Role of VEGF, CD105, and CD31 in the Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer Cases

  • Salem Y. Mohamed
  • Hanan Lotfy Mohammed
  • Hanaa M. Ibrahim
  • Mohamed Elshaimaa M. 
  • Mona Salah
Original Research

Abstract

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence is increasing globally. It is ranked as the second most common cancer in women and the third most in men. Angiogenesis plays a significant role in the development and spread of colorectal cancer. Angiogenesis has been proposed as a prognostic marker in a variety of human neoplasms. In this regard, markers of angiogenic endothelial cells are emerging as targets for cancer therapy.

Aim of the Work

The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic impact of tumor angiogenesis assessed by microvessel density (MVD) counting using CD31 and CD105 along with VEGF immunostaining in colorectal cancer patients.

Methods

VEGF, CD31, and CD105 expressions were evaluated using immunohistochemical staining in 50 patients with colorectal cancer. The relationship between their expressions and clinicopathological factors and outcome of patients were analyzed.

Results

The VEGF expression (70% of the cases) correlated significantly with larger tumor size, higher grade, and advanced tumor stage (p = 0.006, p < 0.001, p < 0.001), respectively. The mean MVD was 24.2 ± VMD by CD105 (p = 0.10.65 019 for CD105, 19.2 ± 8.41 for CD31, respectively. MVD by CD31 (p = 0.023)) and was significant predictive factors for overall survival. Furthermore, the VEGF expression (p = < 0.001) was a significant predictive factor for DFS. There was a statistically significant association between the recurrence rates with both VEGF and CD105 (p < 0.001) but not significant with CD31.

Conclusion

CRC patients with high VEGF, CD105, and CD31 expression showed poor prognosis. The immunohistochemical markers could be used for stratification of patients into low-risk and high-risk groups.

