Abstract
Purpose
Although anti-hypertensive medications, including thiazides and β-blockers (BBs) in particular, have been suggested to cause erectile dysfunction (ED) their real contribution is still conflicting. The aim of this paper is to summarize available evidence providing an evidence-based critical analysis of the topic.
Methods
An overall comprehensive narrative review was performed using Medline, Embase and Cochrane search. In addition, to better understand the impact of BBs on ED a specific systematic review was also performed.
Results
The negative role of centrally acting drugs, such as clonidine and α-methyldopa, is well documented althuogh limited controlled trials are available. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and calcium-channel-blockers (CCBs) have neutral (CCBs) or even positive (ACEis and ARBs) effects on erectile function. Despite some preliminary negative reports, more recent evidence does not confirm the negative impact of thiazides. BBs should be still considered the class of medications more often associated with ED, although better outcomes can be drawn with nebivolol.
Conclusion
Sexual function should be assessed in all patients with arterial hypertension, either at diagnosis or after the prescription of specific medications. A close related patient-physician interaction and discussion can overcome possible negative outcomes allowing a successful management of possible side effects.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Arterial hypertension (AH) represents a well-recognized public health issue estimated to affect over one billion individuals worldwide [1] as well as an established risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), cognitive decline and premature mortality [2, 3]. The blood pressure (BP) lowering effect of antihypertensive medications offers considerable benefits in reducing the impact of such morbidities and related mortality [4]. However, evidence about their possible negative impact on male sexual function is still the object of an intense debate [5, 6]. The Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study (TOMHS) was one of the first large population trials describing an association between AH and sexual dysfunction in both male and female participants [7]. Since then, a large body of evidence clarified how the presence of AH is associated to an increased risk of erectile dysfunction (ED) across different study populations [8,9,10,11,12]. Accordingly, available data suggest that ED is two-times higher in subjects with AH when compared to those derived from the general population [13]. Several pathogenetic mechanisms have been suggested including either central (e.g. catecholamine depletion) or peripheral mechanisms (e.g. metabolic and hormonal profile impairment; see also below) [5, 6, 14]. Notably, antihypertensive medications such as thiazide and β-blockers (BBs) have been found, more frequently than others, to play a detrimental role on sexual function [2, 6, 13, 14]. Calcium-channel-blockers (CCBs) or α-blockers (ABs) have shown essentially neutral effects on ED [6, 14], although negative role of α-blockers on ejaculatory function have been reported [15]. Conversely, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have been suggested to exert the most favourable impact on erectile function [2, 6, 14]. However, it should be recognized that the available evidence is still poor and often derived from expert opinion, rather than evidence-based data. Similarly, the net impact of BBs on male sexual function in men suffering AH is still a matter of debate. While some older trials, based on self-reported erectile function, pointed towards a possible sexual impairment in both healthy and hypertensive men [16, 17], others, based on standardized erectile function assessment methods (International Index of Erectile Function or IIEF), could not confirm such an association [18]. Similarly, a large network meta-analysis including 25 studies accounting for more than 7700 patients showed a neutral effect on erectile function [5]. In addition, there is evidence suggesting that patient knowledge and prejudice about BB side effects could represent a major determinant of ED onset [19]. Moreover, the different pharmacodynamic profiles of BB action are likely responsible for the different impacts on sexual function observed when different molecules are compared; indeed working evidence showed how nebivolol, a third generation BB, is rather associated with slight improvement [20] or no impact on patient IIEF (see below [21]).
The aim of the present review is to provide a summary of the available data related to the possible association between ED and the use of AH medications with a particular focus on the impact of BBs.
Methods
A comprehensive narrative review was performed using Medline, Embase and Cochrane searches and including the following words: ((“erectile dysfunction” [MeSH Terms] OR (“erectile” [All Fields] AND “dysfunction” [All Fields]) OR “erectile dysfunction” [All Fields]) AND (“hypertense” [All Fields] OR “hypertension” [MeSH Terms] OR “hypertension” [All Fields] OR “hypertension s” [All Fields] OR “hypertensions” [All Fields] OR “hypertensive” [All Fields] OR “hypertensive s” [All Fields] OR “hypertensives” [All Fields]) AND (“medic” [All Fields] OR “medical” [All Fields] OR “medicalization” [MeSH Terms] OR “medicalization” [All Fields] OR “medicalizations” [All Fields] OR “medicalize” [All Fields] OR “medicalized” [All Fields] OR “medicalizes” [All Fields] OR “medicalizing” [All Fields] OR “medically” [All Fields] OR “medicals” [All Fields] OR “medicated” [All Fields] OR “medication s” [All Fields] OR “medics” [All Fields] OR “pharmaceutical preparations” [MeSH Terms] OR (“pharmaceutical” [All Fields] AND “preparations” [All Fields]) OR “pharmaceutical preparations” [All Fields] OR “medication” [All Fields] OR “medications” [All Fields])) AND ((humans[Filter]) AND (male[Filter]) AND (english[Filter])). Publications from January 1st, 1969 up to February 29th, 2024 were included.
In addition, to better analyze the impact of BBs on ED a specific systematic review was performed using the same time period reported above, and the following words ((“erectile dysfunction” [MeSH Terms] OR (“erectile” [All Fields] AND “dysfunction” [All Fields]) OR “erectile dysfunction” [All Fields]) AND (“adrenergic beta antagonists” [Pharmacological Action] OR “adrenergic beta antagonists” [MeSH Terms] OR (“adrenergic” [All Fields] AND “beta antagonists” [All Fields]) OR “adrenergic beta antagonists” [All Fields] OR (“beta” [All Fields] AND “blockers” [All Fields]) OR “beta blockers” [All Fields])) AND ((humans [Filter]) AND (male [Filter]) AND (English [Filter])) (Appendix 1). In particular, a meta-analytic approach was selected in order to minimize possible sources of bias derived from a personal interpretation of the data. Meta-analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta-analysis Version 2, Biostat, and (Englewood, NJ, USA). Multivariate analyses as well as other analyses were performed on SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences; Chicago, USA) for Windows, version 25.
