Feasibility and Safety of Transnasal High Flow Air to Reduce Core Body Temperature in Febrile Neurocritical Care Patients: A Pilot Study

A Commentary to this article is available

A Commentary to this article is available

A Commentary to this article is available

Abstract

Background

Fever is an important determinant of prognosis following acute brain injury. Current non-pharmacologic techniques to reduce fever are limited and induce a shivering response. We investigated the safety and efficacy of a novel transnasal unidirectional high flow air device in reducing core body temperature in the neurocritical care unit (NCCU) setting.

Methods

This pilot study included seven consecutive patients in the NCCU who were febrile (> 37.5 °C) for > 24 h despite standard non-pharmacologic and first-line antipyretic agents. Medical grade high flow air was delivered transnasally using a standard continuous positive airway pressure machine with a positive pressure of 20 cmH2O for 2 h. Core esophageal and tympanic temperature were continuously monitored.

Results

Mean age was 40 ± 14 yo, and 72% (5/7 patients) were men. Five patients had intracerebral or intraventricular hemorrhage, one subject had transverse myelitis, and the remaining patient had anoxic brain injury due to a cardiac arrest. After 2 h of cooling, core temperature was significantly lower than the baseline pre-cooling temperature (37.3 ± 0.5 °C vs. 38.4 ± 0.6 °C; p < 0.002). Mean transnasal airflow rate was 57.5 ± 6.5 liters per minute. Five of the seven subjects were normothermic at the end of the 2-h period. One subject with severe hyperthermia (39.7 °C) and the other with multiple interruptions to therapy due to technical reasons did not cool. The core temperature within 30 min of cessation of airflow increased and was similar to the pre-cooling baseline temperature (38.3 ± 0.4 °C vs. 38.4 ± 0.6 °C, p = NS). Rate of core cooling was 0.6 ± 0.15 °C per hour at this flow rate. No shivering response was observed. No protocol-related adverse events occurred.

Conclusions

High flow transnasal air in a unidirectional fashion lowers core body temperature in febrile patients in the NCCU setting. No adverse events were seen, and the process showed no signs of shivering or any other serious side effects during short-term exposure. This pilot study should inform further investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Abbreviations

NCCU:

Neurocritical care unit

ENT:

Ear, nose and throat

CPAP:

Continuous positive airway pressure

LPM:

Liters per minute

SBP:

Systolic blood pressure

DBP:

Diastolic blood pressure

PFC:

Perfluorocarbon

References

  1. 1.

