Skip to main content
Download PDF

Tissue and Stem Cell Sourced Extracellular Vesicle Communications with Microglia

Stem Cell Reviews and Reports volume 17, pages 357–368 (2021)Cite this article

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs), nano- to micro- sized vesicles released from cells, have garnered attention in recent years for their role in intercellular communication. Specifically, EVs from various cell sources including stem cells, have shown to have an exacerbatory or therapeutic effect in the content of pro- and anti-inflammatory environments through their interaction with immune recipient cells. This review aims to the coalescence information surrounding EVs derived from various sources and their interaction with microglia in neutral, anti, and pro- inflammatory environments. Overall, in homeostatic environments, EVs from many CNS lineages have been shown to have specific interactions with recipient microglia. In complex inflammatory environments, such as the tumor micro-environment (TME), EVs have been shown to further influence immune dampening through transition of microglia to a more M2-like phenotype. While not advantageous in the TME, this effect can be harnessed therapeutically in proinflammatory neurological conditions such as stroke, Alzheimer’s, and Parkinson’s. EVs derived from various stem cell and non-stem cell derived sources were found to attenuate proinflammatory responses in microglia in in vitro and in vivo models of these conditions. EVs loaded with anti-inflammatory therapeutics furthered this anti-inflammatory effect on recipient microglia.

Extracellular Vesicles (EVs) from multiple cells types modulate microglial polarization. Cartoon depicting common ways microglia are activated through inflammatory and disease processes. EVs, derived from stem and non-stem sources, have been shown to attenuate proinflammatory responses in in vitro and in vivo.

Background

Extracellular vesicles (EVs), including exosomes and microvesicles, have garnered attention in recent years as a novel type of non-contact-mediated intercellular communication. These vesicles, of endosomal or plasma membrane origin, range in size from ~30 nm-1uM and are released extracellularly by all cell types to be taken up by various populations of recipient cells [1,2,3,4]. These vesicles contain a variety of proteins, mRNA, miRNA, and lipids derived from their parent cells [5]. While some groups have looked to characterize surface molecule expression and content for potential biomarker applications [6], the functional downstream effects of these EVs on recipient cells is also of scientific interest [7]. For example, mRNA transcripts found within EVs have been shown to be translated into functional proteins in recipient cells [5]. Furthermore, certain cell types, such as primary T lymphocytes, have been shown to selectively sort miRNAs into EVs with the help of RNA-binding proteins [8].

Common technical limitations of EV studies have made it difficult to monitor and investigate dynamic endogenous EV activity and obtain high purity EV RNA. Due to their small size, EV isolation methods (ultracentrifugation, ultrafiltration, immunoprecipitation, density gradient flotation, etc. [9] can affect the quantity and quality of isolated EVs and the EV-RNA [10, 11]. Some of these technical limitations can be mitigated through advancements in imaging, which can eliminate the need for EV isolation and allow direct observation of EV effects on recipient cell function, morphology, and activation. For example, 2-photon microscopy, allows for direct observation of endogenous EV production and uptake in CNS cell populations. Similar non-invasive imaging advancements also potentially surmount limitations associated with EV dosing paradigms, elucidating the collective effects of EVs on recipient cells without the need for direct analysis of EV cargo. Future studies should consider looking closely at EV cargo, such as EV RNA, to inform possible mechanisms of action for anti-inflammatory microglia responses noted in this review.

Therapeutic Potential of EVs in Proinflammatory Conditions

Central nervous system (CNS)-derived EVs have shown great therapeutic potential. Neural stem cell-derived (NSC) EVs have significantly improved recovery in large and small animal models of ischemic stroke [12,14,14], as well as in models of traumatic brain injury (TBI) [15]. The parent cells of these EVs, neural stem cells, as well as neurosphere cells (NC) modulated the inflammatory microenvironment after stroke [16]. Some of the NSC EV therapeutic potential could be attributed to modulation of the neuroinflammatory environment. Since microglia are the resident immune cells of the CNS, the effect of EVs on microglia may play a major role in the efficacy of EVs in CNS injury.

Characteristics of Microglial Polarization and Activation

The relationship between EVs and microglia is unique, not only in disease states, but also developmentally. Microglia finely regulate inflammation states in the brain and spinal cord. Environmental cues can shift resident microglia towards either an M1- or M2- like polarization [17, 18]. While, microglia actually embody a spectrum of polarization and do not explicitly fall into binary categorizations [19], these designations have traditionally been used as a general indication of microglia functional state. Here “M1-like” or “M2-like” is used in accordance with the cited study findings as a reference to which portion of this spectrum the microglia are predominantly embodying. M1-like microglia, expressing CD86+, CD206-, and CD16/32+ [20,21,22], produce cytokines such as INF-y, IL-6, TNF-a, IL1-B, KC/GRO/CINC. During activation, microglia also upregulate expression. M1-like microglia, expressing CD86+, CD206-, and CD16/32+ [20,21,22], produce cytokines such as INF-y, IL-6, TNF-a, IL1-B, KC/GRO/CINC. During activation, microglia also upregulate expression of ionizing calcium adaptor binding protein (IBA1), a commonly used marker for microglia. In turn, this polarization heightens the local proinflammatory environment. In development, M1-associated cytokines, such as TNF-a, Il-6, and IL-1, have been shown to be important factors contributing to synaptic plasticity and memory [23]. Conversely, M2-like microglia (CD86-, CD206+) [20] have increased gene expression of Arg-1, IL-10, and STAT6, and release CXCL1, GROα, neutrophil activating protein alpha, cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant (CINC) inducing a more restorative local environment [24]. The studies discussed in this review utilize these polarization-associated changes in expression, transcription, and cytokine secretion to assess the effects of various EV populations on recipient microglia.

Functional transitions of microglia are accompanied by a change in microglia morphology. Upon activation, microglia undergo transitions from a more ramified, complex, aster-like morphology, to a more amoeboid, rounded, and swollen morphology [25, 26]. While morphological changes of microglia may be a less direct way to determine M1- or M2-like polarization of microglia than cytokine analysis, they do serve as a high-throughput way to gauge the inflammation status of microglia in vitro and in vivo [27]. Therefore, if EVs from various cell types are able to exert a specific, measurable effect on microglia polarization, evidenced through cytokine production or morphology, this anti-inflammatory property can be utilized therapeutically [28]. In acute proinflammatory neurological conditions such as stroke [29], TBI [30], spinal cord injury (SCI) [31], or chronic inflammatory conditions such as Parkinson’s [32] and Alzheimer’s [33], exogenous EVs can be provided to shift microglial polarization to more reparative or inactivated state.

Microglia not only play an essential role in tuning local inflammatory environments in the neuronal space, but they also have widespread holistic effects, serving as the major antigen-presenting cells in the brain parenchyma. For example, microglia have been shown to directly affect circulating peripheral T cell activation following injury and disease [34, 35]. Therefore, exogenously administered EVs could invoke changes in microglia activation in homeostatic or in neuroinflammatory injury and disease states which would not only have neuronal effects, but also systemic peripheral ramifications as well.

