Skip to main content
Log in

Adequacy and Diagnostic Accuracy of Aspiration vs. Capillary Fine Needle Thyroid Biopsies

  • Published:
Endocrine Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thyroid nodules can be biopsied by fine needle aspiration (FNA) or fine needle capillary (FNC) biopsies. However, there is controversy on whether one technique is superior to another. In a randomized cytopathologist-blinded cross-sectional study, 260 patients (238 females, age 43.2 ± 12.6) with nodular (82.7%) and diffuse goiter (17.3%) underwent 520 FNAs and 520 FNCs (not guided by ultrasound). Smears were scored for sample adequacy, and diagnosed as malignant, benign, suspicious, or nondiagnostic. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated based on the histological findings of 58 patients submitted to surgery. Intra-technique diagnostic accuracy and sample adequacy was seen in all samples. FNA and FNC provided similar cytological diagnosis, respectively (benign: 75.8% vs. 74.2%, p = 0.600; malignant: 3.8% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.871; suspicious: 10.4% vs. 10.8%, p = 0.913; and nondiagnostic: 10.0% vs. 11.2%, p = 0.598). Adequacy scores were similar by FNA (7.94 ± 2.84) and FNC (7.96 ± 2.81, p = 0.909). The same proportion of adequate or superior samples was seen in both techniques (91.6%). Sensitivity was equal to 85.7% for FNA and 100% for FNC. Similarly, specificity was 100% for both techniques. FNA and FNC provide the similar sample adequacy and diagnostic accuracy. The choice of technique should be based on the operator’s personal preferences and experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Soderstrom N. Puncture of goiters for aspiration biopsy. Acta Med Scand. 144:237–44, 1952.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Santos JE, Leiman G. Nonaspiration fine needle cytology. Application of a new technique to nodular thyroid disease. Acta Cytol. 32:353–6, 1988.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rajasekhar A, Sundaram C, Chowdhary T, Charanpal M, Ratnakar KS. Diagnostic utility of fine-needle sampling without aspiration: a prospective study. Diagn Cytopathol. 7:473–6, 1991.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zajdela A, Zillhardt P, Voillemot N. Cytological diagnosis by fine needle sampling without aspiration. Cancer. 59:1201–5, 1987.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mair S, Dunbar F, Becker PJ, Du Plessis W. Fine needle cytology—is aspiration suction necessary? A study of 100 masses in various sites. Acta Cytol. 33:809–13, 1989.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Haddadi-Nezhad S, Larijani B, Tavangar SM, Nouraei SM. Comparison of fine-needle-nonaspiration with fine-needle-aspiration technique in the cytologic studies of thyroid nodules. Endocr Pathol. 14:369–73, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Degirmenci B, Haktanir A, Albayrak R, et al. Sonographically guided fine-needle biopsy of thyroid nodules: the effects of nodule characteristics, sampling technique, and needle size on the adequacy of cytological material. Clin Radiol. 62:798–803, 2007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kamal MM, Arjune DG, Kulkarni HR. Comparative study of fine needle aspiration and fine needle capillary sampling of thyroid lesions. Acta Cytol. 46:30–4, 2002.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schoedel KE, Tublin ME, Pealer K, Ohori NP. Ultrasound-guided biopsy of the thyroid: a comparison of technique with respect to diagnostic accuracy. Diagn Cytopathol. 36:787–9, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tublin ME, Martin JA, Rollin LJ, Pealer K, Kurs-Lasky M, Ohori NP. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration versus fine-needle capillary sampling biopsy of thyroid nodules: does technique matter? J Ultrasound Med. 26:1697–701, 2007.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kate MS, Kamal MM, Bobhate SK, Kher AV. Evaluation of fine needle capillary sampling in superficial and deep-seated lesions. An analysis of 670 cases. Acta Cytol. 42:679–84, 1998.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lundgren CI, Zedenius J, Skoog L. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of benign thyroid nodules: an evidence-based review. World J Surg. 32:1247–52, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leung AM, Farwell AP. Unsatisfactory consequences from fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules. Thyroid. 18:491–2, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gisah Amaral de Carvalho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Carvalho, G.A., Paz-Filho, G., Cavalcanti, T.C. et al. Adequacy and Diagnostic Accuracy of Aspiration vs. Capillary Fine Needle Thyroid Biopsies. Endocr Pathol 20, 204–208 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-009-9092-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-009-9092-0

Keywords

Navigation