Infection Prevention in the Neurointensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Hospital-acquired infections are common in neurointensive care units. We sought to review interventions which may reduce infection rates in neurocritically ill populations. We conducted a systematic review of studies targeting adult patients in neuro-intensive care units (neuro-ICUs) with an intervention designed to prevent ICU-acquired infections. Our outcome of interest was change in the prevalence or rates of infection between active and control arms of these studies. We excluded studies based on the following criteria: no English full-text version available; pediatric population; non-neurosciences ICU population; pre- or intraoperative methods to prevent infection; lack of discrete data for infection rates/prevalence; studies that were purely observational in nature and did not test an intervention; and studies performed in resource limited settings. We initially retrieved 3716 results by searching the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE via Ovid, and Cochrane CENTRAL via Ovid. No date or language limits were used in the search. Computerized deduplication was conducted using EndNote followed by a confirmatory manual review resulting in 3414 citations. An additional 19 manuscripts were identified through review of references. The screening process followed a standard protocol, using two screeners at the title/abstract level to determine relevance and at the full-text level to determine eligibility for inclusion. The 3427 titles/abstracts were independently screened by two board-certified neurointensivists to determine relevance for full-text review, and 3248 were rejected. The remaining 179 abstracts were reviewed in full text using predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Ultimately, 75 articles met our inclusion criteria and were utilized in the final analysis. The reviewed literature highlights the need for collaborative, multi-disciplinary, and multi-pronged approaches to reduce infections. Rates of VRI, SSI, VAP, CAUTI, and CLABSI can approach zero with persistence and a team-based approach.

Introduction

Hospital-acquired infections are common in intensive care units (ICUs) including those dedicated to the care of neurological patients. There is an extensive literature on preventing general ICU infections such as catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), central line-associated blood stream infections (CLABSIs), surgical site infections (SSIs), and ventilator-associated pneumonias (VAPs) in mixed medical and surgical ICU patients [1,2,3,4]. However, patients in neurointensive care units may have distinct characteristics that predispose them to infections when compared to a general ICU patient population including high utilization of external ventricular drains (EVDs), high rates of dysphagia and urinary retention, and the presence of stroke and brain injury-induced immunosuppression. Given the increasing focus on reducing rates of hospital-acquired infections and the growing use of these metrics as proxies for quality of care, we sought to review current interventions which may reduce rates of these infections in neurocritically ill populations.

Methods

This systematic review was conducted and reported in accordance with PRISMA statement [5]. This systematic review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (Registration Number: CRD42017057281) in February 2017. Search strategies were developed in collaboration with a medical librarian. The research question was framed using the PICO format, and searches were developed using a combination of keywords and subject headings specific to population and intervention terms (see Supplemental Material for search terms). The population of interest was adult patients in neurosciences ICUs in developed countries. The studied interventions were either (a) randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) or (b) cohort studies with measurements before and after a protocol change. We only selected studies with primary or secondary outcomes of prevention of ICU-acquired infections. Exclusion criteria for studies included: no English full-text version available; pediatric population; non-neurosciences ICU population; pre- or intraoperative methods to prevent infection; lack of discrete data for infection rates/prevalence; studies that were purely observational in nature (i.e., did not test a protocol change); and resource limited settings.

We initially retrieved 3716 results by searching the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE via Ovid, and Cochrane CENTRAL via Ovid. No date or language limits were used in the search. Computerized deduplication was conducted using EndNote followed by a confirmatory manual review resulting in 3414 citations. An additional 19 manuscripts were identified through review of references. The screening process followed a standard protocol, using two screeners at the title/abstract level to determine relevance and at the full-text level to determine eligibility for inclusion. The 3427 titles/abstracts were independently screened by two board-certified neurointensivists to determine relevance for full-text review, and 3248 were rejected. The remaining 179 abstracts were reviewed in full text using predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Ultimately, 75 articles met our inclusion criteria and were utilized in the final analysis. An additional six articles on glycemic control were added during the review process of this paper bringing total number of articles to 75. See Fig. 1 for PRISMA flowchart [5]. GRADE criteria were used to determine quality of evidence at the study level. After full-text review, studies were grouped based on type of intervention [6].

Fig. 1
figure1

Reproduced from: Moher et al. [77]

PRISMA 2009 flow diagram.

Results

Methods to Reduce Surgical Site Infections

The following studies demonstrated that attempts to decrease SSI via vigilant adoptions of care bundles can dramatically decrease SSI rate. Le et al. [7] reported a pre/post study on the effect of a perioperative care bundle to reduce SSI and other complications after cranioplasty. The bundle included four doses of perioperative vancomycin, a barrier dressing through postoperative day 3, and decolonization of the surgical incision using topical chlorhexidine from postoperative day 4–7.

In development of their bundle, the authors noted the high rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization compared to other patients in the neurosciences ICU (19 vs. 6%). The care bundle led to decreased rates of SSI (24–3%, p = 0.02) and eliminated the need for redo cranioplasty (19 vs 0%, p = 0.02). Hale et al. [8] report on a pre- and postoperative bundle to reduce SSI. They introduced a “Craniotomy Checklist” which included preoperative chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) shampoo, preoperative CHG-alcohol skin prep, postoperative incision care orders, and a new glycemic control protocol. Craniotomy SSI decreased from 4.4 to 1.2% (p = 0.03). As with other care bundles, it is difficult to assess the efficacy of individual components, but the effectiveness of the bundles demonstrated here denotes that very low rates of SSI are possible.

In a slightly difference approach, Adogwa et al. [9] reported on use of negative pressure wound therapy on patients undergoing long-segment thoracolumbar fusion. In 46 patients, the device was left in place until postoperative day 3 compared with 114 controls. All patients had subfascial drains. The authors demonstrated a relative decrease of 30% in rates of SSI (11 vs. 15%, p = 0.04) as well as decreased rates of wound dehiscence (6 vs. 12%, p = 0.02).

