Conclusion
To sum up: benevolent intervention is a small field of law, but related to many other fields such as the winding up of void contracts, the regime of lacking representation or the regime of unjustified enrichment. In so far, the rules guiding the relationship between the intervener and the principal may offer a useful tool within the scope of the Common Frame of Reference. In general, the draft proposed by the Study Group is a balanced instrument to cope with the problems of benevolent intervention. Some questions, however, such as the scope of application, the duty of the intervener to continue his task and the authority of the intervener to act in the name of the principal, need further discussion.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The author would like to congratulate Professor von Bar and the Study Group on a European Civil Code for their tremendous work and for the excellent outcome.
This paper is the written version of the presentation given by the author at the conference "Principles of European Law — Negotiorum gestio & Unjustified Enrichment" in Trier. 27-28 April 2006. See page 195 et seq. for citations from the Principles of European Law on Benevolent Intervention and Unjustified Enrichment.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sprau, H. Benevolent intervention in another‘s affairs: Some remarks on the draft report presented by the study group on a European civil code. ERA Forum 7, 220–233 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-006-0005-0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-006-0005-0