Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The combination of BRAFV600E mutation and Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System is helpful in the management of AUS/FLUS thyroid nodules

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Endocrine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To explore the utility of the BRAFV600E mutation in combination with the Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (C-TIRADS) in the management of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) thyroid nodule (TN).

Methods

138 AUS/FLUS TNs in 129 patients were included. Each TN underwent preoperative BRAFV600E mutation analysis and was classified using the C-TIRADS. Histopathologic diagnosis served as reference standard.

Results

46 benign TNs and 92 malignant TNs were identified. The C-TIRADS 4C and 5 (OR = 10.409, P = 0.000), BRAFV600E mutation (OR = 36.493, P = 0.000) were independent predictors of malignant nodules. There were significant differences in malignancy rate among the different C-TIRADS TNs (P = 0.000), and these TNs with higher C-TIRADS were associated with increased malignancy rate (P for trend = 0.000). The rate of the nodule with BRAFV600E mutation increased with the increase of C-TIRADS (P for trend = 0.001). For AUS/FLUS TNs without BRAFV600E mutation, the malignancy rates of the C-TIRADS 3, 4A, 4B, 4C, and 5 were 0%, 21.4%, 20.8%, 70.8%, and 100%, respectively (P = 0.000), and the malignancy rate increased from C-TIRADS 3 to C-TIRADS 5 (P for trend = 0.000). C-TIRADS and BRAFV600E mutation had similar diagnostic efficacy (P > 0.05), and the sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the combination were significantly higher than BRAFV600E gene or C-TIRADS alone (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

C-TIRADS can effectively provide risk stratification for AUS/FLUS nodules. The combination is helpful in selecting appropriate management for AUS/FLUS patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

References

  1. B.R. Haugen, E.K. Alexander, K.C. Bible, G.M. Doherty, S.J. Mandel, Y.E. Nikiforov, et al., 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 26(1), 1–133 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2015.0020

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Bongiovanni, A. Spitale, W.C. Faquin, L. Mazzucchelli, Z.W. Baloch, The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: a meta-analysis. Acta Cytol. 56(4), 333–339 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1159/000339959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. C.C. Wang, L. Friedman, G.C. Kennedy, H. Wang, E. Kebebew, D.L. Steward, et al., A large multicenter correlation study of thyroid nodule cytopathology and histopathology. Thyroid 21(3), 243–251 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2010.0243

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. N.P. Ohori, K.E. Schoedel, Variability in the atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance diagnosis in the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: sources and recommendations. Acta Cytol. 55(6), 492–498 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1159/000334218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Z.W. Baloch, V.A. LiVolsi, S.L. Asa, J. Rosai, M.J. Merino, G. Randolph, et al., Diagnostic terminology and morphologic criteria for cytologic diagnosis of thyroid lesions: a synopsis of the National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine-needle Aspiration State of the Science Conference. Diagn. Cytopathol. 36(6), 425–437 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.20830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. E.S. Cibas, S.Z. Ali, The 2017 Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. J. Am. Soc. Cytopathol. 6(6), 217–222 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasc.2017.09.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. K.J. Brister, R.S. Singh, H.H. Wang, Reporting thyroid FNA before and after implementation of the Bethesda system-one institution’s experience. Diagn. Cytopathol. 43(1), 28–31 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.23182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. R. Nayar, M. Ivanovic, The indeterminate thyroid fine-needle aspiration: experience from an academic center using terminology similar to that proposed in the 2007 National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration State of the Science Conference. Cancer 117(3), 195–202 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.20029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. R.L. Ferris, Z. Baloch, V. Bernet, A. Chen, T.J. Fahey 3rd, I. Ganly, et al., American Thyroid Association statement on surgical application of molecular profiling for thyroid nodules: current impact on perioperative decision making. Thyroid 25(7), 760–768 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2014.0502

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Xing, BRAF mutation in thyroid cancer. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 12(2), 245–262 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1677/erc.1.0978

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Xing, B.R. Haugen, M. Schlumberger, Progress in molecular-based management of differentiated thyroid cancer. Lancet 381(9871), 1058–1069 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60109-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. C. Ferraz, M. Eszlinger, R. Paschke, Current state and future perspective of molecular diagnosis of fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 96(7), 2016–2026 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-2567

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Cohen, M. Xing, E. Mambo, Z. Guo, G. Wu, B. Trink, et al., BRAF mutation in papillary thyroid carcinoma. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 95(8), 625–627 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/95.8.625

