Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dynamic risk stratification for medullary thyroid cancer according to the response to initial therapy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Endocrine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Detecting persistent/recurrent disease of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is important. The tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system is useful for predicting disease-specific mortality, but is a static system and does not include postoperative serum calcitonin levels. We have focused on the clinical usefulness of dynamic risk stratification (DRS) using the best response to the initial therapy in MTC patients. A total of 120 MTC patients were classified into three DRS groups based on their responses to initial therapy. Clinical outcomes were assessed according to TNM staging and DRS. In the DRS, 70, 23 and 7 % of the MTC patients were classified into excellent, biochemical incomplete, or structural incomplete response groups, respectively. On TNM staging, 37, 16, 13 and 35 % of patients were stages I–IV, respectively. There were significant differences in survivals according to TNM staging (p = 0.03) and DRS (p = 0.005). During the median follow-up of 6.2 years, 75 patients (63 %) demonstrated no evidence of disease (NED). About 60 and 17 % of patients in stages III and IV were NED, respectively. DRS predicted NED better than TNM staging according to the proportion of variance explained (PVE) (49.1 vs. 28.7 %, respectively). At the final follow-up, 88, 4 and 0 % of patients in excellent, biochemical incomplete, and structural incomplete response groups attained NED, respectively. DRS based on the best response to the initial therapy can provide useful prognostic information in addition to initial TNM staging for predicting of mortality, as well as the likelihood of NED in MTC patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S.A. Wells Jr, S.L. Asa, H. Dralle, R. Elisei, D.B. Evans, R.F. Gagel, N. Lee, A. Machens, J.F. Moley, F. Pacini, F. Raue, K. Frank-Raue, B. Robinson, M.S. Rosenthal, M. Santoro, M. Schlumberger, M. Shah, S.G. Waguespack, Revised American Thyroid Association guidelines for the management of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid 25(6), 567–610 (2015). doi:10.1089/thy.2014.0335

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. P. Fallahi, S.M. Ferrari, F.D. Bari, G. Materazzi, S. Benvenga, P. Miccoli, A. Antonelli, Cabozantinib in thyroid cancer. Recent Pat. Anticancer Drug Discov. 10(3), 259–269 (2015)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Fallahi, F. Di Bari, S.M. Ferrari, R. Spisni, G. Materazzi, P. Miccoli, S. Benvenga, A. Antonelli, Selective use of vandetanib in the treatment of thyroid cancer. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 9, 3459–3470 (2015). doi:10.2147/dddt.s72495

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Roman, R. Lin, J.A. Sosa, Prognosis of medullary thyroid carcinoma: demographic, clinical, and pathologic predictors of survival in 1252 cases. Cancer 107(9), 2134–2142 (2006). doi:10.1002/cncr.22244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. E. Kebebew, P.H. Ituarte, A.E. Siperstein, Q.Y. Duh, O.H. Clark, Medullary thyroid carcinoma: clinical characteristics, treatment, prognostic factors, and a comparison of staging systems. Cancer 88(5), 1139–1148 (2000)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. E. Modigliani, R. Cohen, J.M. Campos, B. Conte-Devolx, B. Maes, A. Boneu, M. Schlumberger, J.C. Bigorgne, P. Dumontier, L. Leclerc, B. Corcuff, I. Guilhem, Prognostic factors for survival and for biochemical cure in medullary thyroid carcinoma: results in 899 patients. The GETC Study Group. Groupe d’etude des tumeurs a calcitonin. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 48(3), 265–273 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. K. Kameyama, H. Takami, Medullary thyroid carcinoma: nationwide Japanese survey of 634 cases in 1996 and 271 cases in 2002. Endocr. J. 51(5), 453–456 (2004)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. F.D. Gilliland, W.C. Hunt, D.M. Morris, C.R. Key, Prognostic factors for thyroid carcinoma. A population-based study of 15,698 cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program 1973–1991. Cancer 79(3), 564–573 (1997)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. M.R. Pelizzo, I.M. Boschin, P. Bernante, A. Toniato, A. Piotto, C. Pagetta, O. Nibale, L. Rampin, P.C. Muzzio, D. Rubello, Natural history, diagnosis, treatment and outcome of medullary thyroid cancer: 37 years experience on 157 patients. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 33(4), 493–497 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2006.10.021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. H.W. Jang, J.I. Lee, K.Y. Hur, J.H. Kim, S.W. Kim, Y.-K. Min, M.-S. Lee, M.-K. Lee, K.-W. Kim, J.H. Chung, Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Endocrinol. Metab. (Seoul) 25(3), 183–191 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. G. Rendl, M. Manzl, W. Hitzl, P. Sungler, C. Pirich, Long-term prognosis of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 69(3), 497–505 (2008). doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03229.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Elisei, A. Pinchera, Advances in the follow-up of differentiated or medullary thyroid cancer. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 8(8), 466–475 (2012). doi:10.1038/nrendo.2012.38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. G. Pellegriti, S. Leboulleux, E. Baudin, N. Bellon, C. Scollo, J.P. Travagli, M. Schlumberger, Long-term outcome of medullary thyroid carcinoma in patients with normal postoperative medical imaging. Br. J. Cancer 88(10), 1537–1542 (2003). doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600930