Infection Prevention for Patients with External Ventricular Drains (EVDs)

EVD Bundles

Table 1 describes the protocol details of 18 different EVD bundles extracted from 17 manuscripts describing 15 unique cohorts [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. All of the manuscripts are quasi-experimental studies assessing the association between implementation of an EVD protocol and the rate of ventriculostomy-related infections (VRIs). The protocols focus on a number of key categories related to EVD placement and maintenance including: (a) use of a checklist; (b) insertion setting (operating room vs. ICU); (c) strictness of sterility during the procedure; (d) hair removal; (e) catheter-type; (f) tunneling; (g) use of occlusive dressings; (h) post-procedure prophylactic antibiotics; (i) reduction in frequency of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sampling; (j) aseptic technique for sampling or manipulation of drain; and k) routine EVD exchanges for extended dwell times. All protocols were developed, implemented, and published by the multi-disciplinary stakeholders in care for patients with EVDs. All protocols involved staff education and many included implementation of periodic infection control rounds.

Table 1 Characteristics of external ventricular brain bundles

The large number of interventions that occur with implementation of each bundle makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness and necessity of each component of the bundle. Additionally, the heterogeneous patient populations, variations in surveillance techniques, and unique definitions of VRI complicate comparisons of the prevalence of VRI across institutions. However, these bundles demonstrate that implementation of a comprehensive EVD bundle that emphasizes aseptic technique throughout the entire lifespan of the EVD has the ability to significantly decrease rates of VRI and that rates approaching 0 are possible. The incremental improvements seen in the studies which introduced aspects of their bundles over different phases provides evidence that a multi-pronged approach is likely necessary to achieve very low rates of VRI.

Silver and Antibiotic-Impregnated EVDs

A number of studies evaluated the benefits of antibiotic-impregnated EVDs as compared with standard catheters. Wong et al. [27] conducted a prospective RCT comparing the infection rate in patients with standard EVDs (who received dual prophylactic systemic antibiotics) and patients with EVDs impregnated with clindamycin and rifampicin (who received only periprocedural systemic antibiotics). They found no ventriculostomy-related infections in either group and no significant difference in the rates of extracranial infections (51 vs. 46%, p = 0.617). In a 2003 prospective RCT of 288 patients at six medical centers, Zabramski et al. [28] compared standard EVDs with minocycline/rifampin-impregnated EVDs and found that the standard EVDs were twice as likely to become colonized (37 vs. 18%, p < 0.0012). Many studies by other authors confirmed the findings by Zabramski et al., [29,30,31], but two retrospective observational cohort studies found no significant difference in the rate of infections for patients with standard EVDs and those with antibiotic-impregnated EVDs [32, 33]. Although Mikhaylov et al. found that antibiotic-impregnated EVDs were associated with lower 3-year mortality rate than standard EVDs (15.8 vs. 24.6%, p = 0.21), Shekhar et al. found that 20% of patients with antibiotic-impregnated EVDs died and 12% of patients with standard EVDs died. The types of antibiotics in antibiotic-impregnated EVDs vary, but in a study that compared the rates of infection in patients with minocycline/rifampin-impregnated catheters and clindamycin/rifampin-impregnated catheters, Abla et al. [34] found no positive cerebrospinal fluid cultures in either cohort.

Silver-bearing catheters have also been used to prevent meningitis. One study of 164 patients that compared standard EVDs with silver-bearing EVDs showed that the occurrence of a positive cerebrospinal fluid culture, colonization of the catheter tip, or cerebrospinal fluid white blood cell count > 4cells/μl was significantly less in patients with silver-bearing catheters (18.9 vs. 33.7%, p = 0.04) [35].

While there are insufficient data to state whether silver-bearing or antibiotic-impregnated catheters are superior to one another, the above evidence suggests that both are superior to standard EVDs with respect to infection prevention. Silver- or antibiotic-impregnated catheters are included in many EVD bundles in neurosciences ICUs where the VRI rate approached zero. Additionally, use of silver- or antibiotic-impregnated catheters may reduce need for prolonged prophylactic systemic antibiotics.

Prolonged Prophylactic Antibiotics for EVDs

The data as to whether prolonged prophylactic antibiotics improve VRI rates are mixed. In one RCT of 255 patients comparing single (cefepime) and dual (ampicillin/sulbactam and aztreonam) antibiotics for the duration of EVD presence, the authors found 12% of patients in the single group and 6% of patients in the dual group developed VRI (p = 0.7) [36]. In a separate RCT, Poon et al. [37] found rates of VRI and extracranial infections were lower in patients who received ampicillin/sulbactam and aztreonam until EVD removal as compared with patients who received periprocedural ampicillin/sulbactam (3 vs. 11%, p = 0.01 for VRI and 20 vs. 42%, p = 0.002 for extracranial infections).

While these studies showed superiority of aggressive antibiotic prophylaxis of EVDs, other studies found results questioning their efficacy [26, 38, 39]. One retrospective study comparing 209 patients who received cefuroxime for the duration of EVD placement and 99 patients who received it periprocedurally (for three or less doses) found that the infection rates were nearly identical (3.8 vs. 4.0%). The authors estimated that discontinuation of prolonged prophylactic antibiotics would lead to a savings of $80,000 per year in direct drug costs [38]. Additionally, in a prospective observational study of 866 patients with antibiotic-impregnated catheters, Murphy et al. found that there was no significant difference in the rate of infection between patients who were given cefazolin or vancomycin for the duration of EVD placement versus those who were given antibiotics periprocedurally (1.1 vs. 0.4%, p = 0.22). The authors noted that use of periprocedural antibiotics led to cost savings of $162,516 in drug costs and reduction in nosocomial infections [39]. Dellit et al. [40] also found that limiting prophylactic antibiotic use to periprocedural administration decreased the incidence of Clostridium difficile infections. Of note, they used antibiotic-impregnated EVDs and there was no change in number of positive CSF cultures after discontinuation of prolonged prophylactic antibiotics.

