Skip to main content
Log in

Teleneurocritical Care: Lessons Learned in Standardizing Care

  • Viewpoint
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Harriott A, DeVita MA. The tele-ICU. Virtual Mentor. 2014;16:969–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lilly CM, Cody S, Zhao H, et al. Hospital mortality, length of stay, and preventable complications among critically ill patients before and after tele-ICU reengineering of critical care processes. JAMA. 2011;305:2175–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kahn JM, Rak KJ, Kuza CC, et al. Determinants of intensive care unit telemedicine effectiveness. An ethnographic study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;199:970–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kahn JM, Le TQ, Barnato AE, et al. ICU telemedicine and critical care mortality: a national effectiveness study. Med Care. 2016;54:319–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ekeland AG, Bowes A, Flottorp S. Effectiveness of telemedicine: a systematic review of reviews. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79:736–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mackintosh N, Terblanche M, Maharaj R, et al. Telemedicine with clinical decision support for critical care: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2016;5:176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Berenson RA, Grossman JM, November EA. Does telemonitoring of patients—the eICU—improve intensive care? Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28:w937–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wechsler LR, Demaerschalk BM, Schwamm LH, et al. Telemedicine quality and outcomes in stroke: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2017;48:e3-25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Davis TM, Barden C, Dean S, et al. American Telemedicine Association guidelines for teleICU operations. Telemed J e-Health. 2016;22:971–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There were no funding sources for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dr. Murray, Dr. Smith, Dr. Püttgen, and Dr. Hobbs developed the conceptual idea for the article and edited and revised its final versions. Dr. Murray wrote and edited the initial drafts of the article. The final manuscript was approved by all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick M. Murray.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest for any authors.

Ethical Approval/Informed Consent

Adherence to ethical guidelines is complete, and institutional review board approval was waived.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murray, N.M., Hobbs, K., Smith, S. et al. Teleneurocritical Care: Lessons Learned in Standardizing Care. Neurocrit Care 36, 691–694 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-022-01478-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-022-01478-3

Navigation