Communication and Well-Being Considerations in Disorders of Consciousness

A Response to Letter To The Editor to this article was published on 04 February 2021

A Proceedings to this article was published on 23 June 2020

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. 1.

    Provencio JJ, Hemphill JC, Claassen J, et al. The Curing Coma campaign: framing initial scientific challenges—proceedings of the first Curing Coma campaign scientific advisory council meeting. Neurocrit Care. 2020;33(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Lazaridis C. End-of-life considerations and shared decision making in neurocritical care. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2018;24(6):1794–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Tulsky JA, Beach MC, Butow PN, et al. A research agenda for communication between health care professionals and patients living with serious illness. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177:1361–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Batten JN, Kruse KE, Kraft SA, Fishbeyn B, Magnus DC. What does the word “treatable” mean? Implications for communication and decision-making in critical illness. Crit Care Med. 2019;47(3):369–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lazaridis C. Withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments in perceived devastating brain injury: the key role of uncertainty. Neurocrit Care. 2019;30(1):33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Laureys S, Celesia GG, Cohadon F, et al. Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a new name for the vegetative state or apallic syndrome. BMC Med. 2010;8:68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Naccache L. Minimally conscious state or cortically mediated state? Brain. 2018;141(4):949–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bayne T, Hohwy J, Owen AM. Reforming the taxonomy in disorders of consciousness. Ann Neurol. 2017;82(6):866–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Fischer D, Truog RD. The problems with fixating on consciousness in disorders of consciousness. AJOB Neurosci. 2017;8(3):135–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lulé D, Zickler C, Häcker S, et al. Life can be worth living in locked-in syndrome. Prog Brain Res. 2009;177:339–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Sen A. Capability and well-being. In: Nussbaum M, Sen A, editors. The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Nussbaum M. Women and human development: the capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Robeyns I. Conceptualising well-being for autistic persons. J Med Ethics. 2016;42(6):383–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lazaridis C, Specker-Sullivan L, Koch P, Kothari S. Changing the conversation: a capabilities approach to disordered consciousness. AJOB Neurosci. 2017;8(3):149–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christos Lazaridis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lazaridis, C., Desai, M. & Johnson, L.S.M. Communication and Well-Being Considerations in Disorders of Consciousness. Neurocrit Care (2021).

Download citation