Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Current Practices for Intracranial Pressure and Cerebral Oxygenation Monitoring in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Latin American Survey

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Stocchetti N, Carbonara M, Citerio G, Ercole A, Skrifvars MB, Smielewski P, et al. Severe traumatic brain injury: targeted management in the intensive care unit. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16:452–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rubiano AM, Griswold DP, Jibaja M, Rabinstein AA, Godoy DA. Management of severe traumatic brain injury in regions with limited resources. Brain Inj. 2021;35:1317–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Godoy DA, Rabinstein AA. How to manage traumatic brain injury without invasive monitoring? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2022;28:111–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chesnut RM, Temkin N, Videtta W, Petroni G, Lujan S, Pridgeon J, et al. Consensus-based management protocol (CREVICE Protocol) for the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury based on imaging and clinical examination for use when intracranial pressure monitoring is not employed. J Neurotrauma. 2020;37:1291–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Rubiano AM, Vera DS, Montenegro JH, Carney N, Clavijo A, Carreño JN, et al. Recommendations of the Colombian consensus committee for the management of traumatic brain injury in prehospital, emergency department, surgery, and intensive care (beyond one option for treatment of traumatic brain injury: a stratified protocol [BOOTStraP]). J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2020;11:7–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

All authors have contributed equally to the design, execution, analysis of results, and writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Agustin Godoy.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

All authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Ethical Approval/Informed Consent

The authors confirm the adherence to ethical guidelines and indicate ethical approvals (institutional review board) and use of informed consent, as appropriate.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 29 kb)

Appendices

Appendix 1: Survey Questions

ICP and Cerebral Oxygenation monitoring in severe TBI in Latin America. What is our current reality?

1. Where do you usually carry out your clinical activity?

  • Public hospital

  • Private hospital

  • Academic hospital

  • Other

2. In what type of Intensive Care Unit do you carry out your activity?

  • Polyvalent

  • Trauma ICU

  • Neurocritical care

  • Other

3. How many severe TBI (GCS < 9/15) do you attend each year?

  • Less than 25

  • 25–50

  • 51–75

  • 76–100

  • More than 100

4. In patients with severe TBI, do you monitor ICP invasively?

  • Yes

  • No

5. If the previous response is yes, what percentage of patients with severe TBI who indicate ICP monitoring has some monitoring system installed?

  • Less than 25%

  • 25–50%

  • 50–75%

  • 75–99%

  • 100%

6. What type of ICP monitoring do you use most often?

  • Intraventricular probe

  • Intraparenchymal probe

  • Subdural probe

  • Epidural probe

7. In patients with intracranial hypertension, do you routinely follow the "Brain Trauma Foundation" recommendations"?

  • Yes

  • No

8. In patients where invasive ICP monitoring is not installed, do you use any protocol for managing intracranial hypertension?

  • Yes

  • No

9. Do you follow protocol or recommendations for the withdrawal of invasive intracranial pressure monitoring?

  • Yes

  • No

10. In severe TBI patients, do you monitor Cerebral Oxygenation?

  • Yes

  • No

11. If your answer to the previous question is YES, what tissue oxygenation monitoring method do you use?

  • SyjO2

  • NIRS

  • PtiO2

  • PtiO2

12. If you consider installing some cerebral oxygenation monitoring, in what percentage of severe TBI do you use it?

  • Less than 10%

  • 10–25%

  • 26–50%

  • More than 50%

13. If PtiO2 is available, where is it put on?

  • Penumbra (perilesional) injured hemisphere

  • Healthy tissue injured hemisphere

  • Non-injured hemisphere

  • PtiO2 is not available

14. In patients in whom monitoring cerebral oxygenation is installed, do you follow any protocol for the management of cerebral tissue hypoxia?

  • Yes

  • No

15. When do you decide to monitor tissue oxygenation if you install the device together with ICP monitoring?

  • Same time with ICP monitoring

  • ICP independently

16. Who directs the management of intracranial hypertension and brain tissue hypoxia?

  • Neurologist

  • Neurosurgeon

  • Intensivist

  • Anesthesiologist

17. In which country do you carry out your clinical activity?

Appendix 2: Tables for Survey Answers

 

N

%

Cumulative percentage

Q1. Where do you usually carry out your clinical activity?

Public hospital

326

54.5

54.7

Private hospital

184

30.8

85.6

Academic hospital

80

13.4

99.0

Other

6

1.0

100.0

Total

596

99.7

 

Q2. In what type of Intensive Care Unit do you carry out your activity?