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. E.K. Alexander, G.C. Kennedy, Z.W. Baloch, E.S. Cibas, D. Chudova, J. Diggans, et al., Preoperative diagnosis of benign thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology. N. Engl. J. Med. 367(8), 705–715 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1203208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. G. Grani, L. Lamartina, V. Ascoli, D. Bosco, F. Nardi, F. D’Ambrosio et al., Ultrasonography scoring systems can rule out malignancy in cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules. Endocrine 57(2), 256–261 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-016-1148-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Zhou, L. Yin, X. Wei, S. Zhang, Y. Song, B. Luo, et al., 2020 Chinese guidelines for ultrasound malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules: the C-TIRADS. Endocrine 70(2), 256–279 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-020-02441-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Zhou, Y. Song, W. Zhan, X. Wei, S. Zhang, R. Zhang, et al., Thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TIRADS) for ultrasound features of nodules: multicentric retrospective study in China. Endocrine 72(1), 157–170 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-020-02442-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Q. Qi, A. Zhou, S. Guo, X. Huang, S. Chen, Y. Li, et al., Explore the diagnostic efficiency of Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems by comparing with the other four systems (ACR TI-RADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS, and EU-TIRADS): a single-center study. Front Endocrinol. 12, 763897 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.763897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. H. Gharib, E. Papini, J.R. Garber, D.S. Duick, R.M. Harrell, L. Hegedus, et al., American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American College of Endocrinology, and Associazione Medici Endocrinologi Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Nodules–2016 update. Endocr. Pract. 22(5), 622–639 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4158/EP161208.GL

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. R.M. Tuttle, B. Haugen, N.D. Perrier, Updated American Joint Committee on Cancer/tumor-node-metastasis Staging System for Differentiated and Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer (Eighth Edition): What Changed and Why?. Thyroid 27(6), 751–756 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2017.0102

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Bongiovanni, L. Giovanella, F. Romanelli, P. Trimboli, Cytological diagnoses associated with noninvasive Follicular thyroid neoplasms with Papillary-like nuclear features according to the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid Cytopathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thyroid 29(2), 222–228 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2018.0394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. X. Zhu, X. Peng, L. Zhu, L. Xie, F. Cheng, B. Zhou, Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with BRAF V600E gene detection in nodules of unclear significance by thyroid fine-needle aspiration. Gland Surg. 10(1), 328–335 (2021). https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-20-705

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. D.S. Cohen, J.E. Tongson-Ignacio, C.M. Lolachi, V.S. Ghaderi, B. Jahan-Parwar, L.D.R. Thompson, Rethinking malignancy risk in indeterminate thyroid nodules with positive molecular studies: Southern California permanente experience. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 161(3), 419–423 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599819842859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Y.F. Zhou, Y.F. Zhang, H.J. Fu, W.P. Yang, C.K. Zhao, H.X. Xu, Improving the diagnosis of AUS/FLUS thyroid nodules using an algorithm with combination of BRAFV600E mutation analysis and ultrasound pattern-based risk stratification. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 77(3), 273–285 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3233/CH-200985

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. M. Rho, E.K. Kim, H.J. Moon, J.H. Yoon, V.Y. Park, K. Han, et al., Clinical parameter for deciding the BRAFV600E mutation test in Atypia of undetermined significance/Follicular lesion of undetermined significance thyroid nodules: US features according to TIRADS. Ultrasound Q. 33(4), 284–288 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Y.J. Suh, Y.J. Choi, Strategy to reduce unnecessary surgeries in thyroid nodules with cytology of Bethesda category III (AUS/FLUS): a retrospective analysis of 667 patients diagnosed by surgery. Endocrine 69(3), 578–586 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-020-02300-w

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. T.Y. Kim, W.B. Kim, J.Y. Song, Y.S. Rhee, G. Gong, Y.M. Cho, et al., The BRAF mutation is not associated with poor prognostic factors in Korean patients with conventional papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Clin. Endocrinol. 63(5), 588–593 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2005.02389.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. K.W. Chung, S.K. Yang, G.K. Lee, E.Y. Kim, S. Kwon, S.H. Lee, et al., Detection of BRAF V600E mutation on fine needle aspiration specimens of thyroid nodule refines cyto-pathology diagnosis, especially in BRAF V600E mutation-prevalent area. Clin. Endocrinol. 65(5), 660–666 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2006.02646.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. M.M. DiLorenzo, J.L. Miller, M. Tuluc, Z.X. Wang, V.W. Savarese, E.A. Pribitkin, False-positive FNA due to highly sensitive BRAF assay. Endocr. Pract. 20(1), E8–E10 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4158/Ep13294.Cr

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the Zhejiang Province Natural Science Foundation (grant no. LY20H180005) which is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Q.L., L.Y., J.L., L.X., M.Z. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Q.L. and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shiyan Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the board of medical ethics of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine.

Consent to participate

Written informed consents were obtained from all participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Q., Yang, L., Lv, J. et al. The combination of BRAFV600E mutation and Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System is helpful in the management of AUS/FLUS thyroid nodules. Endocrine 78, 507–516 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-022-03176-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-022-03176-8

Keywords

Navigation