EUS-Guided Biliary Drainage for Unresectable Malignant Biliary Obstruction: 10-Year Experience of 99 Cases at a Single Center

  • Yoshihide Kanno
  • Shinsuke Koshita
  • Takahisa Ogawa
  • Kaori Masu
  • Hiroaki Kusunose
  • Toshitaka Sakai
  • Toji Murabayashi
  • Sho Hasegawa
  • Fumisato Kozakai
  • Keisuke Yonamine
  • Yujiro Kawakami
  • Yuki Fujii
  • Jun Horaguchi
  • Yutaka Noda
  • Kei Ito
Original Research
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate clinical outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction for cases in which endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) failed at a high-volume center.

Methods

All 99 EUS-BD cases of unresectable malignant biliary obstruction at Sendai City Medical Center between February 2007 and September 2017 were retrospectively evaluated. ERCP is strictly prioritized over EUS-BD during the study period, and EUS-BD was performed in cases wherein ERCP was impossible or ineffective. Technical success, clinical success, adverse events, and time to recurrence of biliary obstruction were evaluated.

Results

EUS-BD was technically successful in 98% of the patients (97/99). The clinical success rate was 93% (90/97). Adverse events that were definitely related to the procedure were observed in ten patients (10%; peritonitis in six, acute cholecystitis in four). Of six patients with bile peritonitis, four suffered from mild localized peritonitis that improved with conservative treatment, whereas two developed pan-peritonitis that improved with additional intervention. Other three patients with a poor performance status succumbed shortly after the successful EUS-BD, with a possible association between the procedure and death. In the 68 patients with a bilioenteric stent, the median time to recurrence of biliary obstruction was 339 days (95% confidence interval (CI), 14–664 days) during the mean follow-up period of 136 ± 173 days.

Conclusion

EUS-BD was found to be feasible. However, there were a few patients with an unfavorable course after successful EUS-BD.

Keywords

Endosonography Choledochoduodenostomy Hepaticogastrostomy Indication Adverse event 

Notes

Author Contribution

All authors had access to the study data and reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Both the EUS-BD procedure and this study were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Sendai City Medical Center. Written informed consent for EUS-BD was obtained with presenting risks and benefits in comparison with other possible options from all patients before the procedure.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Giovannini M, Moutardier V, Pesenti C, Bories E, Lelong B, Delpero JR. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided bilioduodenal anastomosis: a new technique for biliary drainage. Endoscopy. 2001;33:898–900.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Horaguchi J, Fujita N, Noda Y, Kobayashi G, Ito K, Obana T, et al. Endosonography-guided biliary drainage in cases with difficult transpapillary endoscopic biliary drainage. Dig Endosc. 2009;21:239–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yamao K, Bhatia V, Mizuno N, Sawaki A, Ishikawa H, Tajika M, et al. EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy for palliative biliary drainage in patients with malignant biliary obstruction; results of long-term follow-up. Endoscopy. 2008;40:340–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hara K, Yamao K, Niwa Y, Sawaki A, Mizuno N, Hijioka S, et al. Prospective clinical study of EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy for malignant lower biliary tract obstruction. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1239–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Park DH, Jang JW, Lee SS, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH. EUS-guided biliary drainage with transluminal stenting after failed ERCP: predictors of adverse events and long-term results. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:1276–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Horaguchi J, Fujita N, Noda Y, Kobayashi G, Ito K, Koshita S, et al. Metallic stent deployment in endosonography-guided biliary drainage: long-term follow-up results in patients with bilio-enteric anastomosis. Dig Endosc. 2012;24:457–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (1999) Common toxicity criteria, version 2.0. http://ctepcancergov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/ctcv20_4-30-992pdf April 30, 1999.
  8. 8.
    Sharaiha RZ, Khan MA, Kamel F, Tyberg A, Tombazzi CR, Ali B, et al. Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage in comparison with percutaneous biliary drainage when ERCP fails: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:904–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harsha M, Bechtold ML, Forcione D, Srinivas P. A meta-analysis and systematic review: success of endoscopic ultrasound guided biliary stenting in patients with inoperable malignant biliary strictures and a failed ERCP. Medicine. 2017;96(3):e5154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kawakubo K, Isayama H, Kato H, Itoi T, Kawakami H, Hanada K, et al. Multicenter retrospective study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction in Japan. J Heparobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014;21:328–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dhir V, Itoi T, Khashab M, Oark DH, Bun AY, Attam R, et al. Multicenter comparative evaluation of endoscopic placement expandable metal stent for malignant distal common bile duct obstruction by ERCP or EUS-guided approach. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;81:913–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khashab MA, Van der Merwe S, Kunda R, El Zein MH, Teoh AY, Marson FP, et al. Prospective international multicenter study on endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endosc Int Open. 2016;4:E487–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kanno Y, Ito K, Koshita S, Ogawa T, Masu K, Masaki Y, et al. Efficacy of a newly developed dilator for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;16:304–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Binmoeller KB, Shah J. A novel lumen-apposing stent for transluminal drainage of nonadherent extraintestinal fluid collections. Endoscopy. 2011;43:337–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Itoi T, Binmoeller KB, Shah J, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Kurihara T, et al. Clinical evaluation of a novel lumen-apposing metal stent for endosonography-guided pancreatic pseutocyst and gallbladder drainage (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:870–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tsuchiya T, Teoh AYB, Itoi T, Yamao K, Hara K, Nakai Y, Isayama H, Kitano M (2017) Long-term outcomes of EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy using a lumen-apposing metal stent for malignant distal biliary obstruction: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest EndoscGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoshihide Kanno
    • 1
  • Shinsuke Koshita
    • 1
  • Takahisa Ogawa
    • 1
  • Kaori Masu
    • 1
  • Hiroaki Kusunose
    • 1
  • Toshitaka Sakai
    • 1
  • Toji Murabayashi
    • 1
  • Sho Hasegawa
    • 1
  • Fumisato Kozakai
    • 1
  • Keisuke Yonamine
    • 1
  • Yujiro Kawakami
    • 1
  • Yuki Fujii
    • 1
  • Jun Horaguchi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yutaka Noda
    • 1
  • Kei Ito
    • 1
  1. 1.Sendai City Medical CenterSendaiJapan
  2. 2.Natori Chuo ClinicNatoriJapan

Personalised recommendations