These studies suggest that the utility of prolonged prophylactic antibiotics is dependent on a number of factors including background rate of VRI, concurrent use of other infection prevention methods or “bundles,” and use of silver or antibiotic-impregnated EVDs. Notably, decreased antibiotic use may be associated with lower rates of Clostridium difficile and growth of resistant bacteria.

Frequency of CSF Sampling

One study directly addressed the effect of decreasing the frequency of CSF sampling on rates on frequency of VRIs [41]. In this quasi-experimental study of mostly subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with EVDs, the authors looked at the effect of daily CSF sampling versus every 3-day sampling on frequency of “suspected” VRI (defined as those who were treated with antibiotics) and “proven” VRI (defined as those who were treated and had positive CSF cultures). The incidence of “suspected” VRI decreased from 17 to 11% and that of “proven” VRI from 10 to 3%. After controlling for other factors associated with VRI, the authors found the odds ratio for VRI was 0.44 in the every 3-day sampling group compared to daily.

EVD Exchanges

Only one study provides experimental evidence on the effect of routine EVD exchange on rates of VRI. This small RCT of 103 patients compared regular EVD exchange every 5 days to exchange only when clinically indicated [42]. Patients requiring a new catheter had it placed contralateral to existing catheter. The authors found VRI in 8% of patients active arm versus 4% in the control arm (p = 0.44). The mean number of EVDs in the active group was 2.4, while only one patient needed a catheter exchange in the control group (for occlusion). All infections occurred after day 10 in both groups.

A small study of 32 patients investigated the effect of decreasing the frequency of changing the EVD drainage set [43]. They demonstrated a reduction in “evidence of ventriculitis” from 69 to 37% by changing the drainage set less frequently, from 3 to 7 days. However, the high rate of infection in this study makes generalization difficult.

Methods to Prevent VRI at the EVD Insertion Site

In an effort to reduce infections with typical skin commensals, Schodel et al. [44] examined the effect of using a bolt-kit to isolate the EVD as it traverses the skin upon skull entry. In this pre/post study, the authors found a small but significant decrease in VRI using the bolt-kit system compared to traditional twist-drill hole only (4.9 vs. 6.8%, p = 0.034). The results remained significant after controlling for patient age, drainage time, and number of punctures.

Drawing on parallel efforts to reduce CLABSIs, one study examined the isolated effect of chlorhexidine-containing dressings on rates of VRI [45]. The authors saw a reduction from 6.98 to 1.70 VRI per 1000 EVD days, almost exclusively due to decreased infection with staphylococcus species.

Similarly, another quasi-experimental study examined the effect of a cyanoacrylate adhesive (Dermabond) on rates of VRI in patients mostly suffering from non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage [46]. Dermabond, according to the authors, is a “water-catalyzed adhesive that is especially formulated for use on skin and indicated for the primary closure of small, clean surgical wounds….and as a barrier against common bacterial microbes.” The authors showed a reduction in VRI frequency from 15 to 4% (p = 0.002), mostly due to reduction in rates of staphylococcus infections. This reduction supports the authors’ conclusions that Dermabond reduces VRI by providing a barrier to the entry of gram-positive skin flora along the EVD tract.

Infection Prevention for Patients with Intracranial Pressure Monitors

Only one study examined the effect of prolonged prophylactic antibiotics in patients with parenchymal intracranial pressure (ICP) monitors [47]. This study of 279 patients with TBI evaluated the effect of a protocol change from use of a broad-spectrum antibiotic (ceftriaxone) to a narrow-spectrum antibiotic (cefazolin) with the hypothesis that tailoring coverage would not change overall central nervous system (CNS) infection rates but would result in less resistant infections when they occurred in both the CNS and systemically. The authors found an insignificant difference in CNS infections rate between the narrow-spectrum group (1.7%) and the broad-spectrum group (4.4%). Of note, 19 out of 119 patients in the narrow-spectrum group received no antibiotics for reasons not described. There was a higher proportion of systemic infections arising from resistant gram negative species in the broad-spectrum group, especially in patients that developed infections later in the hospital course. There were no experimental or quasi-experimental studies investigating infection rates with and without antibiotic prophylaxis for patients with ICP monitors.

Infection Prevention for Patients with Subdural or Subgaleal Drains

One study from our group evaluated the effect of a protocol change which eliminated the use of prolonged prophylactic antibiotics (cefazolin or vancomycin) in postoperative neurosurgical patients with subdural and subgaleal drains [48]. The 105 patients in the antibiotic group received 513 doses of cefazolin and 77 doses of vancomycin postoperatively until the time of drain removal, compared to six doses of cefazolin and one dose of vancomycin postoperatively for the 80 patients in the no antibiotic group. The rates of SSIs in both groups were similar (1 superficial and 1 deep in the antibiotics group) versus one infection in the no-antibiotics group. There were two cases of Clostridium difficile in the antibiotics group versus none in the no-antibiotics group, but this was insignificant (p = 0.5). We also noted a cost savings of $887.50 per patient in the no-antibiotics group, mostly due to increased costs of treating three patients with resistant infections in the prolonged antibiotics group. There were no resistant organisms grown in the no-antibiotics group.

