Abstract
Introduction
It is unclear whether the rate of stimulation for somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) can influence the presence or absence of cortical responses to median nerve stimulation in comatose patients. If so, this could affect how SEPs are performed and interpreted for prognostication in coma. Our objective was to determine how frequently our comatose patients had absent median nerve SEP responses at 3 Hz stimulation, but present responses at 1 Hz stimulation, and to report outcomes of these patients.
Methods
We reviewed SEP recordings in 639 comatose patients over a 9-year period. All had stimulation at 3 Hz and 1 Hz. This is a retrospective review.
Results
There were seven patients who had absent median nerve SEP responses at 3 Hz stimulation bilaterally, but had present responses at 1 Hz on one or both sides. Six of the seven died. One 16-year-old patient with traumatic brain injury awoke, but had moderate disability.
Conclusions
Stimulation rate is an important determinant of presence or absence of cortical responses in about 1% of comatose patients. It is unclear whether such patients have a different outcome that those with absent responses at both rates of stimulation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Urasaki E, Genmoto T, Akamatsu N, et al. The effects of stimulus rates on high frequency oscillations of median nerve somatosensory-evoked potentials––direct recording study from the human cerebral cortex. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;113:1794–7. doi:10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00291-2.
Araki A, Takada A, Yasuhara A, Kobayashi Y. The effects of stimulus rates on the amplitude of median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials: the developmental change. Brain Dev-Jpn. 1999;21:118–21. doi:10.1016/S0387-7604(98)00092-8.
Fujii M, Yamada T, Aihara M, Kokubun Y, et al. The effects of stimulus rates upon median, ulnar and radial nerve somatosensory evoked potentials. Electroen Clin Neuro. 1994;92:518–26. doi:10.1016/0168-5597(94)90136-8.
Robinson LR, Kraft GH, Fitts SS, Schneider VS. Body cooling may not improve somatosensory pathway function in multiple sclerosis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;76:191–6. doi:10.1097/00002060-199705000-00005.
Robinson LR, Micklesen PJ, Tirschwell DL, Lew HL. Predictive value of somatosensory evoked potentials for awakening from coma. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:960–7. doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000053643.21751.3B.
Deuschl G, Eisen A. editors. Recommendations for the practice of clinical neurophysiology, 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1999.
Zandbergen EGJ, de Haan RJ, Stoutenbeek CP, Koelman JHTM, Hijdra A. Systematic review of early prediction of poor outcome in anoxic ischemic coma. Lancet. 1998;352:1808–12. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(98)04076-8.
Carter BG, Butt W. Are somatosensory evoked potentials the best predictor of outcome after severe brain injury? A systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2005;1(6):765–75. doi:10.1007/s00134-005-2633-1.
Sherman AL, Tirschwell DL, Micklesen PJ, Longstreth WT Jr., Robinson LR. Somatosensory potentials, CSF creatine kinase BB activity, and awakening after cardiac arrest. Neurology. 2000;54:889–94.
Madl C, Grimm G. Early prediction of individual outcome after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Lancet. 1993;341:855–9. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)93061-5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Robinson, L.R., Micklesen, P.J. Does Stimulus Rate Matter When Performing Somatosensory Evoked Potentials for Coma Patients?. Neurocrit Care 12, 69–73 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-009-9191-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-009-9191-2