Clinical data were derived from a consecutive series of more than 4000 patients seeking medical care at the University of Florence, as previously described [3, 11, 22, 23].
Antihypertensive drugs and ED in symptomatic patients
ED subjects represent a population enriched with associated morbidities such as metabolic and hormonal derangements, as well as traditional CV risk factors, including AH [12, 24,25,26]. Accordingly, ED is nowadays considered an early marker of forthcoming major CV diseases (MACE) either in the general population [27] or in patients with diabetes mellitus [28]. In a large series of patients seeking medical care for ED, we previously demonstrated that subjects in the lowest pulse pressure quartile (20–45 mmHg) had up to a 60% reduced risk of MACE after a mean follow-up of 4.3 years [3]. In order to better understand the impact of the most important AH medications, we here reported a specific analysis in an updated population, including 3903 subjects with a mean age of 50.6 ± 11.5 years (Table 1 and 3). Only the first-line drugs recommended by the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) were investigated [2]. The subjects were evaluated according to what was previously described [3, 11]. Among them, 25.2% had a history of AH or were taking AH medications. In particular, the use of BBs, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis), ARBs, CCBs, diuretics and ABs was reported by 8.5%, 12.8%, 9.3%, 9%, 10.9%, and 6.5%, respectively. Specific correlates of any of the aforementioned classes of anti-hypertensive medications were assessed by binary logistic regression analysis, using as a reference those not taking any medication and after adjustment for confounders (including age, smoking and alcohol consumption, history of AH and CVD and body mass index, BMI). As shown in Table 1, no difference in the reported rate of erection sufficient for penetration was observed for all the classes investigated. In BBs, but no in other classes, use was inversely related to the reported frequency of intercourse. In addition, BBs along with ACEis, CBBs and ABs showed the best impact in improving flaccid acceleration at Penile Colour Doppler Ultrasound (PCDU). Similarly, BBs and ARBs showed the best impact in reducing pulse pressure, which is considered one of the best clinical markers of endothelial function [3, 11]. Several AH medications, including BBs, ARBs and CBBs, were associated with a reduction in testis volume. This finding was tightly related to the observed reduction in T circulating levels in patients taking BB and ARBs. Conversely, no modification in gonadotropins levels was observed, apart from a slight, although statistically significant, increase in FSH observed with the use of CBBs. Finally, the use of several classes of AH medications was more often associated with an increase in anxious and depressive symptomatology, as assessed by the Middlesex Hospital Questionnaire, a tool to investigate psychological disturbances in a non-psychiatric setting [29] (Table 1).
Antihypertensive drugs and ED in the general population
As reported in the introduction, the specific impact of anti-hypertensive medications on ED is still confusing and based on poor-quality data. A summary, performed more than 10 years ago, based on 12 different hypertension clinical practice guidelines, showed that only a few of them (n = 3) recognised the importance of assessing sexual function prior to initiation and/or follow-up of antihypertensive therapy, and only two provided specific management recommendations [30]. The European Society of Hypertension (ESH) has recognized the importance of ED since 2007 by introducing a specific Working Group on Sexual Dysfunction [31]. In its updated guideline [2] and in a position paper [13], ESH still supports the negative role of BBs and diuretics and the better outcomes of ARBs and nebivolol on ED. In the following sections, a summary of the available data related to the most important classes of anti-hypertensive medications will be provided (see also Table 2).
Central acting-drugs: clonidine and α-methyldopa
Clonidine acts by stimulating α-adrenergic receptors resulting in inhibition of bulbar sympathetic vasoconstrictor and cardio-accelerator centres. Similarly, α-metildopa can negatively interfere with the sympathetic nervous system inducing catecholamine depletion at a central level. The impairment of sympathetic tone at a central level represents the main putative negative effect of these drugs on ED [32]. Accordingly, the prevalence of ED has been reported in up to 70% of subjects treated with clonidine [33] and up to 53% of those taking methyldopa [34]. In line with these data, evidence derived from animal models showed that clonidine impairs sexual behaviour and the nerve-mediated response to erection in rats [35]. However, it should be recognised that data related to these drugs are derived from very old and uncontrolled reports, often using only self-reported data and not specific validated questionnaires for the evaluation of ED.
Diuretics
Several uncontrolled reports support the negative role of thiazides on erectile function [36, 37]. The working mechanism of action is based on the possible stimulation of the central α-adrenergic receptor pathway due to sodium depletion [38]. In line with this hypothesis, a prospective five-year study performed in the general population showed that the use of thiazides was associated with 2.4 fold increased risk of ED, even after the adjustment for confounders [36]. In contrast to this study, data derived from the Massachusetts Male Aging Study (MMAS) did not confirm an association between ED and the use of thiazides in the multivariate analysis [39]. A first randomized controlled trial (RCT) showed that chlorthalidone impaired erectile function when compared to placebo after 6 months [40]. However, these data were not confirmed in a two-year larger TOMHS study including more than 900 subjects [7]. The contribution of thiazides in combination with other treatments on ED is difficult to assess. However, a recent network meta-analysis, including nine studies with at least one thiazide harm, did not provide an increased ED-related risk [5]. The use of aldosterone antagonists, such as spironolactone and eplerenone, potentially negatively interferes with sexual function due to their anti-androgenic effects and their possible negative role in gonadotropins secretion [38]. However, specific placebo RCTs are still lacking. Similarly, information related to the effects of loop-diuretics on ED is limited. Interestingly, data derived from the MMAS confirmed an increased risk of ED related to the use of either loop-diuretics or spironolactone, even after adjustment for confounders [39].
