Abstract
Background
Respiratory support is required in 20–30% of patients with Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS). We investigated clinical and biological risk factors for mechanical ventilation (MV) in northeast China through a retrospective GBS study. The Erasmus GBS Respiratory Insufficiency Score (EGRIS) is a prognostic model for MV in patients with GBS, and its usefulness has been validated in several countries but not in China. Therefore, we intended to validate the EGRIS model in our GBS cohort.
Methods
A total of 252 patients with GBS were included in this study from January 2013 to October 2017. Risk factors for MV were identified via multivariate logistic regression analysis. The prognostic value of the EGRIS was validated via receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
Results
Thirty-one patients (12.3%) required MV (mean age 54.19 years), with a majority being male (77.4%). The risk factors for MV were male sex [odds ratio (OR) 3.720, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.155–11.985, p < 0.05], shorter interval from onset to admission (OR 0.830, 95% CI 0.711–0.970, p < 0.05), lower Medical Research Council sum score at admission (OR 0.942, 95% CI 0.911–0.973, p < 0.001), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio at admission (OR 1.174, 95% CI 1.049–1.315, p < 0.01), and cranial nerve deficit (OR 3.805, 95% CI 1.373–10.541, p < 0.05). The EGRIS had a good predictive ability for MV (area under the receiver operating curve 0.861) in patients with GBS, and a high EGRIS was a predictor for MV (OR 8.778, 95% CI 3.432–22.448, p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in ganglioside administration between ventilated and nonventilated patients.
Conclusions
An elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio at admission and a high EGRIS could serve as predictors for MV in our GBS cohort.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wu X, Wu W, Wang Z, et al. More severe manifestations and poorer short-term prognosis of ganglioside-associated Guillain–Barré syndrome in Northeast China. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(8):e104074.
Wakerley BR, Yuki N. Infectious and noninfectious triggers in Guillain–Barre syndrome. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2013;9(7):627–39.
Figueras A, Morales-Olivas FJ, Capellà D, Palop V, Laporte JR. Bovine gangliosides and acute motor polyneuropathy. BMJ. 1992;305(6865):1330–1.
Willison HJ, Jacobs BC, van Doorn PA. Guillain–Barré syndrome. The Lancet. 2016;388(10045):717–27.
Islam Z, Papri N, Ara G, et al. Risk factors for respiratory failure in Guillain-Barre syndrome in Bangladesh: a prospective study. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2019;6(2):324–32.
Green C, Baker T, Subramaniam A. Predictors of respiratory failure in patients with Guillain-Barre syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med J Aust. 2018;208(4):181–8.
Durand M-C, Porcher R, Orlikowski D, et al. Clinical and electrophysiological predictors of respiratory failure in Guillain–Barré syndrome: a prospective study. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5(12):1021–8.
Wu X, Li C, Zhang B, et al. Predictors for mechanical ventilation and short-term prognosis in patients with Guillain–Barre syndrome. Crit Care. 2015;19:310.
Haifeng L. Anti-GQ1b antibody as a factor predictive of mechanical ventilation in Guillain–Barre syndrome. Neurology. 2004;63(10):1985.
Durand MC, Lofaso F, Lefaucheur JP, et al. Electrophysiology to predict mechanical ventilation in Guillain–Barré syndrome. Eur J Neurol. 2003;10(1):39–44.
Kannan Kanikannan MA, Durga P, Venigalla NK, et al. Simple bedside predictors of mechanical ventilation in patients with Guillain–Barre syndrome. J Crit Care. 2014;29(2):219–23.
Walgaard C, Lingsma HF, Ruts L, et al. Prediction of respiratory insufficiency in Guillain–Barre syndrome. Ann Neurol. 2010;67(6):781–7.
Yamagishi Y, Suzuki H, Sonoo M, et al. Markers for Guillain–Barre syndrome with poor prognosis: a multi-center study. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2017;22(4):433–9.
Tan CY, Razali SNO, Goh KJ, Shahrizaila N. The utility of Guillain–Barre syndrome prognostic models in Malaysian patients. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2019;24(2):168–73.
Asbury AK, Cornblath DR. Assessment of current diagnostic criteria for Guillain–Barré syndrome. Ann Neurol. 1990;27(Suppl):S21–4.
Hughes RAC, Cornblath DR. Guillain–Barré syndrome. Lancet. 2005;366(9497):1653–66.
Hughes RA, Newsom-Davis JM, Perkin GD, Pierce JM. Controlled trial prednisolone in acute polyneuropathy. Lancet. 1978;2(8093):750–3.
Kleyweg RP, van der Meché FG, Schmitz PI. Interobserver agreement in the assessment of muscle strength and functional abilities in Guillain–Barré syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 1991;14(11):1103–9.
Sharshar T, Chevret S, Bourdain F, Raphaël JC. Early predictors of mechanical ventilation in Guillain–Barré syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(1):278–83.