Glycemic Control to Reduce ICU-Acquired Infections

Six studies reported the results of RCTs on intensive insulin therapy versus more liberal glycemic control strategies and its effect on hospital-acquired infections in mixed groups of neurocritically ill patients [49,50,51,52,53,54]. Four of the six studies showed no difference in rates of ICU-acquired infections, while two showed overall lower rates of infections (in SAH and TBI populations). However, the authors of the study that showed decreased rates of infection with intensive insulin management in SAH patients were unable to replicate their findings in a follow-up study which on patients with TBI [53]. A recent meta-analysis pooled the rates of ICU-acquired pneumonia and found no difference in pooled rates of pneumonia between different arms of glucose control across studies (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.82–1.32, p = 0.73) [49].

Infection Prevention after CNS Trauma

Five studies reported the results of RCTs examining the use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients with basilar skull fractures and evidence of CSF leak [50,51,52,53,54]. Of note, these five studies were the subject of a 2015 Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis which found no benefit to prophylactic antibiotics for reducing the rates of meningitis or meningitis-related mortality in this population [55]. The studies are summarized in Table 2. None of the five studies found a significant reduction in risk of meningitis with prophylactic antibiotic usage, although one study did show a decreased rate of combined meningitis and SSI. With one exception, the rates of meningitis in this clinical setting were low, and most authors recommended against use of prophylaxis based on their findings.

Table 2 Studies of prophylactic antibiotics in basilar skill fractures with CSF leak

Prophylactic Antibiotics to Prevent Hospital-Acquired Infections in the Neurosciences ICU

Prophylactic Antibiotics for Comatose Patients

We identified three studies (2 RCTs, 1 quasi-experimental) that examined whether prophylactic antibiotics were effective in lowering rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in patients presenting with coma [56,57,58]. Sirvent et al. [56] published an open-label RCT of 100 patients in coma (mostly due to TBI (86%) with some stroke and post-neurosurgery patients) with Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) ≤ 12 and expected mechanical ventilation > 72 h. The experimental arm (n = 50) received two doses of high-dose cefuroxime (1500 mg) 12 h apart compared to usual care for the control arm. The incidence of pneumonia in the experimental arm was 24% compared to 50% in the control group (p = 0.007) with most pneumonia occurring within the first 4 days of mechanical ventilation. Despite the reduction in incidence of pneumonia, there was no difference in morbidity or mortality between groups. Acquarolo et al. [57] performed a small randomized, open-label study using 3 days of ampicillin-sulbactam (3 g every 6 h) in 38 comatose patients (GCS ≤ 8) on mechanical ventilation in a mixed TBI, stroke, and cardiac arrest population. A reduction in early onset (within first 4 days) pneumonia was seen (58% control vs. 21% prophylaxis, p = 0.02) without an effect on functional outcome, but the study was underpowered for this outcome. A quasi-experimental study of 129 ventilated patients (71 in prophylaxis group, 58 in control) with coma (GCS ≤ 8) compared a single dose of ceftriaxone (2 g) to control in reduction in early onset (within first 4 days) pneumonia [58]. The groups had similar age (56 vs. 59), APACHE (17 vs. 18), and GCS (5 for both groups) scores. The incidence of early onset pneumonia was lower in the prophylaxis arm compared to control (4.4 vs. 23.1/1000 days of mechanical ventilation, p = 0.02). No mortality benefit was seen, though the prophylaxis group had lower mechanical ventilation and ICU days (10 and 15 day control vs. 6 and 10 prophylaxis, p = 0.01 and 0.02).

Prophylactic Antibiotics for Patients with Severe Ischemic Stroke

While the majority of patients included in the seven published RCTs on use of prophylactic antibiotics after stroke had mild strokes and thus would not be admitted to a neurosciences ICU, two studies evaluating the role of prophylactic antibiotics in patients with severe stroke met our inclusion criteria [59, 60]. The Mannheim Infection in Stroke Study (MISS) was a RCT evaluating the efficacy of prophylactic mezlocillin/sulbactam for 4 days compared to usual care in patients with stroke who had modified Rankin scores > 3 [59]. The study enrolled 30 patients in each group within 4 h of symptom onset. Infections developed in 50% of patients with prophylaxis and in 90% of patients with usual care in the first 10 days (p = 0.002). The reduction was mostly due to decreased rates of urinary tract infections (UTIs). The authors also note that while the infection rate in the prophylactic group was high, most of these infections occurred after prophylactic antibiotics were stopped, with a mean day of infection of 5.1 compared to day 3.3 in the control arm (p = 0.003). Functional outcomes at 90 days were improved in patients in the prophylaxis arm, with 18 patients with mRS 3–4 versus 9 in the control group p < 0.05).

The PANTHERIS trial randomized 80 patients with severe middle cerebral artery infarcts to either 5 days of prophylactic intravenous moxifloxacin (ppx) or placebo within 36 h of symptom onset. Both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were performed due to early deaths, withdrawal of consent, and protocol violations. The primary outcome was total infection rate at day 11. In the ITT analysis (n = 79), the rate of infection was 15% in the treated group and 33% in the placebo group (p = 0.1). In the PP analysis (n = 66), the infection rate was 17% in the treated group and 42% in the control group (p = 0.03). In contrast to the MISS study, the rate of UTIs was similar between groups (ITT: 7.7% ppx vs. 12.5% control, p = 0.7; PP 8.6% ppx vs. 16.1% control, p = 0.5). The rates of pneumonia were reduced to a greater extent but did not reach statistical significance (ITT: 7.7% ppx vs. 20% control, p = 0.2; PP: 8.6% ppx vs. 25.8% control, p = 0.1). Of note, only 9% of patients in the trial received mechanical ventilation (1 ppx, 6 control). Survival curve analysis over the first 180 days showed no survival difference between groups (p = 0.6).