Calcium-channel blockers
Some preliminary studies indicated that nifedipine was associated with worse erectile function when compared to placebo in patients with hypertension [41] or coronary artery diseases [42]. The latter observation, however, was not confirmed when multiple drug treatments where investigated. Accordingly, the TOMHS trial did not find any difference when acebutolol, amlodipine, chlorthalidone, doxasosin, or enalapril were compared to placebo [7]. In addition, “in vitro” studies indicated that nifedipine, diltiazem, and verapamil were able to counteract norepinephrine-induced contraction of corona cavernosa smooth muscles cells [43]. Similar data were derived from amlodipine in hypertensive rats [44]. However, no sufficient data in humans are available to support the positive effect of calcium-channel blockers (CCB) on erectile function. Accordingly, the available network meta-analysis, including five RCTs with at least one CCBs arm, found a neutral effect of these medications on ED rate [5].
Alpha-blockers
According to the current guidelines ABs represent the 3rd line therapy in the overall population [2]. Data derived from the TOMHS trial showed no difference in ED rate when compared to placebo either after 24 or 28 months. However, a trend towards a lower incidence of ED in patients treated with ABs was detected [7]. The combination between ABs with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i) did not improve ED in the overall general population [45]. Conversely, the combined therapy resulted in better IIEF score when patients with low urinary tract symptoms were considered [46].
ACE-inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers
The TOMHS trial [7] did not find any advantage of enalapril, when compared to placebo, on erectile function. Conversely, a more recently published trial, performed in 59 subjects with atherosclerotic ED, showed that quinapril was associated with an improvement of penile vascular flow and ED, as assessed by IIEF, when compared to placebo [47]. Similarly, several uncontrolled and open-label reports have suggested an improvement of erectile function related to the use of ARBs (see for review [6, 13, 14, 38]). Several mechanisms related to the renin-angiotensin pathway can support the positive role of either ACEìs or ARBs on erectile function. Angiotensin II is produced and released by endothelial and smooth muscle cells of the penile arteries and corpora cavernosa under ACE control. At this level, angiotensin II is involved in the regulation of penile detumescence through a direct action on endothelial cells and indirectly by the stimulation of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) [48]. Furthermore, angiotensin II is involved in the increase of the production of reactive oxygen species through the stimulation of the AT1-receptor and then nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase [49]. Despite this evidence, only a few RCTs on the impact of ARBs are available. A recent meta-analysis including four placebo-controlled trials and 2809 subjects concluded that the use of ARBs was associated with an overall improvement in sexual activity, but erectile function did not increase significantly [50]. Similarly, a network meta-analysis, including five studies with at least one ACEi harm and eight studies with at least one ARB harm, concluded with a neutral effect of both medication classes when compared to placebo [5].
Beta-blockers
The use of BBs has been frequently associated with worse erectile function. However, their real contribution is still conflicting and mainly derived from uncontrolled observations. In order to better clarify their role on ED and male sexual function, we systematically investigated date derived from epidemiological studies as well as those obtained in RCTs.
Epidemiological data
Out of 212, 18 studies were collected on the latter topic [18, 36, 39, 51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65]. In addition, data derived from our population including 3903 patients seeking medical care for ED were also considered (Table 3). The retrieved studies included 264,425 subjects with a mean age of 57.1 years (Table 3). ED was defined according to different methods, and the characteristics of the included studies are reported in Table 3. When unadjusted adjusted data were considered Q and I2 were 108.5 and 86.2, respectively (p < 0.001). The funnel plot and Begg-adjusted rank correlation test (Kendall’s τ: 0.08; p = 0.69) indicated no major publication bias. Overall, the use of BBs was associated with an increased risk of ED (Fig. 1A). The risk of ED-related use of BBs increased with age (Fig. 2A) and decreased according to the increase of other CV risk factors, including enlarged BMI and the prevalence of AH or a past history of CVD (Fig. 2B–D). The latter associations were confirmed even after the adjustment for age (not shown). In line with these observations, when adjusted data were analyzed, no risk of ED was observed when subjects using BBs were compared to controls (Fig. 1B).
Interventional studies
Out of 212, 21 RCTs were included in the analysis [7, 20, 21, 37, 66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82]. Among them, 14 were placebo-controlled. Overall, these studies involved 5095 subjects with a mean age of 52.8 years, and mean BMI of 26.2 kg/m2, and a mean follow-up of 41.9 weeks (Table 4). When any kind of BBs was compared to placebo or other drugs (i.e., verapamil [68], telmisartan [80] or losartan [81]) no difference in ED rate between groups was detected (Fig. 3A). The same results were confirmed when only placebo-controlled studies were analyzed (OR = 1.21 [0.91;1.59]; p = 0.19). However, when the weekly frequency of coital intercourses was investigated, the use of BBs was associated with a reported lower number of sexual intercourses, when compared to placebo (Fig. 3B). To better analyze possible differences in the impact of ED among BB users, we compared the use of nebivolol to others. No difference in ED rate was observed between groups (Fig. 3C). However, when only studies using IIEF were considered, the use of Nebivolol resulted in better outcomes when compared to other BBs (Fig. 3D).
