Abstract
Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) in thyroid surgery offers a valid aid to the operator in identifying the recurrent laryngeal nerve and preserving its function. Recently, IONM has also been used in other surgeries, such as spinal accessory nerve dissection, during lymphectomy of the II, III, IV, and V laterocervical lymph nodes. The goal is the preservation of the spinal accessory nerve, whose macroscopic integrity does not always indicate its functionality. A further difficulty is the anatomical variability of its course at the cervical level. The aim of our study is to assess whether the use of the IONM helps to reduce the incidence of transient and permanent paralysis of the spinal accessory nerve, compared to “de visu” identification by the surgeon alone. In our case series, the use of the IONM reduced the incidence of transient paralysis, and no permanent paralysis was recorded. In addition, if the IONM registers a reduction in nerve potential, compared to the baseline value during surgery, it could indicate the need for early rehabilitation treatment, increasing the patients’ chances of regaining function and reducing the costs of prolonged physiotherapy treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
G. Dionigi et al. The technique of intraoperative neuromonitoring in thyroid surgery. Surg. Technol. Int. 19, 25–37 (2010)
P. Miccoli et al. Thyroid surgery: preventing and managing complications. wiley (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118444832.
G.W. Randolph, et al., Electrophysiologic recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring during thyroid and parathyroid surgery: international standards guideline statement. Laryngoscope 121, S1–16 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.21119
R. Schneider et al. International neural monitoring study group guideline 2018 part I: staging bilateral thyroid surgery with monitoring loss of signal. Laryngoscope 128, S1–S17 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27359.
Y. Birinci et al. Spinal accessory nerve monitoring and clinical outcome results of nerve-sparing neck dissections. Otolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg. 151(2), 253–259 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599814531021.
A.J. Wills, G.V. Sawle, Accessory nerve palsies. Pract. Neurol. 10(4), 191–194 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2010.217760.
K. Miyata, Accessory nerve damages and impaired movements after neck dissections. Am. J. Otolaryngol. 18(3), 197–201 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-0709(97)90082-x.
A.M. Nahum, W. Mullally et al. A syndrome resulting from radical neck dissection. Arch. Otolaryngol. 74(4), 424–428 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1961.00740030433011.
R. Cirocchi et al. Intraoperative neuromonitoring versus visual nerve identification for prevention of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in adults undergoing thyroid surgery. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 1, CD012483 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012483.pub2.
B.R. Haugen et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid 26(1), 1–133 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2015.0020.
E. Kandil et al. The impact of surgical volume on patient outcomes following thyroid surgery. Surgery 154, 1346–1352 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2013.04.068.
K.T. Robbins et al. Neck dissection classification update: revisions proposed by the American Head and Neck Society and the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg. 128, 751–758 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.128.7.751.
A.C. Kierner, I. Zelenka et al. Surgical anatomy of the spinal accessory nerve and the trapezius branches of the cervical plexus. Arch. Surg. 135(12), 1428–1431 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.135.12.1428.
G.W. Randolph, H. Dralle, Electrophysiologic recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring during thyroid and parathyroid surgery: International standards guideline statement. Laryngoscope 121(1), 1–16 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.21119.
D.B. Chepeha et al. Functional assessment using Constant’s Shoulder Scale after modified radical and selective neck dissection. Head. Neck 24(5), 432–436 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.10067.
C.R. Constant, A.H. Murley, A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 214, 160–164 (1987)
M.H.H. Rocourt et al. Evaluation of intratester and intertester reliability of the Constant-Murley shoulder assessment. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg., 17(2), 364–369 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.06.024.
K. Miyata, H. Kitamura, Accessory nerve damages and impaired shoulder movements after neck dissections. Am. J. Otolaryngol. 18(3), 197–201 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-0709(97)90082-x.
A. Machens et al. Lymph node dissection in the lateral neck for completion in central node- positive papillary thyroid cancer. Surg. 145(2), 176–181 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2008.09.003.
B. Leipzig, J.Y. Suen et al. Functional evaluation of the spinal accessory nerve after neck dissection. Am. J. Surg. 146(4), 526–530 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(83)90246-5.
D. Remmler et al. A prospective study of shoulder disability resulting from radical and modified neck dissections. Head. Neck Surg. 84, 280–286 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.2890080408.
E.M. Gane et al. Prevalence, incidence, and risk factors for shoulder and neck dysfunction after neck dissection: a systematic review. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 43(7), 1199–1218 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.10.026.
C.P. van Wilgen, P.U. Dijkstra et al. Shoulder complaints after nerve sparing neck dissections. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 33(3), 253–257 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1006/ijom.2003.0507.
A. Köybasioglu et al. Accessory nerve function after modified radical and lateral neck dissections. Laryngoscope 110(1), 73–77 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200001000-00014.
G. Salerno et al. The 11th nerve syndrome in functional neck dissection. Laryngoscope 112(7), 1299–1307 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200207000-00029.
L. Erisen et al. Shoulder function after accessory nerve-sparing neck dissections. Head. Neck 26, 967–971 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.20095.
A. Symes, H. Ellis, Variations in the surface anatomy of the spinal accessory nerve in the posterior triangle. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 27(5), 404–408 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-005-0004-9.
L. Lu et al. Vulnerability of the spinal accessory nerve in the posterior triangle of the neck: a cadaveric study. Orthopedics 25(1), 71–74 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3928/0147-7447-20020101-20.
B. Lanišnik, Different branching patterns of the spinal accessory nerve: impact on neck dissection technique and postoperative shoulder function. Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg. 25(2), 113–118 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000342.
C. Svenberg Lind et al. Quantification of trapezius muscle innervation during neck dissections: cervical plexus versus the spinal accessory nerve. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 124(11), 881–885 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489415589365.
A.C. Kierner, I. Zelenka, How do the cervical plexus and the spinal accessory nerve contribute to the innervation of the trapezius muscle? As seen from within using Sihler’s stain. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg. 127(10), 1230–1232 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.127.10.1230.
S. Sobol et al. Objective comparison of physical dysfunction after neck dissection. Am. J. Surg. 150(4), 503–509 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(85)90164-3.
C. Patten, A.D. Hillel, The 11th nerve syndrome. Accessory nerve palsy or adhesive capsulitis? Arch. Otolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg. 119(2), 215–220 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1993.01880140105016.
A.C. Kierner et al. Intraoperative electromyography for identification of the trapezius muscle innervation: clinical proof of a new anatomical concept. Laryngoscope 112, 1853–1856 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200210000-00028.
B. Leipzig, J.Y. Suen et al. Functional evaluation of the spinal accessory nerve after neck dissection. Am. J. Surg. 146(4), 526–530 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(83)90246-5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. “Conceptualization, A.C. and C.B.; methodology, A.C.; validation, C.B. and G.N.; formal analysis, V.S. and E.B.; investigation, L.C.; resources, A.C. and L.C.; data curation, E.B.; writing—original draft preparation, A.C. and V.S.; writing—review and editing, A.C.,V.S. and E.B.; visualization, V.S.; supervision, C.B. and G.N.; project administration, G.N.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Cossa, A., Sbacco, V., Belloni, E. et al. The role of intraoperative neuromonitoring in preventing lesions of the spinal accessory nerve during functional neck dissection. Endocrine 81, 134–140 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-023-03324-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-023-03324-8