    Bohman L-E, Levine JM. Fever and therapeutic normothermia in severe brain injury: an update. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014;20:182–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Madden LK, Hill M, May TL, Human T, Guanci MM, Jacobi J, Moreda MV, Badjatia N. The implementation of targeted temperature management: an evidence-based guideline from the Neurocritical Care Society. Neurocrit Care. 2017;27(3):468–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Fernandez A, Schmidt J, Claassen J, et al. Fever after subarachnoid hemorrhage risk factors and impact on outcome. Neurology. 2007;68:1013–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ntaios G, Dziedzic T, Michel P, et al. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines for the management of temperature in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Int J Stroke. 2015;10:941–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Diringer MN. Treatment of fever in the neurologic intensive care unit with a catheter-based heat exchange system. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:559–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Diringer MN, Reaven NL, Funk SE, Uman GC. Elevated body temperature independently contributes to increased length of stay in neurologic intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:1489–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Scaravilli V, Tinchero G, Citerio G. Participants in the international multi-disciplinary consensus conference on the critical care management of subarachnoid H. Fever management in SAH. Neurocrit Care. 2011;15:287–94.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Polderman KH, Herold I. Therapeutic hypothermia and controlled normothermia in the intensive care unit: practical considerations, side effects, and cooling methods. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:1101–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Hoedemaekers CW, Ezzahti M, Gerritsen A, van der Hoeven JG. Comparison of cooling methods to induce and maintain normo- and hypothermia in intensive care unit patients: a prospective intervention study. Crit Care. 2007;11:R91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Mayer SA, Kowalski RG, Presciutti M, et al. Clinical trial of a novel surface cooling system for fever control in neurocritical care patients. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:2508–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Badjatia N, Strongilis E, Gordon E, et al. Metabolic impact of shivering during therapeutic temperature modulation: the Bedside Shivering Assessment Scale. Stroke. 2008;39:3242–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Patel N, Nair SU, Gowd P, et al. Central line associated blood stream infection related to cooling catheter in cardiac arrest survivors undergoing therapeutic hypothermia by endovascular cooling. Conn Med. 2013;77:35–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Polderman KH, Callaghan J. Equipment review: cooling catheters to induce therapeutic hypothermia? Crit Care. 2006;10:234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Chava R, Zviman M, Raghavan MS, et al. Rapid Induction of therapeutic hypothermia using transnasal high flow dry air. Ther Hypothermia Temp Manag. 2017;7:50–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Covaciu L, Allers M, Enblad P, Lunderquist A, Wieloch T, Rubertsson S. Intranasal selective brain cooling in pigs. Resuscitation. 2008;76:83–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Castren M, Nordberg P, Svensson L, et al. Intra-arrest transnasal evaporative cooling: a randomized, prehospital, multicenter study (PRINCE: Pre-ROSC IntraNasal Cooling Effectiveness). Circulation. 2010;122:729–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Song SS, Lyden PD. Overview of therapeutic hypothermia. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2012;14:541–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hinz J, Rosmus M, Popov A, Moerer O, Frerichs I, Quintel M. Effectiveness of an intravascular cooling method compared with a conventional cooling technique in neurologic patients. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2007;19:130–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Flint AC, Hemphill JC, Bonovich DC. Therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest: performance characteristics and safety of surface cooling with or without endovascular cooling. Neurocrit Care. 2007;7:109–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lyden P, Ernstrom K, Cruz-Flores S, et al. Determinants of effective cooling during endovascular hypothermia. Neurocrit Care. 2012;16:413–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Badjatia N, Bodock M, Guanci M, et al. Rapid infusion of cold saline (4°) as adjunctive treatment of fever in patients with brain injury. Neurology. 2006;66:1739–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Choi HA, Ko SB, Presciutti M, et al. Prevention of shivering during therapeutic temperature modulation: the Columbia anti-shivering protocol. Neurocrit Care. 2011;14:389–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Einer-Jensen N, Khorooshi M. Cooling of the brain through oxygen flushing of the nasal cavities in intubated rats: an alternative model for treatment of brain injury. Exp Brain Res. 2000;130:244–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Mellergård P. Changes in human intracerebral temperature in response to different methods of brain cooling. Neurosurgery. 1992;31:671–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Harris B, Andrews P, Murray G. Enhanced upper respiratory tract airflow and head fanning reduce brain temperature in brain-injured, mechanically ventilated patients: a randomized, crossover, factorial trial. BJA Br J Anaesth. 2006;98:93–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Busch H-J, Eichwede F, Födisch M, et al. Safety and feasibility of nasopharyngeal evaporative cooling in the emergency department setting in survivors of cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2010;81:943–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Boller M, Lampe JW, Katz JM, Barbut D, Becker LB. Feasibility of intra-arrest hypothermia induction: a novel nasopharyngeal approach achieves preferential brain cooling. Resuscitation. 2010;81:1025–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Chava R, Zviman M, Assis FR, Raghavan MS, Halperin H, Maqbool F, Geocadin R, Quinones-Hinojosa A, Kolandaivelu A, Rosen BA, Tandri H. Effect of high flow transnasal dry air on core body temperature in intubated human subjects. Resuscitation. 2019;134:49–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by Key Technologies Inc.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

WZ analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. DS collected the data. FRA analyzed the data and reviewed the manuscript. HT analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. RGG supervised the project, analyzed the data and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wendy C. Ziai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Harikrishna Tandri is the founder of CoolTech Inc, which is developing a transnasal device for hypothermia. Other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval/Informed Consent

This study was approved by the Johns Hopkins University Institutional Review Board (IRB00086134).

Human and Animal Rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ziai, W.C., Shah, D., Assis, F.R. et al. Feasibility and Safety of Transnasal High Flow Air to Reduce Core Body Temperature in Febrile Neurocritical Care Patients: A Pilot Study. Neurocrit Care 31, 280–287 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-019-00702-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Fever
  • Neurocritical Care
  • Normothermia
  • Neuroprotection
  • Transnasal evaporative cooling