Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcomes of Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical and Upper Thoracic Esophageal Cancers: a Single-Institution Experience of a Rare Cancer

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Upper esophageal carcinomas are uncommon but confer a poor prognosis. However, there is scarcity of data regarding outcomes of definitive chemoradiotherapy for cervical and upper thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Iran.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of cervical and upper thoracic esophagus (at 16 to 25 cm from incisors) treated by definitive chemoradiotherapy in our institution between 2007 and 2015. The primary outcome was overall survival and secondary endpoints were predictors of overall survival.

Results

From 2007 to 2015, 40 patients were entered to final analysis. The mean age of patients was 59.7 ± 14.3 (range 24–85 years). Sixteen (40%) were node-positive. The median follow-up time was 15.3 months. Twenty-seven patients (67.5%) died during post treatment period. Thirty-five percent and 25% of patients suffered from local and distant recurrences, respectively. The actuarial median overall survival was 19.2 (CI 95% 14.2–24.2) months. The 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 76 and 38%, respectively. The overall survival was higher among patients who were younger than 50 years, of female gender, had stage II tumor, grades I to II, who received induction chemotherapy, and whom treated with doses < 60 Gy. However, none of the differences was statistically significant.

Conclusions

Cervical and upper thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinomas are associated with bad outcome. Studies with bigger sample sizes are required to define best treatment strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF. Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2006;24(14):2137–50. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.05.2308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoeben A, Polak J, Van De Voorde L, Hoebers F, Grabsch HI, de Vos-Geelen J. Cervical esophageal cancer: a gap in cancer knowledge: table 1. Ann Oncol [Internet]. 2016;27(9):1664–74. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/annonc/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/annonc/mdw183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Grass GD, Cooper SL, Armeson K, Garrett-Mayer E, Sharma A. Cervical esophageal cancer: a population-based study. Head Neck [Internet]. 2015;37(6):808–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Laterza E, Mosciaro O, Urso US, Inaspettato G, Cordiano C. Primary carcinoma of the hypopharynx and cervical esophagus: evolution of surgical therapy. Hepatogastroenterology [Internet]. 1994;41(3):278–82. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7959554.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tong DKH, Law S, Kwong DLW, Wei WI, Ng RWM, Wong KH. Current management of cervical esophageal cancer. World J Surg [Internet]. 2011;35(3):600–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0876-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cooper JS, Guo MD, Herskovic A, Macdonald JS, Martenson James AJ, Al-Sarraf M, et al. Chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced esophageal cancer. JAMA [Internet]. 1999;281(17):462–7. Available from: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jama.281.17.1623

    Google Scholar 

  7. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN guidelines). Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers[internet]. 2017. Available from: http://nccn.org.

  8. Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(6):1471–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lagergren P, Avery KNL, Hughes R, Barham CP, Alderson D, Falk SJ, et al. Health-related quality of life among patients cured by surgery for esophageal cancer. Cancer [Internet]. 2007;110(3):686–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Blazeby JM, Farndon JR, Donovan J, Alderson D. A prospective longitudinal study examining the quality of life of patients with esophageal carcinoma. Cancer [Internet]. 2000;88(8):1781–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291097-0142%2820000415%2988%3A8%3C1781%3A%3AAID-CNCR4%3E3.0.CO%3B2-G.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang SH, Lockwood G, Brierley J, Cummings B, Kim J, Wong R, et al. Effect of concurrent high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy and conformal radiotherapy on cervical esophageal cancer survival. Int J Radiat Oncol [Internet]. 2008;71(3):735–40. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301607044215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang H-W, Chu P-Y, Kuo K-T, Yang C-H, Chang S-Y, Hsu W-H, et al. A reappraisal of surgical management for squamous cell carcinoma in the pharyngoesophageal junction. J Surg Oncol [Internet]. 2006;93(6):468–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.20472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chan A, Wong A, Turrisi A, et al. Is combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy equally effective as surgical resection in localized esophageal carcinoma? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys [Internet]. 1999;45(2):265–70. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10487544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hironaka S, Ohtsu A, Boku N, Muto M, Nagashima F, Saito H, et al. Nonrandomized comparison between definitive chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery in patients with T2–3Nany M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Int J Radiat Oncol [Internet]. 2003;57(2):425–33. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301603005856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ishikura S, Nihei K, Ohtsu A, Boku N, Hironaka S, Mera K, et al. Long-term toxicity after definitive chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2003;21(14):2697–702. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2003.03.055.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mendenhall WM, Sombeck MD, Parsons JT, Kasper ME, Stringer SP, Vogel SB. Management of cervical esophageal carcinoma. Semin Radiat Oncol [Internet]. 1994;4(3):179–91. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053429605800669

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Burmeister BH, Dickie G, Smithers BM, Hodge R, Morton K. Thirty-four patients with carcinoma of the cervical esophagus treated with chemoradiation therapy. Arch Otolaryngol Neck Surg [Internet]. 2000;126(2):205. Available from: http://archotol.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/archotol.126.2.205–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Triboulet JP, Mariette C, Chevalier D, Amrouni H. Surgical management of carcinoma of the hypopharynx and cervical esophagus: analysis of 209 cases. Arch Surg [Internet]. 2001;136(10):1164–70. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11585510

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bentzen SM. Repopulation in radiation oncology: perspectives of clinical research. Int J Radiat Biol. 2003;79(7):581–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim JJ, Tannock IF. Repopulation of cancer cells during therapy: an important cause of treatment failure. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5(7):516–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Glynne-Jones R, Hoskin P. Neoadjuvant cisplatin chemotherapy before chemoradiation: a flawed paradigm? J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2007;25(33):5281–6. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.12.3133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Minsky BD, Pajak TF, Ginsberg RJ, Pisansky TM, Martenson J, Komaki R, et al. INT 0123 (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 94-05) phase III trial of combined-modality therapy for esophageal cancer: high-dose versus standard-dose radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2002;20(5):1167–74. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11870157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reza Ghalehtaki.

Ethics declarations

Our study was reviewed and approved by the institutional review board and ethics committee to be in agreement with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki “Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects,” amended in October 2013, (www.wma.net). Patients provide informed consent at the time of admission to our cancer institution to share their disease information for future investigations.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Esmati, E., Maddah Safaei, A., Ghalehtaki, R. et al. Outcomes of Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical and Upper Thoracic Esophageal Cancers: a Single-Institution Experience of a Rare Cancer. J Gastrointest Canc 50, 380–385 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-018-0081-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-018-0081-8

Keywords

Navigation