Skip to main content

Cons: endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery is not superior to microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas

Endocrine volume 47, pages 415–420 (2014)Cite this article

Abstract

The introduction of the endoscope to transsphenoidal pituitary surgery is not new and it has been abandoned in the past. Now, after some technological advances has been proposed again as an advancement in this field. However, there is still a debate on this topic and some authors consider endoscopic surgery a form of developing surgery in an evolution step. The use of the endoscope to visualize the sella has been suggested to offer a better visualization as well as an improved range of motion compared to the operating microscope. However, the real advantage in terms of efficacy and safety is still matter of debate. The conversion to microsurgery has been reported in a significant number of cases, particularly in recurrences, where the difficulties of reoperation require more skill. There is evidence in recent studies that the endonasal and bleeding complications are significantly higher in endoscopic approaches than in microscopic ones. In particular, patient discomfort, smell, and taste impairment are higher with the endoscopic method compared with microscopic approaches. At present pure endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery is not a cost effective technology. In fact, the operative time is longer than in microscopic approaches and the number of surgeons required for the procedure is usually double compared to microscopic approaches. This paper will outline on the basis of the data available in literature the reasons why, at present, the pure endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery should not be yet considered the standard technique for transsphenoidal surgery in patients with pituitary adenomas.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  1. P. Mortini, M. Losa, R. Barzaghi, N. Boari, M. Giovanelli, Results of transsphenoidal surgery in a large series of patients with pituitary adenoma. Neurosurgery 56(6), 1222–1233 (2005). discussion 1233

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. P. McCulloch, D.G. Altman, W.B. Campbell, D.R. Flum, P. Glasziou, J.C. Marshall, J. Nicholl, C. Balliol, J.K. Aronson, J.S. Barkun, J.M. Blazeby, I.C. Boutron, W.B. Campbell, P.A. Clavien, J.A. Cook, P.L. Ergina, L.S. Feldman, D.R. Flum, G.J. Maddern, J. Nicholl, B.C. Reeves, C.M. Seiler, S.M. Strasberg, J.L. Meakins, D. Ashby, N. Black, J. Bunker, M. Burton, M. Campbell, K. Chalkidou, I. Chalmers, M. de Leval, J. Deeks, P.L. Ergina, A. Grant, M. Gray, R. Greenhalgh, M. Jenicek, S. Kehoe, R. Lilford, P. Littlejohns, Y. Loke, R. Madhock, K. McPherson, J. Meakins, P. Rothwell, B. Summerskill, D. Taggart, P. Tekkis, M. Thompson, T. Treasure, U. Trohler, J. Vandenbroucke, No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 374(9695), 1105–1112 (2009). doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61116-8

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Colao, M. Boscaro, D. Ferone, F.F. Casanueva, Managing Cushing’s disease: the state of the art. Endocrine (2014). doi:10.1007/s12020-013-0129-2

    Google Scholar 

  4. E.H. Oldfield, J.A. Jane Jr, Endoscopic versus microscopic pituitary surgery. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 84(8), 827 (2013). doi:10.1136/jnnp-2012-304583

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Powell, Microscope and endoscopic pituitary surgery. Acta Neurochir. (Wien) 151(7), 723–728 (2009). doi:10.1007/s00701-009-0297-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Zada, L.S. Governale, E.R. Laws Jr, Intraoperative conversion from endoscopic to microscopic approach for the management of sellar pathology: incidence and rationale in a contemporary series. World Neurosurg. 73(4), 334–337 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2010.02.069

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. E.R. Laws, The endoscopic endonasal approach for recurrent pituitary lesions. World Neurosurg. 80(3–4), 272–273 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2012.11.041

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Ammirati, L. Wei, I. Ciric, Short-term outcome of endoscopic versus microscopic pituitary adenoma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 84(8), 843–849 (2013). doi:10.1136/jnnp-2012-303194

