Skip to main content
Log in

The use of magnetic resonance in the hospital and coronial pediatric postmortem examination

  • Radiology Review
  • Published:
Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has rapidly progressed from being a research tool to an ancillary pre-autopsy imaging technique and now an adjunct of the postmortem (PM) examination. In this review, we describe our experience with the use of PM MRI over the last 6 years in more than 300 fetal PM examinations, initially as research and finally the most recent use in 30 pediatric coronial autopsies. The pediatric pathologist and the neonatal and fetal radiologist retrospectively measured the impact on diagnosis at each stage of the development of the technique together. All imaging techniques have the advantage of being non-invasive, more acceptable to the public, especially certain religious groups and provide a permanent record of the features observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Laing IA. Clinical aspects of neonatal death and autopsy. Semin Neonatol 2004;9:247–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Landefeld CS, Chren MM, Myers A, et al. Diagnostic yield of the autopsy in a university hospital and a community hospital. N Engl J Med 1988;318:1249–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Maniscalco WWM, Clarke TA. Factors influencing neonatal autopsy rate. Am J Dis Child 1982;136:781–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dahms B. The autopsy in pediatrics. Am J Dis Child 1986;140:335.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brodie M, Laing IA, Keeling JW, MacKenzie KJ. Ten years of neonatal autopsies in tertiary referral centre: retrospective study. Br Med J 2002;324:761–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen M, Drut R. The pediatric autopsy. The situation in a pediatric hospital in Argentina. Arch Arg Ped 2003;101:166–70.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Joint Working Party of Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologist and Royal College of Pathologist. Report of fetal and perinatal pathology. London RCOG, 1988.

  8. Khong TY. Falling neonatal autopsies rates. Neonatologists, pathologists and relatives needs to boost neonatal pathology. BMJ 2002;324:49–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Burton JL, Underwood JCE. Necropsy practice after the “organ retention scandal”: requests, performance, and tissue retention. J Clin Pathol 2003;56:537–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Roberts ISD, Cohen M, Benbow EW. The non-invasive or minimally invasive autopsy. In: Underwood J, Pignatelli M, editors. Recent advances in histopathology 22. RSM Press; 2007. p. 181–198.

  11. Ros PR, Li KC, Vo P, et al. Preautopsy magnetic resonance imaging: initial experience. Magn Reson Imaging 1990;8:303–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bisset R. Magnetic resonance imaging may be alternative to necropsy. BMJ 1998;317:1450.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Brookes JS, Hall-Craggs MA. Postmortem perinatal examination: the role of magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;9:145–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Whitby EH, Paley MN, Cohen M, Griffiths PD. Post mortem MR imaging of the fetus: an adjunct or a replacement for conventional autopsy? Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2005;10(5):475–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Whitby EH, Paley MNJ, Cohen M, Griffiths PD. Post-mortem fetal MRI: what do we learn from it? Eur J Radiol 2006;57:250–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Griffiths PD, Variend D, Evans M, et al. Postmortem MR imaging of the fetal and stillborn central nervous system. Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:22–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cohen M, Paley M, Griffiths P, Whitby E. Less invasive autopsy: benefits and limitations of the use of magnetic resonance imaging in the perinatal post-mortem. Pediatr Dev Pathol. Published on line 22 March 2007. In press.

  18. Variend S. Fetal, perinatal and infant autopsies. In: Cotton DWK, Cross SS, editors. The hospital autopsy. Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford; 1993. Chapter 8, pp. 99–115.

  19. www.rcpch.ac.uk/doc.aspx?id_Resource=1983, Accessed 22 July 2007.

  20. Whitby EH, Griffiths PD, Paley M, Cohen M. The value of post mortem magnetic resonance imaging and other ancillary investigations in the fetal autopsy. ECR 2007;Eur Radiol Supplement 1, B644.

  21. Rutherford MA. Magnetic resonance imaging of injury to the immature brain. In: Squire W editor. Acquired damage to the developing brain. London: Arnold Publishers; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Brookes JAS, Hall-Craggs MA, Sams V, Lees WR. Non-invasive perinatal necropsy by magnetic resonance imaging. Lancet 1996;348:1139–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hagmann CF, Robertson NJ, Sams VR, Brookes JA. Postmortem magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to perinatal autopsy for renal-tract abnormalities. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2007;93:F215–18.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Plattner T, Thali MJ, Yen K, et al. Virtopsy-post mortem multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a fatal scuba diving incident. J Forensic Sci 2003;48:1347–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bollinger SA, Thali MJ, Ross S. Virtual autopsy using imaging: bridging radiologic and forensic sciences. A review of the Virtopsy and similar projects. Eur Radiol 2007; Aug 18; [Epub ahead of print].

  26. Thali MJ, Jackowski C, Oesterhelweg L, et al. Virtopsy-the Swiss virtual autopsy approach. Leg Med (Tokyo) 2007;9:100–4.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Huisman TA, Wisser J, Stallmach T, et al. MR autopsy in fetuses. Fetal Diagn Ther 2002;17:58–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lanska MJ, Roessmann U, Wiznitzer M. Magnetic resonance imaging in cervical cord birth injury. Pediatrics 1990;85:760–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Brookes JS, Hagmann C. MRI in fetal necropsy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:1221–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Deng J, Brookes JAS, Gardener JE, et al. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging of the post-mortem fetal heart. Fetal Diagn Ther 1996;11:417–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Jackowski C, Thali MJ, Buck U, et al. Nonivasive estimation of organ weights by post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2006;41:572–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yen K, Lövblad K-O, Scheurer E, et al. Post-mortem forensic neuroimaging: correlation of MSCT and MRI findings with autopsy results. Forensic Sci Int 2007;173:21–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. C. Cohen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cohen, M.C., Whitby, E. The use of magnetic resonance in the hospital and coronial pediatric postmortem examination. Forens Sci Med Pathol 3, 289–296 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-007-9017-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-007-9017-5

Keywords

Navigation