Ning P, Yang B, Yang X, et al. A nomogram to predict mechanical ventilation in Guillain–Barre syndrome patients. Acta Neurol Scand. 2020;142(5):466–74.
Paul BS, Bhatia R, Prasad K, et al. Clinical predictors of mechanical ventilation in Guillain–Barre syndrome. Neurol India. 2012;60(2):150–3.
Omichi K, Cloyd JM, Yamashita S, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery. 2017;162(4):752–65.
Qun S, Tang Y, Sun J, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts 3-month outcome of acute ischemic stroke. Neurotox Res. 2017;31(3):444–52.
Diniz LR, de Lima SG, de Amorim Garcia JM, de Oliveira Diniz KL. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic predictor in older people with acute coronary syndrome. Angiology. 2019;70(3):264–71.
Ozdemir HH. Analysis of the albumin level, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-lymphocyte ratio in Guillain–Barre syndrome. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2016;74(9):718–22.
Huang Y, Ying Z, Quan W, et al. The clinical significance of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio in Guillain–Barre syndrome. Int J Neurosci. 2018;128(8):729–35.
Tunc A. Early predictors of functional disability in Guillain–Barre syndrome. Acta Neurol Belg. 2019;119(4):555–9.
Huner EA, Dai AI, Demiryurek AT. Association of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio with intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in children with Guillain–Barre syndrome. J Child Neurol. 2018;33(2):164–7.
Capone M, Giannarelli D, Mallardo D, et al. Baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and derived NLR could predict overall survival in patients with advanced melanoma treated with nivolumab. J Immunother Cancer. 2018;6(1):74.
Shang P, Zhu M, Baker M, et al. Mechanical ventilation in Guillain–Barre syndrome. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2020;16(11):1053–64.
Liu S, Xiao Z, Lou M, et al. Guillain–Barré syndrome in southern China: retrospective analysis of hospitalised patients from 14 provinces in the area south of the Huaihe River. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 2018;89(6):618–26.
Kalita J, Ranjan A, Misra UK. Outcome of Guillain–Barre syndrome patients with respiratory paralysis. QJM. 2016;109(5):319–23.
Walgaard C, Lingsma HF, van Doorn PA, et al. Tracheostomy or not: prediction of prolonged mechanical ventilation in Guillain–Barré Syndrome. Neurocrit Care. 2017;26(1):6–13.
Shi M, Zhu J, Deng H. Clinical characteristics of intravenous injection of monosialotetrahexosyl ganglioside sodium-related Guillain–Barre syndrome. Front Neurol. 2019;10:225.
Govoni V, Granieri E, Manconi M, Capone J, Casetta I. Is there a decrease in Guillain-Barré syndrome incidence after bovine ganglioside withdrawal in Italy? A population-based study in the Local Health District of Ferrara, Italy. J Neurol Sci. 2003;216(1):99–103.
Latov N, Koski CL, Walicke PA, Schönhöfer PS. Guillain–Barré syndrome and parenteral gangliosides. Lancet. 1991;338(8769):757.
Illa I, Ortiz N, Gallard E, et al. Acute axonal Guillain–Barré syndrome with IgG antibodies against motor axons following parenteral gangliosides. Ann Neurol. 1995;38(2):218–24.
Funes SC, Chiari ME, Comín R, Irazoqui FJ, Nores GA. Experimental Guillain-Barre syndrome induced by immunization with gangliosides: keyhole limpet hemocyanin is required for disease triggering. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2017;1863(6):1473–8.
Asthana P, Vong JS, Kumar G, et al. Dissecting the role of anti-ganglioside antibodies in Guillain–Barré syndrome: an animal model approach. Mol Neurobiol. 2016;53(7):4981–91.
Yuki N, Yamada M, Koga M, et al. Animal model of axonal Guillain–Barré syndrome induced by sensitization with GM1 ganglioside. Ann Neurol. 2001;49(6):712–20.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to all study participants and the staff from the First Hospital of Jilin University for their contributions to this study. The authors also thank Yuqin Ye for her assistance in the electrophysiological examination and classification.
Funding
The work was supported by grants from the Young Scholars Program of the First Hospital of Jilin University (Grant No. JDYY82017029).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
XW and SF conceived and directed this study. YC, CL and WZ collected the clinical data. YC and KL analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. XW and SF re-performed all the data analyses and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript and agreed to submit it for publication.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval/Informed Consent
This study received approval from the institutional review board of the First Hospital of Jilin University. For this type of study, formal consent was not required. Because of the retrospective nature of this study, informed consent was waived.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cheng, Y., Liu, K., Li, C. et al. Risk Factors for Mechanical Ventilation in Patients with Guillain–Barré Syndrome. Neurocrit Care 37, 121–128 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-022-01457-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-022-01457-8