Discussion
Poor BP control still represents one of the major issues in the management of people with AH. Data derived from the US have estimated that only 25–35% of subjects with AH are able to reach a stable, good control of BP [83]. Even lower rates have been reported for the European population and minimal control is obtained in low-income countries [84]. Low adherence has been associated with a high risk of BP-related morbidity and mortality, whereas only a 10% increase in the effectiveness of anti-hypertensive treatment due to better drug adherence has been suggested preventing 14,000 deaths a year in the US [85]. Sexual dysfunctions have been considered one of the major problem leading to poor adherence or to withdrawal from anti-hypertensive therapy [86]. Conversely, several studies have documented that adequate management of ED and its successful treatment in hypertensive subjects, can result in improved adherence to BP lowering drugs [87].
International AH guidelines indicate that ACEis, ARBs, CCB, and thiazides should be considered first-line therapy in the management of hypertensive subjects [2, 88,89,90]. The European Society of Hypertension, along with the European Society of Cardiology (ESC/ESH), also included BBs in the first-line approach [2], whereas this was not reported by other societies [88,89,90]. Data derived from observational and interventional studies indicate that ACEis, ARBs ABs and CCBs have neutral or even positive effects on erectile function. We here report that these classes of medications might even improve penile blood flow, as demonstrated by an increased flaccid acceleration at PDU. Despite some preliminary negative reports related to the use of thiazides, more recently published data seem not to confirm this negative association. The negative role of centrally acting drugs such as clonidine and α-methyldopa is established but limited controlled trials are available and the current use of these drugs in the management of AH is limited [2, 88,89,90].
The role of BBs on CVD and ED deserves a better analysis. Long-term prospective studies have clearly demonstrated that BBs reduce mortality of about 20% after myocardial infarction [91]. Similarly a reduction in mortality and morbidity has also been observed in subjects with heart failure [92]. In line with these data, our results showed that BBs play a major role in improving PP and penile vascular flow, as detected by flaccid acceleration in subjects with ED. Accordingly, we previously reported that either higher PP [3] and reduced flaccid acceleration at PCDU [93] represent valid markers of forthcoming MACE in the ED population. As also recognized by as stated by ESC/ESH Guidelines, BBs are not a homogeneous class [2]. In particular, BBs differ in cardioselectivity, sympathomimetic activity, lipid solubility and vasodilating capability [94, 95] (see also Supplementary Table 1). Several intrinsic mechanisms belonging to BBs can explain their potential negative role in erectile function. The main putative negative mechanism of action deals with the possible decrease in penile perfusion pressure due to unopposed α-receptor stimulation. In addition, a possible decrease of testosterone (T) as well as gonadotropins production induced by metoprolol, pindolol, atenolol, and particularly propranolol has also been reported [16]. Indirect effects on T production, due to metabolic negative consequences induced by BBs, can also be advocated. Accordingly, metabolic derangements and obesity are considered one of the main determinants of the so-called “functional hypogonadism” [14, 96, 97]. Our data, derived from a large series of subjects with ED, showed that the use of BBs is associated with a lower testis volume as well as decreased T levels without any modifications in LH and FSH concentrations. Finally, a decrease in central sympathetic tone, especially for BBs with higher lipid solubility has also been postulated [87]. In line with this evidence, worse effects have been reported for non-selective BBs, particularly for propranolol [87]. Despite these data, one of the largest meta-analyses published so far showed that although the use of BBs was associated with an increased risk of ED, the absolute risk did not reach statistical significance [98]. In addition, no differences were reported according to BB lipid solubility or when non-selective drugs were compared to later BB generations [98]. In line with these data, a more recently published network meta-analysis, including 19 studies with at least one BB blocker harm, did not find any increased risk of ED [5]. Our data are in line with this evidence. Results derived from epidemiological studies showed that the BB-related risk of ED increased as a function of associated morbidities and age. Conversely, no association was found when adjusted data were investigated. Taken together, these results suggest that BB-associated morbidities, rather than BBs per se, support the link between BBs and ED. Accordingly, when interventional studies were considered, our analysis confirmed the neutral effects of BBs on ED. Interestingly, however, our results indicated a negative relationship between BBs and frequency of intercourse as derived from either the meta-analysis of the interventional trials or from patients seeking medical care for ED at Florence Unit. It should be recognized that knowledge and prejudice about the side effects of BBs can produce anxiety and mood disturbances leading to ED reduced frequency of intercourse and drug withdrawal, the so-called “nocebo effect” [19]. Accordingly, our data derived from ED patients, showed that subjects taking BBs more often complained of anxiety and depressive symptoms. Similar considerations can be drawn to explain the relationship between mood disturbances and the reported use of other AH medication classes such as ARBs, CBBs, or diuretics observed in our series.
Nebivolol represents a third-generation BB with cardioselectivity and vasorelaxant activities. However, it has peculiar, specific characteristics since its role in regulating endothelial relaxation is mainly based on the stimulation of nitric-oxide secretion from endothelial cells, rather than on the blockage of α-adrenergic receptors [95, 99]. The interaction of BBs with β3 receptors is considered the main pathway related to their possible negative metabolic effects [94]. Interestingly, a recent meta-analysis showed that nebivolol had a lower impact on LDL and HDL cholesterol when compared to other BBs [100]. These specific characteristics can explain, at least partially, our results suggesting a protective role of nebivolol on ED when IIEF data were considered. Similarly, the aforementioned network meta-analysis showed better outcomes on ED when nebivolol was compared to non-vasodilatory BBs [5]. Nevertheless, data related to the effects of nebivolol in comparisons with the other BBs are limited, and the quality of the available studies is rather modest.
Several limitations should be recognized. The quality of the available studies assessing the impact of AH medications on ED is overall modest or poor and only a limited number of well-designed placebo-controlled RCTs are available. In addition, it should be recognized that erectile function data were often not considered the main outcome of the available studies. Finally, in the vast majority of cases, sexual function was derived from patient self reported questions rather than from validated questionnaires.
