Advertisement

Neuroinformatics

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 619–622 | Cite as

An Efficient and Extendable Python Library to Analyze Neuronal Morphologies

  • Benjamin Torben-Nielsen
News Item

Neuronal morphology has been of interest to neuroscientists since Cajal and Golgi. Due to technical advances and data-sharing initiatives (Ascoli et al. 2007) we have access to more neuronal reconstructions than one could accumulate in a lifetime up to recently. It is known that while neuronal morphology is highly diverse and variant (Soltesz 2005) it is pivotal for brain functioning because the overlap between axons and dendrite limits the network connectivity (Peters’ rule (Peters and Payne 1993)) and dendrites define how inputs are integrated to produce and output signal (Torben-Nielsen and Stiefel 2010). Moreover, morphological anomalies and changes are often implicated in neuro-developmental and degenerative diseases (Kaufmann and Moser 2000). These insights could not have been established without the ability to rigorously quantify neuronal morphologies.

Nowadays quantification is done on reconstructed neuronal morphologies, that is, digital representations of neuronal structures....

References

  1. Ascoli, G. A., Donohue, D. E., & Halavi, M. (2007). NeuroMorpho.Org: a central resource for neuronal morphologies. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(35), 9247–9251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cannon, R. C., Turner, D. A., Pyapali, G. K., & Wheal, H. V. (1998). An on-line archive of reconstructed hippocampal neurons. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 84(1–2), 49–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cuntz, H., Forstner, F., Borst, A., & Häusser, M. (2010). One rule to grow them all: a general theory of neuronal branching and its practical application. PLoS Computational Biology, 6(8), e1000877.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Glaser, J. R., & Glaser, E. M. (1990). Neuron imaging with neurolucida—a PC-based system for image combining microscopy. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 14(5), 307–317.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kaufmann, W. E., & Moser, H. W. (2000). Dendritic anomalies in disorders associated with mental retardation. Cerebral Cortex, 10(10), 981–991.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Peters, A., & Payne, B. R. (1993). Numerical relationships between geniculocortical afferents and pyramidal cell modules in cat primary visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 3(1), 69–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Scorcioni, R., Polavaram, S., & Ascoli, G. A. (2008). L-Measure: a web-accessible tool for the analysis, comparison and search of digital reconstructions of neuronal morphologies. Nature Protocols, 3(5), 866–876.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Soltesz, I. (2005). Diversity in the neuronal machine: Order and variability in interneuronal microcircuits. New-York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Torben-Nielsen, B., & Stiefel, K. M. (2010). An inverse approach for elucidating dendritic function. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 4, 128.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Van Pelt, J., Uylings, H. B., Verwer, R. W., Pentney, R. J., & Woldenberg, M. J. (1992). Tree asymmetry—a sensitive and practical measure for binary topological trees. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 54(5), 759–784.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computational Neuroscience UnitOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate UniversityOkinawaJapan

Personalised recommendations