Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is there still a place for adrenal venous sampling in the diagnostic localization of pheochromocytoma?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Endocrine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our objective is to outline the utility of adrenal venous sampling (AVS) with measurements of metanephrine to normetanephrine ratios for diagnostic localization of phaeochromocytoma in a patient with normal plasma levels of catecholamines. A 53-year-old-woman was referred for evaluation of recurrent pheochromocytoma following a right adrenalectomy 14 years earlier. Diagnosis of recurrent disease was established from elevations in plasma metanephrines with normal levels of catecholamines. Magnetic resonance imaging indicated two 1–2 cm masses in the right surgical bed and another 1-1.5 cm mass in the left adrenal. These masses were negative on 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy. There was no evidence of a hereditary syndrome. We, therefore, carried out two investigational approaches to identify the tumor masses. Hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 68Ga-DOTATOC (68Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT) confirmed the presence of recurrent disease in the right surgical bed and also suggested additional left adrenal involvement. Normal plasma catecholamines precluded the use of adrenal venous sampling (AVS) with catecholamine measurements. Hence, we performed AVS with measurements of plasma metanephrines, which were 4- to 7-fold higher in the left adrenal vein than in central venous plasma. We observed a reversal of the normally high metanephrine to normetanephrine ratio (mean value ± SD 5.28 ± 1.86; range 3.36–8.84, n = 13) to 0.73, establishing the presence of a left adrenal pheochromocytoma. Surgical pathology confirmed bilateral disease. This case highlights a scenario where a combination of 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT and AVS with measurement of the metanephrine to normetanephrine ratio was crucial for the preoperative assessment of a patient with bilateral pheochromocytoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T.S. Harrison, J.F. Seaton, J.C. Cerny, J.J. Bookstein, J.D. Bartlett Jr., Arch. Surg. 95, 339–343 (1967)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. R.C. Causon, M.J. Brown, Ann. Clin. Biochem. 19, 396–404 (1982)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. E.C. Newbould, G.A. Ross, J.E. Dacie, P.M. Bouloux, G.M. Besser, A. Grossman, Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf) 35, 55–59 (1991)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Pacak, D.S. Goldstein, J.L. Doppman, B.L. Shulkin, R. Udelsman, G. Eisenhofer, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 86, 3641–3646 (2001)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. U. Srirangalingam, B. Khoo, M. Matson, R. Carpenter, R. Reznek, E.R. Maher, S.L. Chew, W.M. Drake, Horm. Res. Paediatr. 73, 135–139 (2010)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Eisenhofer, D.S. Goldstein, M.M. Walther, P. Friberg, J.W. Lenders, H.R. Keiser, K. Pacak, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 88, 2656–2666 (2003)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Hartmann, K. Zöphel, R. Freudenberg, L. Oehme, M. Andreeff, G. Wunderlich, G. Eisenhofer, J. Kotzerke, Nuklearmedizin 48, 201–207 (2009)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Eisenhofer, B. Rundquist, A. Aneman, P. Friberg, N. Dakak, I.J. Kopin, M.C. Jacobs, J.W. Lenders, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 80, 3009–3017 (1995)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. E. Korpershoek, B.J. Petri, F.H. van Nederveen, W.N. Dinjens, A.A. Verhofstad, W.W. de Herder, S. Schmid, A. Perren, P. Komminoth, R.R. de Krijger, Endocr. Rel. Cancer 14, 453–462 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. K. Pacak, G. Eisenhofer, H. Ahlman, S.R. Bornstein, A.P. Gimenez-Roqueplo, A.B. Grossman, N. Kimura, M. Mannelli, A.M. McNicol, A.S. Tischler, Nat. Clin. Pract. Endocrinol. Metab. 3, 92–102 (2007)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Kroiss, D. Putzer, C. Uprimny, C. Decristoforo, M. Gabriel, W. Santner, C. Kranewitter, B. Warwitz, D. Waitz, D., Kendler, I.J. Virgolini, Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging (2011) (in press)

Download references

Acknowledgments

Roland Därr was supported by a clinical investigator fellowship and training award from the Dresden University Cancer Center.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorenz C. Hofbauer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Därr, R., Eisenhofer, G., Kotzerke, J. et al. Is there still a place for adrenal venous sampling in the diagnostic localization of pheochromocytoma?. Endocrine 40, 75–79 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-011-9471-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-011-9471-4

Keywords

Navigation