In conclusion, in line with what was previously reported [5, 13, 30, 38, 87], we showed that BBs represent the class of AH medications more often associated with ED, although better results can be obtained with the use of nebivolol. However, we need to clarify that in many cases, the observed negative effects on ED can be managed with adequate information, preventing negative prejudices and wrong beliefs that can result in worse long-term mortality and morbidity outcomes. In line with what was reported by the ESH [2] and our Society [6], sexual function should be assessed in all patients with AH at diagnosis and after the introduction of specific medications. Although conflicting results have been reported, the use of BBs should be recommended in the presence of specific indications, including angina, post-myocardial infarction, heart failure or when heart-rate control is required [2]. This approach can allow to overcome negative outcomes related to the use of AH drugs and to adequately and timely manage possible side effects.
Data availability
The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC), Worldwide trends in blood pressure from 1975 to 2015: a pooled analysis of 1479 population-based measurement studies with 19·1 million participants. Lancet 389(Jan 10064), 37–55 (2017)
B. Williams, G. Mancia, W. Spiering et al. 2018 Practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension. Blood Press 27(Dec 6), 314–340 (2018)
G. Corona, M. Monami, V. Boddi et al. Pulse pressure independently predicts major cardiovascular events in younger but not in older subjects with erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med 8(Jan 1), 247–254 (2011)
M. Brunström, B. Carlberg, Association of blood pressure lowering with mortality and cardiovascular disease across blood pressure levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 178(Jan 1), 28–36 (2018)
I.T. Farmakis, N. Pyrgidis, I. Doundoulakis et al. Effects of major antihypertensive drug classes on erectile function: a network meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 36(Oct 5), 903–914 (2022)
G. Corona, D. Cucinotta, G. Di Lorenzo et al. The Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS), along with ten other Italian Scientific Societies, guidelines on the diagnosis and management of erectile dysfunction. J Endocrinol Invest 46(Jun 6), 1241–1274 (2023)
R.H. Grimm Jr, G.A. Grandits, R.J. Prineas et al. Long-term effects on sexual function of five antihypertensive drugs and nutritional hygienic treatment in hypertensive men and women. Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study (TOMHS). Hypertension 29(Jan 1 Pt 1), 8–14 (1997)
C.B. Johannes, A.B. Araujo, H.A. Feldman et al. Incidence of erectile dysfunction in men 40 to 69 years old: longitudinal results from the Massachusetts male aging study. J Urol 163(Feb 2), 460–463 (2000)
G. Corona, D.M. Lee, G. Forti et al. Age-related changes in general and sexual health in middle-aged and older men: results from the European Male Ageing Study (EMAS). J Sex Med 7(Apr 4 Pt 1), 1362–1380 (2010)
A. Ponholzer, C. Temml, K. Mock et al. Prevalence and risk factors for erectile dysfunction in 2869 men using a validated questionnaire. Eur Urol 47(Jan 1), 80–85 (2005).
G. Corona, E. Mannucci, F. Lotti et al. Pulse pressure, an index of arterial stiffness, is associated with androgen deficiency and impaired penile blood flow in men with ED. J Sex Med 6(Jan 1), 285–293 (2009)
D.G. Corona, W. Vena, A. Pizzocaro et al. Metabolic syndrome and erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis study. J Endocrinol Invest 46(Nov 11), 2195–2211 (2023)
M. Viigimaa, C. Vlachopoulos, M. Doumas et al. Update of the position paper on arterial hypertension and erectile dysfunction. J Hypertens 38(Jul 7), 1220–1234 (2020)
A. Salonia, C. Bettocchi, L. Boeri et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on sexual and reproductive health-2021 update: male sexual dysfunction. Eur Urol 80(Sep 3), 333–357 (2021)
M. Gacci, V. Ficarra, A. Sebastianelli et al. Impact of medical treatments for male lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia on ejaculatory function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sex Med 11(Jun 6), 1554–1566 (2014)
R.C. Rosen, J.B. Kostis, A.W. Jekelis, Beta-blocker effects on sexual function in normal males. Arch Sex Behav 17(Jun 3), 241–255 (1988)
R.C. Rosen, J.B. Kostis, A. Jekelis et al. Sexual sequelae of antihypertensive drugs: treatment effects on self-report and physiological measures in middle-aged male hypertensives. Arch Sex Behav 23(Apr 2), 135–152 (1994)
A. Cordero, V. Bertomeu-Martínez, P. Mazón et al. Erectile dysfunction in high-risk hypertensive patients treated with beta-blockade agents. Cardiovasc Ther 28(1), 15–22 (2010)
A. Silvestri, P. Galetta, E. Cerquetani et al. Report of erectile dysfunction after therapy with beta-blockers is related to patient knowledge of side effects and is reversed by placebo. Eur Heart J 24(Nov 21), 1928–1932 (2003)
K. Brixius, M. Middeke, A. Lichtenthal et al. Nitric oxide, erectile dysfunction and beta-blocker treatment (MR NOED study): benefit of nebivolol versus metoprolol in hypertensive men. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 34(Apr 4), 327–331 (2007)
Ö. Gür, S. Gurkan, G. Yumun et al. The comparison of the effects of nebivolol and metoprolol on erectile dysfunction in the cases with coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 23(Apr 2), 91–95 (2017)
