Hijacked journals, hijacked web-sites, journal phishing, misleading metrics, and predatory publishing: actual and potential threats to academic integrity and publishing ethics
- 1.2k Downloads
Academic research has always faced challenges associated with assuring its quality and seeking optimal ways of representing results. Conducting a high level of research and selecting a suitable target publisher and journal require careful attention. The choice of publishing venue has been expanded by the open access (OA) movement, spurring additional scientific activity. The benefits of OA, which consist, generally speaking, in making the results of empirical research and/or the results of intellectual work available almost immediately and to a wide audience, have also introduced a number of threats and challenges to the academic world. On one hand, the number of opportunities to publish has increased significantly. On the other hand, the traditional system of peer review that was always perceived to exert a level of control by the academic community with respect to the quality of publications, has become less strict and rigorous, or has shown flaws. Collectively, a...
KeywordsOpen Access Journal Academic Integrity Scholarly Publishing Page Ranking Reputable Journal
The authors thank Prof. Marwan M. Obeidat (Department of English Language and Literature, Hashemite University, Jordan), Valentina Christova-Bagdassarian (National Center of Public Health and Analyses, Sofia, Bulgaria), and Claudia Stefanutti (Lipid Clinic and Atherosclerosis Prevention Centre, Immunohematology and Transfusion Medicine, “Umberto I” Hospital, Department of Molecular Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Italy) for limited suggestions on early versions of this manuscript.
- 2.Lukić T, Blešić I, Basarin B, Ivanović Bibić L, Milošević D, Sakulski D. Predatory and fake scientific journals/publishers: a global outbreak with rising trend—a review. Geogr Pannonica. 2014;18:69–81.Google Scholar
- 5.Retraction Watch. 2015. http://retractionwatch.com/category/by-reason-for-retraction/self-peer-review/. Accessed 12 May 2016.
- 6.Retraction Watch. 2015. http://retractionwatch.com/category/by-reason-for-retraction/faked-emails/. Accessed 12 May 2016.
- 8.Teixeira da Silva JA. Archives of Biological Sciences: from falling star to glimmer of hope. 2015; self-publ:1-8. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282366831_Archives_of_Biological_Sciences_From_Falling_Star_to_Glimmer_of_Hope. Accessed 12 May 2016.
- 9.Dadkhah M, Alharbi AM, Al-Khresheh MH, Sutikno T, Maliszewski T, Jazil MD, Shamshirband S. Affiliation oriented journals: don’t worry about peer review if you have good affiliation. Int J Elect Comput Eng. 2015;5:621–5.Google Scholar
- 12.Jalalian M, Mahboobi H. New corruption detected: bogus impact factors compiled by fake organizations. Electron Phys. 2013;5:685–6.Google Scholar
- 13.Teixeira da Silva JA. Debunking post-publication peer review. Int J Educ Inf Technol. 2015;1:34–7.Google Scholar
- 14.McCook A. Can journals get hijacked? Apparently, yes. 2015. http://retractionwatch.com/2015/11/19/can-journals-get-hijacked-apparently-yes/. Accessed 12 May 2016.
- 16.Dadkhah M, Obeidat MM, Jazi MD, Sutikno T, Riyadi MA. How can we identify hijacked journals? Bull Electr Eng Inf. 2015;4:83–7.Google Scholar
- 20.Dadkhah M, Elias N, Jazi MD, Christova-Bagdassarian V, Abu-Elteen KH. A new challenge in the academic world: earning real money and eminence by paper publishing. Jordan J Biol Sci. 2015;8:73–5.Google Scholar
- 21.Dadkhah M, Tarhini A, Lyashenko VV, Jazi MD. Hiring editorial member for receiving papers from authors. Mediterr J Soc Sci. 2015;6:11–2.Google Scholar
- 23.Jalalian M, Dadkhah M. The full story of 90 hijacked journals from August 2011 to June 2015. Geogr Pannonica. 2015;19:73–87.Google Scholar