Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Levetiracetam is Associated with Improved Cognitive Outcome for Patients with Intracranial Hemorrhage

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To date, common therapy in patients with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) includes prophylaxis of seizure using antiepileptic drugs, commonly phenytoin. Phenytoin therapy is associated with a high incidence of cognitive disturbance. Levetiracetam is known to cause less cognitive disruption and may be a suitable alternative for seizure prophylaxis. Cognitive outcomes in ICH patients receiving seizure prophylaxis with levetiracetam or phenytoin are compared.

Method

A retrospective chart review was conducted with 269 patients who received prophylactic levetiracetam or phenytoin between August 2005 and May 2008. A total of 85 reviewed patients met inclusion criteria (phenytoin n = 25, levetiracetam n = 60).

Results

Statistically significant results included higher Glasgow Coma Scores (GCS) at dismissal (median, 14 vs. 11, P = 0.023), lower seizure incidence (0.0 vs. 8%, P = 0.03) for patients receiving levetiracetam than those treated with phenytoin and patients being discharged home (21.7% vs. 16%, P = 0.03). Observed trends included greater cognitive function retention rate (56.7% vs. 36%, P = 0.08).

Conclusion

Despite similarities in hemorrhage type and severity at onset, patients receiving levetiracetam had better cognition at discharge and fewer seizures than patients receiving phenytoin. These data suggest that levetiracetam is more effective than phenytoin for seizure prophylaxis without suppression of cognitive abilities in patients with ICH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2009;119(3):e21–181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hart R, Byer J, Slaughter J, Hewett J, Easton J. Occurrence and implications of seizures in subarachnoid hemorrhage due to ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 1981;8(4):417–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Keränen T, Tapaninaho A, Hernesniemi J, Vapalahti M. Late epilepsy after aneurysm operations. Neurosurgery. 1985;17(6):897–900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kotila M, Waltimo O. Epilepsy after stroke. Epilepsia. 1992;33(3):495–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Olafsson E, Gudmundsson G, Hauser W. Risk of epilepsy in long-term survivors of surgery for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a population-based study in Iceland. Epilepsia. 2000;41(9):1201–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ryvlin P, Montavont A, Nighoghossian N. Optimizing therapy of seizures in stroke patients. Neurology. 2006;67(12 Suppl 4):S3–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chumnanvej S, Dunn I, Kim D. Three-day phenytoin prophylaxis is adequate after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 2007;60(1):99–102. (discussion 102–103).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Choudhari K, Kaliaperumal C. Three-day phenytoin prophylaxis is adequate after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 2007;61(6):E1340. (author reply E1340).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zubkov A, Wijdicks E. Antiepileptic drugs in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Rev Neurol Dis. 2008;5(4):178–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carpay J, Aldenkamp A, van Donselaar C. Complaints associated with the use of antiepileptic drugs: results from a community-based study. Seizure. 2005;14(3):198–206.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Naidech A, Kreiter K, Janjua N, et al. Phenytoin exposure is associated with functional and cognitive disability after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2005;36(3):583–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Díaz R, Sancho J, Serratosa J. Antiepileptic drug interactions. Neurologist. 2008;14(6 Suppl 1):S55–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rogawski M. Diverse mechanisms of antiepileptic drugs in the development pipeline. Epilepsy Res. 2006;69(3):273–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Arif H, Buchsbaum R, Weintraub D, Pierro J, Resor SJ, Hirsch L. Patient-reported cognitive side effects of antiepileptic drugs: predictors and comparison of all commonly used antiepileptic drugs. Epilepsy Behav. 2009;14(1):202–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nau K, Divertie G, Valentino A, Freeman W. Safety and efficacy of levetiracetam for critically ill patients with seizures. Neurocrit Care. 2009;11(1):34–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Szaflarski J, Meckler J, Szaflarski M, Shutter L, Privitera M, Yates S. Levetiracetam use in critically ill patients. Neurocrit Care. 2007;7(2):140–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lynch B, Lambeng N, Nocka K, et al. The synaptic vesicle protein SV2A is the binding site for the antiepileptic drug levetiracetam. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(26):9861–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to As’ad Ehtisham.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taylor, S., Heinrichs, R.J., Janzen, J.M. et al. Levetiracetam is Associated with Improved Cognitive Outcome for Patients with Intracranial Hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 15, 80–84 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-010-9341-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-010-9341-6

Keywords

Navigation