G. Corona, V. Ricca, E. Bandini et al. Association between psychiatric symptoms and erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med 5(Feb 2), 458–468 (2008)
G. Corona, E. Mannucci, L. Petrone et al. Psychobiological correlates of delayed ejaculation in male patients with sexual dysfunctions. J Androl 27(May-Jun 3), 453–458 (2006)
G. Corona, S. Bianchini, A. Sforza et al. Hypogonadism as a possible link between metabolic diseases and erectile dysfunction in aging men. Hormones 14(Oct-Dec 4), 569–578 (2015)
E. Maseroli, G. Corona, G. Rastrelli et al. Prevalence of endocrine and metabolic disorders in subjects with erectile dysfunction: a comparative study. J Sex Med 12(Apr 4), 956–965 (2015)
G. Corona, E. Mannucci, G. Forti et al. Following the common association between testosterone deficiency and diabetes mellitus, can testosterone be regarded as a new therapy for diabetes? Int J Androl 32(Oct 5), 431–441 (2009)
H. Mostafaei, K. Mori, S. Hajebrahimi et al. Association of erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular disease: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. BJU Int 128(Jul 1), 3–11 (2021)
S. Seidu, A. Cebrián, S.K. Kunutsor et al. Erectile dysfunction, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor use and risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality in people with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prim Care Diabetes 16(Oct 5), 601–613 (2022)
S. Crown, A.H. Crisp, A short clinical diagnostic self-rating scale for psychoneurotic patients. The Middlesex Hospital Questionnaire (M.H.Q.). Br J Psychiatry 112(Sep 490), 917–923 (1966)
M. Karavitakis, C. Komninos, P.N. Theodorakis et al. Evaluation of sexual function in hypertensive men receiving treatment: a review of current guidelines recommendation. J Sex Med 8(Sep 9), 2405–2414 (2011)
G. Mancia, G. De Backer, A. Dominiczak et al. 2007 Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens 25(Jun 6), 1105–1187 (2007)
H.B. Moss, W.R. Procci, Sexual dysfunction associated with oral antihypertensive medication: a critical survey of the literature. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 4(Jul 2), 121–129 (1982)
M.C. Laver, Sexual behaviour patterns in male hypertensives. Aust N Z J Med 4(Feb 1), 29–31 (1974)
W.D. Alexander, J.I. Evans, Letter: side effects of methyldopa. Br Med J 2(May 5969), 501 (1975)
B. Srilatha, P.G. Adaikan, S. Arulkumaran et al. Sexual dysfunction related to antihypertensive agents: results from the animal model. Int J Impot Res 11(Apr 2), 107–113 (1999)
R. Shiri, J. Koskimäki, J. Häkkinen et al. Cardiovascular drug use and the incidence of erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 19(Mar-Apr 2), 208–212 (2007)
M. Doumas, A. Tsakiris, S. Douma et al. Beneficial effects of switching from beta-blockers to nebivolol on the erectile function of hypertensive patients. Asian J Androl 8(Mar 2), 177–182 (2006)
M. Baumhäkel, N. Schlimmer, M. Kratz et al. Cardiovascular risk, drugs and erectile function-a systematic analysis. Int J Clin Pract 65(Mar 3), 289–298 (2011)
C.A. Derby, M.M. Barbour, A.L. Hume et al. Drug therapy and prevalence of erectile dysfunction in the Massachusetts male aging study cohort. Pharmacotherapy 21(Jun 6), 676–683 (2001)
H.G. Langford, R.W. Rockhold, S. Wassertheil-Smoller et al. Effect of weight loss on thiazide produced erectile problems in men. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 101, 190–194 (1990)
J.E. Marley, Safety and efficacy of nifedipine 20 mg tablets in hypertension using electronic data collection in general practice. J R Soc Med 82(May 5), 272–275 (1989)
P.A. Poole-Wilson, B.A. Kirwan, Z. Vokó et al. Safety of nifedipine GITS in stable angina: the ACTION trial. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 20(Feb 1), 45–54 (2006)
M. Fovaeus, K.E. Andersson, H. Hedlund, Effects of some calcium channel blockers on isolated human penile erectile tissues. J Urol 138(Nov 5), 1267–1272 (1987)
M. Ushiyama, T. Kuramochi, S. Katayama, Treatment with hypotensive agents affects the impaired relaxation of the penile corpus cavernosum in hypertensive rats. Hypertens Res 29(Jul 7), 523–532 (2006)
I. Mykoniatis, N. Pyrgidis, I. Sokolakis et al. Assessment of combination therapies vs monotherapy for erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 4(Feb 2), e2036337 (2021)
M. Gacci, G. Corona, M. Salvi et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors alone or in combination with α-blockers for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Urol 61(May 5), 994–1003 (2012)
T.G. Speel, L.A. Kiemeney, T. Thien et al. Long-term effect of inhibition of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) on cavernosal perfusion in men with atherosclerotic erectile dysfunction: a pilot study. J Sex Med 2(Mar 2), 207–212 (2005)
I. Kifor, G.H. Williams, M.A. Vickers et al. Tissue angiotensin II as a modulator of erectile function. I. Angiotensin peptide content, secretion and effects in the corpus cavernosum. J Urol 157(May 5), 1920–1925 (1997)
K.K. Griendling, C.A. Minieri, J.D. Ollerenshaw et al. Angiotensin II stimulates NADH and NADPH oxidase activity in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res 74(Jun 6), 1141–1148 (1994)
S.B. Ismail, N.M. Noor, N.H.N. Hussain et al. Angiotensin receptor blockers for erectile dysfunction in hypertensive men: a brief meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Am J Mens Health 13(Nov-Dec 6), 1557988319892735 (2019)