Keywords

VEGF CD105 CD31 Colorectal cancer 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Abdel Dayem HM, Abd El All HS, Kamel AA, Yossef WT, Hamma MM. Correlation of vascular endothelial growth factor expression and neovascularization with colorectal carcinoma: a pilot study. J Adenocarcinoma. 2016;1(1):5.  https://doi.org/10.21767/2572-309X.10005.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abdelzaher E, El Deeb NM, Gowil AG, Yahya. Biological and demographic profile of meningiomas in a cohort of Egyptian patients: impact on tumor recurrence. Sci World J. 2013;2013:375139.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/375139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bendardaf R, Buhmeida A, Hilska M, et al. VEGF-1expression in colorectal cancer is associated with disease localization, stage, and long-term disease-specific survival. Anticancer Res. 2008;28(6B):3865–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bergers G, Benjamin LE. Tumorigenesis and the angiogenic switch. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:401–410.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cammarota R, Bertolini V, Penne G. The tumor microenvironment of colorectal cancer: stromal TLR-4 expression as a potential prognostic marker. J Transl Med. 2010;8:112.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carmeliet P. VEGF as a key mediator of angiogenesis in cancer. Oncology. 2005;69:34–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen YB, Wan DS, Zhan YQ, Zhou ZW, Li W, Chen G. Correlation of tumor microvessel density to metastasis and recurrence of rectal cancer. Ai Zheng. 2004;23:1203–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chung J, Braunschweig T, Hong S, et al. Assessment of vascular endothelial growth factor in formalin fixed, paraffin-embedded colon cancer specimens using a well-based reverse phase protein array. Proteome Sci. 2014;12:27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dallas NA, Samuel S, Xia L, et al. Endoglin (CD105): a marker of tumor vasculature and a potential target for therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(7):1931–7.  https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4478.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dassoulas K, Gazouli M, Theodoropoulos M, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor and endoglin expression in colorectal cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010;136(5):703–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deliu C, Ciurea P, Neagoe D, et al. Evaluation of Angiogenesis in Colorectal Cancer. Current Health Sciences. 2015;41(2).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Deliu IC, Neagoe CD, Beznă M, et al. Correlations between endothelial cell markers CD31, CD34 and CD105 in colorectal carcinoma. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2016;57(3):1025–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ferroni P, Palmirotta R, Spila A, Martini F, et al. Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen and vascular endothelial growth factor tumor tissue content in colorectal cancer. Oncology. 2006;71:176–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gulubova M, Vlaykova T. Prognostic significance of mast cell number and microvascular density for the survival of patients with primary colorectal cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;4(7):1265–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hamilton SR, Vogelstein B, Kudo S, Riboli E, Nakamura S, et al. World Health Organization Classification Of Tumours: Pathology and genetics of tumors of the digestive system. Lyon: IARC Press; 2000. p. 104–143.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hashim AF, Al-Janabi AA, Mahdi LH, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor expression correlates with histologic grade and stage of colorectal cancer. Libyan J Med. 2010;5  https://doi.org/10.3402/ljm.v5i0.5059.
  18. 18.
    Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:225–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jamshidi S, Zargaran M, Baghaei F, et al. An immunohistochemical survey to evaluate the expression of CD105 and CD34 in ameloblastoma and odontogenic keratocyst. J Dent (Shiraz). 2014;15(4):192–8.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jung I, Gurzu S, Ranica M, et al. The differences between the endothelial area marked with CD31 and CD105 in colorectal carcinomas by computer-assisted morphometrical analysis. Romanian J Morphol Embryol. 2009;50(2):239–43.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kannarkatt J, Joseph J, Kurniali PC, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer: a clinical dilemma. J Oncol Pract. 2017;13(4):233–41.  https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2016.017210.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Khorana AA, Ryan CK, Cox C, Eberly S, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor, CD68, and epidermal growth factor receptor expression and survival in patients with Stage II and Stage III colon carcinoma: a role for the host response in prognosis. Cancer. 2003;97:960–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li C, Gardy R, Seon BK, et al. Both high intratumoral microvessel densities determined using a CD105 antibody, and elevated plasma levels of CD105 in colorectal cancer patients correlate with poor prognosis. Br J Cancer. 2003;88:1424–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Minhajat R, Mori D, Yamasaki F, et al. Endoglin (CD105) expression in angiogenesis of colon cancer: analysis using tissue microarrays and comparison with other endothelial markers. Virchows Arch. 2006;448(2):127–34. Epub 2005 Sep 22CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mohamed AH, Abd El All SH, Kamel AA, et al. Correlation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression and Neovascularization with Colorectal Carcinoma: A Pilot Study .journal of adenocarcinoma. 2016;1(1):5Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mokhtar N, Gouda I, Adel I. Cancer pathology registry (2003–2004) and time trend analysis. In: Mokhtar N, Gouda I, Adel I, editors. Malignant digestive system tumors. Cairo: NCI, Elshere press; 2007. p. 55–67.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nakayama H, Enzan H, Miyazaki E, et al. Differential expression of CD34 in normal colorectal tissue, peritumoral inflammatory tissue, and tumourstroma. J Clin Pathol. 2000;53(8):626–9.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Raica M, Cimpean AM, Ribatti D. Angiogenesis in pre-malignant conditions. Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jul;45(11):1924–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Redston M. Epithelial neoplasm of the large intestine. In: Odze RD, Goldblum JR, Crawford JM (eds). Surgical pathology of the GI tract, liver, biliary tract, and pancreas. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2004. p. 441–472Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Saad RS, Jasnosz KM, Silverman JF. Endoglin (CD105) expression in endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2003;22:248–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Saad RS, Liu YL, Nathan G, et al. Endoglin (CD105) and vascular endothelial growth factor as prognostic markers in colorectal cancer. Mod Pathol. 2004 Feb;17(2):197–203.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Saad RS, El-Gohary YL, Memari E, Liu YL, Silverman JF. Endoglin (CD105) and vascular endothelial growth factor as prognostic markers in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2005;36:955–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schoenleber SJ, Kurtz DM, Talwalkar JA, Roberts LR, et al. Prognostic role of vascular endothelial growth factor in hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2009;100:1385–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Soumaoro LT, Uetake H, Higuchi T, Takagi Y, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression: a significant prognostic indicator for patients with colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:8465–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Takahashi N, Kawanishi-Tabata R, Haba A, et al. Association of serum endoglin with metastasis in patients with colorectal, breast, and other solid tumors, and suppressive effect of chemotherapy on the serum endoglin. Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7(3):524–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tien YW, Chang KJ, Jeng M, et al. Tumor angiogenesis and its possible role in intravasation of colorectal epithelial cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7(6):1627–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Uribarrena AR, Ortego J, Fuentes J, et al. Prognostic value of microvascular density in Dukes A and B (T1–T4, N0, M0) colorectal carcinomas. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2009;2009:679830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wang Y, Yao X, Ge J, et al. Can vascular endothelial growth factor and microvessel density be used as prognostic biomarkers for colorectal cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci World J. 2014:102736.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Weidner N. Current pathologic methods for measuring intratumoral microvessel density within breast carcinoma and other solid tumors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1995;36:169–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    World Health Organization. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Colorectal Cancer: Estimated Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide in 2012. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Available at http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_cance r.aspx. Accessed July 1, 2014.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Salem Y. Mohamed
    • 1
  • Hanan Lotfy Mohammed
    • 2
  • Hanaa M. Ibrahim
    • 2
  • Mohamed Elshaimaa M. 
    • 3
  • Mona Salah
    • 4
  1. 1.Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of MedicineZagazig UniversityZagazigEgypt
  2. 2.Pathology Department, Faculty of MedicineZagazig UniversityZagazigEgypt
  3. 3.Radiology Department, Faculty of MedicineZagazig UniversityZagazigEgypt
  4. 4.Medical Oncology Department, Faculty of MedicineZagazig UniversityZagazigEgypt

Personalised recommendations