In the Know and in the News: How Science and the Media Communicate About Stem Cells, Autism and Cerebral Palsy
- 535 Downloads
Stem cell research has generated considerable attention for its potential to remediate many disorders of the central nervous system including neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and cerebral palsy (CP) that place a high burden on individual children, families and society. Here we characterized messaging about the use of stem cells for ASD and CP in news media articles and concurrent dissemination of discoveries through conventional science discourse. We searched LexisNexis and Canadian Newsstand for news articles from the US, UK, Canada and Australia in the period between 2000 and 2014, and PubMed for peer reviewed articles for the same 10 years. Using in-depth content analysis methods, we found less cautionary messaging about stem cells for ASD and CP in the resulting sample of 73 media articles than in the sample of 87 science papers, and a privileging of benefits over risk. News media also present stem cells as ready for clinical application to treat these neurodevelopmental disorders, even while the science literature calls for further research. Investigative news reports that explicitly quote researchers, however, provide the most accurate information to actual science news. The hope, hype, and promise of stem cell interventions for neurodevelopmental disorders, combined with the extreme vulnerability of these children and their families, creates a perfect storm in which journalists and stem cell scientists must commit to a continued, if not even more robust, partnership to promote balanced and accurate messaging.
KeywordsStem cells Cerebral palsy Autism spectrum disorder Media Newspaper reporting
- 1.Pew Project for Excellence in Journalism (2010). The state of the news media: an annual report of American journalism. http://www.stateofthemedia.org/2010/. Accessed 12 June 2015.
- 2.Hughes, E., Kitzinger, J., & Murdock, G. (2008). Media discourses and framing of risk. http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/jomec/resources/KitzingerWkPaper27.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2015.
- 11.Bubela, T., Li, M. D., Hafez, M., Bieber, M., & Atkins, H. (2012). Is belief larger than fact: expectations, optimism and reality for translational stem cell research. BMC Medicine, 10(1), 133.Google Scholar
- 12.Marks, L., Kalaitzandonakes, N., Wilkins, L., & Zakharova, L. (2007). Mass media framing of biotechnology news. Public Understanding of Science, 16(2), 183–203.Google Scholar
- 13.McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 176–187.Google Scholar
- 19.Henderson, L., & Kitzinger, J. (1999). The human drama of genetics: ‘hard’and ‘soft’media representations of inherited breast cancer. Sociology of Health & Illness, 21(5), 560–578.Google Scholar
- 21.Nisbet, M., & Scheufele, D. (2009). What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. American Journal of Botany, 96(10), 1767–1778.Google Scholar
- 22.Benjaminy, S., Kowal, S. P., MacDonald, I. M., & Bubela, T. (2015). Communicating the promise for ocular gene therapies: challenges and recommendations. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 160(3), 408-415.Google Scholar
- 23.Robillard, J. M., Cabral, E., Hennessey, C., Kwon, B. K., & Illes, J. (2015). Fueling hope: stem cells in social media. Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, 11(4), 540–546.Google Scholar
- 24.Robillard, J. M., Johnson, T. W., Hennessey, C., Beattie, B. L., & Illes, J. (2013). Aging 2.0: health information about dementia on twitter. PLoS ONE, 8(7), e69861.Google Scholar
- 25.Chou, W. S., Hunt, Y. M., Beckjord, E. B., Moser, R. P., & Hesse, B. W. (2009). Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 11(4), e48.Google Scholar
- 26.Reimer, J., Borgelt, E., & Illes, J. (2010). In pursuit of “informed hope” in the stem cell discourse. American Journal of Bioethics, 10(5), 31–32.Google Scholar