R.G. Taylor, A.J. Crisp, B.I. Hoffbrand et al. Plasma sex hormone concentrations in men with hypertension treated with methyldopa and/or propranolol. Postgrad Med J 57(Jul 669), 425–426 (1981)
J. Jensen, A. Lendorf, H. Stimpel et al. The prevalence and etiology of impotence in 101 male hypertensive outpatients. Am J Hypertens 12(Mar 3), 271–275 (1999)
M. Burchardt, T. Burchardt, L. Baer et al. Hypertension is associated with severe erectile dysfunction. J Urol 164(Oct 4), 1188–1191 (2000)
W.A. Blumentals, R.R. Brown, A. Gomez-Caminero, Antihypertensive treatment and erectile dysfunction in a cohort of type II diabetes patients. Int J Impot Res 15(Oct 5), 314–317 (2003)
W.A. Blumentals, A. Gomez-Caminero, S. Joo et al. Is erectile dysfunction predictive of peripheral vascular disease? Aging Male 6(Dec 4), 217–221 (2003)
P.K. Moulik, K.J. Hardy, Hypertension, anti-hypertensive drug therapy and erectile dysfunction in diabetes. Diabet Med 20(Apr 4), 290–293 (2003)
A. Roth, O. Kalter-Leibovici, Y. Kerbis et al. Prevalence and risk factors for erectile dysfunction in men with diabetes, hypertension, or both diseases: a community survey among 1,412 Israeli men. Clin Cardiol 26(Jan 1), 25–30 (2003)
P. Montorsi, P.M. Ravagnani, S. Galli et al. Association between erectile dysfunction and coronary artery disease. Role of coronary clinical presentation and extent of coronary vessels involvement: the COBRA trial. Eur Heart J 27(Nov 22), 2632–2639 (2006)
M. Böhm, M. Baumhäkel, J.L. Probstfield et al. Sexual function, satisfaction, and association of erectile dysfunction with cardiovascular disease and risk factors in cardiovascular high-risk patients: substudy of the ongoing telmisartan alone and in combination with Ramipril Global endpoint trial/telmisartan randomized assessment study in ACE-intolerant subjects with cardiovascular disease (ONTARGET/TRANSCEND). Am Heart J 154(Jul 1), 94–101 (2007)
J. Falkensammer, A.G. Hakaim, C.E. Falkensammer et al. Prevalence of erectile dysfunction in vascular surgery patients. Vasc Med 12(Feb 1), 17–22 (2007)
J.M. Maroto-Montero, M.T. Portuondo-Maseda, M. Lozano-Suárez et al. Erectile dysfunction in patients in a cardiac rehabilitation program. Rev Esp Cardiol 61(Sep 9), 917–922 (2008)
N. Artom, G. Pinna, N.R. Musso et al. Prevalence of erectile dysfunction in a cohort of Italian hypertensive subjects. Clin Exp Hypertens 38(2), 143–149 (2016)
B. Nisahan, T. Kumanan, N. Rajeshkannan et al. Erectile dysfunction and associated factors among men with diabetes mellitus from a tertiary diabetic center in Northern Sri Lanka. BMC Res Notes 12(Apr 1), 210 (2019)
M.C. Correia, E.N. Ogola, J.K. Kayima et al. Erectile dysfunction in hypertensive males in Kenya: a tertiary referral hospital experience. Afr Health Sci 22(Jun 2), 420–427 (2022)
C. Zhao, J.L. Feng, S. Deng et al. Genetically predicted hypertension, antihypertensive drugs, and risk of erectile dysfunction: a Mendelian randomization study. Front Cardiovasc Med 10, 1157467 (2023)
J.W. Hollifield, K. Sherman, R.V. Zwagg et al. Proposed mechanisms of propranolol’s antihypertensive effect in essential hypertension. N Engl J Med 295(Jul 2), 68–73 (1976)
G.E. Bauer, J. Baker, S.N. Hunyor et al. Side-effects of antihypertensive treatment: a placebo-controlled study. Clin Sci Mol Med Suppl 4(Dec), 341s–344s (1978)
A.E. Fletcher, P.C. Chester, C.M. Hawkins et al. The effects of verapamil and propranolol on quality of life in hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 3(Apr 2), 125–130 (1989)
Adverse reactions to bendrofluazide and propranolol for the treatment of mild hypertension, Report of medical research council working party on mild to moderate hypertension. Lancet 2(Sep 8246), 539–543 (1981)
G. Olsson, N. Rehnqvist, A. Sjögren et al. Long-term treatment with metoprolol after myocardial infarction: effect on 3 year mortality and morbidity. J Am Coll Cardiol 5(Jun 6), 1428–1437 (1985)
S. Wassertheil-Smoller, M.D. Blaufox, A. Oberman et al. Effect of antihypertensives on sexual function and quality of life: the TAIM study. Ann Intern Med 114(Apr 8), 613–620 (1991)
C.P. Broekman, S.M. Haensel, L.L. Van de Ven et al. Bisoprolol and hypertension: effects on sexual functioning in men. J Sex Marital Ther 18(4), 325–331 (1992). Winter
D.L. Morrissette, M.H. Skinner, B.B. Hoffman et al. Effects of antihypertensive drugs atenolol and nifedipine on sexual function in older men: a placebo-controlled, crossover study. Arch Sex Behav 22(Apr 2), 99–109 (1993)
R. Fogari, A. Zoppi, L. Corradi et al. Sexual function in hypertensive males treated with lisinopril or atenolol: a cross-over study. Am J Hypertens 11(Oct 10), 1244–1247 (1998)
R. Fogari, A. Zoppi, L. Poletti et al. Sexual activity in hypertensive men treated with valsartan or carvedilol: a crossover study. Am J Hypertens 14(Jan 1), 27–31 (2001)
D. Franzen, A. Metha, N. Seifert et al. Effects of beta-blockers on sexual performance in men with coronary heart disease. A prospective, randomized and double blinded study. Int J Impot Res 13(Dec 6), 348–351 (2001)
R. Fogari, P. Preti, G. Derosa et al. Effect of antihypertensive treatment with valsartan or atenolol on sexual activity and plasma testosterone in hypertensive men. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 58(Jun 3), 177–180 (2002)
