ERA Forum

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 357–371 | Cite as

The Regulation of Gambling at European Level. The Balance to be Found

Open Access
Article

Abstract

This article seeks to illustrate some of the balances which need to be reached in gambling regulation in the context of the internal market. Such balances are to be found at both the national and European levels. Although the regulation of gambling is currently a national competence, Member States have to consider the impact of the case-law of the European Court of Justice. Consequently the balance of interests which Member States seek to achieve at national level must be striven for in a manner compatible with Community law. This is a balancing exercise in itself. Further, cross-border consequences arise from nationally-oriented approaches, offering both possible solutions and problems for the regulation of gambling in the European Union.

Keywords

Free movement of services Gambling 

References

  1. Arendts, M., Hambach, W.: Germany in: Balestra, M., Cabot, A. (eds.), Internet Gambling Report: An Evolving Conflict Between Technology and Law, St. Charles, River City Group (2005)Google Scholar
  2. eCOGRA, Global Online Gambler Report, An Exploratory Investigation into the Attitudes and Behaviours of Internet Casino and Poker Players, Media Summary (2007). Available at www.ecogra.com
  3. Geradin, D.: The Opening of State Monopolies to Competition: Main Issues of the Liberalisation Process in Geradin, D. (ed.), The Liberalization of State Monopolies in the European Union and Beyond, Kluwer Law International (2000)Google Scholar
  4. Griffiths, M.: Gambling Technologies: Prospects for Problem Gamblers. Journal for Gambling Studies 15(3), 265–283 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Griffiths, M., Parke, A., Wood, R., Parke, J.: Internet Gambling: An Overview of Psychosocial Impacts. UNLV Gaming Research and Review Journal 10(1), 27–39 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. Guilayn, A. A.: Spain, in: Balestra, M., Cabot, A. (eds.), Internet Gambling Report: an Evolving Conflict Between Technology and Law, St. Charles, River City Group (2005)Google Scholar
  7. Lea, R.: The Larceny of the Lottery Fund, Centre for Policy Studies, London (2006)Google Scholar
  8. London Economics, The case for State Lotteries. A Report for the European Lotteries and Toto Association, September 2006Google Scholar
  9. Ömberg, J. C.: Nordic gambling markets and the possibilities for state-level control. Journal of Gambling Issues 18, 9–30 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. Straetmans, G.: Case C-124/97, Läärä and Case C-67/98, Zenatti. Common Market Law Review 37, 991–1005 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Straetmans, G.: Case C-243/01, Piergiorgio Gambelli; and C-42/02 Diana Elisabeth Lindman. Common Market Law Review 41, 1409–1428 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. Svenska Spel, Svenska Spel in Society 2005. Available at www.svenskaspel.se
  13. Svenska Spel International – a partner in a regulated gaming market. Available at www.svenskaspel.se
  14. Swiss Institute for Comparative Law, Study of Gambling Services in the Internal Market of the European Union, Final Report, 14 June 2006 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ERA 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tilburg Law and Economics Center (TILEC)Faculty of LawTilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations