Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Utilization of Mutational Analysis (MA) in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) Management in British Columbia (BC) Between January 2008 to December 2017: a Retrospective Population-Based Study

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To examine oncologists’ practice pattern of ordering MA in localized and metastatic GISTs in British Columbia (BC).

Methods

Patients diagnosed with GIST from January 2008 to December 2017 in BC were identified. Chart review was performed to determine clinical characteristics and the use of MA as part of their oncologic care.

Results

The cohort included 411 patients: median age 64 (18–94 years), 49.1% male, primary site included stomach (53%), small intestine (32%), and others (15%). Sixty-nine percent had localized disease, while 13% presented with de novo metastatic disease and 18% had recurrent metastatic disease. MA was ordered in 41% of the patients overall, 28% in localized, and 70% in metastatic settings (63% in de novo metastasis and 78% in recurrent metastasis). Among patients with localized disease, higher MA use rates were observed among those undergoing neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatment (45%) compared to those not receiving systemic therapy (18%). While MA use rates in localized GIST did not change over time (28.5% before 2015 and 28% after 2015), MA use in metastatic disease increased from 54% before 2015 to 79% after 2015. Among all MA ordered for metastatic disease, 82.4% were ordered at the time of de novo metastatic diagnosis, and 77.4% were ordered either at the time of recurrent metastatic diagnosis or earlier when the disease was localized.

Conclusion

MA use has remained stable for localized disease but has increased after 2015 in the metastatic setting which may be due to evolving sequencing technology, expansion of metastatic treatment options, and enhanced awareness of MA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Heinrich MC, Jones RL, von Mehren M, Schöffski P, Serrano C, Kang YK, et al. Avapritinib in advanced PDGFRA D842V-mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumour (NAVIGATOR): a multicentre, open-label, phase 1 trial. Lancet Oncol [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Jan 2];21(7):935–46. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32615108/

  2. Blay JY, Serrano C, Heinrich MC, Zalcberg J, Bauer S, Gelderblom H, et al. Ripretinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours (INVICTUS): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 1];21(7):923–34. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32511981/

  3. Schöffski P, Mir O, Kasper B, Papai Z, Blay JY, Italiano A, et al. Activity and safety of the multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor cabozantinib in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour after treatment with imatinib and sunitinib: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer phase II trial 1317 ‘CaboGIST.’ Eur J Cancer. 2020;1(134):62–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Martin-Broto J, Moura DS. New drugs in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Curr Opin Oncol [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 21];32(4):314–20. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32453031

  5. Wang Y, Call J. Mutational testing in gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Curr Cancer Drug Targets [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 May 19];19(9):688–97. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30914028/

  6. Patel S. Long-term efficacy of imatinib for treatment of metastatic GIST [Internet]. Vol. 72, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol; 2013 [cited 2021 Jan 2]. p. 277–86. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23503753/

  7. Heinrich MC, Maki RG, Corless CL, Antonescu CR, Harlow A, Griffith D, et al. Primary and secondary kinase genotypes correlate with the biological and clinical activity of sunitinib in imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumor. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2008 Nov 20 [cited 2021 Jan 2];26(33):5352–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18955458/

  8. Debiec-Rychter M, Sciot R, Le Cesne A, Schlemmer M, Hohenberger P, van Oosterom AT, et al. KIT mutations and dose selection for imatinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(8):1093–103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shi E, Chmielecki J, Tang CM, Wang K, Heinrich MC, Kang G, et al. FGFR1 and NTRK3 actionable alterations in “wild-type” gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Transl Med [Internet]. 2016 Dec 14 [cited 2021 Jan 2];14(1). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27974047/

  10. Ben-Ami E, Barysauskas CM, von Mehren M, Heinrich MC, Corless CL, Butrynski JE, et al. Long-term follow-up results of the multicenter phase II trial of regorafenib in patients with metastatic and/or unresectable GI stromal tumor after failure of standard tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Ann Oncol [Internet]. 2016 Sep 1 [cited 2021 Jan 2];27(9):1794–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27371698/

  11. Mussi C, Schildhaus HU, Gronchi A, Wardelmann E, Hohenberger P. Therapeutic consequences from molecular biology for gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients affected by neurofibromatosis type 1. Clin Cancer Res [Internet]. 2008 Jul 15 [cited 2021 Jan 2];14(14):4550–5. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18628470/

  12. Mehren M Von, Randall RL, Benjamin RS, Boles S, Bui MM, Ganjoo KN, et al. Soft tissue sarcoma, version 2.2018: Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. JNCCN J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2018;16(5):536–63.

