Neurocritical Care

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 420–427 | Cite as

CSF Volumetric Analysis for Quantification of Cerebral Edema After Hemispheric Infarction

  • Rajat Dhar
  • Kristy Yuan
  • Tobias Kulik
  • Yasheng Chen
  • Laura Heitsch
  • Hongyu An
  • Andria Ford
  • Jin-Moo Lee
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Malignant cerebral edema (CED) complicates at least 20 % of large hemispheric infarcts (LHI) and may result in neurological deterioration or death. Midline shift (MLS) is a standard but crude measure of edema severity. We propose that volumetric analysis of shifts in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) over time provides a reliable means of quantifying the spectrum of edema severity after LHI.

Methods

We identified 38 patients from 2008 to 2014 with NIHSS ≥8, baseline CT <6 h after stroke onset, at least 1 follow-up (FU) CT, and no parenchymal hematoma. The volumes of CSF (sulci, ventricles, and cisterns) ipsilateral (IL) and contralateral (CL) to infarct on baseline and FU CTs were quantified by manually assisted outlining with MIPAV image analysis software, as was infarct volume and MLS on FU CTs. Percentage change in CSF volumes (∆CSF) from baseline to FU scans was correlated with MLS and compared in those with vs. without malignant edema (defined as hemicraniectomy, osmotic therapy, or death/neurological deterioration with MLS ≥5 mm).

Results

11 of 38 subjects (29 %) developed malignant edema. Neither baseline NIHSS nor CSF volume differed between those with and without edema (median NIHSS 18 vs. 13, p = 0.12, CSF volume 102 vs. 124 ml, p = 0.16). Inter-rater reliability for CSF measurements was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.97). ∆CSF correlated strongly with MLS at peak edema (r = −0.75), even adjusting for infarct volume (p = 0.009). ∆CSF was also greater in those with malignant edema [−55 % (IQR −49 to −62) vs. −36 % (−27 to −45), p = 0.004]. ∆CSF was the greatest within IL sulci [−97 % (−86 to −99) vs. −71 % (−41 to −79), p = 0.002] but also significantly greater within CL sulci in those with malignant edema [−50 % (−29 to −65) vs. −25 % (0 to −31), p = 0.014]. More than half this CSF volume reduction occurred by the time of first FU CT around 24 h after stroke, while MLS rose later.

Conclusions

Volumetric CSF analysis reliably quantifies CED and distinguishes those with malignant edema and MLS from those with a more benign course after LHI. ∆CSF may provide an earlier and more sensitive indicator of edema severity across a broader dynamic range than MLS.

Keywords

Stroke Brain edema Cerebrospinal fluid Neuroimaging 

Supplementary material

12028_2015_204_MOESM1_ESM.docx (58 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 57 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Silver FL, Norris JW, Lewis AJ, Hachinski VC. Early mortality following stroke: a prospective review. Stroke. 1984;15:492–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hacke W, Schwab S, Horn M, Spranger M, De Georgia M, von Kummer R. “Malignant” middle cerebral artery territory infarction: clinical course and prognostic signs. Arch Neurol. 1996;53:309–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vahedi K, Hofmeijer J, Juettler E, Vicaut E, George B, Algra A, et al. Early decompressive surgery in malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery: a pooled analysis of three randomised controlled trials. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6:215–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thomalla G, Hartmann F, Juettler E, Singer OC, Lehnhardt F-G, Köhrmann M, et al. Prediction of malignant middle cerebral artery infarction by magnetic resonance imaging within 6 hours of symptom onset: a prospective multicenter observational study. Ann Neurol. 2010;68:435–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wijdicks EF, Diringer MN. Middle cerebral artery territory infarction and early brain swelling: progression and effect of age on outcome. Mayo Clin Proc. 1998;73:829–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dohmen C, Bosche B, Graf R, Staub F, Kracht L, Sobesky J, et al. Prediction of malignant course in MCA infarction by PET and microdialysis. Stroke. 2003;34:2152–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Manno EM, Adams RE, Derdeyn CP, Powers WJ, Diringer MN. The effects of mannitol on cerebral edema after large hemispheric cerebral infarct. Neurology. 1999;52:583–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kasner SE, Demchuk A, Berrouschot J, Schmutzhard E, Harms L, Verro P, et al. Predictors of fatal brain edema in massive hemispheric ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2001;32:2117–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krieger DW, Demchuk AM, Kasner SE, Jauss M, Hantson L. Early clinical and radiological predictors of fatal brain swelling in ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1999;30:287–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nguyen B-T, Mullins ME. Computed tomography follow-up imaging of stroke. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2006;27:168–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fiorelli M, Bastianello S, von Kummer R, del Zoppo GJ, Larrue V, Lesaffre E, et al. Hemorrhagic transformation within 36 hours of a cerebral infarct: relationships with early clinical deterioration and 3-month outcome in the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study I (ECASS I) cohort. Stroke. 1999;30:2280–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pexman JH, Barber PA, Hill MD, Sevick RJ, Demchuk AM, Hudon ME, et al. Use of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) for assessing CT scans in patients with acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:1534–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Strbian D, Meretoja A, Putaala J, Kaste M, Tatlisumak T. Cerebral edema in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Int J Stroke. 2013;8:529–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Monro A. Observations on the structure and functions of the nervous system. Edinburgh: Creech and Johnson; 1783.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Burrows G. On disorders of the cerebral circulation and on the connection between affections of the brain and diseases of the heart. Philadelphia: Lea & Blanchard; 1848.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cushing H. The third circulation in studies in intracranial physiology and surgery. London: Oxford University Press; 1926. p. 1–51.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yoo AJ, Sheth KN, Kimberly WT, Chaudhry ZA, Elm JJ, Jacobson S, et al. Validating imaging biomarkers of cerebral edema in patients with severe ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;22:742–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Videen TO, Zazulia a R, Manno EM, Derdeyn CP, Adams RE, Diringer MN, et al. Mannitol bolus preferentially shrinks non-infarcted brain in patients with ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2001;57:2120–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Koenig MA, Bryan M, Lewin JL, Mirski MA, Geocadin RG, Stevens RD. Reversal of transtentorial herniation with hypertonic saline. Neurology. 2008;70:1023–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Minnerup J, Wersching H, Ringelstein EB, Heindel W, Niederstadt T, Schilling M, et al. Prediction of malignant middle cerebral artery infarction using computed tomography-based intracranial volume reserve measurements. Stroke. 2011;42:3403–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Simard JM, Chen M, Tarasov KV, Bhatta S, Ivanova S, Melnitchenko L, et al. Newly expressed SUR1-regulated NC(Ca-ATP) channel mediates cerebral edema after ischemic stroke. Nat Med. 2006;12:433–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kimberly WT, Battey TWK, Pham L, Wu O, Yoo AJ, Furie KL, et al. Glyburide is associated with attenuated vasogenic edema in stroke patients. Neurocrit Care. 2014;20:193–201.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dhar R, Murphy-Human T. A bolus of conivaptan lowers intracranial pressure in a patient with hyponatremia after traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2011;14:97–102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeurologyWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Emergency MedicineWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisUSA
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations