Clinicopathological Associations of K-RAS and N-RAS Mutations in Indonesian Colorectal Cancer Cohort
K-RAS and recently N-RAS gene mutation testing are mandatory requirements prior to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody treatment of metastatic CRC. Mutation prevalence and distribution in Indonesian colorectal cancer (CRC) are not known.
Combined methods of PCR high-resolution melt (HRM), restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), and direct DNA sequencing were used to genotype exons 2, 3, and 4 of both K-RAS and N-RAS genes for routine clinical testing of CRC patients. Descriptive analytical review of 595 consecutive CRC patients (years 2013 to 2016) was performed to find associations between gene mutations and clinicopathologic features.
This retrospective study revealed overall K-RAS gene mutation in exon 2 (codon 12 and 13) rates being 34.9%. Women (42.5%), stages I and II (43.4%), and well and moderate differentiations (37.7%) had higher frequency of K-RAS exon 2 mutations than men (29%, p = 0.006), stages (III and IV 31.9%, p = 0.05), and poor differentiation (11.8%, p = 0.002), respectively. At later period (2015–2016), 121 of 595 patients were genotyped for the remaining exons 3 and 4 of K-RAS as well as exons 2, 3, and 4 of N-RAS mutations resulting in overall RAS mutation prevalence of 41%. Mucinous histology had highest frequency of N-RAS mutation.
Combination of PCR HRM with either RFLP or direct DNA sequencing was useful to detect K-RAS exon 2 and extended RAS mutations, respectively. Frequency of all RAS mutations in stage IV Indonesian (41%) was similar among Asians (41–49%), which tend to be lower than western (55%) CRC.
KeywordsK-RAS N-RAS Colorectal cancer mutation Indonesia High-resolution melting Asian
This research effort was funded by an internal grant for PT Kalbe Farma Tbk. We thanked Fitria Yunida, Dewi Nawangwulan, and Siska Yogiwanti for excellent technical assistance.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This study was determined to be exempt by the Institutional Review Board and performed in accordance to 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments. This retrospective study was approved by Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Stem-cell and Cancer Institute (SCI).
Conflict of interest
ML, GP, FS, and AU are employees of PT Kalbe Farma; GW and WG are senior pathologists receiving honoraria from PT Bifarma Adiluhung, Kalbe Farma; and all other authors have declared no conflicts of interests.
- 1.Kokki I, Papana A, Campbell H, Theodoratou E. Estimating the incidence of colorectal cancer in South East Asia. Croat Med J. 2013;54:532–40.Google Scholar
- 2.Pourhoseingholi MA. Increased burden of colorectal cancer in Asia. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2012;4(4):68–70.Google Scholar
- 3.Presario. Molecular profile of colorectal cancer in Indonesia: is there another pathway? Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2012;5:71–8.Google Scholar
- 7.Negru S, Papadopoulou E, Apessos A, Stanculeanu DL, Ciuleanu E, Volovat C, et al. KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutations in Greek and Romanian patients with colorectal cancer: a cohort study. BMJ Open British Medical Journal Publishing Group. 2013;4 e004652–2Google Scholar
- 8.Ogura T, Kakuta M, Yatsuoka T, Nishimura Y, Sakamoto H, Yamaguchi K, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic impact of colorectal cancers with NRAS mutations. Oncol Rep. 2014;32(1):50–6.Google Scholar
- 14.Ferreira CG, Aran V, Zalcberg-Renault I, Victorino AP, Salem JH, Bonamino MH, et al. KRAS mutations: variable incidences in a Brazilian cohort of 8,234 metastatic colorectal cancer patients. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014;14:1–8.Google Scholar
- 15.Watanabe T, Yoshino T, Uetake H, Yamazaki K, Ishiguro M, Kurokawa T, et al. KRAS mutational status in Japanese patients with colorectal cancer: results from a Nationwide, multicenter, cross-sectional study. Oxford University Press. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013;43(7):706–12.Google Scholar
- 16.Zhang J, Zheng J, Yang Y, Lu J, Gao J, Lu T, et al. Molecular spectrum of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations in Chinese colorectal cancer patients: analysis of 1,110 cases. Sci Rep Nature Publishing Group. 2015;5:1–8.Google Scholar
- 20.Hanna MC, Go C, Roden C, Jones RT, Pochanard P, Javed AY, et al. Colorectal cancers from distinct ancestral populations show variations in BRAF mutation frequency. PLoS One. 2012;8:e74950–0.Google Scholar
- 24.Peeters M, Kafatos G, Taylor A, Gastanaga VM, Oliner KS, Hechmati G, et al. Prevalence of RAS mutations and individual variation patterns among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Cancer Elsevier. 2015;51:1704–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Webster J, Kauffman TL, Feigelson HS, Pawloski PA, Onitilo AA, Potosky AL, et al. KRAS testing and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor treatment for colorectal cancer in community settings. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev American Association for Cancer Research. 2013;22:91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Loupakis F, Yang D, Yau L, Feng S, Cremolini C, Zhang W, et al. Primary tumor location as a prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer. Oxford University Press. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(3):dju427.Google Scholar
- 30.Chen K-H, Shao Y-Y, Chen H-M, Lin Y-L, Lin Z-Z, Lai M-S, et al. Primary tumor site is a useful predictor of cetuximab efficacy in the third-line or salvage treatment of KRAS wild-type (exon 2 non-mutant) metastatic colorectal cancer: a nationwide cohort study. BMC Cancer BioMed Central. 2016;16:327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar