Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Towards a high-affinity allosteric enhancer at muscarinic M1 receptors

  • Lead Compound Discovery And Optimization
  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Loss of forebrain acetylcholine (ACh) is an early neurochemical lesion in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), and muscarinic receptors for ACh are involved in memory and cognition, so a muscarinic agonist could provide ‘replacement therapy’ in this disease. Muscarinic receptors, which couple to G-proteins, occur throughout the CNS, and in the periphery they mediate the responses of the parasympathetic nervous system, so selectivity is crucial. The five subtypes of muscarinic receptor, M1–M5, have a distinct regional distribution, with M2 and M3 mediating most of the peripheral effects, M2 predominating in hindbrain areas, and M1 predominating in the cortex and hippocampus—the brain regions most associated with memory and cognition, which has lead to a search for a truly M1-selective muscarinic agonist. That search has so far been unsuccessful, but acetylcholinesterase inhibitors such as donepezil (Aricept), which potentiate cholinergic neurotransmission, have a therapeutic role in the management of AD; so the M1 receptor remains a therapeutic target. Our approach is to develop allosteric enhancers—compounds which bind to the receptor at an ‘allosteric’ site which is distinct from the ‘primary’ site to which the endogenous ligand binds, and which enhance the affinity (or efficacy) of the endogenous ligand. We have developed radioligand binding assays and analyses for the detection and quantitatitation of allosteric interactions of a test agent with labelled and unlabelled ‘primary’ ligands, and we report here some results of the initial phase of a chemical synthesis project to develop potent and selective allosteric enhancers at muscarinic M1 receptors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Birdsall N. J. M., Farries T., Gharagozloo P., Kobayashi S., Lazareno S., and Sugimoto M. (1999) Subtype-selective positive cooperative interactions between brucine analogs and acetylcholine at muscarinic receptors: functional studies. Mol. Pharmacol. 55, 778–786.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caulfield M. and Straughan D. (1983) Muscarinic receptors revisited. Trends Neurisci. 6, 73–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felder C. C., Bymaster F. P., Ward J., and DeLapp N. (2000) Therapeutic opportunities for muscarinic receptors in the central nervous system. J. Med. Chem. 43, 4333–4353.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gharagozloo P., Lazareno S., Popham A., and Birdsall N. J. M. (1999) Allosteric interactions of quaternary strychnine and brucine derivatives with muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. J. Med. Chem. 42, 438–445.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lazareno S. (1999) Measurement of agonist-stimulated [35S]GTP gamma S binding to cell membranes, in Receptor Binding Techniques, 106th ed. (Keen M., ed.), Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp. 231–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazareno S. and Birdsall N. J. M. (1993) Estimation of competitive antagonist affinity from functional inhibition curves using the Gaddum, Schild and Cheng-Prusoff Equations. Br. J. Pharmacol. 109, 1110–1119.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lazareno S. and Birdsall N. J. M. (1995) Detection, quantitation, and verification of allosteric interactions of agents with labeled and unlabeled ligands at G protein-coupled receptors: interactions of strychnine and acetylcholine at muscarinic receptors. Mol. Pharmacol. 48, 362–378.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lazareno S. and Birdsall N. J. M. (2000) Measurement of competitive and allosteric interactions in radioligand binding studies, in G Protein-Coupled Receptors (Haga T. and Berstein G., eds.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazareno S., Gharagozloo P., Kuonen D., Popham A., and Birdsall N. J. M. (1998) Subtype-selective positive cooperative interactions between brucine analogues and acetylcholine at muscarinic receptors: radioligand binding studies. Mol. Pharmacol. 53, 573–589.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lazareno S., Popham A., and Birdsall N. J. M. (2000) Allosteric interactions of staurosporine and other indolocarbazoles with N-[methyl-(3)H]scopolamine and acetylcholine at muscarinic receptor subtypes: identification of a second allosteric site. Mol. Pharmacol. 58, 194–207.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warburton D. M. (1975) Brain, Behaviour and Drugs. John Wiley & Sons, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Lazareno.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lazareno, S., Popham, A. & Birdsall, N.J.M. Towards a high-affinity allosteric enhancer at muscarinic M1 receptors. J Mol Neurosci 19, 123–127 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-002-0022-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-002-0022-6

Index Entries

Navigation