  13. Casali PG, Abecassis N, Bauer S, Biagini R, Bielack S, Bonvalot S, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: ESMO-EURACAN Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol [Internet]. 2018 Oct 1 [cited 2021 Jan 2];29(Suppl 4):iv68–78. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29846513/

  14. Florindez J, Trent J. Low frequency of mutation testing in the United States: an analysis of 3866 GIST patients. Am J Clin Oncol. 2020;43(4):270–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bartholomew AJ, Dohnalek H, Prins PA, O’Neill SC, Quadri HS, Marshall JL, et al. Underuse of exon mutational analysis for gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Surg Res. 2018;231:43–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer [Internet]. 2009 Jan [cited 2021 Mar 2];45(2):228–47. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19097774/

  17. R Core Team (2016). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

  18. Steeghs EMP, Gelderblom H, Ho VKY, Voorham QJM, Willems SM, Grünberg K, et al. Nationwide evaluation of mutation-tailored treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in daily clinical practice. Gastric Cancer [Internet]. 2021 Apr 28 [cited 2021 May 19]; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-021-01190-9

  19. Joensuu H, Vehtari A, Riihimäki J, Nishida T, Steigen SE, Brabec P, et al. Risk of recurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumour after surgery: an analysis of pooled population-based cohorts. Lancet Oncol [Internet]. 2012 Mar [cited 2021 Mar 21];13(3):265–74. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22153892/

  20. Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Sundby Hall K, Reichardt A, Hermes B, Schütte J, et al. Survival outcomes associated with 3 years vs 1 year of adjuvant imatinib for patients with high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an analysis of a randomized clinical trial after 10-year follow-up. JAMA Oncol [Internet]. 2020 Aug 1 [cited 2021 Mar 17];6(8):1241–6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32469385/

  21. Patrikidou A, Domont J, Chabaud S, Ray-Coquard I, Coindre JM, Bui-Nguyen B, et al. Long-term outcome of molecular subgroups of GIST patients treated with standard-dose imatinib in the BFR14 trial of the French Sarcoma Group. Eur J Cancer [Internet]. 2016 Jan 1 [cited 2021 Mar 1];52:173–80. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26687836/

  22. Antonescu CR, Besmer P, Guo T, Arkun K, Hom G, Koryotowski B, et al. Acquired resistance to imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumor occurs through secondary gene mutation. Clin Cancer Res [Internet]. 2005 Jun 1 [cited 2021 Apr 3];11(11):4182–90. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15930355/

  23. Serrano C, Mariño-Enríquez A, Tao DL, Ketzer J, Eilers G, Zhu M, et al. Complementary activity of tyrosine kinase inhibitors against secondary kit mutations in imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Br J Cancer [Internet]. 2019 Mar 19 [cited 2021 Apr 3];120(6):612–20. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30792533/

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank all patients and sarcoma physicians at BC Cancer and across 15 academic cancer centers in Canada who participated in this study and Colleen Wong and colleagues in BC Cancer Surveillance and Outcome and BC Cancer Sarcoma Outcome Unit.

Funding

We received a Glenita Mungcal GIST research award from Sarcoma Life Raft Group Canada to help support this research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.H.L, C.S., C.H., P.T., and X.F. conceived and designed the study. T.P., J.C., H.L, P.T., and X.F. wrote the manuscript with additional text and feedback from all authors. T.P., J.C., H.L, A.D., C.C., and X.F. performed the data collection and analysis. C.H.L., S.Y., C.S., and X.F. supervised the data generation. J.H., P.P., C.H., P.T., and X.F. supervised the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaolan Feng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

This study was approved by the University of British Columbia Research Ethics Board (REB# H19-02339).

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patterson, T., Chai, J., Li, H. et al. Utilization of Mutational Analysis (MA) in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) Management in British Columbia (BC) Between January 2008 to December 2017: a Retrospective Population-Based Study. J Gastrointest Canc 53, 709–717 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-021-00682-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-021-00682-2

Keywords

Navigation