Prevention of VAP in the Neurosciences ICU

Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Bundles

Weireter et al. [61] performed a quasi-experimental study evaluating the efficacy of a VAP bundle in reducing rates of VAP in a neurotrauma ICU. The intervention instituted a weekly multi-disciplinary team meeting, standardized weaning protocols (including empowerment of respiratory therapists and nursing to proceed with extubation if all protocol criteria were met), an oral care regimen, protocols for patient positioning, subglottic suctioning for patients with endotracheal tubes, and aggressive antibiotic stewardship. VAP rates dropped from 21/1000 patient days to < 1/1000 patient days. Mechanical ventilation time also decreased from 5.8 to 4.75 days over a 10-year period.

Two additional conference abstracts reported on the efficacy of multi-intervention performance improvement projects in reducing rates of VAP in the neurosciences ICU [62, 63]. Both reports showed improvement in VAP. Interventions included use of multi-disciplinary work groups, VAP bundles, hand hygiene, oral care, and reduction in transport of patients.

Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract

In 1993, two trials reported conflicting results on the effect of selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) to prevent pneumonia in mechanically ventilated neurosciences ICU patients.

Korinek et al. [64] performed a double-blinded RCT of SDD on 123 comatose patients intubated for at least 5 days after emergent admission to a neurosurgical ICU for mostly trauma and vascular insults. The study period consisted of up to 15 days of a suspension of polymyxin E 100 mg, tobramycin 80 mg, and amphotericin B 500 mg via nasogastric tube as well as oral application of a paste consisting of a 2% mixture of the above antimicrobials and 4% vancomycin. The primary outcome was incidence of bronchopneumonia. Patients were excluded for infection, extubation, or death prior to day five. The authors found a decrease in the rates of both bronchopneumonia (42 vs. 24%, p < 0.04) and total infections (82 vs. 46%, p < 0.001). The authors found the reduction in infection to be higher in head trauma versus vascular patients. There was no difference in mortality between groups.

Hammond and Potgieter [65] conducted a smaller RCT of SDD on 33 patients with mostly non-surgical neurological issues (Guillain-Barré syndrome, meningoencephalitis, status epilepticus, and myasthenia gravis) who were expected to remain intubated for at least 48 h and remain in ICU for at least five days. The SDD consisted of the same agents as in the Korinek study; however, both SDD and placebo arms received three days of intravenous cefotaxime. There was an overall higher infection rate in the SDD group (46 vs. 32%, no p value reported). The authors did not publish data on mortality or functional outcomes. The study is flawed by the use of intravenous cefotaxime in both arms, which the authors state was added because “the use of an intravenous placebo might have resulted in the withdrawal of an excessive number of cases from the study because the need for antibiotics would have led to unblinding.” However, given that prophylactic intravenous antibiotics for mechanical ventilation are not standard of care, the authors dilute the effect of SDD by their design.

A brief conference abstract reported the results of a quasi-experimental study on the effect of oral and enteral SDD with intravenous cefotaxime on rates of nosocomial pneumonia in a neurotrauma ICU [66]. They demonstrated a significant decrease in rates of pneumonia, but additional details were not available in the abstract.

Oral Hygiene

Three articles discussed the use oropharyngeal decontamination to prevent VAP in patients with neurotrauma or severe stroke.

Seguin et al. [67] performed a single-center RCT with 110 patients to evaluate the efficacy of regular oropharyngeal application of povidone-iodine in closed head trauma patients with GCS ≤ 8 after initial resuscitation and expected need for mechanical ventilation for ≥ 2 days. The incidence of VAP in the decontamination group was 8 vs. 39% in the active control (saline, p = 0.003) and 42% in the negative control (no oral application, p = 0.001). Pneumonias occurred earlier (median day 3) in the povidone-iodine group compared to the control group (median day 8). There was no difference in length-of-stay or mortality between groups.

Based on these results, a multicenter, placebo-controlled randomized double-blind trial was performed to evaluate the same research question in an expanded patient population that included patients with hemorrhagic stroke in addition to neurotrauma patients [68]. In the 150 patients in the intention-to-treat analysis, they found VAP rates of 31% in the povidone-iodine group versus 28% in the control group (RR 1.11, CI 0.67–1.82). Of note, there were five cases of acute respiratory distress syndrome in the povidone-iodine group and none in the control arm. There were no differences in ICU and Hospital length-of-stay or ICU and 90-day mortality.

Wagner et al. [69] performed a quasi-experimental study to evaluate whether a protocol for oral hygiene care was effective in reducing rates of pneumonia in both intubated and non-intubated patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage. After instituting the protocol which consisted of campus-wide nursing education to perform systematic assessment of oral health and use of Sage Oral Care kits (0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride and 1.5% hydrogen peroxide and suction toothbrush, rates of VAP decreased from 14 to 10% (p = 0.022). Although there was a higher proportion of intracerebral hemorrhage patients in the pre-protocol cohort (47 vs. 31%), a post hoc analysis showed no effect modification by stroke subtype on the efficacy of intervention.

Prevention of Central Line-Associated Blood Stream Infections in the Neurosciences Intensive Care Unit

In two reports, Fukunaga et al. [70, 71] reported on the efficacy of povidone-iodine ointment and gauze dressings in reducing rates of CLABSI in a mixed neurological ICU population. They showed that application of a 10% povidone-iodine ointment covered with gauze and a Tegaderm resulted in less CLABSI and central line colonization than use of Tegaderm alone (0/1000 days CLABSI, 0.6/1000 days colonization vs. 5.22/1000 days CLABSI, 9/1000 days colonization, both p < 0.05).

Elsayed et al. [72] reported on the efficacy of a multi-intervention approach in reducing CLABSI rates in a mixed neuro-ICU population through use of prepacked central line kits including all necessary sterile equipment, campus-wide education, a central line bundle, antiseptic coated catheters, and biopatches. The CLABSI rate decreased from 6.24 to 3.7 per 1000/catheter days in the first year (no p-value reported). Continued enforcement of the intervention led to 0 CLABSIs by year 4.

