Abstract
Background
Rectal cancer represents a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Staging defines the local and distant extent of the disease, guides management, and predicts prognosis. Different modalities are available for staging including TRUS (transrectal ultrasound), CT (computed tomography), and MRI (magnetic resonance imaging).
Objective
The objective of this study was to screen and isolate CT imaging parameters suggestive of advanced rectal cancer and its utility as a tool in simplifying the staging protocol making further imaging studies unnecessary.
Design
Retrospective, single center study.
Patients and Settings
Seventy-five patients with rectal carcinoma were included and were divided into two groups according to their T score and nodal involvement status, as diagnosed by TRUS. Group 1 (n = 15) “local disease” (T1/T2 N0) and group 2 (n = 60) “locally advanced disease” are both eligible for neoadjuvant treatment (N/any T or T3/any N). For each patient, three CT imaging parameters that represent locally advanced disease, i.e., perirectal fat infiltration, local lymphadenopathy, and rectal wall thickening, were evaluated and compared between the two groups.
Main Outcome Measure
The capability of CT imaging to accurately predict locally advanced rectal carcinoma.
Results
Rectal wall thickening on CT was found to have 92% PPV and perirectal lymphadenopathy 96% PPV for predicting a locally advanced stage. A combination of those two parameters results in a predictive PPV of 98%.
Limitations
This was a single center retrospective study, with a relatively small cohort.
Conclusions
CT is a valuable tool in the assessment and management of rectal carcinoma as it can identify locally advanced rectal cancer. This enables treatment without any further unnecessary evaluation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492.
Nerad E, Lahaye MJ, Maas M, Nelemans P, Bakers FCH, Beets GL, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of CT for local staging of colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Roentgenol. 2016;207:984–95. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.15.15785.
Glimelius B, Tiret E, Cervantes A, Arnold D, Group W. clinical practice guidelines. Rectal cancer : ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines clinical practice guidelines. 2013;24. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt240.
Wu JS. Rectal Cancer Staging. 2007;1:148–57. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-984859.
Crane CH, Skibber J. Preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer: rationale, technique, and results of treatment. Semin Surg Oncol. 2003;21:265–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/ssu.10046.
Påhlman L, Glimelius B. Pre- or postoperative radiotherapy in rectal and rectosigmoid carcinoma. Report from a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 1990;211:187–95.
Siddiqui AA, Fayiga Y, Huerta S. International seminars in surgical the role of endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of rectal cancer. 2006;7:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7800-3-36.
Valentini V, Glimelius B, Minsky BD, Van Cutsem E, Bartelink H, Beets-Tan RGH, et al. The multidisciplinary rectal cancer treatment: Main convergences, controversial aspects and investigational areas which support the need for an European consensus. Radiother Oncol. 2005;76:241–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2005.07.001.
Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Bartram CI, et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology. 2005;237:893–904. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2373050176.
Dewhurst C, Rosen MP, Blake MA, Baker ME, Cash BD, Fidler JL, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria pretreatment staging of colorectal cancer. J Am Coll Radiol. 2012;9:775–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2012.07.025.
Puli SR, Reddy JBK, Bechtold ML, Choudhary A. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound to diagnose nodal invasion by rectal cancers: a meta-analysis and systematic review. 2009:1255–65. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0337-4.
Al-Sukhni E, Milot L, Fruitman M, Beyene J, Victor JC, Schmocker S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for assessment of T category, lymph node metastases, and circumferential resection margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:2212–23. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-2210-5.
Bianchi P, Ceriani C, Rottoli M, Torzilli G, Pompili G, Malesci A, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance in preoperative staging of rectal cancer: comparison with histologic findings. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9:1222–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.07.008.
Kristina Gregory NM, Lisa Gurski O, Benson AB, Venook AP, Helen Diller Family U, Al-Hawary MM, et al. Continue NCCN guidelines panel disclosures. 2018.
Harewood GC, Wiersema MJ. Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography in the evaluation of proximal rectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:874–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05603.x.
Kauer WKH, Prantl L, Dittler HJ, Siewert JR. The value of endosonographic rectal carcinoma staging in routine diagnostics: a 10-year analysis. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1075–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9088-7.
Harewood GC, Wiersema MJ, Nelson H, Maccarty RL, Olson JE, Clain JE, et al. A prospective, blinded assessment of the impact of preoperative staging on the management of rectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:24–32.
Puli SR, Reddy JBK, Bechtold ML, Choudhary A, Antillon MR, Brugge WR. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound to diagnose nodal invasion by rectal cancers: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1255–65. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0337-4.
Raman SP, Chen Y, Fishman EK. Evolution of imaging in rectal cancer: multimodality imaging with MDCT, MRI, and PET. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015;6:172–84. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2014.108.
Juchems MS, Ernst AS, Kornmann M, Barth TF, Kramer K, Brambs H-J, et al. Value of MDCT in preoperative local staging of rectal cancer for predicting the necessity for neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Rofo. 2009;181:1168–74. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1109356.
Vliegen R, Dresen R, Beets G, Daniels-Gooszen A, Kessels A, van Engelshoven J, et al. The accuracy of multi-detector row CT for the assessment of tumor invasion of the mesorectal fascia in primary rectal cancer. Abdom Imaging. 2008;33:604–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9341-y.
Kanamoto T, Matsuki M, Okuda J, Inada Y, Tatsugami F, Tanikake M, et al. Preoperative evaluation of local invasion and metastatic lymph nodes of colorectal cancer and mesenteric vascular variations using multidetector-row computed tomography before laparoscopic surgery. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007;31:831–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0b013e3180517af3.
Taylor A, Slater A, Mapstone N, Taylor S, Halligan S. Staging rectal cancer: MRI compared to MDCT. Abdom Imaging. 2007;32:323–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-006-9081-4.
Sinha R, Verma R, Rajesh A, Richards CJ. Diagnostic value of multidetector row CT in rectal cancer staging: comparison of multiplanar and axial images with histopathology. Clin Radiol. 2006;61:924–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2006.03.019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gal, O., Feldman, D., Mari, A. et al. Computerized Tomography Criteria as a Tool for Simplifying the Assessment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. J Gastrointest Canc 51, 130–134 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-019-00220-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-019-00220-1