In contrast to recent reviews which have focused on the functional effects of microglia-derived EVs in various inflammatory states [36, 37], this review aims to coalesce information specifically surrounding the relationship between EVs derived from various cell sources, including stem cells and their effects on recipient microglia. Microglia-derived EVs are only considered in the context of their effects on recipient microglia. Here, the specificity of this relationship in neutral, pro- and anti-inflammatory conditions is examined, as well as the downstream functional effect on microglia polarization and activation.

Regulation of Microglia by EVs

The Role of EVs in Microglia Homeostasis and Development

Interaction of EVs and microglia In Vitro

In homeostatic states, EVs from multiple cell types have been shown to have a specific association with microglia. The extent and components of this specific association have been assessed for oligodendrocyte- [38], neuronal- [39], and astrocyte- [40] derived EVs on various in vitro microglia cell lines. Under homeostatic conditions, mouse oligodendroglia cell (Oli-Neu) EVs were taken up by primary microglia cultures [38, 41]. To test the specificity of this uptake, Oli-Neu EVs were applied to mixed primary brain cultures and their uptake by different recipient cells was compared. This study showed there was a specific uptake of Oli-Neu EVs by primary microglia not replicated by neurons, astrocytes, or oligodendrocytes [38].The degree of uptake of these EVs was decreased in the presence of phosphatidyl serine (PS) and phosphatidyl choline (PC, to a lesser extent)-containing liposome, or following inhibition with Dynasore, an inhibitor of dynamin-dependent endocytosis [38]. The dependence of PS epitope availability for efficient EV uptake by microglia has been observed in other in vitro models, as well. For example, blocking of the PS epitope on N2a (a neuroblastoma cell line)-derived EVs was shown to affect their uptake into BV2 cells (an immortalized microglia cell line) and primary microglia. Additionally, specific uptake of N2a EVs into BV2s and primary microglia was documented, but not into primary neurons [39]. Lastly, astrocyte-derived EVs (ADEVs) were shown to be taken up into the cytoplasm of primary microglia and then trafficked and colocalized to microglial endosomes [40]. These in vitro studies reinforce the notion that there is a robust, specific, and significant uptake of oligodendrocyte, neuronal, and astrocyte EVs by microglia in non-diseased or homeostatic conditions compared to other recipient cell types.

Functional effects of EVs and microglia In Vitro

In addition to cytokine release and surveillance, microglia are known to carry out a variety of other functions in non-diseased states such as neurite pruning. The effect of EVs on these other microglia process has also been assessed. Following exposure to differentiated and excited PC12 (a pheochromocytoma-derived mix of neuroblastic and eosinophilic cells) EVs, MG6 cells (a mouse microglial cell line) had an enhanced ability to remove degenerating neurites from PC12 cells compared to control non-exposed MG6 cells. This enhanced pruning effect was specific to PC12-EV engulfment, since uptake of NIH3T3/TIM4 EVs (TIM4-expressing mouse embryonic fibroblast line) did not produce the same pruning effect. PC12 EV uptake did not affect other classically understood microglia functions, such as phagocytosis of E. coli. The enhanced synaptic pruning response of MG6 microglia was due to a specific, detectable, and inhibitable upregulation of complement component 3 (C3) [42]. In contrast, astrocyte-derived extracellular vesicles (ADEVs) exposed to morphine increased activation of toll like receptor 7 (TLR7), ultimately impairing microglial phagocytosis processes [40]. This shows that while uptake of some EVs, such as PC12 derived EVs, may not affect phagocytic microglia processes, previous exposure of EVs to opioids or other conditions could affect these processes. Decreased phagocytosis was only reported in morphine-exposed ADEVs, thus further examination is required.

Interaction of EVs and microglia In Vivo

Specific EV and microglial association under homeostatic conditions has also been assessed in vivo. PKH26-labeled Oli-Neu EVs were injected intrathecally into C3CR1 (microglia)-EGFP transgenic mice, and 2-photon microscopy revealed 50% of EGFP-labeled microglia colocalized with PKH26-labeled Oli-Neu EVs within 400uM of the injection site [38]. This showed that even in the complex in vivo environment, a majority of microglia surrounding the injection site had successfully interacted with and taken up labeled Oli-Neu EVs. Experiments with other EV types reported similar results regarding EV uptake and clearance in developmental conditions [43]. Constitutively released CD9-GFP-positive subventricular zone (SVZ) NSC EVs were cleared in neonatal mice concurrently with an influx of IBA1-positive microglia. Furthermore, DiI-labeled SVZ NSC EVs revealed a pattern of uptake into IBA1+ and CD11b+ Cd68+ microglia This uptake was not effected by UV irradiation of nucleic acid EV content [43]. Upon investigation of N2a EV uptake, DiI-labeled EV were observed to colocalize with 93% of IBA1+ microglia at P2 and 80% at P7 [38]. Lastly, intranasally administered EL-4 (murine lymphoblast) EVs colocalized with more than 60% of IBA1+ cells within an hour of administration [44]. Ultimately, these studies reveal a specific uptake of Oli-Neu, SVZ, N2a, and EL-4 EVs by IBA1+ microglia in vivo.

Functional effects of EVs on microglia In Vivo

While a specific directed uptake of EVs from microglia has been established, one of the most important questions remains: what effect do EVs have on the polarization status of microglia in these non-diseased conditions? M1-like or M2-like polarization of microglia after EV interaction could substantially affect the pro- or anti- inflammatory status of the surrounding tissue. Microglia morphology and cytokine expression is correlated to microglia polarization. These three parameters were examined after EV uptake. In vivo experiments of Oli-Neu EVs revealed no change in morphology of EGFP-CX3CR1+ cells (a labeled chemokine receptor highly expressed in microglia) following EV colocalization. In vitro experiments revealed no increase in proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-12, following Oli-Neu EV treatment of primary microglia [38]. This suggests Oli-Neu EVs do not have a significant effect on microglia polarization in non-diseased states. In contrast, in developmental models, microglia treatment with non-irradiated, DiI-labeled, SVZ NSC EVs did result in an increase of CD11b expression. A transition to reduced microglia complexity, quantified by number of extensions, compared to UV-treated EVs, suggested a more activated M1-like transition [43]. Therefore, the downstream effect of EVs on microglia polarization seems dependent on the EV-type applied.

Collectively, these studies show an important, specific relationship between CNS EVs and recipient microglia in developmental and non-diseased states summarized in Table 1. While the oligodendrocytes EVs were shown to have no effect on microglial morphology or cytokine release, SVZ NSC EVs were shown to invoke an amoeboid-like transition. To understand the overarching effects of stem cell or primary cell EV treatment on microglial polarization, an investigation of disease and injury models must also be considered.

