Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Response to Rady re: Religion and Neuroscience

  • Response to a Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 05 August 2019

The Original Article was published on 19 June 2019

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lewis A. A survey of multidenominational rabbis on death by neurologic criteria. Neurocrit Care. 2019;Epub ahead of print.

  2. Lewis A, Adams N, Varelas P, Greer D, Caplan A. Organ support after death by neurologic criteria: results of a survey of US neurologists. Neurology. 2016;87:827–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shemie SD, Hornby L, Baker A, Teitelbaum J, Torrance S, Young K, et al. International guideline development for the determination of death. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:788–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Setta SM, Shemie SD. An explanation and analysis of how world religions formulate their ethical decisions on withdrawing treatment and determining death. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2015;10:1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Qazi F, Ewell JC, Munawar A, Asrar U, Khan N. The degree of certainty in brain death: probability in clinical and Islamic legal discourse. Theor Med Bioeth [Internet]. 2013;34:117–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wijdicks EFM, Varelas PN, Gronseth GS, Greer DM. Evidence-based guideline update: determining brain death in adults: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2010;74:1911–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fara MG, Chancellor B, Lord AS, Lewis A. Controversies in cardiopulmonary death. J Clin Ethics [Internet]. 2017;28:97–101.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Merriam-Webster.com. 2019.

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Neurocritical Care, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, 530 First Avenue, HCC-5A, New York, NY, 10016, USA

    Ariane Lewis

Authors
  1. Ariane Lewis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ariane Lewis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lewis, A. Response to Rady re: Religion and Neuroscience. Neurocrit Care 31, 449–450 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-019-00807-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-019-00807-3

Search

Navigation