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. A.N. Mamelak, Pro: endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery is superior to microscope-based transsphenoidal surgery. Endocrine (2014). doi:10.1007/s12020-014-0294-y

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Buchfelder, S.M. Schlaffer, Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging during surgery for pituitary adenomas: pros and cons. Endocrine 42(3), 483–495 (2012). doi:10.1007/s12020-012-9752-6

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. G. Frank, E. Pasquini, Endoscopic endonasal cavernous sinus surgery, with special reference to pituitary adenomas. Front. Horm. Res. 34, 64–82 (2006). doi:10.1159/000091573

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. B.P. Meij, M.B. Lopes, D.B. Ellegala, T.D. Alden, E.R. Laws Jr, The long-term significance of microscopic dural invasion in 354 patients with pituitary adenomas treated with transsphenoidal surgery. J. Neurosurg. 96(2), 195–208 (2002). doi:10.3171/jns.2002.96.2.0195

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Losa, L. Gioia, P. Picozzi, A. Franzin, M. Valle, M. Giovanelli, P. Mortini, The role of stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 93(7), 2546–2552 (2008). doi:10.1210/jc.2008-0135

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Losa, P. Picozzi, M. Motta, M. Valle, A. Franzin, P. Mortini, The role of radiation therapy in the management of non-functioning pituitary adenomas. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 34(8), 623–629 (2011). doi:10.3275/7618

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. V.V. Dolenc, Transcranial epidural approach to pituitary tumors extending beyond the sella. Neurosurgery 41(3), 542–550 (1997). discussion 551–542

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Yano, T. Kawano, M. Kudo, K. Makino, H. Nakamura, Y. Kai, M. Morioka, J. Kuratsu, Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach through the bilateral nostrils for pituitary adenomas. Neurol. Med. Chir. 49(1), 1–7 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. J.A. Gondim, J.P. Almeida, L.A. Albuquerque, M. Schops, E. Gomes, T. Ferraz, W. Sobreira, M.T. Kretzmann, Endoscopic endonasal approach for pituitary adenoma: surgical complications in 301 patients. Pituitary 14(2), 174–183 (2011). doi:10.1007/s11102-010-0280-1

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. H. Halvorsen, J. Ramm-Pettersen, R. Josefsen, P. Ronning, S. Reinlie, T. Meling, J. Berg-Johnsen, J. Bollerslev, E. Helseth, Surgical complications after transsphenoidal microscopic and endoscopic surgery for pituitary adenoma: a consecutive series of 506 procedures. Acta Neurochir. (Wien) 156(3), 441–449 (2014). doi:10.1007/s00701-013-1959-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. G. Frank, E. Pasquini, G. Farneti, D. Mazzatenta, V. Sciarretta, V. Grasso, M. Faustini Fustini, The endoscopic versus the traditional approach in pituitary surgery. Neuroendocrinology 83(3–4), 240–248 (2006). doi:10.1159/000095534

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. M.S. Kabil, H.K. Shahinian, A series of 112 fully endoscopic resections of vestibular schwannomas. Minim. Invasive Neurosurg. 49(6), 362–368 (2006). doi:10.1055/s-2006-955068

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Berker, D.B. Hazer, T. Yucel, A. Gurlek, A. Cila, M. Aldur, M. Onerci, Complications of endoscopic surgery of the pituitary adenomas: analysis of 570 patients and review of the literature. Pituitary 15(3), 288–300 (2012). doi:10.1007/s11102-011-0368-2

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. X.F. Shou, S.Q. Li, Y.F. Wang, Y. Zhao, P.F. Jia, L.F. Zhou, Treatment of pituitary adenomas with a transsphenoidal approach. Neurosurgery 56(2), 249–256 (2005). discussion 249–256

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. L.R. Barzaghi, M. Losa, M. Giovanelli, P. Mortini, Complications of transsphenoidal surgery in patients with pituitary adenoma: experience at a single centre. Acta Neurochir. 149(9), 877–885 (2007). doi:10.1007/s00701-007-1244-8. discussion 885–876

