Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

New modified Friedewald formulae for estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol according to triglyceride levels: extraction and validation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Endocrine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The most commonly used method for estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) is Friedewald formula (FF). This study aims to extract and validate new modified Friedewald formulae for estimating LDLC according to triglyceride (TG) levels in Iranians.

Methods

Total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC), LDLC, and TG were measured in 5030 fasted subjects. The original FF was used for estimating LDLC. Data were divided into training and validation data sets. For extracting modified Friedewald formulae, linear regression was used with TG as independent and TC, HDLC, and directly measured LDLC (D-LDLC) as dependent variables, respectively. An overall modified formula was extracted for TG concentrations <400 mg/dL. The specific modified formulae were extracted for different TG categories. The performance of the modified formulae was assessed in the validation data set.

Results

The overall derived formula for calculating LDLC was M-LDLC = TC–HDLC–TG/4. The coefficients of TG (specific TG terms) in modified formulae were 2.7, 3.7, 4.6, and 5 for TG <100, 100–200, 200–300, and 300–400 mg/dL, respectively. Compared to the original FF, applying a new modified formula with TG/4 to a validation data set provided a less mean difference (4.03 vs. 10.86 mg/dL), greater kappa coefficient (0.691 vs. 0.505), and better subject classification (80.8 vs. 67.1%). After applying modified formulae with specific TG terms, the difference between M-LDLC and D-LDLC decreased to 1.41 mg/dL.

Conclusions

Modified formulae were developed and validated for LDLC estimation that compared to the original FF, provided more accurate estimation of LDLC and better classification of subjects. These findings shall be useful for preventive, diagnostic, and therapeutic purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C.M. Cordova, C.R. Schneider, I.D. Juttel, M.M. Cordova, Comparison of LDL-cholesterol direct measurement with the estimate using the Friedewald formula in a sample of 10,664 patients. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 83(6), 482–487 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Y.F. Peng, Y.S. Wei, The relationships between serum fructosamine concentrations and lipid profiles in community-dwelling adults. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 6886 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Y. Chen, X. Zhang, B. Pan, X. Jin, H. Yao, B. Chen, Y. Zou, J. Ge, H. Chen, A modified formula for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values. Lipids Health Dis. 9, 52 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Anandaraja, R. Narang, R. Godeswar, R. Laksmy, K.K. Talwar, Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol estimation by a new formula in Indian population. Int. J. Cardiol. 102(1), 117–120 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Timon-Zapata, E.J. Laserna-Mendieta, D. Pineda-Tenor, M. Agudo-Macazaga, C. Narros-Cecilia, M.J. Rocha-Bogas, G. Ruiz-Martin, M. Gomez-Serranillos, Extreme concentrations of high density lipoprotein cholesterol affect the calculation of low density lipoprotein cholesterol in the Friedewald formula and other proposed formulas. Clin. Biochem. 44(17–18), 1451–1456 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Nauck, G.R. Warnick, N. Rifai, Methods for measurement of LDL-cholesterol: a critical assessment of direct measurement by homogeneous assays versus calculation. Clin. Chem. 48(2), 236–254 (2002)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Gasko, Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol estimation by a new formula—confirmation. Int. J. Cardiol. 119(2), 242–243 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R. Kapoor, M. Chakraborty, N. Singh, A leap above Friedewald formula for calculation of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol. J. Lab. Physicians 7(1), 11–16 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. S.Y. Choi, H.E. Park, M.K. Kim, C.S. Shin, S.H. Cho, B.H. Oh, Difference between calculated and direct-measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in subjects with diabetes mellitus or taking lipid-lowering medications. J. Clin. Lipidol. 6(2), 114–120 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S.S. Martin, M.J. Blaha, M.B. Elshazly, P.P. Toth, P.O. Kwiterovich, R.S. Blumenthal, S.R. Jones, Comparison of a novel method vs the Friedewald equation for estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels from the standard lipid profile. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 310(19), 2061–2068 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. O. Tabatabaei-Malazy, M. Qorbani, T. Samavat, F. Sharifi, B. Larijani, H. Fakhrzadeh, Prevalence of dyslipidemia in iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Int. J. Prev. Med. 5(4), 373–393 (2014)

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. C.M. de Cordova, M.M. de Cordova, A new accurate, simple formula for LDL-cholesterol estimation based on directly measured blood lipids from a large cohort. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 50(Pt 1), 13–19 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. P.S. Bachorik, J.W. Ross, National cholesterol education program recommendations for measurement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: executive summary. The National Cholesterol Education Program Working Group on Lipoprotein Measurement. Clin. Chem. 41(10), 1414–1420 (1995)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. L. Baruch, S. Agarwal, B. Gupta, A. Haynos, S. Johnson, K. Kelly-Johnson, C. Eng, Is directly measured low-density lipoprotein clinically equivalent to calculated low-density lipoprotein? J. Clin. Lipidol. 4(4), 259–264 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. W. Puavilai, D. Laoragpongse, Is calculated LDL-C by using the new modified Friedewald equation better than the standard Friedewald equation? J. Med. Assoc. Thai. 87(6), 589–593 (2004)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Vujovic, J. Kotur-Stevuljevic, S. Spasic, N. Bujisic, J. Martinovic, M. Vujovic, V. Spasojevic-Kalimanovska, A. Zeljkovic, D. Pajic, Evaluation of different formulas for LDL-C calculation. Lipids Health Dis. 9, 27 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. W.T. Friedewald, R.I. Levy, D.S. Fredrickson, Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin. Chem. 18(6), 499–502 (1972)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Hata, K. Nakajima, Application of Friedewald’s LDL-cholesterol estimation formula to serum lipids in the Japanese population. Jpn. Circ. J. 50(12), 1191–1200 (1986)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Y. Hattori, M. Suzuki, M. Tsushima, M. Yoshida, Y. Tokunaga, Y. Wang, D. Zhao, M. Takeuchi, Y. Hara, K.I. Ryomoto, M. Ikebuchi, H. Kishioka, T. Mannami, S. Baba, Y. Harano, Development of approximate formula for LDL-chol, LDL-apo B and LDL-chol/LDL-apo B as indices of hyperapobetalipoproteinemia and small dense LDL. Atherosclerosis 138(2), 289–299 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. K.M. Li, D.E. Wilcken, N.P. Dudman, Effect of serum lipoprotein(a) on estimation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by the Friedewald formula. Clin. Chem. 40(4), 571–573 (1994)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. R. Saeedi, M. Li, M. Allard, J. Frohlich, Marked effects of extreme levels of lipoprotein(a) on estimation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Clin. Biochem. 47(12), 1098–1099 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. H. Ghoreishian, M. Tohidi, A. Derakhshan, F. Hajsheikholeslami, F. Azizi, S. Kazempour-Ardebili, F. Hadaegh, Presence of hypertension modifies the impact of insulin resistance on incident cardiovascular disease in a Middle Eastern population: the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Diabet. Med. 32(10), 1311–1318 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. F. Azizi, A. Ghanbarian, A.A. Momenan, F. Hadaegh, P. Mirmiran, M. Hedayati, Y. Mehrabi, S. Zahedi-Asl, Prevention of non-communicable disease in a population in nutrition transition: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study phase II. Trials 10, 5 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. M.J. Healy, Outliers in clinical chemistry quality-control schemes. Clin. Chem. 25(5), 675–677 (1979)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. A. Ghasemi, S. Zahediasl, Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians. Int. J. Endocrinol. Metab. 10(2), 486–489 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. W.Y. Fujimoto, Friedewald’s LDL-cholesterol estimation formula in a Japanese American population. Jpn. Circ. J. 52(7), 604–606 (1988)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel, Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation 106(25), 3143–3421 (2002)