Table 1 Interactions of EVs with microglia in homeostasis and development
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Diagram of effects of EVs on microglia in neutral (A) and pro- and anti- inflammatory states (B)

Full size image

The Role of EVs in Tumor Microenvironments

While EVs affect microglia in homeostatic states, their effect on the polarization of microglia in cancerous, inflammatory, and neurodegenerative conditions should also be considered, especially given the aforementioned therapeutic potential and interest in EVs. Historically, before reports of lymphatic vasculature along dural sinuses, the brain was considered an immune-privileged organ [45, 46]. Now, however, immune cells in the brain tumor microenvironment (TME) have emerged as a major regulator of tumor progression in low- and high-grade gliomas. Greater understanding of this TME can be utilized to understand tumor metastasis and tumor progression [47]. The interaction of tumor-derived EVs on immune cells in this environment should be considered.

Interaction of EVs and Microglia in Models of GBM

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the highest-grade astrocytoma, is a heterogenous primary neoplasm highly resistant to current radiological, chemotherapeutic, and surgical options [48]. The therapeutic resistance of GBM results in only a 6% 5-year survival of this disease after diagnosis [49, 50]. In order to develop more targeted and effective treatment options, a better understanding of the intricate TME of GBM is warranted. A portion of the TME involving the interaction of GBM-derived EVs and microglia is discussed here.

Exposure of microglia to GBM EVs every 24 h for 5 days in vitro resulted in alterations in the secretion of multiple cytokines and a 40% increase in microglia proliferation. Out of 40 cytokines assessed, 6 cytokines were upregulated, and 3 cytokines were downregulated compared to non-exposed microglia by more than 50%. Of upregulated cytokines, 5 were involved in glioma growth, including CXCL10, CXCL1, CCL2, and CCL5 and IL-6, with 1, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP-1), being involved in matrix degradation. Of the 3 downregulated cytokines, IL-16, IL-23, and IL-27, all were involved in the induction of immune responses. Taken together, these results suggest that GBM EVs are able to significantly alter functional microglia phenotype, causing a progression from an M1 to a more M2-like phenotype evidenced through cytokine expression [51, 52]. This GBM EV invoked effect on dampening M1-like microglial activation could play a role in GBM immune evasion, as well as local immune dampening for metastasis priming [53]. Effects of GBM EVs on tumor-associated microglia is specific. Other cell populations, such as monocytes and macrophages, were not found to have significantly altered MT1-MMP expression following GBM EV treatment. Regional primary human microglia were, providing evidence of a microglia-specific response to GBM EVs compared to other immune cells [54]. Multiphoton intravital microscopy was used to confirm successful interaction of GBM EVs with microglia/monocytes in animals. GL261-FLuc-mcC-palmtdT tumors produced red-labeled EVs which could be tracked in their interaction with CX3CR1-GFP+ cells. Colocalization or interaction of EVs with microglia and monocytes was in 18–74% percent of tumor area, depending on field of view (FOV) location, as well as 1–10 puncta within GFP+ cells. Upon flow cytometry analysis there was a higher density of microglia associated with tumors and higher number of monocytes/macrophages overall in tumor-bearing tissue [51]. These studies show that GBM EVs do indeed interact with microglia.

Functional Effects of Loaded and Non-loaded EVs on GBM TME

To directly understand the downstream effects the GBM EVs are having on the polarization and function of recipient microglia, cytokine and phenotypic changes were studied. MiRNA transferred from GBM EVs to recipient microglia may invoke cytokine and phenotypic changes. Two miRNAs, miR-451 and miR-21 (out of 1146 assessed), were significantly elevated in patient-derived and immortalized GBM cells and EVs. Researchers assessed changes in these miRNAs in two recipient cell lines, primary mouse microglia and human adult primary microglia. Following addition of GBM EVs to primary mouse and human microglia, significant increases in miR-21 (a known oncomir expressed in solid tumors) and miR-451 (known to be associated with chemotherapy resistance) were observed compared to control, suggesting miRNA transfer from EVs to these cells. Additionally, c-Myc (a known target of both miR-21 and miR-451) mRNA levels were significantly decreased in recipient microglia following GBM EV treatment, suggesting functional miRNA transfer from GBM EVs to microglia. Finally, using FACS to examine and compare microglia from tumor-bearing mice to control mice, tumor-associated microglia had increased levels of miR-21 and decreased c-Myc mRNA levels, indicating functional miRNA transfer from EVs to microglia in vivo [51].

In addition to understanding the endogenous effects of GBM EVs on microglia and tumor progress, exogenous EVs can also be harnessed for therapeutic purposes in GBM. One approach is to load EVs with specific therapeutics destined for microglial targets. In an orthotopic glioblastoma (GL-26) model, intranasally administered EL-4 (murine lymphoblast) EVs loaded with JSI124 (STAT3 inhibitor) were shown to increase tumor apoptosis, survival, and concomitant reduction of tumor, as well as decrease neurological symptoms. Two animals treated with JSI124 EVs had no evidence of tumor left. Exo-JSI124 treatment was correlated with a reduction in STAT3 and decrease in IL-1β and IL-6 in CD45.2+ microglial cells, suggesting this beneficial treatment effect to be microglia-mediated. Ultimately, this study reveals the strength of EV-based therapeutics in the TME and specifically in GBM [44].

Collectively, these studies show that astrocytoma EVs are robustly taken up by recipient microglia in vivo and in vitro, summarized in Table 2. Of greater significance, this uptake is correlated with an increase in immunosuppression as well as conveyance of well-known onco-miRNA and chemotherapeutic resistance miRNAs. In light of these findings, inhibition of the uptake of GBM EVs or interruption to the downstream processing of GBM EV contents by microglia could prove a novel therapeutic avenue for GBM therapeutic development. Alternatively, exogenous EVs loaded with relevant inhibitors, such as JSI124, could effectively tune microglia responses to tumor cells, leading to decreased tumor burden and increased survival [44].

Table 2 Interactions of EVs with microglia in neural injury and disease
Full size table

EVs and Microglia in Neurodegenerative Disease

This anti-inflammatory effect of EVs could be extremely beneficial in neuroinflammatory or neurodegenerative diseases. While the effects of microglia-derived EVs in a range of neurodegenerative diseases have been examined in recent reviews [36, 37, 55], the effects of CNS and non-CNS EVs on microglia in these diseases should also be coalesced. Here, the effects of EVs from various cell types in different CNS diseases and injuries is discussed in in vitro and in vivo models.