B. Boydak, S. Nalbantgil, F. Fici et al. A randomised comparison of the effects of nebivolol and atenolol with and without chlorthalidone on the sexual function of hypertensive men. Clin Drug Investig 25(6), 409–416 (2005)
E.J. Eichhorn, M.J. Domanski, H. Krause-Steinrauf et al. A trial of the beta-blocker bucindolol in patients with advanced chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 344(May 22), 1659–1667 (2001)
F. Freytag, A. Schelling, T. Meinicke et al. Comparison of 26-week efficacy and tolerability of telmisartan and atenolol, in combination with hydrochlorothiazide as required, in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension: a randomized, multicenter study. Clin Ther 23(Jan 1), 108–123 (2001)
L.M. Van Bortel, C.J. Bulpitt, F. Fici, Quality of life and antihypertensive effect with nebivolol and losartan. Am J Hypertens 18(Aug 8), 1060–1066 (2005)
Aldemir, M. Keleş, İ, M. Karalar et al. Nebivolol compared with metoprolol for erectile function in males undergoing coronary artery bypass graft. Anatol J Cardiol 16(Feb 2), 131–136 (2016)
E.J. Benjamin, P. Muntner, A. Alonso et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2019 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 139(Mar 10), e56–e528 (2019)
C.K. Chow, K.K. Teo, S. Rangarajan et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in rural and urban communities in high-, middle-, and low-income countries. JAMA 310(Sep 9), 959–968 (2013)
T.A. Farley, M.A. Dalal, F. Mostashari et al. Deaths preventable in the U.S. by improvements in use of clinical preventive services. Am J Prev Med 38(Jun 6), 600–609 (2010)
C.I. Voils, M. Sandelowski, P. Dahm et al. Selective adherence to antihypertensive medications as a patient-driven means to preserving sexual potency. Patient Prefer Adherence 2(Feb), 201–206 (2008)
A. Manolis, M. Doumas, C. Ferri et al. Erectile dysfunction and adherence to antihypertensive therapy: focus on β-blockers. Eur J Intern Med 81(Nov), 1–6 (2020)
T. Unger, C. Borghi, F. Charchar et al. 2020 International society of hypertension global hypertension practice guidelines. Hypertension 75(Jun 6), 1334–1357 (2020)
P.K. Whelton, R.M. Carey, W.S. Aronow et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension 71(Jun 6), 1269–1324 (2018)
Guideline for the Pharmacological Treatment of Hypertension in Adults. Geneve. World Health Organization; 2021. 2021. Available from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/344424/9789240033986-eng.pdf
N. Freemantle, J. Cleland, P. Young et al. beta Blockade after myocardial infarction: systematic review and meta regression analysis. Bmj 318(Jun 7200), 1730–1737 (1999)
M.R. Bristow, beta-adrenergic receptor blockade in chronic heart failure. Circulation 101(Feb 5), 558–569 (2000)
G. Rastrelli, G. Corona, F. Lotti et al. Flaccid penile acceleration as a marker of cardiovascular risk in men without classical risk factors. J Sex Med 11(Jan 1), 173–186 (2014)
G.T. do Vale, C.S. Ceron, N.A. Gonzaga et al. Three generations of β-blockers: history, class differences and clinical applicability. Curr Hypertens Rev 15(1), 22–31 (2019)
C. Ferri, The role of nebivolol in the management of hypertensive patients: from pharmacological profile to treatment guidelines. Future Cardiol 17(Nov 8), 1421–1433 (2021)
A.M. Isidori, A. Aversa, A. Calogero et al. Adult- and late-onset male hypogonadism: the clinical practice guidelines of the Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS) and the Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE). J Endocrinol Invest 45(Dec 12), 2385–2403 (2022)
G. Corona, G. Rastrelli, L. Vignozzi et al. Emerging medication for the treatment of male hypogonadism. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 17(Jun 2), 239–259 (2012)
D.T. Ko, P.R. Hebert, C.S. Coffey et al. Beta-blocker therapy and symptoms of depression, fatigue, and sexual dysfunction. JAMA 288(Jul 3), 351–357 (2002)
Y. Gao, P.M. Vanhoutte, Nebivolol: an endothelium-friendly selective β1-adrenoceptor blocker. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 59(Jan 1), 16–21 (2012)
I.M.F. Wikananda, I. Nurcahya, P. Wijaya et al. Effects of Nebivolol therapy on hemodynamic parameters and lipid profile compared to other beta blockers in patients with essential hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Caspian J Intern Med 15(1), 28–37 (2024)
Funding
We acknowledge co-funding from Next Generation EU, in the context of the National Recovery and Resilience Plan, Investment PE8 – Project Age-It: “Ageing Well in an Ageing Society”. This resource was co-financed by the Next Generation EU [DM 1557 11.10.2022]. The views and opinions expressed are only those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Commission. Neither the European Union nor the European Commission can be held responsible for them. Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Firenze within the CRUI-CARE Agreement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Walter Vena, Clotilde Sparano, Alessandro Pizzocaro and Gianmaria Salvio, Alessandra Sforza. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Giovanni Corona and Mario Maggi and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Corona, G., Vena, W., Pizzocaro, A. et al. Anti-hypertensive medications and erectile dysfunction: focus on β-blockers. Endocrine (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-024-04020-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-024-04020-x