Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Is Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter a Reliable Proxy for Intracranial Pressure in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage?

  • Letters to the editor
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Response to Letter To The Editor to this article was published on 27 May 2020

The Original Work to this article was published on 21 April 2020

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zoerle T, Caccioppola A, D’Angelo E, Carbonara M, Conte G, Avignone S, et al. Optic nerve sheath diameter is not related to intracranial pressure in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients. Neurocrit Care. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-00970-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hockel K, Schuhmann MU. ICP Monitoring by open extraventricular drainage: common practice but not suitable for advanced neuromonitoring and prone to false negativity. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2018;126:281–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schott CK, Hirzallah MI, Heyman R, Lesky DN, Brant EB, Callaway CW. Ultrasound measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter pre- and post-lumbar puncture. Ultrasound J. 2020;12(1):26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Naldi A, Provero P, Vercelli A, Bergui M, Mazzeo AT, Cantello R, et al. Optic nerve sheath diameter asymmetry in healthy subjects and patients with intracranial hypertension. Neurol Sci. 2020;41(2):329–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee S, Kim YO, Baek JS, Ryu JA. The prognostic value of optic nerve sheath diameter in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moretti R, Pizzi B. Optic nerve ultrasound for detection of intracranial hypertension in intracranial hemorrhage patients: confirmation of previous findings in a different patient population. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2009;21(1):16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None for all the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Neuroanesthesia Division, Department of Anesthesiology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, India

    Neeraja Ajayan, Unnikrishnan Prathapadas, Ajay Prasad Hrishi & Manikandan Sethuraman

Authors
  1. Neeraja Ajayan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Unnikrishnan Prathapadas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ajay Prasad Hrishi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Manikandan Sethuraman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

NA wrote the paper with input from authors UP, APH, and MS,

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Unnikrishnan Prathapadas.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ajayan, N., Prathapadas, U., Hrishi, A.P. et al. Is Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter a Reliable Proxy for Intracranial Pressure in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage?. Neurocrit Care 33, 617–618 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-01038-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-01038-7

Search

Navigation