Interaction of EVs and Microglia in Neuroinflammatory Injury and Disease

In a model of spinal cord injury (SCI), treatment with EVs from TNF-α- and IFN-γ-stimulated mesenchymal stem cells (MSC EVs+) or EVs from non-stimulated mesenchymal stem cells (MSC EVswt) at 3 h post-injury was able to significantly decrease M1-like microglia (CD32+ and CD86+) levels to those of sham animals. Concentration of M2-like microglia (CD100R+, CD163+, and RT1B+) was also decreased with MSC EVs+ and MSC EVswt treatment, revealing an overall attenuation of microglial responses by MSC EVs following SCI [56]. The anti-inflammatory effects of MSC EVs on microglia in other disease models has been shown, as well. In a model of perinatal brain injury, MSC EVs decreased the number of IBA1+ cells after systemic LPS injection at P3, compared to LPS stimulation alone. Amoeboid transition, associated with M1-like proinflammatory microglia, was also decreased with MSC EV treatment [57]. This shows that MSC EVs induced a transition of microglia away from M1 polarization in two different models of acute injury. In an aged rhesus monkey model of cortical injury, EV treatment resulted in a greater density of ramified MHCII-expressing microglia. Morphological features of microglia after EV treatment were significantly correlated with motor function recovery in these animals [58]. MSC EVs were able to effectively attenuate microglia activation even in a perinatal injury model. This was in contrast to earlier developmental studies discussed, which showed an increase in M1 polarization of microglia following interaction with SVZ NSC EVs. This implies that EV effects on microglial polarization may be more specific to EV source and overarching inflammatory state than developmental timepoint.

MSC EVs were also found to be an effective anti-inflammatory therapeutic in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Transgenic AD mice were treated with MSC EVs or pre-conditioned MSC EVs (PC-MSC EVs). DiI-labeled EVs from both treatment groups were shown to colocalize with astrocytes and microglia upon imaging. Additionally, the expression of IBA1 in microglia was significantly decreased in both EV-treated groups, and there was a significant increase in CD11c+ cells (pan-myeloid marker) in the PC-MSC EVs treatment group. Furthermore, analysis of cytokine secretion revealed PC-MSC EV and MSC EV treatment resulted in a decrease of TNF-α and IL-1β cytokine secretion and gene expression and increased the levels of IL-4 and IL-10 (anti-inflammatory cytokines). Additional in vitro experiments confirmed a significant reduction in TNF-α and IL-1β of LPS-treated BV2s after PC-MSC EV or MSC EV treatment. Lastly, a decrease in STAT3 and NF-κB p65 (inflammatory pathways) activation was observed in the brains of AD mice, and an increase in miR-21 expression was detected after PC-MSC EV or MSC EV treatment. In each of these measures, PC-MSC EVs showed even more significant anti-inflammatory effects than non-pre-conditioned MSC EVs. In these studies, authors speculate that these anti-inflammatory effects of MSC EV treatment could be responsible for drastic improvements in learning seen in AD mice during Morris water maze assessment [59]. Collectively, these studies of neuroinflammatory conditions reveal an overarching anti-inflammatory effect of MSC EV treatment, either with or without pre-treatment, on microglia polarization.

Microglia are known to play an important role in amyloid beta (Aβ) degradation in models of AD. A role for EVs in Aβ trafficking and degradation was investigated. Aβ-exposed to N2a EVs was taken up more readily by BV2s and primary microglia and was cleared faster from the media. This increased clearance and uptake of Aβ by microglia was dependent on PS availability on N2a EVs. Once internalized, Aβ-laden EVs were trafficked to the lysosomes of recipient microglia for degradation [39]. Also, Alzheimer’s disease mice were treated with MSC EVs or PC-MSC EVs (mentioned above). There was a reduction in plaque deposition in the cortex and hippocampus of transgenic AD mice treated with MSC EVs or PC-MSC EVs. Most compelling, there were significant decreases in soluble and insoluble Aβ observed in both EV-treated groups, implying MSC EV treatment can also halt the spread of AD to other locations within the brain [59]. These studies reveal how this aforementioned relationship between EVs and microglia is utilized for clearance and degradation of pathological materials in the diseased brain [39].

Like Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease [60] remains a leading cause of neurodegeneration and chronic neuroinflammation [61]. In 6-hydroxydopamine-invoked models of PD, measured increases in TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, and a decrease in IL-10 indicate the role microglia play in perpetuating this proinflammatory condition [62]. Peripheral immune cells may also be contributing to this increased proinflammatory state, in turn further perpetuating microglial activation. To answer this question, researchers isolated EVs from the plasma of PD patients and analyzed their interactions with mouse microglia in vitro and in vivo. Following application to BV2s, plasma EVs were shown to be taken up, colocalize with microglia lysosomes, and activate the Akt-mTOR pathway, suppressing autophagy, a crucial process in α-synuclein (α-syn) degradation. Upon unilateral injection of PKH26-labeled PD patient plasma EVs, specific colocalization with IBA1+ cells was observed in the bilateral striatum, substantia nigra, and cortex, and an increase in IBA1 and NO expression and a transition to amoeboid microglia phenotype was observed. Increased phosphorylated α-syn accumulation in dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) lends to a hypothesis of EV-mediated microglia-to-neuron mode of transmission for α-syn conformers [63]. This study reveals that endogenous EVs, exposed to the already proinflammatory PD environment, interact with microglia, further perpetuating neuroinflammation and potentially the spread of α-syn.

The downstream effects of proinflammatory-exposed blood-derived EVs were also considered in a mouse model of TBI. Flow cytometry analysis revealed that microglia-derived EVs make up a significant portion of the total EV population and were also increased after TBI. Exposure of BV2 cells to enriched blood EVs from TBI animals resulted in significant increases in IL-1β and CCL2 in recipient microglia and no significant change in TNF-α or miR-155 compared to non-TBI-exposed EVs [64]. LPS-exposed BV2 EVs also resulted in increases in IL-1β, TNF-α, CCL2, IL-6, NOS2 mRNA, and miR-155 in recipient BV2 microglia. In addition, LPS-exposed BV2 EV treatment resulted in significant increases in IBA1+ and P2Y12+ cells and an amoeboid transition in in vivo microglia [64]. Taken together, these TBI and PD examples reveal that plasma EVs which are previously exposed to proinflammatory conditions perpetuate further proinflammatory responses in recipient microglia. EVs derived from cells which have not been previously stimulated, however, show a net decrease in proinflammatory activation of recipient microglia, summarized in Table 2.

Loading of EVs with Anti-Inflammatory Therapeutics for Targeted Microglial Delivery

As in previously mentioned GBM experiments, EVs can be loaded with certain molecules to increase delivery of intended therapeutics to microglia due to this specific targeted uptake. In neuroinflammatory conditions, anti-inflammatory therapeutics can be loaded into EVs for targeted delivery to microglia. In one study, administered curcumin (spice known to suppress inflammation)-loaded EL-4 (mouse lymphoma cell line) EVs (Exo-cur), were shown to significantly reduce the number of activated inflammatory microglia (CD45.2+ IL-1β+) after LPS challenge compared to non-treated animals. Furthermore, apoptosis was confirmed in microglia cells through TUNEL assay, revealing efficacy of loaded EVs not only to decrease microglia activation and proliferation, but also to induce cell death [44]. In a myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model, disease severity in Exo-cur mice was significantly reduced compared to vehicle and non-encapsulated curcumin-treated mice. This significant functional effect of Exo-cur EVs was correlated with decreased expression of IL-1β and CD45.2+ microglia [44]. The significant differences observed between Exo-cur and non-encapsulated curcumin groups provides support for the use of EVs for targeted therapeutic delivery.