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. J.A. Jane Jr, E.R. Laws Jr, The surgical management of pituitary adenomas in a series of 3,093 patients. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 193(6), 651–659 (2001)

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. R.M. Starke, D.M. Raper, S.C. Payne, M.L. Vance, E.H. Oldfield, J.A. Jane Jr, Endoscopic vs microsurgical transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly: outcomes in a concurrent series of patients using modern criteria for remission. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 98(8), 3190–3198 (2013). doi:10.1210/jc.2013-1036

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. K. Koc, I. Anik, D. Ozdamar, B. Cabuk, G. Keskin, S. Ceylan, The learning curve in endoscopic pituitary surgery and our experience. Neurosurg. Rev. 29(4), 298–305 (2006). doi:10.1007/s10143-006-0033-9. discussion 305

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. H.D. Jho, R.L. Carrau, Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: experience with 50 patients. J. Neurosurg. 87(1), 44–51 (1997). doi:10.3171/jns.1997.87.1.0044

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. I. Ciric, A. Ragin, C. Baumgartner, D. Pierce, Complications of transsphenoidal surgery: results of a national survey, review of the literature, and personal experience. Neurosurgery 40(2), 225–236 (1997). discussion 236–227

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Y. Tao, G. Jian-wen, K. Yong-qin, Y. Li-bin, H. Hai-dong, Y. Wen-tao, X. Xue-min, Transsphenoidal surgery assisted by a new guidance device: results of a series of 747 cases. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 113(8), 626–630 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2011.04.010

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. R. Fahlbusch, M. Buchfelder, Transsphenoidal surgery of parasellar pituitary adenomas. Acta Neurochir. (Wien) 92(1–4), 93–99 (1988)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. E.R.J. Laws, Complications of transsphenoidal microsurgery for pituitary adenomas, in Modern Neurosurgery, vol. 1, ed. by M. Brock (Springer, Berlin, 1982), pp. 181–186

  32. J. D’Haens, K. Van Rompaey, T. Stadnik, P. Haentjens, K. Poppe, B. Velkeniers, Fully endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for functioning pituitary adenomas: a retrospective comparison with traditional transsphenoidal microsurgery in the same institution. Surg. Neurol. 72(4), 336–340 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.surneu.2009.04.012

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. T. Zhou, S.B. Wei, X.H. Meng, B.N. Xu, Pure endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for 375 pituitary adenomas. Zhonghua wai ke za zhi 48(19), 1443–1446 (2010)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. G. Barkhoudarian, A. Del Carmen Becerra Romero, E.R. Laws, Evaluation of the 3-dimensional endoscope in transsphenoidal surgery. Neurosurgery 73((1 Suppl Operative)), ons74–78 (2013). doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31828ba962. discussion ons78–79

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. J. Canet, L. Gallart, C. Gomar, G. Paluzie, J. Valles, J. Castillo, S. Sabate, V. Mazo, Z. Briones, J. Sanchis, A. Group, Prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in a population-based surgical cohort. Anesthesiology 113(6), 1338–1350 (2010). doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181fc6e0a

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. V. Mazo, S. Sabate, J. Canet, L. Gallart, M. de Gama Abreu, J. Belda, O. Langeron, A. Hoeft, P. Pelosi, Prospective external validation of a predictive score for postoperative pulmonary complications. Anesthesiology (2014). doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000000334

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery and Radiosurgery, San Raffaele University Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy

    Pietro Mortini

Authors
  1. Pietro Mortini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pietro Mortini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mortini, P. Cons: endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery is not superior to microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas. Endocrine 47, 415–420 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-014-0365-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-014-0365-0

Keywords

  • Pituitary
  • Adenomas
  • Transsphenoidal
  • Surgery
  • Microscopy
  • Endoscopy