Polyvalent

487

81.4

81.7

Trauma ICU

29

4.8

86.6

Neurocritical care

54

9.0

95.6

Other

26

4.3

100.0

Total

596

99.7

 

Q3. How many severe TBI (GCS < 9/15) do you attend each year?

Less than 25

240

40l1

40.3

25–50

186

31.1

71.5

51–75

74

12.4

83.9

76–100

32

5.4

89.3

More than 100

64

10.7

100.0

Total

596

100.0

 

Q4. In patients with severe TBI, do you monitor ICP invasively?

Yes

316

53.0

53.1

No

280

46.8

100.0

Total

596

100.0

 

Q5. If the previous response is yes, what percentage of patients with severe TBI who indicate ICP monitoring has some monitoring system installed?

Less than 25%

289

48.3

49.2

25–50%

106

17.7

67.3

50–75%

77

12.9

80.4

75–99%

73

12.2

92.8

100%

42

7.0

100.0

Total

587

98.2

 

Q6. What type of ICP monitoring do you use most often?

Intraventricular probe

364

66.4

 

Intraparenchimatous probe

136

24.8

91.2

Subdural probe

38

6.9

98.2

Epidural probe

10

1.8

100.0

Total

548

100.0

 

Q7. In patients with intracranial hypertension, do you routinely follow the "Brain Trauma Foundation" recommendations"?

Yes

476

80.5

80.5

No

115

19.5

100.0

Total

591

100.0

 

Q8. In patients where invasive ICP monitoring is not installed, do you use any protocol for managing intracranial hypertension?

Yes

472

79.7

79.7

No

120

20.3

100.0

Total

592

100.0

 

Q9. Do you follow protocol or recommendations for the withdrawal of invasive intracranial pressure monitoring?

Yes

415

71.8

71.8

No

163

28.2

100.0

Total

578

100.0

 

Q10. In severe TBI patients, do you monitor Cerebral Oxygenation?

Yes

87

55.8

55.8

No

69

44.2

100.0

Total

156

100.0

 

Q11. If your answer to the previous question was YES, what tissue oxygenation monitoring method do you use?

SyjO2

47

52.2

52.2

NIRS

18

20.0

72.2

PtiO2

13

14.4

86.7

None

3

3.3

90.0

Two or more

9

10.0

100.0

Total

90

100.0

 

Q12. If you consider installing some cerebral oxygenation monitoring, what percentage of severe TBI do you use it?

Less than 10%

43

32.3

32.3

10–25%

26

19.5

51.9

26–50%

22

16.5

68.4

More than 50%

42

31.6

100.0

Total

133

100.0

 

Q13. If PtiO2 available, where is it put on?

Penumbra (perilesional) injured hemisphere

54

77.1

77.1

Healthy tissue injured hemisphere

9

12.9

90.0

Non-injured hemisphere

7

10.0

100.0

Total

70

100.0

 

Q14. In patients in whom monitoring cerebral oxygenation is installed, do you follow any protocol for the management of cerebral tissue hypoxia?

Yes

60

51.3

51.3

No

57

48.7

100.0

Total

117

100.0

 

Q15. When do you decide to monitor tissue oxygenation you install the device together with ICP monitoring?

Same time with ICP monitoring

93

75.6

75.6

ICP independently

30

24.4

100.0

Total

123

100.0

 

Q16. Who directs the management of intracranial hypertension and brain tissue hypoxia?

Neurologist

2

1.5

1.5

Neurosurgeon

7

5.2

6.7

Intensivist

126

93.3

100.0

Total

135

100.0

 

Q17. In which country do you carry out your clinical activity?

Argentina

71

12.1

12.1

Colombia

113

19.3

31.5

Chile

31

5.3

36.8

Perú

74

12.6

49.4

Ecuador

56

9.6

59.0

Brazil

31

5.3

64.3

Costa Rica

19

3.2

67.5

Paraguay

29

5.0

72.5

Uruguay

17

2.9

75.4

Venezuela

30

5.1

80.5

Honduras

3

0.5

81.0

Guatemala

16

2.7

8.8

México

54

9.2

93.0

El Salvador

1

0.2

93.2

Panamá

7

1.2

94.4

Other

14

2.4

96.8

Bolivia

17

2.9

99.7

Cuba

2

0.3

100.0

Total

585

100.0

 

Unaswered

11

  

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Godoy, D.A., Carrizosa, J., Aguilera, S. et al. Current Practices for Intracranial Pressure and Cerebral Oxygenation Monitoring in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Latin American Survey. Neurocrit Care 38, 171–177 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-022-01605-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-022-01605-0

Navigation