2014) GABAergic neurotransmission and new strategies of neuromodulation to compensate synaptic dysfunction in early stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Front Cell Neurosci 8:167. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2014.00167
Neuman KM, Molina-Campos E, Musial TF, Price AL, Oh K-J, Wolke ML, Buss EW, Scheff SW, Mufson EJ, Nicholson DA (2015) Evidence for Alzheimer’s disease-linked synapse loss and compensation in mouse and human hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. Brain Struct Funct 220:3143–3165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-014-0848-z
Oakley H, Cole SL, Logan S, Maus E, Shao P, Craft J, Guillozet-Bongaarts A, Ohno M, Disterhoft J, Van Eldik L, Berry R, Vassar R (2006) Intraneuronal beta-amyloid aggregates, neurodegeneration, and neuron loss in transgenic mice with five familial Alzheimer’s disease mutations: potential factors in amyloid plaque formation. J Neurosci: Off J Soci Neurosci 26:10129–10140. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1202-06.2006
Oblak AL et al (2021) Comprehensive evaluation of the 5XFAD mouse model for preclinical testing applications: a MODEL-AD study. Front Aging Neurosci 13:713726. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.713726
Ohno M (2009) Failures to reconsolidate memory in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Learn Mem 92:455–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2009.05.001
Perez-Cruz C, Nolte MW, van Gaalen MM, Rustay NR, Termont A, Tanghe A, Kirchhoff F, Ebert U (2011) Reduced spine density in specific regions of CA1 pyramidal neurons in two transgenic mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci: Off J Soc Neurosci 31:3926–3934. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6142-10.2011
Perry EK, Gibson PH, Blessed G, Perry RH, Tomlinson BE (1977) Neurotransmitter enzyme abnormalities in senile dementia. Choline acetyltransferase and glutamic acid decarboxylase activities in necropsy brain tissue. J Neurol Sci 34:247–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-510x(77)90073-9
Power SK, Venkatesan S, Qu S, McLaurin J, Lambe EK (2023) Enhanced prefrontal nicotinic signaling as evidence of active compensation in Alzheimer’s disease models. bioRxivhttps://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.09.566499
Quilichini PP, Le Van QM, Ivanov A, Turner DA, Carabalona A, Gozlan H, Esclapez M, Bernard C (2012) Hub GABA neurons mediate gamma-frequency oscillations at ictal-like event onset in the immature hippocampus. Neuron 74:57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.01.026
Ramos B, Baglietto-Vargas D, del Rio JC, Moreno-Gonzalez I, Santa-Maria C, Jimenez S, Caballero C, Lopez-Tellez JF, Khan ZU, Ruano D, Gutierrez A, Vitorica J (2006) Early neuropathology of somatostatin/NPY GABAergic cells in the hippocampus of a PS1xAPP transgenic model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 27:1658–1672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.09.022
Salazar AM, Leisgang AM, Ortiz AA, Murtishaw AS, Kinney JW (2021) Alterations of GABA B receptors in the APP/PS1 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 97:129–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.10.013
Sil A, Erfani A, Lamb N, Copland R, Riedel G, Platt B (2022) Sex Differences in Behavior and Molecular Pathology in the 5XFAD Model. J Alzheimer’s Dis: JAD 85:755–778. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-210523
Takacs VT, Freund TF, Gulyas AI (2008) Types and synaptic connections of hippocampal inhibitory neurons reciprocally connected with the medial septum. Eur J Neurosci 28:148–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06319.x
Taniguchi H, He M, Wu P, Kim S, Paik R, Sugino K, Kvitsiani D, Fu Y, Lu J, Lin Y, Miyoshi G, Shima Y, Fishell G, Nelson SB, Huang ZJ (2011) A resource of Cre driver lines for genetic targeting of GABAergic neurons in cerebral cortex. Neuron 71:995–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.07.026
Toth K, Borhegyi Z, Freund TF (1993) Postsynaptic targets of GABAergic hippocampal neurons in the medial septum-diagonal band of broca complex. J Neurosci: Off J Soc Neurosci 13:3712–3724
Villette V, Poindessous-Jazat F, Simon A, Lena C, Roullot E, Bellessort B, Epelbaum J, Dutar P, Stephan A (2010) Decreased rhythmic GABAergic septal activity and memory-associated theta oscillations after hippocampal amyloid-beta pathology in the rat. J Neurosci: Off J Soc Neurosci 30:10991–11003. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6284-09.2010
Villette V, Poindessous-Jazat F, Bellessort B, Roullot E, Peterschmitt Y, Epelbaum J, Stephan A, Dutar P (2012) A new neuronal target for beta-amyloid peptide in the rat hippocampus. Neurobiol Aging 33:1126-e1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.11.024. (1114)
Wander CM, Li YD, Bao H, Asrican B, Luo YJ, Sullivan HA, Chao TH, Zhang WT, Chery SL, Tart DS, Chen ZK, Shih YI, Wickersham IR, Cohen TJ, Song J (2023) Compensatory remodeling of a septo-hippocampal GABAergic network in the triple transgenic Alzheimer’s mouse model. J Transl Med 21:258. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-04078-7
Yuan M, Meyer T, Benkowitz C, Savanthrapadian S, Ansel-Bollepalli L, Foggetti A, Wulff P, Alcami P, Elgueta C, Bartos M (2017) Somatostatin-positive interneurons in the dentate gyrus of mice provide local- and long-range septal synaptic inhibition. Elife 6:e21105. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21105
Acknowledgements
We thank Patricia Lamb for plasmid preparation; the NIEHS Viral Vector Core for virus packaging; the NIEHS Comparative Medicine Branch for their assistance and support with this study; and Yakel lab members for comments on this manuscript.
Funding
Open access funding provided by the National Institutes of Health. This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Z01 ES090089).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.C.D. and J.L.Y. conceptualized and designed experiments. J.C.D. performed experiments and wrote the original draft of the manuscript. J.L.Y. revised the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
All procedures were approved and performed in compliance with the NIEHS/NIH Humane Care and Use of Animals in Research protocols.
Competing Interests
Jerrel L. Yakel is a member of the Journal for Molecular Neuroscience Editorial Board.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Damborsky, J.C., Yakel, J.L. Regulation of Hippocamposeptal Synaptic Transmission by GABABRs Is Altered in 5XFAD Mice in a Sex- and Age-Dependent Manner. J Mol Neurosci 74, 82 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-024-02260-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-024-02260-0