Prevention of Urinary Tract Infections in the Neurosciences Intensive Care Unit

Wisniewski et al. [73] reported on the efficacy of a nursing driven protocol in a neurosurgical ICU to perform meatal and foley care using chlorhexidine wipes to reduce rates of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). The CAUTI rate decreased from 5.8/1000 to 0/1000 device days (p < 0.001).

Samuel et al. [74] described a protocol that included daily assessment of catheter need according to preset criteria, urine culture only with a positive urinalysis if other causes of fever were excluded, nursing foley maintenance strategies, and compliance audits. After implementing the protocol with a 6-month education phase, the CAUTI rate in the neurosciences ICU decreased from 3 to 1% (p = 0.001) and length-of-stay decreased from 3 to 2 days (p = 0.02) though mortality and post-ICU disposition did not change.

Patel et al. [75] reported on a physician-directed daily checklist to assess whether a urinary catheter was still needed and a nursing-directed protocol to utilize bladder scanning and clean intermittent catheterization prior to insertion of a urinary catheter. They found a nonsignificant decrease in CAUTI rate from 3.8 to 2.9 infections/1000 catheter days (p = 0.8) and a decrease in the percentage of catheter days in the ICU (69–50%, p = 0.02). Lusby et al. reported on a similar protocol which also utilized chlorhexidine baths and reflex cultures only after positive urinalysis. CAUTI rates decreased from 8.6 to 3.7/1000 patient days (p = 0.001) [76].

Conclusion

Preventing hospital-acquired infections is an important focus in neurosciences ICUs. There are numerous infection prevention strategies available. The reviewed literature highlights the need for collaborative, multi-disciplinary, and multi-pronged approaches. Rates of VRI, SSI, VAP, CAUTI, and CLABSI can approach zero with persistence and a team-based approach. Given the impact preventing these infections may have on patient-centered outcomes as well as their use as important benchmarks for regulatory agencies and payers on measuring the quality of care, developing protocols and auditing compliance for prevention infection should be standard practice in modern neurosciences ICUs.

References

  1. 1.

