Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of Left Colonic Artery Preservation on Anastomotic Leakage in Laparoscopic Sigmoid Resection and Anterior Resection for Sigmoid and Rectosigmoid Colon Cancer

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the effect of left colonic artery (LCA) preservation on laparoscopic sigmoidectomy outcomes

Methods

We identified 447 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic sigmoidectomy at our hospital group between January 2010 and December 2016. We divided the patients into groups with and without LCA preservation and with and without anastomotic leakage (AL). We compared the patient age and gender, tumor location, stage, D2/D3 lymph node dissection, comorbidities, operating time, and blood loss between these groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the risk factors for AL.

Results

There were significant differences in age, sex, tumor location, D2/D3 lymph node dissection, hypertension, operating time, blood loss, and AL for groups with and without LCA preservation. There were significant differences in sex, tumor location, and LCA preservation for groups with and without AL. Multivariate analysis showed male sex (hazard ratio (HR) = 6.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.39–20.6; p < 0.0001), non-LCA preservation (HR = 5.01, 95% CI 1.41–31.8.0; p = 0.01), and rectosigmoidal tumor location (HR = 2.51, 95% CI 1.15–5.61; p = 0.01) as significant independent risk factors for AL.

Conclusions

Based on the results obtained by performing laparoscopic operation for sigmoid colon cancer and rectosigmoid cancer, the LCA preservative procedure is warranted for prevention of AL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

LCA:

Left colonic artery

IMA:

Inferior mesenteric artery

AL:

Anastomotic leakage

HR:

Hazard ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

DM:

Diabetes mellitus

HT:

Hypertension

References

  1. Frasson M, Flor-Lorente B, Rodriguez JL, Granero-Castro P, Hervas D, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leak after colon resection for cancer: multivariate analysis and nomogram from a multicentric, prospective, National Study with 3193 patients. Ann Surg. 2015;262:321–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Park IJ, Kim JC. Adequate length of the distal resection margin in rectal cancer: from the oncological point of view. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:1331–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim HJ, Huh JW, Kim HR, Kim YJ. Oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery according to the use of fibrin glue: case-control study using propensity score matching method. Am J Surg. 2013.

  4. Kawada K, Hasegawa S, Wada T, Takahashi R, Hisamori S, Hida K, et al. Evaluation of intestinal perfusion by ICG fluorescence imaging in laparoscopic colorectal surgery with DST anastomosis. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:1061–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sekimoto M, Takemasa I, Mizushima T, Ikeda M, Yamamoto H, Doki Y, et al. Laparoscopic lymph node dissection around the inferior mesenteric artery with preservation of the left colic artery. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:861–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kanemitsu Y, Hirai T, Komori K, Kato T. Survival benefit of high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in sigmoid colon or rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2006;93:609–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yasuda K, Kawai K, Ishihara S, Murono K, Otani K, Nishikawa T, et al. Level of arterial ligation in sigmoid colon and rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14:99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hinoi T, Okajima M, Shimomura M, Egi H, Ohdan H, Konishi F, et al. Effect of left colonic artery preservation on anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic anterior resection for middle and low rectal cancer. World J Surg. 2013;37:2935–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, et al. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1324–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kitano S, Inomata M, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, Watanabe M, Yamamoto S, et al. Survival outcomes following laparoscopic versus open D3 dissection for stage II or III colon cancer (JCOG0404): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2:261–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Seike K, Koda K, Saito N, Oda K, Kosugi C, Shimizu K, et al. Laser Doppler assessment of the influence of division at the root of the inferior mesenteric artery on anastomotic blood flow in rectosigmoid cancer surgery. Int J Color Dis. 2007;22:689–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Meyers MA. Griffiths’ point: critical anastomosis at the splenic flexure. Significance in ischemia of the colon. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1976;126:77–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Park JS, Choi GS, Kim SH, Kim HR, Kim NK, Lee KY, et al. Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer excision: the Korean laparoscopic colorectal surgery study group. Ann Surg. 2013;257:665–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lange MM, Buunen M, van de Velde CJ, Lange JF. Level of arterial ligation in rectal cancer surgery: low tie preferred over high tie. A review. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1139–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rutegard M, Hemmingsson O, Matthiessen P, Rutegard J. High tie in anterior resection for rectal cancer confers no increased risk of anastomotic leakage. Br J Surg. 2012;99:127–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bonnet S, Berger A, Hentati N, Abid B, Chevallier JM, Wind P, et al. High tie versus low tie vascular ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer surgery: impact on the gain in colon length and implications on the feasibility of anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:515–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yamamoto S, Inomata M, Katayama H, Mizusawa J, Etoh T, Konishi F, et al. Short-term surgical outcomes from a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic and open D3 dissection for stage II/III colon cancer: Japan clinical oncology group study JCOG 0404. Ann Surg. 2014;260:23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study concept and design: SM; data acquisition: HK, SM, K. Sakamoto; analysis and interpretation of data: HK, SM, K. Sugimoto, YM, KS, RY, SU, ST, SS, TK, HO, MS, HM; drafting of the manuscript: SM; critical revision of the manuscript: K. Sato.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shinya Munakata.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Committee on Human Experimentation of our institution.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kato, H., Munakata, S., Sakamoto, K. et al. Impact of Left Colonic Artery Preservation on Anastomotic Leakage in Laparoscopic Sigmoid Resection and Anterior Resection for Sigmoid and Rectosigmoid Colon Cancer. J Gastrointest Canc 50, 723–727 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-018-0126-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-018-0126-z

Keywords

Navigation