Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prevalence and Outcomes of Patients Meeting Palliative Care Consultation Triggers in Neurological Intensive Care Units

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Palliative care needs among patients in the neurological intensive care unit (neuroICU) are poorly characterized. Our aim was to explore the prevalence and type of potential palliative care consultation triggers in neuroICUs.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of neuroICU admissions in Project IMPACT from 2001 to 2008. We assessed the prevalence of neuroICU admissions meeting one or more of five validated palliative care consultation triggers and compared the percentage of admissions meeting these triggers in other ICUs from the same hospitals.

Results

Among 1268 admissions to 2 neuroICUs, 200 (15.8 %) met one or more triggers for palliative care consultation. Among 13,694 admissions to non-neuroICUs in the same hospitals, 1909 (13.9 %) met one or more palliative care triggers (p = 0.44). The most common trigger in the neuroICU was intracerebral hemorrhage with mechanical ventilation (n = 92; 7.3 %). The most common trigger in non-neuroICUs was ICU admission following ≥10-day hospital stay (n = 805; 5.9 %). Although ICU mortality was not significantly higher in neuroICU vs. non-neuroICU patients meeting triggers (23.4 vs 19.9 %, p = 0.46), neuroICU patients were significantly more likely to have withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies (19.4 vs 8.0 %, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Among neuroICU patients, 15.8 % met triggers for palliative care consultation. Although prevalence of admissions meeting any trigger was similar amongst all ICUs, neuroICU admissions met different types of triggers and were more likely to have withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. These data suggest that palliative care needs are common among neuroICU patients and discussions with patients and families regarding limitation of life-sustaining therapy may differ in this setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lanken PN, Terry PB, Delisser HM, et al. An official american thoracic society clinical policy statement: palliative care for patients with respiratory diseases and critical illnesses. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177:912–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nelson JE, Curtis JR, Mulkerin C, et al. Choosing and using screening criteria for palliative care consultation in the icu: a report from the improving palliative care in the icu (ipal-icu) advisory board. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:2318–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hua MS, Li G, Blinderman CD, Wunsch H. Estimates of the need for palliative care consultation across united states intensive care units using a trigger-based model. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189:428–36.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Holloway RG, Ladwig S, Robb J, Kelly A, Nielsen E, Quill TE. Palliative care consultations in hospitalized stroke patients. J Palliat Med. 2010;13:407–12.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kross EK, Engelberg RA, Downey L, et al. Differences in end-of-life care in the icu across patients cared for by medicine, surgery, neurology, and neurosurgery physicians. Chest. 2014;145:313–21.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Project ICIC, Cook SF, Visscher WA, Hobbs CL, Williams RL. Project impact: results from a pilot validity study of a new observational database. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:2765–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Norton SA, Hogan LA, Holloway RG, Temkin-Greener H, Buckley MJ, Quill TE. Proactive palliative care in the medical intensive care unit: effects on length of stay for selected high-risk patients. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:1530–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Williams RL. A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics. 2000;56:645–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dallara A, Tolchin DW. Emerging subspecialties in neurology: palliative care. Neurology. 2014;82:640–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Borasio GD. The role of palliative care in patients with neurological diseases. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013;9:292–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Geurts M, Macleod MR, van Thiel GJ, van Gijn J, Kappelle LJ, van der Worp HB. End-of-life decisions in patients with severe acute brain injury. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13:515–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Holloway RG, Arnold RM, Creutzfeldt CJ, et al. Palliative and end-of-life care in stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from the american heart association/american stroke association. Stroke. 2014;45:1887–916.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Diringer MN, Edwards DF, Aiyagari V, Hollingsworth H. Factors associated with withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in a neurology/neurosurgery intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:1792–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Becker KJ, Baxter AB, Cohen WA, et al. Withdrawal of support in intracerebral hemorrhage may lead to self-fulfilling prophecies. Neurology. 2001;56:766–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Creutzfeldt CJ, Becker KJ, Weinstein JR, et al. Do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders and prognostic models for intraparenchymal hemorrhage. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:158–62.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Creutzfeldt CJ, Holloway RG. Treatment decisions after severe stroke: uncertainty and biases. Stroke. 2012;43:3405–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kelly AG, Hoskins KD, Holloway RG. Early stroke mortality, patient preferences, and the withdrawal of care bias. Neurology. 2012;79:941–4.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Verkade MA, Epker JL, Nieuwenhoff MD, Bakker J, Kompanje EJ. Withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in a mixed intensive care unit: most common in patients with catastropic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2012;16:130–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Quill TE, Abernethy AP. Generalist plus specialist palliative care–creating a more sustainable model. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1173–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nelson JE, Bassett R, Boss RD, et al. Models for structuring a clinical initiative to enhance palliative care in the intensive care unit: a report from the ipal-icu project (improving palliative care in the icu). Crit Care Med. 2010;38:1765–72.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claire J. Creutzfeldt.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Creutzfeldt, C.J., Wunsch, H., Curtis, J. et al. Prevalence and Outcomes of Patients Meeting Palliative Care Consultation Triggers in Neurological Intensive Care Units. Neurocrit Care 23, 14–21 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-015-0143-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-015-0143-8

Keywords

Navigation