    Gould CV, Umscheid CA, Agarwal RK, et al. Guideline for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections 2009. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31(4):319–26.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Blot K, Bergs J, Vogelaers D, Blot S, Vandijck D. Prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infections through quality improvement interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(1):96–105.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Muscedere J, Dodek P, Keenan S, et al. Comprehensive evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for ventilator-associated pneumonia: prevention. J Crit Care. 2008;23(1):126–37.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013;70(3):195–283.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group, P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1006–12.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Le C, Guppy KH, Axelrod YV, et al. Lower complication rates for cranioplasty with peri-operative bundle. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014;120:41–4.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Hale M, Coppa N, Dogan A, Townes J. A multi-disciplinary performance improvement project to reduce craniotomy surgical site infections. Am J Infect Control. 2012;40(5):e47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Adogwa O, Fatemi P, Perez E, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy reduces incidence of postoperative wound infection and dehiscence after long-segment thoracolumbar spinal fusion: a single institutional experience. Spine J. 2014;14(12):2911–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bader MK, Littlejohns L, Palmer S. Ventriculostomy and intracranial pressure monitoring: in search of a 0% infection rate. Heart Lung J Crit Care. 1995;24(2):166–72.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Korinek AM, Reina M, Boch AL, et al. Prevention of external ventricular drain–related ventriculitis. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2005;147(1):39–45 discussion-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Dasic D, Hanna SJ, Bojanic S, Kerr RSC. External ventricular drain infection: the effect of a strict protocol on infection rates and a review of the literature. Br J Neurosurg. 2006;20(5):296–300.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Harrop JS, Sharan AD, Ratliff J, et al. Impact of a standardized protocol and antibiotic-impregnated catheters on ventriculostomy infection rates in cerebrovascular patients. Neurosurgery. 2010;67(1):187–91 discussion 91.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Honda H, Jones JC, Craighead MC, et al. Reducing the incidence of intraventricular catheter-related ventriculitis in the neurology-neurosurgical intensive care unit at a tertiary care center in St Louis, Missouri: an 8-year follow-up study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31(10):1078–81.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Leverstein-van Hall MA, Hopmans TE, van der Sprenkel JW, et al. A bundle approach to reduce the incidence of external ventricular and lumbar drain-related infections. J Neurosurg. 2010;112(2):345–53.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Amini S, Fauerbach L, Archibald L, Friedman W, Layon A. Ventriculostomy-placement bundle and decreased ventricular infections: a single institution’s experience. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:139.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Rahman M, Whiting JH, Fauerbach LL, Archibald L, Friedman WA. Reducing ventriculostomy-related infections to near zero: the eliminating ventriculostomy infection study. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Jt Comm Resour. 2012;38(10):459–64.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kubilay Z, Amini S, Fauerbach LL, et al. Decreasing ventricular infections through the use of a ventriculostomy placement bundle: experience at a single institution. J Neurosurg. 2013;118(3):514–20.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Hill M, Baker G, Carter D, et al. A multidisciplinary approach to end external ventricular drain infections in the neurocritical care unit. J Neurosci Nurs. 2012;44(4):188–93.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lwin S, Low SW, Choy DK, Yeo TT, Chou N. External ventricular drain infections: successful implementation of strategies to reduce infection rate. Singapore Med J. 2012;53(4):255–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Flint AC, Rao VA, Renda NC, et al. A simple protocol to prevent external ventricular drain infections. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(6):993–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Camacho EF, Boszczowski I, Freire MP, et al. Impact of an educational intervention implanted in a neurological intensive care unit on rates of infection related to external ventricular drains. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(2):e50708.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Zakaria R, Tripathy S, Srikandarajah N, Rothburn MM, Lawson DDA. Reduction of drain-associated cerebrospinal fluid infections in neurosurgical inpatients: a prospective study. J Hosp Infect. 2013;84(3):215–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Chatzi M, Karvouniaris M, Makris D, et al. Bundle of measures for external cerebral ventricular drainage-associated ventriculitis. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(1):66–73.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Angulo MN, Fagaragan L, Tabbilos SJ, et al. Improving the practice on external ventricular drains: risk and cost reduction through a multi-collaborative approach. Neurocrit Care. 2015;1:S138.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Phan K, Schultz K, Huang C, et al. External ventricular drain infections at the Canberra Hospital: a retrospective study. J Clin Neurosci. 2016;32:95–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Wong GK, Poon WS, Ng SC, Ip M. The impact of ventricular catheter impregnated with antimicrobial agents on infections in patients with ventricular catheter: interim report. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2008;102:53–5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Zabramski JM, Whiting D, Darouiche RO, et al. Efficacy of antimicrobial-impregnated external ventricular drain catheters: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Neurosurg. 2003;98(4):725–30.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Gutierrez-Gonzalez R, Boto GR, Fernandez-Perez C, del Prado N. Protective effect of rifampicin and clindamycin impregnated devices against Staphylococcus spp. infection after cerebrospinal fluid diversion procedures. BMC Neurol. 2010;10:93.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Wright K, Young P, Brickman C, et al. Rates and determinants of ventriculostomy-related infections during a hospital transition to use of antibiotic-coated external ventricular drains. Neurosurg Focus. 2013;34(5):E12.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Mikhaylov Y, Wilson TJ, Rajajee V, et al. Efficacy of antibiotic-impregnated external ventricular drains in reducing ventriculostomy-associated infections. J Clin Neurosci. 2014;21(5):765–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Verberk JDM, Berkelbach van der Sprenkel JW, Arts MP, et al. Preventing ventriculostomy-related infections with antibiotic-impregnated drains in hospitals: a two-centre Dutch study. J Hosp Infect. 2016;92(4):401–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Shekhar H, Kalsi P, Dambatta S, Strachan R. Do antibiotic-impregnated external ventriculostomy catheters have a low infection rate in clinical practice? A retrospective cohort study. Br J Neurosurg. 2016;30(1):64–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Abla AA, Zabramski JM, Jahnke HK, Fusco D, Nakaji P. Comparison of two antibiotic-impregnated ventricular catheters: a prospective sequential series trial. Neurosurgery. 2011;68(2):437–42 discussion 42.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Fichtner J, Guresir E, Seifert V, Raabe A. Efficacy of silver-bearing external ventricular drainage catheters: a retrospective analysis. J Neurosurg. 2010;112(4):840–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Wong GKC, Poon WS, Lyon D, Wai S. Cefepime vs. Ampicillin/Sulbactam and Aztreonam as antibiotic prophylaxis in neurosurgical patients with external ventricular drain: result of a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2006;31(3):231–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Poon WS, Ng S, Wai S. CSF antibiotic prophylaxis for neurosurgical patients with ventriculostomy: a randomised study. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 1998;71:146–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Alleyne CH Jr, Hassan M, Zabramski JM, et al. The efficacy and cost of prophylactic and periprocedural antibiotics in patients with external ventricular drains. Neurosurgery. 2000;47(5):1124–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Murphy RKJ, Liu B, Srinath A, et al. No additional protection against ventriculitis with prolonged systemic antibiotic prophylaxis for patients treated with antibiotic-coated external ventricular drains. J Neurosurg. 2015;122(5):1120–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Dellit TH, Chan JD, Fulton C, et al. Reduction in Clostridium difficile infections among neurosurgical patients associated with discontinuation of antimicrobial prophylaxis for the duration of external ventricular drain placement. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35(5):589–90.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Williams TA, Leslie GD, Dobb GJ, Roberts B, van Heerden PV. Decrease in proven ventriculitis by reducing the frequency of cerebrospinal fluid sampling from extraventricular drains. J Neurosurg. 2011;115(5):1040–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Wong GKC, Poon WS, Wai S, et al. Failure of regular external ventricular drain exchange to reduce cerebrospinal fluid infection: result of a randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73(6):759–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Duncan C, Laurie K, Lynch M. Reducing the frequency of external ventricular drainage set changes may reduce the incidence of clinically defined ventriculitis. Aust Crit Care. 2011;24(1):69.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Schodel P, Proescholdt M, Ullrich OW, Brawanski A, Schebesch KM. An outcome analysis of two different procedures of burr-hole trephine and external ventricular drainage in acute hydrocephalus. J Clin Neurosci. 2012;19(2):267–70.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Scheithauer S, Schulze-Steinen H, Hollig A, et al. Significant reduction of external ventricular drainage-associated meningoventriculitis by chlorhexidine-containing dressings: a before-after trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62(3):404–5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Bookland MJ, Sukul V, Connolly PJ. Use of a cyanoacrylate skin adhesive to reduce external ventricular drain infection rates. J Neurosurg. 2014;121(1):189–94.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    May AK, Fleming SB, Carpenter RO, et al. Influence of broad-spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis on intracranial pressure monitor infections and subsequent infectious complications in head-injured patients. Surg Infect. 2006;7(5):409–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Lewis A, Sen R, Hill TC, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for subdural and subgaleal drains. J Neurosurg. 2017;126(3):908–12.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Kramer AH, Roberts DJ, Zygun DA. Optimal glycemic control in neurocritical care patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2012;16(5):R203.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Ignelzi RJ, VanderArk GD. Analysis of the treatment of basilar skull fractures with and without antibiotics. J Neurosurg. 1975;43(6):721–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Hoff JT, Brewin AU, Letter HS. : antibiotics for basilar skull fracture. J Neurosurg. 1976;44(5):649.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Klastersky J, Sadeghi M, Brihaye J. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with rhinorrhea or otorrhea: a double-blind study. Surg Neurol. 1976;6(2):111–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Demetriades D, Charalambides D, Lakhoo M, Pantanowitz D. Role of prophylactic antibiotics in open and basilar fractures of the skull: a randomized study. Injury. 1992;23(6):377–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Eftekhar B, Ghodsi M, Nejat F, Ketabchi E, Esmaeeli B. Prophylactic administration of ceftriaxone for the prevention of meningitis after traumatic pneumocephalus: results of a clinical trial. J Neurosurg. 2004;101(5):757–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Ratilal BO, Costa J, Pappamikail L, Sampaio C. Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing meningitis in patients with basilar skull fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;4:CD004884.