Concluding Remarks

This review was conducted to coalesce the current understanding of the effects of EVs on microglia in development, homeostasis, the TME, and in neurodegenerative disease. While EVs from some sources, such as SVZ NSCs, did show a polarization of microglia to a more M1-like morphology, CNS EVs from all other studies presented here showed measurable anti-inflammatory effects (in disease states) or no effects (in non-diseased states), evidenced by cytokine release, expression, and morphological analysis. It should be noted that many of EVs referenced in this review were derived from immortalized or cancerous cell lines which are not found in normal CNS microenvironment. Therefore, the in vivo microenvironment and microglial response may differ. Even with this caveat, these findings suggest the relationship between EVs and microglia is very specific, measurable, and of therapeutic interest.

In the TME, pre-clinical studies have already begun to assess the efficacy of increasing M1-like activation of microglia in an effort to decrease tumor burden. Specifically, differentiation of M2-like microglia to a more M1-like phenotype through competitive antagonism of the colony stimulating factor-1 receptor (CSF-1R) was shown to halt GBM growth and enhance survival [66]. Therefore, the efficacy of shifting microglia polarization to enhance survival in GBM has been established clinically. Inhibition and/or sequestration of endogenous GBM EVs or loading of exogenous EVs with M2 inhibitors (which will be specifically taken up by microglia) have the potential for similar efficacious outcomes through halting the characteristic M2-like polarization of GBM-associated microglia.

In cases of disease or trauma-invoked neuroinflammation, inhibition of microglial activation has been an efficacious strategy. For example, corticosteroids have been shown to inhibit microglial activation in SCI [48] and traumatic brain injury (TBI) [67], and minocycline-induced attenuation of M1 microglial responses has shown efficacy in stroke [68] and Parkinson’s disease [69]. Attaining this level of anti-inflammation has been a goal of many regenerative medicine whole cell biological strategies, such as MSCs [70]. There exists, however, many limitations of whole cell therapies, including risk of rejection, site accessibility, and retention [12, 13, 71,71,73). EV-based therapeutics exist in a new space between the two approaches, with enhanced multi-faceted therapeutic potential over single-target small molecule strategies and without some of the limitations associated with whole cell therapies. Through exogenous administration of EVs or enhancement of endogenous EV production, anti-inflammatory efficacy through targeting of microglia polarization in various neuronal diseases could be achieved.

Abbreviations

AD:

Alzheimer’s disease

ADEVs:

astrocyte derived extracellular vesicles

CSF1:

colony stimulating factor 1

CSF-1R:

colony stimulating factor-1 receptor

C3:

complement component 3

Exo-cur:

curcumin-loaded mouse lymphoma cell EVs

CINC:

cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant

eGFP:

enhanced green fluorescent protein

EAE:

experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

EVs:

Extracellular vesicles

FOV:

field of view

GBM:

glioblastoma multiforme

IBA:

ionizing calcium adaptor binding protein

JS1124:

STAT3 inhibitor

BV2:

microglial cell line (BV2)

MG6:

mouse microglia cell line

EL-4:

murine lymphoblast

MOG:

myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein

NSC:

neural stem cell

N2a:

neuroblastoma cell line

NC:

neurosphere cells

MSC EVswt :

non-stimulate mesenchymal stem cell

Oli-Neu:

oligodendroglia cell

GL-2:

orthotopic glioblastoma

60:

Parkinson’s Disease

PC12:

pheochromocytoma

73:

phosphatidyl choline

PS:

phosphatidyl serine

PC-MSC EVs:

pre-conditioned MSC EVs

SCI:

spinal cord injury

MSC EVs+ :

stimulated mesenchymal stem cells

SNpc:

substania nigra pars compacta

SVZ:

subventricular zone

NIH3T3/ TIM4:

TIM4 expressing mouse embryonic fibroblast line

TIMP-1:

tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1

TLR7:

toll-like receptor 7

TGF-β:

transforming growth factor beta

TBI:

traumatic brain injury

TME:

tumor microenvironment

YS:

yolk sac

α-syn:

α-synuclein

References

  1. Théry, C., Witwer, K. W., Aikawa, E., Alcaraz, M. J., Anderson, J. D., Andriantsitohaina, R.,...Zuba-Surma, E. K. (2018). Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. Journal of extracellular vesicles, 7(1), 1535750-1535750.https://doi.org/10.1080/20013078.2018.1535750.

  2. György, B., Szabó, T. G., Pásztói, M., Pál, Z., Misják, P., Aradi, B., László, V., Pállinger, É., Pap, E., Kittel, Á., Nagy, G., Falus, A., & Buzás, E. I. (2011). Membrane vesicles, current state-of-the-art: Emerging role of extracellular vesicles. Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 68(16), 2667–2688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-011-0689-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hessvik, N. P., & Llorente, A. (2018). Current knowledge on exosome biogenesis and release. Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 75(2), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-017-2595-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Latifkar, A., Hur, Y. H., Sanchez, J. C., Cerione, R. A., & Antonyak, M. A. (2019). New insights into extracellular vesicle biogenesis and function. Journal of Cell Science, 132(13), jcs222406. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.222406.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Valadi, H., Ekström, K., Bossios, A., Sjöstrand, M., Lee, J. J., & Lötvall, J. O. (2007). Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nature Cell Biology, 9(6), 654–659. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1596.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dickhout, A., & Koenen, R. R. (2018). Extracellular vesicles as biomarkers in cardiovascular disease; chances and risks. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 5(113). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2018.00113.

  7. Doyle, L. M., & Wang, M. Z. (2019). Overview of extracellular vesicles, their origin, composition, purpose, and methods for exosome isolation and analysis. Cells, 8(7), 727. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8070727.

