Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Critically Ill Cancer Patients are not Consistently Hypercoagulable after Craniotomy

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Recent reports using thrombelastography have suggested that neurosurgical patients develop a hypercoagulable state in the postoperative period. Since venous thromboembolism is a potentially life threatening complication in these patients, we studied a similar population in our institution.

Methods

We conducted a prospective pilot study to evaluate postoperative coagulation changes in critically ill cancer patients after craniotomy. Data collected included demographics, diagnoses, severity of illness, all hematological information (coagulation tests included conventional and TEG), therapies, and complications. Analysis included descriptive statistics, and multivariate regression analysis.

Results

Eleven patients were included in the study. Mean age was 52 ± 17 years, BMI 28 ± 6.5, APACHE II and SOFA scores were 11.18 ± 5.0 and 3.82 ± 1.6 respectively. The Coagulation Index (CI), which is derived from the measured values of R, K, MA, and alpha angle was 1.22 ± 3.5, R 4.2 ± 1.6, K 2.0 ± 2.1, MA 60.78 ± 5.97, and alpha angle 66.88 ± 14.9; while the Thrombodynamic Potential Index (TPI), which is derived from the measured values of K and MA only was 32.48 ± 21. The CI correlated significantly with R, K, alpha angle, MA, TMA, TPI, PMA, E, A30 and A60 but not with the PTT, INR, or SOFA and APACHE II scores. One patient was hypocoagulable by CI and TPI values; in contrast, nine patients were hypercoagulable by TPI but only one by CI. There were no cases of VTE.

Conclusions

Hypercoagulability as defined by the CI was not a common finding in this study. Although the TPI indicated hypercoagulability in a large number of patients, we do not believe it is a good tool to assess the patient’s clotting status or predictor of thrombosis because in contrast to the CI, it does not take into account the enzymatic portions of the clotting cascade. A larger TEG study is warranted to determine the clinical significance of these changes in this and other populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sawaya R, Ramo OJ, Glas-Greenwalt P, Wu SZ. Plasma fibrinolytic profile in patients with brain tumors. Thromb Haemost 1991;65(1):15–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sawaya R, Zuccarello M, Elkalliny M, Nishiyama H. Postoperative venous thromboembolism and brain tumors: Part I. Clinical profile. J Neurooncol 1992;142(2):119–25.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sawaya R, Glas-Greenwalt P. Postoperative venous thromboembolism and brain tumors: Part II. Hemostatic profile. J Neurooncol 1992;14(2):127–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sawaya R, Highsmith RF. Postoperative venous thromboembolism and brain tumors: Part III. Biochemical profile. J Neurooncol 1992;14(2):113–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Goh KY, Tsoi WC, Feng CS, Wickham N, Poon WS. Haemostatic changes during surgery for primary brain tumors. J Neurol Neurosurg & Psych 1997;63:334–38.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goobie SM, Soriano SG, Zurakowski D, McGowan FX, Rockoff MA. Hemostatic changes in pediatric neurosurgical patients as evaluated by Thombelastograph®. Anesth Analg 2001;93:887–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Abrahams JM, Torchia MB, McGarvey M, Putt M, Baranov D, Sinson GP. Perioperative assessment of coagulability in neurosurgical patients using thrombelastography. Surg Neurol 2002;58:5–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Whitten C, Greilich PE. Thromboelastography® past, present, and future. Anesthesiol 2000;92(5): 1223–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shore-Lesserson L, Manspeizer HE, DePerio M, Francis S, Vela-Cantos F, Ergin MA. Thrombelastography-guided transfusion algorithm reduces transfusions in complex cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 1999;88:312–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Traverso CI, Caprini JA, Arcelus JI. The normal thrombelastogram and its interpretation. Semin Thromb Hemost 1995;21(4): 7–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sawaya RE, Ligon BL. Thromboembolic complications associated with brain tumors. J Neurooncol 1994;22(2):173–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Iberti T, Myron M, Abalos A, Fischer E, Post K, Benjamin E, Oropello J, Wiltshire-Clement M, Rand J. Abnormal coagulation profile in brain tumor patients during surgery. Neurosurgery 1994;34(3):389–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Salooja N, Perry DJ. Thrombelastography. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2001;12(5):327–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ibrahim EH, Iregui M, Prentice D, et al. Deep vein thrombosis during prolonged mechanical ventilation despite prophylaxis. Crit Care Med 2002;30:771–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mallett SV, Cox DJ. Thrombelastography. BJA 1992;69:307–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim HW, Stubdal H, Greenburg AG. Coagulation dynamics after hemodilution with polyhemoglobin. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992;175:219–26.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ng KF, Lo JW. The development of hypercoagulability state, as measured by thrombelastography, associated with intraoperative surgical blood loss. Anaesth Intens Care 1996;24(1):20–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gibbs NM. The effect of anesthetic agents on platelet function. Anesth Intens Care 1991;19(4):495–520.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bjoraker DG. The thrombelastograph D coagulation Analyzer. Anesthesiol Review 1991;XVIII(4):34–8.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kaufmann CR, Dwyer KM, Crews JD, Dols SJ, Trask AL. Usefulness of Thrombelastography in assessment of trauma patient coagulation. J Trauma 1997;42(4):716–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Flinn WR, Sandager G, Silva MB, Benjamin ME, Cerullo LJ, Taylor M. Prospective surveillance for perioperative venous thrombosis: experience in 2643 patients. Arch Surg 1996;131:472–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sawaya R, Donlon JA. Chronic disseminated intravascular coagulation and metastatic brain tumor: a case report and review of the literature. Neurosurgery 1983;12:580–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bodin D, Martin L, Dubos J, Couvret C, Santini JJ, Mercier C. Consumption coagulopathy and meningioma. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 1986;5(3):308–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vukovich TC, Gabriel A, Schaeffer B, Veitl M, Matula C, Spiss CK. Hemostasis activation in patients undergoing brain tumor surgery. J Neurosurg 1997;87:508–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang PS, Koo KE. Diffuse intravascular coagulation associated with brain tumor surgery in children. Pediatr Neurosurg 1990–1991;16(1):43–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dragoni F, Mazzucconi MG, Acqui M, Ferrante L, Rosa G, Mastronardi L, Chistolini A, deSanctis V, Mandelli F. Coagulation study in patients who had undergone surgery for meningioma. Haemostasis 1993;23(6):301–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Thomas D. Venous thrombogenesis. Br Med Bull 1994;50(4):803–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bauer K, Rosendaal FR, Heit JA. Hypercoagulability: too many tests, too much conflicting data. Hematology 2002;2002:353–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 112, Houston, TX, 77030, USA

    Joseph L. Nates, Natarajan Aravindan, Spencer Kee, Anh T. Nguyen, Karen Chen & Kristen J. Price

  2. Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

    Cheryl Hirsch-Ginsberg & Kurt C. Sizer

  3. Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA

    Andrew D. Shaw

Authors
  1. Joseph L. Nates
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Natarajan Aravindan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cheryl Hirsch-Ginsberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kurt C. Sizer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Spencer Kee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Anh T. Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Karen Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Andrew D. Shaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Kristen J. Price
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph L. Nates.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nates, J.L., Aravindan, N., Hirsch-Ginsberg, C. et al. Critically Ill Cancer Patients are not Consistently Hypercoagulable after Craniotomy. Neurocrit Care 7, 211–216 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-007-0064-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-007-0064-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation