Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gender differences amongst board members of endocrinology and diabetes societies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Endocrine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Although women’s status has shown marked improvement over the years in many areas, women still face a gender bias, especially in the workforce. Despite the best efforts of organizations to promote diversity and equality, women still dominate the lower-paying administrative ranks while men continue to dominate at the executive level. The present study examines gender disparity in the leadership positions in the national and international endocrinology and diabetes societies across the globe.

Methods

We first composed a list of Diabetes and Endocrinology societies from online databases, including the International Diabetes Federation, European Society of Endocrinology, and other similar online directories. The Scopus database author search was used to find the total number of publications, publication range (in years), h-indices, number of citations, and years of active research of each member.

Results

Our study included 524 board members of whom 31.3% (164/524) were women. The institutional academic rank of 310 of the total board members was found. The proportion of women in higher-faculty ranks (Assistant Professor, Associate Professors, and Professors) is much lower than males. Female endocrinologists also have fewer publications, citations, and years of active research.

Conclusions

Endocrinology is becoming a female-predominant subspecialty of internal medicine. As women are becoming a more significant portion of the endocrinology workforce, it is imperative to study and mitigate gender differences and disparities to optimize the endocrinology workforce.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M.S. Khan, M.S. Usman, T.J. Siddiqi, M.T. Ayub, K. Fatima, C. Acob, H. Muhammad, W.J. Manning, C. Tsao, F. Khosa, V. Figueredo, Cardiology: a study of program directors and division chiefs. J. Women’s Health (2018) https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2018.7135

  2. R. Jagsi, E.A. Guancial, C.C. Worobey, L.E. Henault, Y. Chang, R. Starr, N.J. Tarbell, E.M. Hylek, The “gender gap” in authorship of academic medical literature—a 35-year perspective. New Engl. J. Med. 355, 281–287 (2006)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. E. Pelley, A. Danoff, D.S. Cooper, C. Becker, Female physicians and the future of endocrinology. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 101, 16–22 (2016)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. L.G. Hofler, M.R. Hacker, L.E. Dodge, R. Schutzberg, H.A. Ricciotti, Comparison of women in department leadership in obstetrics and gynecology with other specialties. Obstet. Gynecol. 127, 442–447 (2016)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. A.H. Calderwood, B.K. Enestvedt, R. DeVivo, C.M. Schmitt, Impact of gender on requests for ASGE leadership assignments. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 83, 730–733 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Shah, S. Jalal, F. Khosa, Influences for gender disparity in dermatology in North America. Int. J. Dermatol. 57, 171–176 (2018)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Ahmadi, K. Khurshid, P.C. Sanelli, S. Jalal, T. Chahal, A. Norbash, S. Nicolaou, M. Castillo, F. Khosa, Influences for gender disparity in academic neuroradiology. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 39, 18–23 (2018)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. B.J. Tesch, H.M. Wood, A.L. Helwig, A.B. Nattinger, Promotion of women physicians in academic medicine. Glass ceiling or sticky floor? J. Am. Med. Assoc. 273, 1022–1025 (1995)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. A.L. Wright, L.A. Schwindt, T.L. Bassford, V.F. Reyna, C.M. Shisslak, P.A. St Germain, K.L. Reed, Gender differences in academic advancement: patterns, causes, and potential solutions in one U.S. college of medicine. Acad. Med. 78, 500–508 (2003)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. M.J. Yedidia, J. Bickel, Why aren’t there more women leaders in academic medicine? the views of clinical department chairs. Acad. Med. 76, 453–465 (2001)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Asghar, M.S. Usman, R. Aibani, H.T. Ansari, T.J. Siddiqi, K. Fatima, M.S. Khan, V.M. Figueredo, Sex differences in authorship of academic cardiology literature over the last 2 decades. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 72, 681–685 (2018)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Bickel, D. Wara, B.F. Atkinson, L.S. Cohen, M. Dunn, S. Hostler, T.R. Johnson, P. Morahan, A.H. Rubenstein, G.F. Sheldon, E. Stokes, Increasing women’s leadership in academic medicine: report of the AAMC Project Implementation Committee. Acad. Med. 77, 1043–1061 (2002)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Sege, L. Nykiel-Bub, S. Selk, Sex differences in institutional support for junior biomedical researchers. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 314, 1175–1177 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. P.L. Carr, A.S. Ash, R.H. Friedman, L. Szalacha, R.C. Barnett, A. Palepu, M.M. Moskowitz, Faculty perceptions of gender discrimination and sexual harassment in academic medicine. Ann. Intern. Med. 132, 889–896 (2000)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Poppas, J. Cummings, S. Dorbala, P.S. Douglas, E. Foster, M.C. Limacher, Survey results: a decade of change in professional life in cardiology: a 2008 report of the ACC women in cardiology council. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 52, 2215–2226 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Carnes, C. Bland, Viewpoint: a challenge to academic health centers and the National Institutes of Health to prevent unintended gender bias in the selection of clinical and translational science award leaders. Acad. Med. 82, 202–206 (2007)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. R.E. Steinpreis, K.A. Anders, D. Ritzke, The impact of gender on the review of the curricula vitae of job applicants and tenure candidates: a national empirical study. Sex Roles 41, 509–528 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. B.B. Fischer, M. Stamm, C. Buddeberg, G. Bauer, O. Hämmig, M. Knecht, R. Klaghofer, The impact of gender and parenthood on physicians’ careers—professional and personal situation seven years after graduation. BMC Health Serv. Res. 10, 40 (2010)

  19. A.P. Mayer, J.E. Blair, M.G. Ko, S.N. Hayes, Y.H. Chang, S.L. Caubet, J.A. Files, Gender distribution of U.S. medical school faculty by academic track type. Acad. Med. 89, 312–317 (2014)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the endocrinology and diabetes societies, whose publicly available data made this study possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yamna Waseem.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Waseem, Y., Mahmood, S., Siddiqi, R. et al. Gender differences amongst board members of endocrinology and diabetes societies. Endocrine 64, 496–499 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-019-01861-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-019-01861-9

Keywords

Navigation