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Villarroya-Beltri, C., Gutiérrez-Vázquez, C., Sánchez-Cabo, F., Pérez-Hernández, D., Vázquez, J., Martin-Cofreces, N., Martinez-Herrera, D. J., Pascual-Montano, A., Mittelbrunn, M., & Sánchez-Madrid, F. (2013). Sumoylated hnRNPA2B1 controls the sorting of miRNAs into exosomes through binding to specific motifs. Nature Communications, 4(1), 2980. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3980.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Sadik, N., Cruz, L., Gurtner, A., Rodosthenous, R. S., Dusoswa, S. A., Ziegler, O., van Solinge, T. S., Wei, Z., Salvador-Garicano, A. M., Gyorgy, B., Broekman, M., & Balaj, L. (2018). Extracellular RNAs: A new awareness of old perspectives. In T. Patel (Ed.), Extracellular RNA: Methods and protocols (pp. 1–15). New York, NY: Springer New York.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Webb, R. L., Kaiser, E. E., Scoville, S. L., Thompson, T. A., Fatima, S., Pandya, C., Sriram, K., Swetenburg, R. L., Vaibhav, K., Arbab, A. S., Baban, B., Dhandapani, K. M., Hess, D. C., Hoda, M. N., & Stice, S. L. (2018). Human neural stem cell extracellular vesicles improve tissue and functional recovery in the murine thromboembolic stroke model. Translational Stroke Research, 9(5), 530–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-017-0599-2.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Webb Robin, L., Kaiser Erin, E., Jurgielewicz Brian, J., Spellicy, S., Scoville Shelley, L., Thompson Tyler, A., et al. (2018). Human neural stem cell extracellular vesicles improve recovery in a porcine model of ischemic stroke. Stroke, 49(5), 1248–1256. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020353.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Spellicy, S. E., Kaiser, E. E., Bowler, M. M., Jurgielewicz, B. J., Webb, R. L., West, F. D., & Stice, S. L. (2019). Neural stem cell extracellular vesicles disrupt midline shift predictive outcomes in porcine ischemic stroke model. Translational Stroke Research., 11, 776–788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-019-00753-4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sun, M. K., Passaro, A. P., Latchoumane, C.-F., Spellicy, S. E., Bowler, M., Goeden, M., Martin, W. J., Holmes, P. V., Stice, S. L., & Karumbaiah, L. (2019). Extracellular vesicles mediate neuroprotection and functional recovery after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurotrauma, 37, 1358–1369. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2019.6443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Capone, C., Frigerio, S., Fumagalli, S., Gelati, M., Principato, M.-C., Storini, C., Montinaro, M., Kraftsik, R., Curtis, M. D., Parati, E., & Simoni, M.-G. D. (2007). Neurosphere-derived cells exert a Neuroprotective action by changing the ischemic microenvironment. PLoS One, 2(4), e373. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000373.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ransohoff, R. M. (2016). A polarizing question: do M1 and M2 microglia exist? Nature Neuroscience, 19(8), 987–991. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4338.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou, T., Huang, Z., Sun, X., Zhu, X., Zhou, L., Li, M., . . . He, C. (2017). Microglia polarization with M1/M2 phenotype changes in rd1 mouse model of retinal degeneration. Front Neuroanat, 11. Doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2017.00077.

  17. Morrison, H. W., & Filosa, J. A. (2013). A quantitative spatiotemporal analysis of microglia morphology during ischemic stroke and reperfusion. In J Neuroinflammation (Vol. 10, pp. 4).

  18. Sedgwick, A. L. F., Goodsall, A. L., Hickey, W. F., & J, D. (1995). Normal adult ramified microglia separated from other central nervous system macrophages by flow cytometric sorting. Phenotypic differences defined and direct ex vivo antigen presentation to myelin basic protein-reactive CD4+ T cells compared. Retrieved from http://www.jimmunol.org/content/154/9/4309.long

  19. Marinelli, S., Basilico, B., Marrone, M. C., & Ragozzino, D. (2019). Microglia-neuron crosstalk: Signaling mechanism and control of synaptic transmission. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, 94, 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2019.05.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bailey, J. C. G., Timothy, J. K., Bei, Z., Michael, B. O., & William, M. (2017). Predictive screening of M1 and M2 macrophages reveals the immunomodulatory effectiveness of post spinal cord injury azithromycin treatment. Scientific Reports, 7, 40144. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40144.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Salamanca, L., Mechawar, N., Murai, K. K., Balling, R., Bouvier, D. S., & Skupin, A. (2019). MIC-MAC: An automated pipeline for high-throughput characterization and classification of three-dimensional microglia morphologies in mouse and human postmortem brain samples. Glia, 67(8), 1496–1509. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.23623.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Galieva, L. R., James, V., Mukhamedshina, Y. O., & Rizvanov, A. A. (2019). Therapeutic potential of extracellular vesicles for the treatment of nerve disorders. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, 163–163. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00163.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lambertsen, K. L., Finsen, B., & Clausen, B. H. (2019). Post-stroke inflammation—Target or tool for therapy? Acta Neuropathologica, 137(5), 693–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-018-1930-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wofford, K. L., Loane, D. J., & Cullen, D. K. (2019). Acute drivers of neuroinflammation in traumatic brain injury. Neural Regeneration Research, 14(9), 1481–1489. https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.255958.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Okada, S. (2016). The pathophysiological role of acute inflammation after spinal cord injury. Inflammation and regeneration, 36, 20–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41232-016-0026-1.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, Q., Liu, Y., & Zhou, J. (2015). Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease and its potential as therapeutic target. Translational Neurodegeneration, 4(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40035-015-0042-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Kinney, J. W., Bemiller, S. M., Murtishaw, A. S., Leisgang, A. M., Salazar, A. M., & Lamb, B. T. (2018). Inflammation as a central mechanism in Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.), 4, 575–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2018.06.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fitzner, D., Schnaars, M., van Rossum, D., Krishnamoorthy, G., Dibaj, P., Bakhti, M., Regen, T., Hanisch, U. K., & Simons, M. (2011). Selective transfer of exosomes from oligodendrocytes to microglia by macropinocytosis. Journal of Cell Science, 124(3), 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.074088.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yuyama, K., Sun, H., Mitsutake, S., & Igarashi, Y. (2012). Sphingolipid-modulated exosome secretion promotes clearance of amyloid-β by microglia. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 287(14), 10977–10989. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.324616.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Hu, G., Liao, K., Niu, F., Yang, L., Dallon, B. W., Callen, S., Tian, C., Shu, J., Cui, J., Sun, Z., Lyubchenko, Y. L., Ka, M., Chen, X. M., & Buch, S. (2018). Astrocyte EV-induced lincRNA-Cox2 regulates microglial phagocytosis: Implications for morphine-mediated Neurodegeneration. Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids, 13, 450–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtn.2018.09.019.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Bahrini, I., Song, J.-H., Diez, D., & Hanayama, R. (2015). Neuronal exosomes facilitate synaptic pruning by up-regulating complement factors in microglia. Scientific Reports, 5(1), 7989. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07989.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Morton, M. C., Neckles, V. N., Seluzicki, C. M., Holmberg, J. C., & Feliciano, D. M. (2018). Neonatal subventricular zone neural stem cells release extracellular vesicles that act as a microglial Morphogen. Cell Reports, 23(1), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.037.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhuang, X., Xiang, X., Grizzle, W., Sun, D., Zhang, S., Axtell, R. C., Ju, S., Mu, J., Zhang, L., Steinman, L., Miller, D., & Zhang, H.-G. (2011). Treatment of brain inflammatory diseases by delivering exosome encapsulated anti-inflammatory drugs from the nasal region to the brain. Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 19(10), 1769–1779. https://doi.org/10.1038/mt.2011.164.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Quail, D. F., & Joyce, J. A. (2017). The microenvironmental landscape of brain tumors. Cancer Cell, 31(3), 326–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2017.02.009.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Bahadur, S., Sahu, A. K., Baghel, P., & Saha, S. (2019). Current promising treatment strategy for glioblastoma multiform: A review. Oncology Reviews, 13(2), 417–417. https://doi.org/10.4081/oncol.2019.417.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. dos Anjos Pultz, B., Andrés Cordero da Luz, F., Socorro Faria, S., Peixoto Ferreira de Souza, L., Cristina Brígido Tavares, P., Alonso Goulart, V., et al. (2017). The multifaceted role of extracellular vesicles in metastasis: Priming the soil for seeding. International Journal of Cancer, 140(11), 2397–2407. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.30595.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. de Vrij, J., Maas, S. L. N., Kwappenberg, K. M. C., Schnoor, R., Kleijn, A., Dekker, L., Luider, T. M., de Witte, L. D., Litjens, M., van Strien, M. E., Hol, E. M., Kroonen, J., Robe, P. A., Lamfers, M. L., Schilham, M. W., & Broekman, M. L. D. (2015). Glioblastoma-derived extracellular vesicles modify the phenotype of monocytic cells. International Journal of Cancer, 137(7), 1630–1642. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29521.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. van der Vos, K. E., Abels, E. R., Zhang, X., Lai, C., Carrizosa, E., Oakley, D., Prabhakar, S., Mardini, O., Crommentuijn, M. H. W., Skog, J., Krichevsky, A. M., Stemmer-Rachamimov, A., Mempel, T. R., el Khoury, J., Hickman, S. E., & Breakefield, X. O. (2015). Directly visualized glioblastoma-derived extracellular vesicles transfer RNA to microglia/macrophages in the brain. Neuro-Oncology, 18(1), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nov244.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Ruppert, K. A., Nguyen, T. T., Prabhakara, K. S., Toledano Furman, N. E., Srivastava, A. K., Harting, M. T., Cox Jr., C. S., & Olson, S. D. (2018). Human Mesenchymal stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles modify microglial response and improve clinical outcomes in experimental spinal cord injury. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 480–480. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18867-w.

