Neurocritical Care

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 76–81 | Cite as

IV vs. IA TPA in Acute Ischemic Stroke with CT Angiographic Evidence of Major Vessel Occlusion: A Feasibility Study

  • Souvik Sen
  • David Y. Huang
  • Omid Akhavan
  • Susan Wilson
  • Piero Verro
  • Sten Solander
Original Article

Abstract

Background and Aims

Studies suggest that stroke patients with thrombus in a major cerebral vessel respond less favorably to intravenous (IV) thrombolysis. The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility of a protocol comparing IV versus intra-arterial (IA) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) in an acute ischemic stroke with major vessel occlusion.

Methods

Consecutive ischemic stroke patients presenting <3 h from symptom onset with major vessel occlusion on CT angiogram (CTA) were randomly assigned to IV TPA (per NINDS protocol) or IA TPA (22 mg over 2 h). Demographics, times to presentation and thrombolysis, presenting NIH stroke scale (NIHSS) and 90-day NIHSS, Barthel Index, and modified Rankin Scale were recorded. CT-scans at 24-h were reviewed for presence of hemorrhage. Recanalization was determined by post-procedure MR angiograms, which are obtained the day after thrombolytic therapy.

Results

Seven patients (median NIHSS = 16) were randomized to IV (N = 4) or IA (N = 3) TPA. There were no significant differences in the presentation NIHSS, time to presentation, or time to treatment between the two groups. Hemorrhage was noted in one patient in the IA group (asymptomatic) and one patient in the IV group (symptomatic). Recanalization was seen in all patients treated with IA TPA and none treated with IV TPA (P = 0.03, Fisher’s Exact test).

Conclusions

We found that it is feasible to conduct a trial comparing IV vs. IA TPA in ischemic stroke patients with major vessel occlusion presenting <3 h from onset. Patients treated with IA TPA showed a trend toward higher rate of recanalization. A larger trial may be designed to test safety and effectiveness of IA TPA in this specific group of stroke patients.