  28. J.M. Williamson, S.R. Lipsitz, A.K. Manatunga, Modeling kappa for measuring dependent categorical agreement data. Biostatistics 1(2), 191–202 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. L.E. Daly, G.J. Bourke. Interpretation and Uses of Medical Statistics. 5th edn. (Blackwell Sciences Ltd., Oxford, 2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. D.A. Tighe, I.S. Ockene, G. Reed, R. Nicolosi, Calculated low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels frequently underestimate directly measured low density lipoprotein cholesterol determinations in patients with serum triglyceride levels<or=4.52 mmol/l: an analysis comparing the LipiDirect magnetic LDL assay with the Friedewald calculation. Clin. Chim. Acta 365(1–2), 236–242 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. J. Rubies-Prat, J.L. Reverter, M. Senti, J. Pedro-Botet, I. Salinas, A. Lucas, X. Nogues, A. Sanmarti, Calculated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol should not be used for management of lipoprotein abnormalities in patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 16(8), 1081–1086 (1993)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. C.P. Onyenekwu, M. Hoffmann, F. Smit, T.E. Matsha, R.T. Erasmus, Comparison of LDL-cholesterol estimate using the Friedewald formula and the newly proposed de Cordova formula with a directly measured LDL-cholesterol in a healthy South African population. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 51(Pt 6), 672–679 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. M. Boshtam, M.A. Ramezani, G. Naderi, N. Sarrafzadegan, Is Friedewald formula a good estimation for low density lipoprotein level in Iranian population? J. Res. Med. Sci. 17(6), 519–522 (2012)

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. E. Paz, J. Hermida, L. Bouzas, J. Brenlla, J.C. Tutor, LDL cholesterol estimation using the Anandaraja’s and Friedewald’s formulas in schizophrenic patients treated with antipsychotic drugs. Clin. Biochem. 41(12), 1002–1007 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. N. Nakanishi, Y. Matsuo, H. Yoneda, K. Nakamura, K. Suzuki, K. Tatara, Validity of the conventional indirect methods including Friedewald method for determining serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level: comparison with the direct homogeneous enzymatic analysis. J. Occup. Health 42(3), 130–137 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. M. Gonzalez Estrada, C.R. Rodriguez Ferrer, I.R. Astarloa, E.M. Lahera, Use of serum cholesterol/triglyceride ratio to discern for which individuals the Friedewald formula can be used confidently. Clin. Chem. 36(9), 1673–1675 (1990)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. D.M. DeLong, E.R. DeLong, P.D. Wood, K. Lippel, B.M. Rifkind, A comparison of methods for the estimation of plasma low- and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The Lipid Research Clinics Prevalence Study. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 256(17), 2372–2377 (1986)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. S.A. Ahmadi, M.A. Boroumand, K. Gohari-Moghaddam, P. Tajik, S.M. Dibaj, The impact of low serum triglyceride on LDL-cholesterol estimation. Arch. Iran. Med. 11(3), 318–321 (2008)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. R.K. Wadhera, D.L. Steen, I. Khan, R.P. Giugliano, J.M. Foody, A review of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, treatment strategies, and its impact on cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. J. Clin. Lipidol. 10(3), 472–489 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. S. Al-Kindi, T. Al-Juhaishi, F. Haddad, S. Taheri, C. Abi Khalil, Cardiovascular disease research activity in the Middle East: a bibliometric analysis. Ther. Adv. Cardiovasc. Dis. 9(3), 70–76 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (grant number: 704). The authors would like to thank Mr. A. Khoshbakhti for his technical laboratory assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maryam Tohidi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghasemi, A., Asgari, S., Hadaegh, F. et al. New modified Friedewald formulae for estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol according to triglyceride levels: extraction and validation. Endocrine 62, 404–411 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-018-1685-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-018-1685-2

Keywords

Navigation