  40. Drommelschmidt, K., Serdar, M., Bendix, I., Herz, J., Bertling, F., Prager, S., Keller, M., Ludwig, A. K., Duhan, V., Radtke, S., de Miroschedji, K., Horn, P. A., van de Looij, Y., Giebel, B., & Felderhoff-Müser, U. (2017). Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles ameliorate inflammation-induced preterm brain injury. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 60, 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2016.11.011.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Go, V., Bowley, B. G. E., Pessina, M. A., Zhang, Z. G., Chopp, M., Finklestein, S. P., Rosene, D. L., Medalla, M., Buller, B., & Moore, T. L. (2020). Extracellular vesicles from mesenchymal stem cells reduce microglial-mediated neuroinflammation after cortical injury in aged rhesus monkeys. GeroScience, 42(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-019-00115-w.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Noble-Haeusslein, P. A. L., John, H. Z., & Linda, J. (2013). RIGOR Guidelines: Escalating STAIR and STEPS for Effective Translational Research. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-012-0209-2.

  43. Cui, G.-H., Wu, J., Mou, F.-F., Xie, W.-H., Wang, F.-B., Wang, Q.-L., Fang, J., Xu, Y. W., Dong, Y. R., Liu, J. R., & Guo, H.-D. (2017). Exosomes derived from hypoxia-preconditioned mesenchymal stromal cells ameliorate cognitive decline by rescuing synaptic dysfunction and regulating inflammatory responses in APP/PS1 mice. The FASEB Journal, 32(2), 654–668. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201700600R.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Xia, Y., Zhang, G., Han, C., Ma, K., Guo, X., Wan, F., Kou, L., Yin, S., Liu, L., Huang, J., Xiong, N., & Wang, T. (2019). Microglia as modulators of exosomal alpha-synuclein transmission. Cell Death & Disease, 10(3), 174. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-019-1404-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kumar, A., Stoica, B. A., Loane, D. J., Yang, M., Abulwerdi, G., Khan, N., Kumar, A., Thom, S. R., & Faden, A. I. (2017). Microglial-derived microparticles mediate neuroinflammation after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neuroinflammation, 14(1), 47–47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-017-0819-4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Otxoa-de-Amezaga, A., Miró-Mur, F., Pedragosa, J., Gallizioli, M., Justicia, C., Gaja-Capdevila, N., Ruíz-Jaen, F., Salas-Perdomo, A., Bosch, A., Calvo, M., Márquez-Kisinousky, L., Denes, A., Gunzer, M., & Planas, A. M. (2019). Microglial cell loss after ischemic stroke favors brain neutrophil accumulation. Acta Neuropathologica, 137(2), 321–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-018-1954-4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Troncoso-Escudero, P., Parra, A., Nassif, M., & Vidal, R. L. (2018). Outside in: Unraveling the role of Neuroinflammation in the progression of Parkinson's disease. Frontiers in Neurology, 9(860). https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00860.

  48. Goes, A. T. R., Jesse, C. R., Antunes, M. S., Lobo Ladd, F. V., Lobo Ladd, A. A. B., Luchese, C., Paroul, N., & Boeira, S. P. (2018). Protective role of chrysin on 6-hydroxydopamine-induced neurodegeneration a mouse model of Parkinson's disease: Involvement of neuroinflammation and neurotrophins. Chemico-Biological Interactions, 279, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2017.10.019.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Pyonteck, S. M., Akkari, L., Schuhmacher, A. J., Bowman, R. L., Sevenich, L., Quail, D. F., Olson, O. C., Quick, M. L., Huse, J. T., Teijeiro, V., Setty, M., Leslie, C. S., Oei, Y., Pedraza, A., Zhang, J., Brennan, C. W., Sutton, J. C., Holland, E. C., Daniel, D., & Joyce, J. A. (2013). CSF-1R inhibition alters macrophage polarization and blocks glioma progression. Nature Medicine, 19(10), 1264–1272. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3337.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhang, Z., Zhang, Z., Artelt, M., Burnet, M., & Schluesener, H. J. (2007). Dexamethasone attenuates early expression of three molecules associated with microglia/macrophages activation following rat traumatic brain injury. Acta Neuropathologica, 113(6), 675–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-007-0195-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Malhotra, K., Chang, J. J., Khunger, A., Blacker, D., Switzer, J. A., Goyal, N., Hernandez, A. V., Pasupuleti, V., Alexandrov, A. V., & Tsivgoulis, G. (2018). Minocycline for acute stroke treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Journal of Neurology, 265(8), 1871–1879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-018-8935-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Du, Y., Ma, Z., Lin, S., Dodel, R. C., Gao, F., Bales, K. R., et al. (2001). Minocycline prevents nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurodegeneration in the MPTP model of Parkinson's disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98(25), 14669–14674. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.251341998.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Elgaz, S., Kuçi, Z., Kuçi, S., Bönig, H., & Bader, P. (2019). Clinical use of Mesenchymal stromal cells in the treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease. Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy, 46(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1159/000496809.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Li, X., Mauro, M., & Williams, Z. (2015). Comparison of plasma extracellular RNA isolation kits reveals kit-dependent biases. BioTechniques, 59(1), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.2144/000114306.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Royo, F., Zuñiga-Garcia, P., Sanchez-Mosquera, P., Egia, A., Perez, A., Loizaga, A., Arceo, R., Lacasa, I., Rabade, A., Arrieta, E., Bilbao, R., Unda, M., Carracedo, A., & Falcon-Perez, J. M. (2016). Different EV enrichment methods suitable for clinical settings yield different subpopulations of urinary extracellular vesicles from human samples. Journal of extracellular vesicles, 5(1), 29497. https://doi.org/10.3402/jev.v5.29497.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Morrison, H. W., & Filosa, J. A. (2013). A quantitative spatiotemporal analysis of microglia morphology during ischemic stroke and reperfusion. J Neuroinflammation, 10, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-10-4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Anrather, J., & Iadecola, C. (2016). Inflammation and stroke: An overview. In Neurotherapeutics (Vol. 13, pp. 661-670).