Keywords

Thrombolysis Stroke CT angiogram Intra-arterial 

References

  1. 1.
    NINDS Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(24):1581–7. doi:10.1056/NEJM199512143332401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, Brozman M, Dávalos A, Guidetti D, et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(13):1317–29. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0804656.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Furlan A, Higashida R, Wechsler L, Gent M, Rowley H, Kase C, et al. Intra-arterial prourokinase for acute ischemic stroke. The PROACT II study a randomized controlled trial. Prolyse in acute cerebral thromboembolism. JAMA. 1999;282(21):2003–11. doi:10.1001/jama.282.21.2003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Adams HP Jr, del Zoppo G, Alberts MJ, Bhatt DL, Brass L, Furlan A, et al. Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2007;38(5):1655–711. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.181486.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lisboa RC, Jovanovic BD, Alberts MJ. Analysis of the safety and efficacy of intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy in ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2002;33(12):2866–71. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000038987.62325.14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lev MH, Farkas J, Rodriguez VR, Schwamm LH, Hunter GJ, Putman CM, et al. CT angiography in the rapid triage of patients with hyperacute stroke to intraarterial thrombolysis: accuracy in the detection of large vessel thrombus. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2001;25(4):520–8. doi:10.1097/00004728-200107000-00003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    IMS Study Investigators. Combined intravenous and intra-arterial recanalization for acute ischemic stroke: the Interventional Management of Stroke Study. Stroke. 2004;35(4):904–11. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000121641.77121.98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ciccone A, Valvassori L, Gasparotti R, Scomazzoni F, Ballabio E, Sterzi R. Debunking 7 myths that hamper the realization of randomized controlled trials on intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2007;38(7):2191–5. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.465567.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bookstein JJ, Bookstein FL. Augmented experimental pulse-spray thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator, enabling dose reduction by one or more orders of magnitude. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000;11:299–303. doi:10.1016/S1051-0443(07)61421-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    TIMI Study Group The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial. Phase I findings. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:932–6.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Neumann-Haefelin T, de Rochemont R, Fiebach JB, Gass A, Nolte C, Kucinski T, et al. Effect of incomplete (spontaneous and postthrombolytic) recanalization after middle cerebral artery occlusion: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Stroke. 2004;35:109–14. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000106482.31425.D1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bastianello S, Pierallini A, Colonnese C, Brughitta G, Angeloni U, Antonelli M, et al. Fieschi, Bozzao L. Hyperdense middle cerebral artery CT sign. Neuroradiology. 1991;33:207–11. doi:10.1007/BF00588219.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moulin T, Cattin F, Crépin-Leblond T, Tatu L, Chavot D, Piotin M, et al. Early CT signs in acute middle cerebral artery infarction: predictive value for subsequent infarct locations and outcome. Neurology. 1996;47:366–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zorzon M, Mase G, Pozzi-Mucelli F, Biasutti E, Antonutti L, Iona L, et al. Increased density in the middle cerebral artery by nonenhanced computed tomography: prognostic value in acute cerebral infarction. Eur Neurol. 1993;33:256–9. doi:10.1159/000116949.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Launes J, Ketonen L. Dense middle cerebral artery sign: an indicator of poor outcome in middle cerebral artery area infarction. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987;50:1550–2. doi:10.1136/jnnp.50.11.1550.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Manelfe C, Larrue V, von Kummer R, Bozzao L, Ringleb P, Bastianello S, et al. Association of hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign with clinical outcome in patients with tissue plasminogen activator. Stroke. 1999;30:769–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tomsick T, Brott T, Barsan W, Broderick J, Clarke Haley E, Spilker J, et al. Prognostic value of the hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign and stroke scale score before ultraearly thrombolytic therapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996;17:79–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    The NINDS rtPA Stroke Study Group. Generalized efficacy of rtPA for acute stroke: subgroup analysis of the NINDS rtPA stroke trial. Stroke. 1997;28:2119–25.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Qureshi AI. Endovascular treatment of cerebrovascular diseases and intracranial neoplasms. Lancet. 2004;363:804–13. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15697-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Agarwal P, Kumar S, Hariharan S, Eshkar N, Verro P, Cohen B, et al. Hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign: can it be used to select intraarterial versus intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke? Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;17:182–90. doi:10.1159/000075789.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Garg N, Eshkar N, Tanenbaum L, Cohen B, Sen S. Computed tomography angiographic correlates of early computed tomography signs in acute ischemic stroke. J Neuroimaging. 2004;14(3):242–5. doi:10.1177/1051228404264938.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
    http://www.neurorad-bern.ch/combatstroke/. Accessed December 27, 2008.
  24. 24.
    Macleod MR, Davis SM, Mitchell PJ, Gerraty RP, Fitt G, Hankey GJ, et al. Results of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial of intra-arterial urokinase in the treatment of acute posterior circulation ischaemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005;20(1):12–7. doi:10.1159/000086121.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Broderick JP. Practical considerations in the early treatment of ischemic stroke. Am Fam Physician. 1998;57:73–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mattle HP, Arnold M, Georgiadis D, Baumann C, Nedeltchev K, Benninger D, et al. Comparison of intraarterial and intravenous thrombolysis for ischemic stroke with hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign. Stroke. 2008;39(2):379–83. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.492348.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rha JH, Saver JL. The impact of recanalization on ischemic stroke ourcome, a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2007;38:967–73. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000258112.14918.24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Souvik Sen
    • 1
  • David Y. Huang
    • 1
  • Omid Akhavan
    • 1
  • Susan Wilson
    • 1
  • Piero Verro
    • 2
  • Sten Solander
    • 3
  1. 1.UNC Stroke Center, Department of NeurologyUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA
  2. 2.University of California DavisSacramentoUSA
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations