Skip to main content
Log in

Delivering harm reduction to the community and frontline medical practitioners through the South Australian Drug Early Warning System (SADEWS)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Australia does not have a formal drug early warning system. A coordinated program of fixed or event-based drug-checking is expensive and provides harm reduction information to atargeted user group. The South Australian Drug Early Warning System (SADEWS) is an informal inter-agency collaboration which rapidly and confidentially exchanges contemporary,evidence-based information about drug seizures, usage trends and clinical outcomes associated with drug use in South Australia. Information is sourced from policing, forensic analysis,waste-water analysis, medical research, clinical data and directly from people using drugs. SADEWS exchanges information relating to new drug emergences and clusters of adverseoutcomes following drug use, amongst members via secure digital platforms. The diverse but complimentary expertise of members allows a comprehensive assessment of changes tothe baseline risk associated with drug use and, where a potential community harm is identified, enables the timely delivery of warnings through formal mechanisms existing withinmember agencies. It is expected that these warnings contribute to significantly reduced medical consequences associated with community drug use through decreased drug overdosefatalities and hospital presentations rates, contributing to reduced healthcare costs. Importantly, this drug early warning system is politically risk-free, is achieved simply and without external funding or significant administrative overheads.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brunt TM, Niesink RJ. The Drug Information and Monitoring System (DIMS) in the Netherlands: implementation, results, and international comparison. Drug Test Anal. 2011;3:621–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kriener H, Billeth R, Gollner C, Lachout S, Neubauer P, Schmid R. An inventory of on-site pill-testing interventions in the EU. Vienna: EMCDDA; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Measham FC. Drug safety testing, disposals and dealing in an English field: Exploring the operational and behavioural outcomes of the UK’s first onsite ‘drug checking’ service. Int J Drug Policy. 2019;67:102–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Saleemi S, Pennybaker SJ, Wooldridge M, Johnson MW. Who is ‘Molly’? MDMA adulterants by product name and the impact of harm-reduction services at raves. J Psychopharmacol. 2017;31:1056–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sage C. Harm reduction and drug checking; a wrap-around service for festivals. Case Study: Shambhala Music Festival/ANKORS Drug Checking Harm Reduction Service data 2015. ANKORS; 2016.

  6. Karamouzian M, Dohoo C, Forsting S, McNeil R, Kerr T, Lysyshyn M. Evaluation of a fentanyl drug checking service for clients of a supervised injection facility, Vancouver. Canada Harm Reduct J. 2018;15:46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pill Testing Australia. https://pilltestingaustralia.com.au. Accessed May 2020.

  8. Camilleri AM, Caldicott D. Underground pill testing, down under. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;151:53–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Early Warning Advisory (EWA) on New Psychoactive Substance (NPS). https://www.unodc.org/LSS/Home/NPS. Accessed May 2020.

  10. Centre European Monitoring, for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). European drug report, . trends and developments. Lisbon: EMCDDA; 2015. p. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brunt TM, Nagy C, Bücheli A, Martins D, Ugarte M, Beduwe C, et al. Drug testing in Europe: monitoring results of the trans European drug information (TEDI) project. Drug Test Anal. 2017;9:188–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. NDEWS National Drug Early Warning System. https://ndews.umd.edu/. Accessed May 2020.

  13. Young MM, Pirie T, Buxton JA, Hosein FS. The rise of overdose deaths involving fentanyl and the value of early warning. Can J Addict. 2015;6:13–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Buxton JA, Spearn B, Amlani A, Kuo M, Lysyshyn M, Young S, et al. The British Columbia drug overdose and alert partnership: Interpreting and sharing timely illicit drug information to reduce harms. J CSWB. 2019;4:4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Caldicott D. What is drug checking and why do we need it in Australia? In: The Conversation. 2015. https://theconversation.com/what-is-drug-checking-and-why-do-we-need-it-in-australia-51578. Accessed May 2020.

  16. Groves A. ‘Worth the test?’ Pragmatism, pill testing and drug policy in Australia. Harm Reduct J. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-018-0216-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ritter A. Six reasons Australia should pilot ‘pill testing’ party drugs. In: The Conversation. 2008. http://theconversation.com/six-reasons-australia-should-pilot-pill-testing-party-drugs-34073. Accessed May 2020.

  18. McGowan M. Parents of drug-overdose victims at odds over benefits of pill testing. In: The Guardian (Australia). 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/jan/19/parents-of-drug-overdose-victims-at-odds-over-benefits-of-pill-testing. Accessed May 2020.

  19. Hutchens G. Pill-testing: budget office finds it would cost $16m to put services in major cities. In: The Guardian (Australia). 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/nov/09/pill-testing-budget-office-finds-it-would-cost-16m-to-put-services-in-major-cities. Accessed May 2020.

  20. Health Minister Greg Hunt rejects ‘dangerous’ pill testing, backs Tasmanian Government stance. In: news.com.au. 2019. https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-minister-greg-hunt-rejects-dangerous-pill-testing-backs-tasmanian-government-stance/news-story/2f04a8c01cbf3ca35b47d1634b4068d6. Accessed May 2020.

  21. Australian Associated Press. NSW to introduce tougher drug penalties, but no pill testing, after festival deaths. In: The Guardian (Australia). 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/oct/23/nsw-premier-says-drug-dealers-could-be-jailed-for-25-years-after-music-festival-deaths. Accessed May 2020.

  22. Makkai T, Macleod M, Vumbaca G, Hill P, Caldicott D, Noffs M, et al. Report on Canberra GTM harm reduction service. Harm Reduction Australia; 2018.

  23. Grahame H. Inquest into the death of six patrons of NSW music festivals, Hoang Nathan Tran Diana Nguyen Joseph Pham Callum Brosnan Joshua Tam Alexandra Ross-King. Lidcombe: NSW State Coroner’s Court; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Partidge E, Alfred S, Camilleri A, Green H, Haustead D, Kostakis C, et al. Establishing the protocols for the South Australian Emergency Department Admission Blood Psychoactive Testing (EDABPT) programme for drug surveillance. Emerg Med Australas. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.13752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hyde B. Ecstasy found with deadly NBOMe prompts second police warning in two days. In: The Advertiser (Australia). 2013. https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/ecstasy-found-with-deadly-nbome-prompts-second-police-warning-in-two-days/news-story/ca41c0d0417ca0ddf444a63161886d29.  Accessed May 2020.

Download references

Acknowledgements

SADEWS is an unfunded entity but would not operate without in-kind support from the participating agencies.

Funding

Emergency Department Admission Blood Psychoactive Testing (EDABPT) was supported by research funding from the National Centre for Clinical Research on Emerging Drugs (NCREDD), as well as in-kind and financial support from FSSA. The National Wastewater Drug Monitoring Program (NWDMP) is an Australian Government initiative and funding to the University of South Australia is provided through the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission (ACIC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Andrew Camilleri and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Camilleri.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The Emergency Department Admission Blood Psychoactive Testing (EDABPT) was granted ethics approval by the RAH Research Ethics Committee - HREC/17/RAH/439 R20171015).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Camilleri, A., Alfred, S., Gerber, C. et al. Delivering harm reduction to the community and frontline medical practitioners through the South Australian Drug Early Warning System (SADEWS). Forensic Sci Med Pathol 17, 388–394 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-021-00381-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-021-00381-1

Keywords

Navigation