Skip to main content

Impact of Pattern of Admission on ICH Outcomes

Neurocritical Care volume 12, pages 149–154 (2010)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is associated with the highest mortality of all strokes. Admission to a Neurosciences Critical Care Unit (NCCU) compared to a general ICU has been associated with reduced mortality following ICH. Such association has led to several hospitals transferring ICH patients to Neuro-ICUs in tertiary care centers. However, delays in optimizing ICH management prior to and during transfer can lead to deleterious consequences. To compare functional outcomes in ICH patients admitted to our NCCU directly from the ED versus inter-hospital transfer admissions.

Methods

Records of consecutive spontaneous supratentorial ICH patients admitted to The Johns Hopkins Hospital NCCU were reviewed. Patients with ICH related to trauma or underlying lesions (brain tumors, aneurysms, AVM) were excluded. We compared outcomes at discharge in patients admitted directly from the ED and inter-hospital transfers (IHT) using dichotomized modified Rankin Scale (Good outcomes: mRS 0-3). Other factors potentially impacting outcomes such as age, ICH volume, IVH volume, and admission GCS were included in the multiple logistic regression analysis.

Results

125 patients were included in the analysis (ED 61.6%; IHT 38.4%). There were no significant differences between the two groups in mean age (ED 63.4 ± 13.1; IHT 63.4 ± 15.2, P = 0.96), ICH volume (ED 31.4 ± 37.6; IHT 33.5 ± 42.8, P = 0.76), IVH volume (ED 6.0 ± 11.2; IHT 8.0 ± 14.5, P = 0.38), and GCS (ED 11.3 ± 3.7, IHT 10.9 ± 3.5; P = 0.44). 57.2% ED patients had good outcomes (mRS 0-3) at discharge compared to 37.5% IHT. This difference was statistically significant following univariate (P = 0.034, 95% CI .2151–.9416) and multivariate analysis (P = 0.028, 95% CI .1338–.8896). Odds (adjusted) of ED admissions having good outcomes was three times higher than IHT. Neurological deterioration (GCS decline 2 or more) was more common in IHT and, in subgroup analysis of IHT patients with warfarin-associated ICH, hematoma enlargement was significantly more likely than in direct ED admissions.

Conclusions

Patients with ICH brought directly to our ED had significantly better outcomes than IHT; we hypothesize this may be caused by delays in optimizing management prior to arrival at the facility with a dedicated Neuro-ICU. Nevertheless, other equally plausible hypotheses need to be prospectively tested.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Broderick JP, Brott T, Tomsick T, Miller R, Huster G. Intracerebral hemorrhage more than twice as common as subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 1993;78(2):188–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Qureshi AI, Tuhrim S, Broderick JP, Batjer HH, Hondo H, Hanley DF. Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1450–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Diringer MN, Edwards DF. Admission to a neurologic/neurosurgical intensive care unit is associated with reduced mortality rate after intracerebral hemorrhage. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(3):635–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Broderick J, Connolly S, Feldmann E, Hanley D, Kase C, Krieger D, Mayberg M, Morgenstern L, Ogilvy CS, Vespa P, Zuccarello M; American Heart Association; American Stroke Association Stroke Council; High Blood Pressure Research Council; Quality of Care and Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in adults: 2007 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, High Blood Pressure Research Council, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. Stroke. 2007; 38(6):2001–23.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brott T, Broderick J, Kothari R, et al. Early hemorrhage growth in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 1997;28:1–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mayer SA, Sacco RL, Shi T, Mohr JP. Neurologic deterioration in noncomatose patients with supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 1994;44(8):1379–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rosand J, Eckman MH, Knudsen KA, Singer DE, Greenberg SM. The effect of warfarin and intensity of anticoagulation on outcome of intracerebral hemorrhage. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(8):880–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Flibotte JJ, Hagan N, O’Donnell J, Greenberg SM, Rosand J. Warfarin, hematoma expansion, and outcome of intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 2004;63(6):1059–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldstein JN, Thomas SH, Frontiero V, Joseph A, Engel C, Snider R, et al. Timing of fresh frozen plasma administration and rapid correction of coagulopathy in warfarin-related intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2006;37(1):151–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Diringer MN, Edwards DF, Zazulia AR. Hydrocephalus: a previously unrecognized predictor of poor outcome from supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 1998;29(7):1352–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Qureshi AI, Mendelow AD, Hanley DF. Intracerebral haemorrhage. Lancet. 2009;373(9675):1632–44. (Review).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Byrne RW, Bagan BT, Slavin KV, Curry D, Koski TR, Origitano TC. Neurosurgical emergency transfers to academic centers in Cook County: a prospective multicenter study. Neurosurgery. 2008;62(3):709–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Anderson CS, Huang Y, Wang JG, Arima H, Neal B, Peng B, Heeley E, Skulina C, Parsons MW, Kim JS, Tao QL, Li YC, Jiang JD, Tai LW, Zhang JL, Xu E, Cheng Y, Heritier S, Morgenstern LB, Chalmers J, INTERACT Investigators. Intensive blood pressure reduction in acute cerebral haemorrhage trial (INTERACT): a randomised pilot trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(5):391–9.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vespa P. Continuous EEG monitoring for the detection of seizures in traumatic brain injury, infarction, and intracerebral hemorrhage: “to detect and protect”. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;22(2):99–106. (Review).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vespa PM, O’Phelan K, Shah M, Mirabelli J, Starkman S, Kidwell C, et al. Acute seizures after intracerebral hemorrhage: a factor in progressive midline shift and outcome. Neurology. 2003;60(9):1441–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Broderick JP, Brott TG, Duldner JE, Tomsick T, Huster G. Volume of intracerebral hemorrhage. A powerful and easy-to-use predictor of 30-day mortality. Stroke. 1993;24:987–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hemphill JC III, Bonovich DC, Besmertis L, Manley GT, Johnston SC. The ICH score: a simple, reliable grading scale for intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2001;32(4):891–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lisk DR, Pasteur W, Rhoades H, Putnam RD, Grotta JC. Early presentation of hemispheric intracerebral hemorrhage: prediction of outcome and guidelines for treatment allocation. Neurology. 1994;44(1):133–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tuhrim S, Horowitz DR, Sacher M, Godbold JH. Volume of ventricular blood is an important determinant of outcome in supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. Crit Care Med. 1999;27(3):617–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Naff NJ, Carhuapoma JR, Williams MA, Bhardwaj A, Ulatowski JA, Bederson J, et al. Treatment of intraventricular hemorrhage with urokinase: effects on 30-day survival. Stroke. 2000;31(4):841–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Steiner L, Bergvall U, Zwetnow N. Quantitative estimation of intracerebral and intraventricular hematoma by computer tomography. Acta Radiol Suppl. 1975;346:143–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA

    Neeraj Sunderrajan Naval

  2. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

    J. Ricardo Carhuapoma

Authors
  1. Neeraj Sunderrajan Naval
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Ricardo Carhuapoma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neeraj Sunderrajan Naval.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Naval, N.S., Ricardo Carhuapoma, J. Impact of Pattern of Admission on ICH Outcomes. Neurocrit Care 12, 149–154 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-009-9302-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-009-9302-0

Keywords

  • Intracerebral hemorrhage
  • Outcomes
  • Inter-hospital transfer