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. N. Barbot, C. Calmettes, I. Schuffenecker, J.P. Saint-Andre, B. Franc, V. Rohmer, P. Jallet, J.C. Bigorgne, Pentagastrin stimulation test and early diagnosis of medullary thyroid carcinoma using an immunoradiometric assay of calcitonin: comparison with genetic screening in hereditary medullary thyroid carcinoma. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 78(1), 114–120 (1994). doi:10.1210/jcem.78.1.7904611

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. G. Costante, D. Meringolo, C. Durante, D. Bianchi, M. Nocera, S. Tumino, U. Crocetti, M. Attard, M. Maranghi, M. Torlontano, S. Filetti, Predictive value of serum calcitonin levels for preoperative diagnosis of medullary thyroid carcinoma in a cohort of 5817 consecutive patients with thyroid nodules. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 92(2), 450–455 (2007). doi:10.1210/jc.2006-1590

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Elisei, V. Bottici, F. Luchetti, G. Di Coscio, C. Romei, L. Grasso, P. Miccoli, P. Iacconi, F. Basolo, A. Pinchera, F. Pacini, Impact of routine measurement of serum calcitonin on the diagnosis and outcome of medullary thyroid cancer: experience in 10,864 patients with nodular thyroid disorders. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 89(1), 163–168 (2004). doi:10.1210/jc.2003-030550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. S.C. Lindsey, I. Ganly, F. Palmer, R.M. Tuttle, Response to initial therapy predicts clinical outcomes in medullary thyroid cancer. Thyroid 25(2), 242–249 (2015). doi:10.1089/thy.2014.0277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. R.M. Tuttle, I. Ganly, Risk stratification in medullary thyroid cancer: moving beyond static anatomic staging. Oral Oncol. 49(7), 695–701 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2013.03.443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. S.B. Edge, D.R. Byrd, C.C. Compton, A.G. Fritz, F.L. Greene, A. Trotti, AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 7th edn. (Springer, New York, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Beheshti, S. Pocher, R. Vali, P. Waldenberger, G. Broinger, M. Nader, S. Kohlfurst, C. Pirich, H. Dralle, W. Langsteger, The value of 18F-DOPA PET-CT in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma: comparison with 18F-FDG PET-CT. Eur. Radiol. 19(6), 1425–1434 (2009). doi:10.1007/s00330-008-1280-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. S. Hoegerle, C. Altehoefer, N. Ghanem, I. Brink, E. Moser, E. Nitzsche, 18F-DOPA positron emission tomography for tumour detection in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma and elevated calcitonin levels. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 28(1), 64–71 (2001)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. H. Kwon, W.G. Kim, Y.M. Choi, E.K. Jang, M.J. Jeon, D.E. Song, J.H. Baek, J.S. Ryu, S.J. Hong, T.Y. Kim, W.B. Kim, Y.K. Shong, A cut-off value of basal serum calcitonin for detecting macroscopic medullary thyroid carcinoma. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 82(4), 598–603 (2015). doi:10.1111/cen.12562

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. M.J. Jeon, W.G. Kim, W.R. Park, J.M. Han, T.Y. Kim, D.E. Song, K.W. Chung, J.S. Ryu, S.J. Hong, Y.K. Shong, W.B. Kim, Modified dynamic risk stratification for predicting recurrence using the response to initial therapy in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 170(1), 23–30 (2014). doi:10.1530/EJE-13-0524

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. J.D. Brierley, T. Panzarella, R.W. Tsang, M.K. Gospodarowicz, B. O’Sullivan, A comparison of different staging systems predictability of patient outcome. Thyroid carcinoma as an example. Cancer 79(12), 2414–2423 (1997)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Bumsuk Academic Research Fund in 2014.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Won Gu Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kwon, H., Kim, W.G., Jeon, M.J. et al. Dynamic risk stratification for medullary thyroid cancer according to the response to initial therapy. Endocrine 53, 174–181 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-015-0849-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-015-0849-6

Keywords

Navigation