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Sirvent JM, Torres A, El-Ebiary M, et al. Protective effect of intravenously administered cefuroxime against nosocomial pneumonia in patients with structural coma. Am J Respir Crit Med. 1997;155(5):1729–34.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Acquarolo A, Urli T, Perone G, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis of early onset pneumonia in critically ill comatose patients. A randomized study. Intensiv Care Med. 2005;31(4):510–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Valles J, Peredo R, Burgueno MJ, et al. Efficacy of single-dose antibiotic against early-onset pneumonia in comatose patients who are ventilated. Chest. 2013;143(5):1219–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Schwarz S, Al-Shajlawi F, Sick C, Meairs S, Hennerici MG. Effects of prophylactic antibiotic therapy with mezlocillin plus sulbactam on the incidence and height of fever after severe acute ischemic stroke: the Mannheim infection in stroke study (MISS). Stroke. 2008;39(4):1220–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Harms H, Prass K, Meisel C, et al. Preventive antibacterial therapy in acute ischemic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE. 2008;3(5):e2158.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Weireter LJ Jr, Collins JN, Britt RC, et al. Impact of a monitored program of care on incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia: results of a longterm performance-improvement project. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208(5):700–4.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Schmitz M. Preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia in the neuroscience intensive care unit: a multidisciplinary approach. Am J Infect Control. 2013;1:S89–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Frattalone A, Ziai W, Fellerman D. Effect of independent monitoring and quality improvement interventions on the rate of ventilator associated pneumonia in a neurocritical care unit. Neurocrit Care. 2011;1:S264.

    Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Korinek AM, Laisne MJ, Nicolas MH, et al. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract in neurosurgical intensive care unit patients: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Crit Care Med. 1993;21(10):1466–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Hammond JMJ, Potgieter PD. Neurologic disease requiring long-term ventilation: the role of selective decontamination of the digestive tract in preventing nosocomial infection. Chest. 1993;104(2):547–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Cabrera Santana M, Pena Morant V, Sanchez Ramirez C, et al. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) effects on nosocomial infections in a neurotraumatic intensive care unit (ICU) in a tertiary-care hospital. Intensiv Care Med. 2013;39:S271–2.

    Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Seguin P, Tanguy M, Laviolle B, Tirel O, Malledant Y. Effect of oropharyngeal decontamination by povidone-iodine on ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients with head trauma. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(5):1514–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Seguin P, Laviolle B, Dahyot-Fizelier C, et al. Effect of oropharyngeal povidone-iodine preventive oral care on ventilator-associated pneumonia in severely brain-injured or cerebral hemorrhage patients: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(1):1–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Wagner C, Marchina S, Deveau JA, et al. Risk of stroke-associated pneumonia and oral hygiene. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;41(1–2):35–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Fukunaga A, Naritaka H, Fukaya R, Tabuse M, Nakamura T. Our method of povidone-iodine ointment and gauze dressings reduced catheter-related infection in serious cases. Dermatology. 2006;212(Suppl 1):47–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Fukunaga A, Naritaka H, Fukaya R, Tabuse M, Nakamura T. Povidone-iodine ointment and gauze dressings associated with reduced catheter-related infection in seriously ill neurosurgical patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004;25(8):696–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Elsayed A, Mahanes D, Nathan B, Gress D. Prevention of catheter-related blood stream infection in the neurointensive care unit. Neurocrit Care. 2010;13:S140.

    Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Wisniewski P, Mulatre M, Ibrahim J, Ashworth S, Aguirre L. Decrease in CAUTI rate following adoption of new protocols in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2013;1:A277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Samuel S, Bertin M, Rasmussen P, Manno E, Frontera J. Implementation of cauti prevention protocol in the Neuro ICU lowers CAUTI rates and length of stay. Crit Care Med. 2014;1:A1550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Patel S, Ibrahim J, Smith C, Safcsak K, Ashworth S. Strategies to reduce urinary catheter usage and rate of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Crit Care Med. 2014;1:A1552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Lusby M, Williams MH, Blaber B, et al. A multi-faceted program to reduce the rates of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Neurocrit Care. 2014;1:S41.

    Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed1000097.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Dr. Lord was supported by CTSA award to NYU School of Medicine (1UL1TR001445).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dr. Lord was involved with all aspects of the study including conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis, interpretation, and drafting. Joseph Nicholson was involved in the conception and design. Dr. Lewis was involved with all aspects of the study including conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis, interpretation, and drafting.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aaron Sylvan Lord.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 21 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lord, A.S., Nicholson, J. & Lewis, A. Infection Prevention in the Neurointensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review. Neurocrit Care 31, 196–210 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-018-0568-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Hospital-acquired infections
  • Neurointensive care
  • Infection prevention
  • Care bundles
  • Surgical site infections
  • Ventriculitis
  • Ventilator-associated pneumonia