Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Practice Variation in the Diagnosis of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Survey of US and Canadian Emergency Medicine Physicians

  • Original Work
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Aims

Spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) from a brain aneurysm, if untreated in the acute phase, leads to loss of functional independence in about 30% of patients and death in 27–44%. To evaluate for SAH, the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) Clinical Policy recommends obtaining a non-contrast brain computed tomography (CT) scan followed by a lumbar puncture (LP) if the CT is negative. On the other hand, current evidence from prospectively collected data suggests that CT alone may be sufficient to rule out SAH in patients who present within 6 h of symptom onset while anecdotal evidence suggests that CT angiogram (CTA) may be used to detect aneurysms, which are the probable cause of SAH. Since many different options are available to emergency physicians, we examined their practice pattern variation by observing their diagnostic approaches and their adherence to the ACEP Clinical Policy.

Methods

We developed, validated, and distributed a survey to emergency physicians at three practice sites: (1) Stanford Healthcare, California, (2) Intermountain Healthcare (five emergency departments), Utah, and (3) Ottawa General Hospital, Toronto. The survey questions examined physician knowledge on CT and LP's test performance and used case-based scenarios to assess diagnostic approaches, variation in practice, and adherence to guidelines. Results were presented as proportions with 95% CIs.

Results

Of the 216 physicians surveyed, we received 168 responses (77.8%). The responses by site were: (1) (n = 38, 23.2%), (2) (n = 70, 42.7%), (3) (n = 56, 34.1%). To the CT and LP test performance question, most physicians indicated that CT alone detects > 90% of SAH in those with a confirmed SAH [n = 150 (89.3%, 95% CI 83.6–93.5]. To the case-based questions, most physicians indicated that they would perform a CTA along with a CT [n = 110 (65.5%, 95% CI 57.8–72.6)], some indicated a LP along with a CT [n = 57, 33.9% 95% CI 26.8–41.6)], and a few indicated both a CTA and a LP [n = 16, 9.5%, 95% CI 5.5–15.0]. We also observed practice site variation in the proportion of physicians who indicated that they would use CTA: (1) (n = 25, 65.8%), (2) (n = 54, 77.1%), and (3) (n = 28, 50.0%) (p = 0.006).

Conclusions

Survey responses indicate that physicians use some or all of the imaging tests, with or without LP to diagnose SAH. We observed variation in the use of CTA by site and academic setting and divergence from ACEP Clinical Policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Connolly ES Jr, Rabinstein AA, Carhuapoma JR, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2012;43(6):1711–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Carpenter CR, Hussain AM, Ward MJ, et al. Spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis describing the diagnostic accuracy of history, physical examination, imaging, and lumbar puncture with an exploration of test thresholds. Acad Emerg Med. 2016;23(9):963–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Qu F, Aiyagari V, Cross DT 3rd, Dacey RG Jr, Diringer MN. Untreated subarachnoid hemorrhage: who, why, and when? J Neurosurg. 2004;100(2):244–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Manella H, Sivasankar S, Perry JJ, et al. A web-based decision tool to estimate subarachnoid hemorrhage risk in emergency department patients. Cureus. 2018;10(1):e2096.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. McCormack RF, Hutson A. Can computed tomography angiography of the brain replace lumbar puncture in the evaluation of acute-onset headache after a negative noncontrast cranial computed tomography scan? Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(4):444–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Perry JJ, Stiell IG, Sivilotti ML, et al. Clinical decision rules to rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage for acute headache. JAMA. 2013;310(12):1248–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Perry JJ, Stiell IG, Sivilotti MLA, Bullard MJ, Émond M, Symington C, et al. Sensitivity of computed tomography performed within six hours of onset of headache for diagnosis of subarachnoid haemorrhage: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2011;343:d4277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mark DG, Hung YY, Offerman SR, et al. Nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage in the setting of negative cranial computed tomography results: external validation of a clinical and imaging prediction rule. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;62(1):1–10 (e11).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Perry JJ. Multicentre before-after implementation study of the Ottawa subarachnoid hemorrhage strategy In: Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine. 27–30 May 2018; Calgary, Alberta.

  10. Perry JJ, Sivilotti ML, Stiell IG, et al. Should spectrophotometry be used to identify xanthochromia in the cerebrospinal fluid of alert patients suspected of having subarachnoid hemorrhage? Stroke. 2006;37(10):2467–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Perry JJ, Eagles D, Clement CM, et al. An international study of emergency physicians practice for acute headache management and the need for a clinical decision rule. CJEM. 2009;11(06):516–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1481803500011775.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge Drs. Sam Shen and Deepika Mohan for providing valuable suggestions to the survey design. In addition, we wish to thank the Dean’s Summer Research Program at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and Stanford Healthcare for supporting the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AK contributed to data analysis, manuscript writing and editing. KN contributed to data analysis and manuscript writing. ALB contributed to building the survey instrument on REDCap and manuscript editing. MW contributed to project development. JB, JJP contributed to project development and manuscript editing, PG contributed to project development, data analysis and manuscript editing. MAK contributed to data analysis and manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prasanthi Govindarajan.

Ethics declarations

Source of support

No financial support was used for this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication.

Ethical Approval

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board, Stanford University.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, A., Niknam, K., Lumba-Brown, A. et al. Practice Variation in the Diagnosis of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Survey of US and Canadian Emergency Medicine Physicians. Neurocrit Care 31, 321–328 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-019-00679-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-019-00679-7

Keywords

Navigation