  58. Kreutzberg, G. W. (1996). Microglia: A sensor for pathological events in the CNS. Trends in Neurosciences, 19(8), 312–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-2236(96)10049-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Fernández-Arjona, M. D. M., Grondona, J. M., Granados-Durán, P., Fernández-Llebrez, P., & López-Ávalos, M. D. (2017). Microglia morphological categorization in a rat model of Neuroinflammation by hierarchical cluster and principal components analysis. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 11(235). https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2017.00235.

  60. Nitsch, F. E., Christine, B., Peggy, T., Daniel, R., Ulrike, S., Volker, S., ... Robert (2013). Microglial Activation Milieu Controls Regulatory T Cell Responses. doi:https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1203331.

  61. Schetters, S. T. T., Gomez-Nicola, D., Garcia-Vallejo, J. J., & Van Kooyk, Y. (2017). Neuroinflammation: Microglia and T cells get ready to tango. Front Immunol, 8. Doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01905.

  62. Brites, D., & Fernandes, A. (2015). Neuroinflammation and depression: Microglia activation, extracellular microvesicles and microRNA Dysregulation. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 9, 476–476. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2015.00476.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Delpech, J.-C., Herron, S., Botros, M. B., & Ikezu, T. (2019). Neuroimmune crosstalk through extracellular vesicles in health and disease. Trends in Neurosciences, 42(5), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2019.02.007.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Frühbeis, C., Fröhlich, D., Kuo, W. P., Amphornrat, J., Thilemann, S., Saab, A. S., Kirchhoff, F., Möbius, W., Goebbels, S., Nave, K. A., Schneider, A., Simons, M., Klugmann, M., Trotter, J., & Krämer-Albers, E.-M. (2013). Neurotransmitter-triggered transfer of Exosomes mediates Oligodendrocyte–neuron communication. PLoS Biology, 11(7), e1001604. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001604.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Ferreira, J. R., Teixeira, G. Q., Santos, S. G., Barbosa, M. A., Almeida-Porada, G., & Gonçalves, R. M. (2018). Mesenchymal stromal cell Secretome: Influencing therapeutic potential by cellular pre-conditioning. Frontiers in Immunology, 9, 2837–2837. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.02837.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Aspelund, A., Antila, S., Proulx, S. T., Karlsen, T. V., Karaman, S., Detmar, M., Wiig, H., & Alitalo, K. (2015). A dural lymphatic vascular system that drains brain interstitial fluid and macromolecules. The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 212(7), 991–999. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20142290.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Louveau, A., Smirnov, I., Keyes, T. J., Eccles, J. D., Rouhani, S. J., Peske, J. D., Derecki, N. C., Castle, D., Mandell, J. W., Lee, K. S., Harris, T. H., & Kipnis, J. (2015). Structural and functional features of central nervous system lymphatic vessels. Nature, 523(7560), 337–341. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14432.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Cantrell, J. N., Waddle, M. R., Rotman, M., Peterson, J. L., Ruiz-Garcia, H., Heckman, M. G., Quiñones-Hinojosa, A., Rosenfeld, S. S., Brown, P. D., & Trifiletti, D. M. (2019). Progress toward long-term survivors of Glioblastoma. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 94(7), 1278–1286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.11.031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Simpson, L., & Galanis, E. (2006). Recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: Advances in treatment and promising drug candidates. Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy, 6(11), 1593–1607. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737140.6.11.1593.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Roesch, S., Rapp, C., Dettling, S., & Herold-Mende, C. (2018). When immune cells turn bad-tumor-associated microglia/macrophages in Glioma. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19(2), 436. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19020436.

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Paolicelli, R. C., Bergamini, G., & Rajendran, L. (2019). Cell-to-cell communication by extracellular vesicles: Focus on microglia. Neuroscience, 405, 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.04.003.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Mitchell, R., Mellows, B., Sheard, J., Antonioli, M., Kretz, O., Chambers, D., Zeuner, M. T., Tomkins, J. E., Denecke, B., Musante, L., Joch, B., Debacq-Chainiaux, F., Holthofer, H., Ray, S., Huber, T. B., Dengjel, J., de Coppi, P., Widera, D., & Patel, K. (2019). Secretome of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells promotes skeletal muscle regeneration through synergistic action of extracellular vesicle cargo and soluble proteins. Stem Cell Research & Therapy, 10(1), 116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-019-1213-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Sun, D. Z., Abelson, B., Babbar, P., & Damaser, M. S. (2019). Harnessing the mesenchymal stem cell secretome for regenerative urology. Nature Reviews Urology, 16(6), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-019-0169-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank BioRender service which was utilized to create Fig. 1.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Regenerative Bioscience Center, Department of Animal and Dairy Science, Rhodes Center for Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, 425 River Road, Athens, GA, 30602, USA

    Samantha E. Spellicy & Steven L. Stice

  2. University System of Georgia MD/PhD Program, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA

    Samantha E. Spellicy

  3. Aruna Bio Inc, Athens, GA, 30602, USA

    Steven L. Stice

Authors
  1. Samantha E. Spellicy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Steven L. Stice
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SES had the idea for the article, performed the literature search and data analysis, and drafted tables, figures, and the work. SLS critically revised the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven L. Stice.

Ethics declarations

SLS is a stockholder in Aruna Bio. S.L.S. was a part time employee of Aruna Bio during the study. SLS is an inventor on patent US 8,178,089 and US 7,531,354, method of producing feeder cell free neuroprogenitor cells, by contacting pluripotent stem cells with bFGF and a differentiation protein and assigned University of Georgia Research Foundation and exclusively licensed by Aruna Bio. SLS and RW have a patent pending on neural extracellular vesicles, assigned University of Georgia Research Foundation and exclusively licensed by Aruna Bio. These patents are related to the source of material used in the original study.

Disclosures and Declarations

This work was funded by the National Science Foundation Science and Technology Center for Emergent Behaviors of Integrated Cellular Systems, Grant No. 0939511.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Special Issue on Exosomes and Microvesicles: from Stem Cell Biology to Translation in Human Diseases Guest Editor: Giovanni Camussi

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spellicy, S.E., Stice, S.L. Tissue and Stem Cell Sourced Extracellular Vesicle Communications with Microglia. Stem Cell Rev and Rep 17, 357–368 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-020-10011-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-020-10011-y

Keywords

  • Extracellular vesicles
  • Exosomes
  • Microglia
  • Inflammation
  • Stem cells